Back to Authors

Rohlinger, Audrey L.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 4

Photopatch Testing of 182 Patients: A 6-Year Experience at the Mayo Clinic
Scalf, Leigh Ann, Davis, Mark D.P. , Rohlinger, Audrey L., Connolly, Suzanne M.

Dermatitis® | September 6, 2019 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 44-52

10.2310/6620.2008.08049 Get It

Background: Photopatch testing is important for diagnosing photoallergic contact dermatitis. Although results of photopatch testing have been presented from many European centers, there have been few reports of the results of photopatch testing in the United States. Objective: To review the Mayo Clinic’s recent experience with photopatch testing, identify common photoallergens, and compare our current and previous findings. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent photopatch testing at the Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005 (N=182). Results: Fifty-four patients (29.7%) had photoallergic contact reactions, and 29 (15.9%) had allergic contact reactions. The most common photoallergens were medications, sunscreen agents, fragrances, and antiseptics. Conclusion: Photopatch testing is the technique useful in identifying photoallergens. The series of allergens used must be constantly updated to reflect newly identified and outdated photoallergens. We present a 6-year experience with photopatch testing. Medications, sunscreen agents, fragrances, and antiseptics were the most frequently identified photoallergens.
Sinonasal melanoma: A clinicopathologic review of 61 cases
Dauer, Eileen H., Lewis, Jean E., Rohlinger, Audrey L., Weaver, Amy L. , Olsen, Kerry D.

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | March 2, 2008 | Volume: 138 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 347-352

10.1016/j.otohns.2007.12.013 Get It

OBJECTIVETo review the Mayo Clinic experience with sinonasal melanoma.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective review (case series).SUBJECTS AND METHODSWe identified 61 patients who had melanoma arising from the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, or both. All were treated at our institution from 1955 through 2003. Clinical and pathologic data were summarized, and survival curves were generated.RESULTSThe most common symptoms at presentation were epistaxis and nasal congestion. The most common treatment was excision only (48%). The cancer‐specific survival rate (ie, rate of death due to disease) was 48.9% and 22.1% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Median time between diagnosis and death due to disease was 19 months.CONCLUSIONSinonasal melanoma is a rare but devastating disease. Wide local excision is the treatment of choice, and some patients may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy. Local recurrence and distant metastasis are common. Improved survival depends on better systemic therapies.
Urachal Anomalies: A Longitudinal Study of Urachal Remnants in Children and Adults
Ashley, Richard , Inman, Brant A. , Routh, Jonathan C. , Rohlinger, Audrey L., Husmann, Douglas A. , Kramer, Stephen A., Routh, Jonathan C , Inman, Brant A

Journal of Urology | August 18, 2007 | Volume: 178 | Issue: 4S | Pages: 1615-1618

10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.194 Get It

Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension Associated With Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal and Proximal Ureteral Stones at 19 Years of Followup
Krambeck, Amy E. , Gettman, Matthew T., Rohlinger, Audrey L., Lohse, Christine M. , Patterson, David E., Segura, Joseph W.

Journal of Urology | April 6, 2006 | Volume: 175 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1742-1747

10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00989-4 Get It