Back to Authors

Wool, Geoffrey D.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3335-2905

Mayo Clinic

Medical College of Wisconsin

Citations 13

Interlaboratory Performance in Measurement of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban
Goodwin, Andrew , Higgins, Russell A. , Long, Thomas , Chandler, Wayne L. , Harris, Neil , Isom, James , Moser, Karen , Olson, John D. , Smock, Kristi J. , VanSandt, Amanda M., Chen, Dong , Chen, Dong , Volod, Oksana , Rollins‐Raval, Marian A. , Pham, Huy P. , Wool, Geoffrey D.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | June 16, 2021 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 145-153

10.5858/arpa.2020-0633-cp Get It

Context.— Assessing direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) drug levels by reliable laboratory assays is necessary in a number of clinical scenarios. Objective.— To evaluate the performance of DOAC-specific assays for various concentrations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban, assess the interlaboratory variability in measurement of these DOACs, and investigate the responsiveness of the routine clotting assays to various concentrations of these oral anticoagulants. Design.— College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey data from 2013 to 2016 were summarized and analyzed. Results.— For dabigatran, the interlaboratory coefficient of variation (CV) of ecarin chromogenic assay was broad (ranging from 7.5% to 29.1%, 6.3% to 15.5%, and 6.8% to 9.0% for 100-ng/mL, 200-ng/mL, and 400-ng/mL targeted drug concentrations, respectively). The CV for diluted thrombin time for dabigatran was better overall (ranging from 11.6% to 17.2%, 9.3% to 12.3, and 7.1% to 11.2% for 100 ng/mL, 200 ng/mL, and 400 ng/mL, respectively). The rivaroxaban-calibrated anti-Xa assay CVs also showed variability (ranging from 11.5% to 22.2%, 7.2% to 10.9%, and 6.4% to 8.1% for 50-ng/mL, 200-ng/mL, and 400-ng/mL targeted drug concentrations, respectively). The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) showed variable dose- and reagent-dependent responsiveness to DOACs: PT was more responsive to rivaroxaban and aPTT to dabigatran. The undiluted thrombin time showed maximum prolongation across all 3 dabigatran concentrations, making it too sensitive for drug-level monitoring, but supporting its use as a qualitative screening assay. Conclusions.— DOAC-specific assays performed reasonably well. While PT and aPTT cannot be used safely to determine DOAC degree of anticoagulation, a normal thrombin time excludes the presence of dabigatran.
Red blood cell exchange in patients with sickle cell disease—indications and management: a review and consensus report by the therapeutic apheresis subsection of the AABB
Biller, Elizabeth, Zhao, Yong, Berg, Mary , Boggio, Lisa , Fang, Deanna C., Koepsell, Scott A. , Music‐Aplenc, Lejla, Treml, Angela , Weiss, John, Wool, Geoffrey D. , Baron, Beverly W. , Baron, Beverly W , Wool, Geoffrey , Capocelli, Kelley E. , Music-Aplenc, Lejla, Pham, Huy P.

Transfusion | September 10, 2018 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1965-1972

10.1111/trf.14806 Get It

BACKGROUNDA prior practice survey revealed variations in the management of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and stressed the need for comprehensive guidelines. Here we discuss: 1) common indications for red blood cell exchange (RCE), 2) options for access, 3) how to prepare the red blood cells (RBCs) to be used for RCE, 4) target hemoglobin (Hb) and/or hematocrit (Hct) and HbS level, 5) RBC depletion/RCE, and 6) some complications that may ensue.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSFifteen physicians actively practicing apheresis from 14 institutions representing different areas within the United States discussed how they manage RCE for patients with SCD.RESULTSSimple transfusion is recommended to treat symptomatic anemia with Hb level of less than 9 g/dL. RCE is indicated to prevent or treat complications arising from the presence of HbS. The most important goals are reduction of HbS while also preventing hyperviscosity. The usual goals are a target HbS level of not more than 30% and Hct level of less than 30%.CONCLUSIONAlthough a consensus as to protocol details may not be possible, there are areas of agreement in the management of these patients, for example, that it is optimal to avoid hyperviscosity and iron overload, that a target Hb S level in the range of 30% is generally desirable, and that RCE as an acute treatment for pain crisis in the absence of other acute or chronic conditions is ordinarily discouraged.
The management of anticoagulation in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange: A concise review
Shunkwiler, Sara M., Wool, Geoffrey D. , Ipe, Tina S. , Fang, Deanna C., Biller, Elizabeth, Treml, Angela , Weiss, John, Baron, Beverly W. , Berg, Mary, AABB, On behalf of the Therapeutic Apheresis Subsection of the, Wool, Geoffrey , Ipe, Tina S , Baron, Beverly W , Pham, Huy P. , AABB, On behalf of the Therapeutic Apheresis Subsection of the

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | October 26, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 371-379

10.1002/jca.21592 Get It

We surveyed multiple apheresis centers represented by the authors for their clinical approach to the management of anticoagulation issues during therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). We present the results of their practices and a review of the pertinent literature. As plasma is removed during TPE, replacement with all or partial non‐plasma‐containing fluids (eg, 5% albumin) may lead to significant changes in hemostasis. These changes are amplified in patients who are receiving anticoagulation. We discuss various anticoagulants as well as the monitoring and adjustment of anticoagulation before, during, and after TPE. No single guideline can be applied, but rather, patients must be monitored individually, taking into account their often complex clinical conditions and medication profiles.