Scalf, Leigh Ann

8025 Background: The Src/Stat 3 pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several malignancies including melanoma. In the current study we evaluated the prevalence of Src and Stat3 activation in human melanoma and the effect of Src inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents on melanoma cell lines. Methods: Activation of Src was measured by staining for Src-phosphotyrosine 416 (P-Src) and Stat3 by phosphotyrosine 705 Stat3 (P-Stat3). Immunohistochemistry was performed with anti-pStat3-Y705 and anti-pSrc-Y416 antibodies (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA) on 3 melanoma subtypes. Staining of tumor cells for P-Stat3 was scored by percentage of stained cells as follows: 0 (no staining), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (>50%), and intensity 0–3 (0: absent, 1: low, 2: moderate, and 3: high). The sum of these was the composite P-Stat3 score: 0 (0), 1 (1–2), 2 (3–4), and 3 (5–6). P-Src staining was scored by intensity. Melanoma cell lines, A-375, SK-Mel-5 and SK-Mel-28 were exposed to Src inhibitors, SKI-606, PD 180970 and BMS 354825 alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy agents and IC-50 was determined by MTT assay at 24 and 72 hours. Results: 35 biopsies were stained. Median age was 66 years (range 23–90); 60% were women. 48% of all melanoma stained express P-Src; all samples express pStat3. We found a positive correlation between P-Src and P-Stat3 (Spearman coefficient=0.346, p=0.042). 46% stained only for pStat3 and 6% did not stain for either P-Src or P-Stat3. Most positively stained biopsies stained weakly for P-Src and moderately or strongly for pStat3. Src inhibitors inhibited the proliferation of melanoma cell lines; furthermore Src inhibitor treatment synergized with platinum and topoisomerase I inhibitors but not temozolomide. Conclusions: 1) Immunohistochemistry shows variable expression of P-Src and P-Stat3 in human melanoma 2) All tumors staining for P-Src also stain for P-Stat3 and the strength of staining is significantly related. 3) This data may be useful in planning future clinical trials with Src inhibitors in melanoma. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Background: Photopatch testing is important for diagnosing photoallergic contact dermatitis. Although results of photopatch testing have been presented from many European centers, there have been few reports of the results of photopatch testing in the United States. Objective: To review the Mayo Clinic’s recent experience with photopatch testing, identify common photoallergens, and compare our current and previous findings. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent photopatch testing at the Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005 (N=182). Results: Fifty-four patients (29.7%) had photoallergic contact reactions, and 29 (15.9%) had allergic contact reactions. The most common photoallergens were medications, sunscreen agents, fragrances, and antiseptics. Conclusion: Photopatch testing is the technique useful in identifying photoallergens. The series of allergens used must be constantly updated to reflect newly identified and outdated photoallergens. We present a 6-year experience with photopatch testing. Medications, sunscreen agents, fragrances, and antiseptics were the most frequently identified photoallergens.