Back to Authors

Strupp, Michael Leo

0000-0002-9544-2279

Mayo Clinic

Deutsches Schwindel- und Gleichgewichtszentrum

Citations 7

The International Classification of Vestibular Disorders: Achievements, challenges, and future directions
Kaski, Diego , Tarnutzer, Alexander A. , Carey, John P. , Cha, Yoon‐Hee , Eggers, Scott D.Z. , Furman, Joseph M. , Kim, Hyun Ah , Lempert, Thomas , López‐Escámez, José A. , Magnusson, Måns , Newman‐Toker, David E. , Seemungal, Barry M. , Berg, Raymond van de , Brevern, Michael von , Bisdorff, Alexandre , Cha, Y H , Eggers, Scott Dz, Lempert, Thomas , López-Escámez, Jose A , Magnusson, Mans , Newman-Toker, David E , Seemungal, Barry M , Staab, Jeffrey P , Agrawal, Yuri , Kim, Ji‐Soo , Staab, Jeffrey P. , Strupp, Michael Leo , Ward, Bryan Kevin

Journal of Vestibular Research | May 17, 2025 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 105-112

10.1177/09574271251313803 Get It

In 2007, the Bárány Society embarked on a project to establish definitions of vestibular syndromes and disorders based on best available evidence, referred to as the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders (ICVD). Since then, numerous publications providing consensus-driven diagnostic criteria for vestibular symptoms, syndromes, and disorders have been published. Here, we reflect on the rationale for developing the ICVD as well as its subsequent achievements, challenges, and outlook. In this summary of the work of the ICVD to date, the authors will focus on practical aspects to help improve the utility and applicability of these diagnostic criteria moving forward.
Acetyl-acetyl-L-leucine for Niemann-Pick type C: a multinational double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover study
Fields, Taylor , Billington, Ian, Churchill, Grant C. , Evans, William , Fields, Cassandra, Galione, Antony, Kay, R., Matheison, Toni, Martakis, Κyriakos , Platt, Frances M. , Factor, Mallory, Martakis, Kyriakos , Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana , Galione, Antony, Kay, Richard, Patterson, Marc C. , Factor, Mallory, Strupp, Michael Leo

No container title available | October 20, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-2048685/v1 Get It

Abstract Background Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) is a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative lysosomal disease characterized by multiple symptoms such as progressive cerebellar ataxia and cognitive decline. The modified amino acid N-acetyl-leucine has been associated with positive symptomatic and neuroprotective, disease-modifying effects in various studies, including animal models of NPC, observational clinical case studies, and a multinational, rater-blinded Phase IIb clinical trial. Here, we describe the development of a study protocol (Sponsor Code “IB1001-301”) for the chronic treatment of symptoms in adult and pediatric patients with NPC. Methods This multinational double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover Phase III study will enroll patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of NPC patients aged 4 years and older across 16 trial sites. Patients are assessed during a baseline period and then randomized (1:1) to one of two treatment sequences: IB1001 followed by placebo or vice versa. Each sequence consists of a 12-week treatment period. The primary efficacy endpoint is based on the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, and secondary outcomes include cerebellar functional rating scales, clinical global impression, and quality of life assessments. Discussion Pre-clinical as well as observational and Phase IIb clinical trials have previously demonstrated that IB1001 rapidly improved symptoms, functioning, and quality of life for pediatric and adult NPC patients and is safe and well tolerated. In this placebo-controlled cross-over trial, the risk/benefit profile of IB1001 for NPC will be evaluated. It will also give information about the applicability of IB1001 as a therapeutic paradigm for other rare and common neurological disorders. Trial registrations: The trial (IB1001-301) has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05163288) and www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EudraCT: 2021-005356-10).
Vestibular migraine and recurrent vertigo of childhood: Diagnostic criteria consensus document of the Classification Committee of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society and the International Headache Society
Berg, Raymond van de , Widdershoven, Josine , Bisdorff, Alexandre , Evers, Stefan , Wiener‐Vacher, Sylvette , Mack, Kenneth J. , Kim, Ji Soo , Jahn, Klaus , Lempert, Thomas , Kim, Ji‐Soo , Cushing, Sharon Lynn , Strupp, Michael Leo

Journal of Vestibular Research | December 29, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-9

10.3233/ves-200003 Get It

This paper describes the diagnostic criteria for “Vestibular Migraine of Childhood”, “probable Vestibular Migraine of Childhood” and “Recurrent Vertigo of Childhood” as put forth by the Committee for the Classification of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society (ICVD) and the Migraine Classification subgroup of the International Headache Society. Migraine plays an important role in some subgroups of children with recurrent vertigo. In this classification paper a spectrum of three disorders is described in which the migraine component varies from definite to possibly absent. These three disorders are: Vestibular Migraine of Childhood, probable Vestibular Migraine of Childhood and Recurrent Vertigo of Childhood. The criteria for Vestibular Migraine of Childhood (VMC) include (A) at least five episodes with vestibular symptoms of moderate or severe intensity, lasting between five minutes and 72 hours, (B) a current or past history of migraine with or without aura, and (C) at least half of episodes are associated with at least one migraine feature. Probable Vestibular Migraine of Childhood (probable VMC) is considered when at least three episodes with vestibular symptoms of moderate or severe intensity, lasting between five minutes and 72 hours, are accompanied by at least criterion B or C from the VMC criteria. Recurrent Vertigo of Childhood (RVC) is diagnosed in case of at least three episodes with vestibular symptoms of moderate or severe intensity, lasting between 1 minute and 72 hours, and none of the criteria B and C for VMC are applicable. For all disorders, the age of the individual needs to be below 18 years old. It is recommended that future research should particularly focus on RVC, in order to investigate and identify possible subtypes and its links or its absence thereof with migraine.
Mal de débarquement syndrome diagnostic criteria: Consensus document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society
Baloh, Robert W., Cho, Catherine , Magnusson, Måns , Magnusson, Mans , Cha, Yoon‐Hee , Song, Jae‐Jin , Strupp, Michael Leo , Wuyts, Floris L. , Staab, Jeffrey P.

Journal of Vestibular Research | September 22, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 285-293

10.3233/ves-200714 Get It

We present diagnostic criteria for mal de débarquement syndrome (MdDS) for inclusion into the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders. The criteria include the following: 1] Non-spinning vertigo characterized by an oscillatory perception (‘rocking,’ ‘bobbing,’ or ‘swaying’) present continuously or for most of the day; 2] Onset occurs within 48 hours after the end of exposure to passive motion, 3] Symptoms temporarily reduce with exposure to passive motion (e.g. driving), and 4] Symptoms persist for >48 hours. MdDS may be designated as “in evolution,” if symptoms are ongoing but the observation period has been less than 1 month; “transient,” if symptoms resolve at or before 1 month and the observation period extends at least to the resolution point; or “persistent” if symptoms last for more than 1 month. Individuals with MdDS may develop co-existing symptoms of spatial disorientation, visual motion intolerance, fatigue, and exacerbation of headaches or anxiety. Features that distinguish MdDS from vestibular migraine, motion sickness, and persistent postural perceptual dizziness (PPPD) are reviewed. Motion-moderated oscillatory vertigo can also occur without a motion trigger, typically following another vestibular disorder, a medical illness, heightened psychological stress, or metabolic disturbance. Terminology for this non-motion triggered presentation has been varied as it has features of both MdDS and PPPD. Further research is needed into its phenomenological and biological relationship to MdDS, PPPD, and other vestibular disorders.
Hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo: Diagnostic criteria
Kim, Hyun Ah , Bisdorff, Alexandre , Bronstein, Adolfo M. , Lempert, Thomas , Rossi-Izquierdo, Marcos , Kim, Ji‐Soo , Staab, Jeffrey P. , Strupp, Michael Leo

Journal of Vestibular Research | March 15, 2019 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 2-3 | Pages: 45-56

10.3233/ves-190655 Get It

This paper presents the diagnostic criteria for hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo to be included in the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders (ICVD). The aim of defining diagnostic criteria of hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo is to help clinicians to understand the terminology related to orthostatic dizziness/vertigo and to distinguish orthostatic dizziness/vertigo due to global brain hypoperfusion from that caused by other etiologies. Diagnosis of hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo requires: A) five or more episodes of dizziness, unsteadiness or vertigo triggered by arising or present during upright position, which subsides by sitting or lying down; B) orthostatic hypotension, postural tachycardia syndrome or syncope documented on standing or during head-up tilt test; and C) not better accounted for by another disease or disorder. Probable hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo is defined as follows: A) five or more episodes of dizziness, unsteadiness or vertigo triggered by arising or present during upright position, which subsides by sitting or lying down; B) at least one of the following accompanying symptoms: generalized weakness/tiredness, difficulty in thinking/concentrating, blurred vision, and tachycardia/palpitations; and C) not better accounted for by another disease or disorder. These diagnostic criteria have been derived by expert consensus from an extensive review of 90 years of research on hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo, postural hypotension or tachycardia, and autonomic dizziness. Measurements of orthostatic blood pressure and heart rate are important for the screening and documentation of orthostatic hypotension or postural tachycardia syndrome to establish the diagnosis of hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo.
Diagnostic criteria for persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD): Consensus document of the committee for the Classification of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society
Staab, Jeffrey P. , Eckhardt‐Henn, Annegret, Jacob, Rolf G. , Brandt, Thomas, Bronstein, Adolfo M. , Horii, Arata , Strupp, Michael Leo , Staab, Jeffrey P

Journal of Vestibular Research | October 10, 2017 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 191-208

10.3233/ves-170622 Get It