Connolly, Suzanne M.

Background: The standard allergen series used in patch testing contains metals that most commonly cause allergic contact dermatitis, but testing with additional metal allergens is warranted for select patients. Objective: To report our experience with patch testing of metals. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 1,112 patients suspected of having metal allergies. Patients were seen from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2009. Patch testing was performed with 42 metal preparations (6 in the standard series, 36 in the metal series). Results: Patch testing most commonly was performed for patients with oral disease (almost half the patients), hand dermatitis, generalized dermatitis, and dermatitis affecting the lips, legs, arms, trunk, or face. At least one positive reaction was reported for 633 patients (57%). Metals with the highest allergic patch-test reaction rates were nickel, gold, manganese, palladium, cobalt, Ticonium, mercury, beryllium, chromium, and silver. Metals causing no allergic patch-test reactions were titanium, Vitallium, and aluminum powder. Metals with extremely low rates of allergic patch-test reactions included zinc, ferric chloride, and tin. Reaction rates varied depending on metal salt, concentration, and timing of readings. Conclusion: Many metals not in the standard series were associated with allergic patch-test reactions. The many questions raised by these findings, concerning patch testing with individual metals, will be the subject of future studies.

Background: Photopatch testing is important for diagnosing photoallergic contact dermatitis. Although results of photopatch testing have been presented from many European centers, there have been few reports of the results of photopatch testing in the United States. Objective: To review the Mayo Clinic’s recent experience with photopatch testing, identify common photoallergens, and compare our current and previous findings. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent photopatch testing at the Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005 (N=182). Results: Fifty-four patients (29.7%) had photoallergic contact reactions, and 29 (15.9%) had allergic contact reactions. The most common photoallergens were medications, sunscreen agents, fragrances, and antiseptics. Conclusion: Photopatch testing is the technique useful in identifying photoallergens. The series of allergens used must be constantly updated to reflect newly identified and outdated photoallergens. We present a 6-year experience with photopatch testing. Medications, sunscreen agents, fragrances, and antiseptics were the most frequently identified photoallergens.

Background: Vitamin E, of which the most biologically active form is a-tocopherol, has become widely known for its antioxidant effects. It has been ingested or applied topically for purported anti-aging effects and for cosmetic enhancement. Objective: To determine whether the incidence of allergic contact dermatitis from vitamin E has increased in recent years. Methods: With the approval of the Mayo Clinic institutional review board, we retrospectively analyzed patch-test data from patients tested from June 1987 through December 2007. Results: A total of 2,950 patients were patch-tested during this period, and 18 patients (0.61%) had positive reactions to a-tocopherol; 6 (0.53%) of 1,136 patients tested from June 1987 through December 1997 had positive results, and 12 (0.66%) of 1,814 patients tested from January 1998 through December 2007 had positive results (p = .69). Conclusion: Vitamin E appears to be a relatively rare contact allergen in our experience.

Background: Patients diagnosed with melanoma of the foot have been reported to have a poor prognosis. We reviewed our experience at a tertiary-care medical clinic to determine the disease course in patients diagnosed with melanoma of the foot. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 38 patients with a diagnosis of primary or locally recurrent melanoma of the foot treated between January, 1988, and July, 2004. The main outcome measures included methods of diagnosis, clinical and histopathologic features, and patterns of recurrence. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 61 years; most were women (58%) and Caucasian (95%). The average time to diagnosis was 17 months. Initial clinical diagnosis had been considered benign in 12 (32%). The median Breslow thickness was 1.75 mm, T1 lesions were the most common, and acral lentiginous melanoma accounted for 42%. Thirteen patients (34%) had ulcerated lesions. Sentinel lymph node biopsy specimens of 25 patients identified four (16%) with metastatic disease. Surgical complications occurred in 12 patients, usually after skin graft or soft-tissue flap reconstruction. Systemic recurrence developed in six patients, four of whom also had regional recurrence. Conclusions: Most patients were elderly Caucasian women and most presented with early-stage disease, but diagnosis can be difficult and a subgroup presented with thick melanomas. Reconstructive surgical procedures had a high rate of complications; however, overall functional outcomes were good. Stage of cancer at diagnosis was associated with systemic metastases.