ABSTRACT Background Gastric emptying (GE) scintigraphy with 4‐h imaging and a radiolabeled chicken egg‐based meal (320 kcal, 30% fat) is the standard test for gastroparesis at Mayo Clinic, with an intraindividual coefficient of variation (COV intra ) of 23.8% for GE half emptying time (T 1/2 ). Alternative meals for patients with dietary restrictions, including egg allergies or vegan diets, are lacking, limiting test accessibility. The study aimed to establish a vegan, lactose‐, nut‐, and gluten‐free meal with similar caloric and fat content to the egg meal and to assess its performance in GE studies. Methods In Vitro: 99m Tc binding to egg meal over 4 h was compared to a calorically and nutritionally similar vegan alternative, JUST Egg, using a validated in vitro model simulating gastric conditions of pH, pepsin, and stirring. In Vivo: 10 healthy participants underwent randomized crossover GE scintigraphy with standard and vegan meals, spaced ≥ 3 days apart to measure GE% at 2 h, 4 h, and GE T 1/2 . Group comparisons and variance analysis included Rank Sum tests and Bland–Altman plots. Key Results In Vitro: A strong correlation ( R = 0.975, p ‐value < 0.01) between 99m Tc binding in the egg and vegan egg models was observed. Minimal variance (< 10%) was recorded at all time points. In Vivo: GE at 4 h and GE T 1/2 showed non‐statistically significant mean differences, < 2% and < 10 min respectively, between both meals. The intra‐individual variability was 18.8%. Conclusions and Inferences The vegan meal demonstrated in vitro stability, in vivo performance comparable to the egg meal, and a COV intra of 18.8%, which was lower than the 23.8% reported in repeat egg meal GE studies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT06991036 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06991036?term=NCT06991036&rank=1 )
Abstract CT104: MC1R imaging and histology in the targeted imaging of melanoma for alpha-particle radiotherapy (TIMAR1) trial
Abstract Purpose: Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) has been shown in animal models to be a target for effective radionuclide therapy. This first-in-human clinical trial studied the safety and biodistribution of two novel MC1R-targeted imaging tracers designed to support the development of MC1R-targeted alpha particle therapy through image-based identification of MC1R and radiation dosimetry. Imaging was compared to MC1R expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of subjects’ melanoma tumors. Methods: Subjects with stage IV melanoma were randomized to receive either [203Pb]VMT01 SPECT/CT imaging followed by [68Ga]VMT02 PET/CT imaging approximately 1 month later, or vice versa in a cross-over design during their normal melanoma treatment course. Patient selection included a positive [18F]FDG PET/CT within 30 days of imaging tracer injection. 555 - 925 mBq of [203Pb]VMT01 was injected IV with imaging performed at 1, 4, and 24 hours. 74 - 277 mBq [68Ga]VMT02 was injected IV and imaging performed dynamically up to 1 hour, and at 2 and 3 hours. Due to an interruption in drug supply, only 3 subjects received [203Pb]VMT01 imaging. Key FDG-avid melanoma lesions were marked and presented to three experienced Radiologists serving as blinded reviewers. The blinded reviewers compared [18F]FDG PET/CT to experimental imaging and scored scans and key lesions on multiple metrics. Imaging positivity was defined as tumor uptake and retention of tracer in ≥ 1 melanoma tumors above background liver activity. Melanoma biopsy tissue was obtained and MC1R IHC performed as available. Results: 7 subjects were enrolled; 6 were imaged and 5 had available pathology. 3 of 6 imaged subjects had MC1R positive tumors via experimental imaging tracers. [68Ga]VMT02 PET/CT at 3 hours led to the best tumor to background ratio, and [203Pb]VMT01 SPECT/CT showed tumor retention at 24 hours. 4 of 5 subjects had positive MC1R staining by IHC. Of the 3 subjects with negative imaging, 2 had positive staining by IHC. Of the 3 subjects with positive imaging, 2 had available biopsies and all stained positive for MC1R by IHC. Conclusion: A subgroup of advanced melanoma patients were identified to express MC1R using new MC1R-targeted imaging agents. Full concordance between imaging and IHC of positive scans, but not with negative scans, suggests that IHC is a more sensitive biomarker detection method. Additional testing is needed to establish frequency of positive MC1R imaging in stage IV melanoma and its correlation to histological findings and treatment outcomes. Preferential tumor retention provides proof-of-concept that the MC1R-targeting therapy trial for [212Pb]VMT01 alpha-emitting therapy will deliver localized radiation to high MC1R expressing tumors as screened by [203Pb]VMT01 or [68Ga]VMT02. Imaging quality is sufficient for subject selection and dosimetry but may exclude subjects with MC1R receptor expression only detectable by IHC. Citation Format: Brenna M. Marks, Matthew Block, Geoffrey B. Johnson, Carrie B. Hruska, Mukesh K. Pandey, Andrew Paulsen, Michael K. Schultz, Michael A. McDonald, Edwin A. Sagastume, Frances L. Johnson. MC1R imaging and histology in the targeted imaging of melanoma for alpha-particle radiotherapy (TIMAR1) trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT104.
How to Safely Perform Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Radioactive Seed Localizations in the Breast
When a breast lesion is seen on only magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and needs to be excised, pre-operative MRI-guided radioactive seed localization (RSL) is preferred. However, MRI safety and radiation safety issues associated with the inability to recover a potentially lost seed in the MRI scanner room (Zone IV) have precluded this in the past. This manuscript provides a protocol for MRI-guided RSLs that meets MRI safety and radiation safety criteria established by the American College of Radiology and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. To the authors’ best knowledge, this has never been published in the literature. The complete protocol is provided.
Non-invasive clinical visualization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A pilot study.
3034 Background: Unique to modern immune therapy for cancer is that early in the course of treatment, patients frequently exhibit transient tumor enlargement (pseudo-progression, pPROG) due to tumor infiltration by lymphocytes (TIL). Currently, pPROG cannot be reliably distinguished from true tumor progression (PROG). There is a need for biomarker techniques to discriminate pPROG (effect of therapy) and PROG (therapy failure). Nuclear medicine offers radiopharmaceuticals capable of imaging immune cells; images can be fused to evaluate functional and anatomic characteristics of tumors, and potentially discriminate pPROG from PROG. Methods: In our study of metastatic melanoma patients, SPECT/CT imaging with 99mTc-interleukin-2 (99mTc-IL2) was performed to visualize TIL. Images were collected before/after 12 weeks of ipilimumab (IPI) or pembrolizomab (PEMBRO) therapy. The 99mTc-IL2 tracer was synthesized by conjugating succinimidyl-6-hydrazinopyridine-3-carboxylate (HYNIC-NHS) with commercial interleukin-2 (Aldesleukin). HYNIC-IL2 was incubated with tricine, 99mTcO4- (370-740 MBq) and SnCl2. After labelling 99mTc-IL2 was purified by reverse-phase chromatography and diluted in 5% glucose with 0.1% human albumin before injection. Five patients were enrolled in this study. Two patients failed to complete the 12 week 99mTc-IL2 scan due to discontinuation of IPI after: 1) grade 3 colitis and 2) patient refusal for adverse events attributed to IPI. No adverse events attributable to the tracer infusion were reported. Results: Metastatic lesions could be visualized by the tracer. Some lesions decreased in size, while others increased. A positive correlation was found between size and 99mTc-IL2 uptake, before and after therapy, suggesting the potential discrimination of tumor PROG (no 99mTc-IL2 uptake) from pPROG (high 99mTc-IL2 uptake). Immunohistochemical staining for TIL of 99mTc-IL2 positive and negative lesions are illustrated. Conclusions: The results demonstrate feasibility of 99mTc-IL2 imaging as a clinically useful tool capable of discriminating tumor PROG from pPROG. A clinical validation study is in progress. Clinical trial information: NCT01789827.
Non-invasive visualization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a pilot study