Back to Authors

Flores, Shaney

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2726-8704

Mayo Clinic

Washington University in St. Louis

Citations 29

T1 and FLAIR signal intensities are related to tau pathology in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease
Brier, Matthew R. , Gordon, Brian A. , Flores, Shaney , Keefe, Sarah , Hornbeck, Russ C. , Ances, Beau M. , Xiong, Chengjie , Wang, Guoqiao , Raji, Cyrus A. , Libre‐Guerra, Jorge J., Perrin, Richard J. , Daniels, Alisha , Day, Gregory S. , Fulham, Michael , Jack, Clifford R. , Fougère, Christian la , Oh, Hwamee , Vöglein, Jonathan , Yakushev, Igor , Morris, John C. , (DIAN), For the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Rahmani, Farzaneh , Cash, David M , Jack, Clifford R , Gordon, Brian A , Day, Gregory S , Vöglein, Jonathan , Xiong, Chengjie , Ances, Beau M , Morris, John C , McKay, Nicole S. , Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Xiong, Chengjie , McDade, Eric , Karch, Celeste M. , Brickman, Adam M. , Reischl, Gerald , Schofield, Peter R. , Cash, David M. , Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Klunk, William E. , Bateman, Randall J. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , (DIAN), For the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network

Human Brain Mapping | October 23, 2023 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 6375-6387

10.1002/hbm.26514 Get It

AbstractCarriers of mutations responsible for dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease provide a unique opportunity to study potential imaging biomarkers. Biomarkers based on routinely acquired clinical MR images, could supplement the extant invasive or logistically challenging) biomarker studies. We used 1104 longitudinal MR, 324 amyloid beta, and 87 tau positron emission tomography imaging sessions from 525 participants enrolled in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Observational Study to extract novel imaging metrics representing the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of standardized image intensities of T1‐weighted and Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR scans. There was an exponential decrease in FLAIR‐μ in mutation carriers and an increase in FLAIR and T1 signal heterogeneity (T1‐σ and FLAIR‐σ) as participants approached the symptom onset in both supramarginal, the right postcentral and right superior temporal gyri as well as both caudate nuclei, putamina, thalami, and amygdalae. After controlling for the effect of regional atrophy, FLAIR‐μ decreased and T1‐σ and FLAIR‐σ increased with increasing amyloid beta and tau deposition in numerous cortical regions. In symptomatic mutation carriers and independent of the effect of regional atrophy, tau pathology demonstrated a stronger relationship with image intensity metrics, compared with amyloid pathology. We propose novel MR imaging intensity‐based metrics using standard clinical T1 and FLAIR images which strongly associates with the progression of pathology in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease. We suggest that tau pathology may be a key driver of the observed changes in this cohort of patients.
Etiology of White Matter Hyperintensities in Autosomal Dominant and Sporadic Alzheimer Disease
Shirzadi, Zahra , Schultz, Stephanie A. , Yau, Wai‐Ying Wendy , Fitzpatrick, Colleen , Levin, Raina, Kantarci, Kejal , Preboske, Gregory M., Jack, Clifford R. , Farlow, Martin R. , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C. , Xiong, Chengjie , Levey, Allan I. , Gordon, Brian A. , Salloway, Stephen , Perrin, Richard J. , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C. , Goate, Alison , Day, Gregory S. , Chui, Helena C., Berman, Sarah , Mori, Hiroshi , Ruthirakuhan, Myuri , Wu, Che‐Yuan , Sohrabi, Hamid R. , Martins, Ralph N. , Johnson, Keith A. , Greenberg, Steven M. , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Initiative, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Weiner, Michael W. , Aisen, Paul, Petersen, Ronald , Jack, Clifford R., Jagust, William J. , Trojanowki, John Q., Morris, John C., Shaw, Leslie M. , Khachaturian, Zaven S., Carrillo, Maria, Potter, William Z., Bernard, Marie , Jackson, Jonathan , Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Okonkwo, Ozioma C. , Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Fleisher, Adam , Sacrey, Diana Truran, Fockler, Juliet , Conti, Cat, Jin, Chengshi , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ashford, Miriam T. , Flenniken, Derek , Kormos, Adrienne, Montine, Tom, Raman, Rema , Jiménez, Gustavo , Gessert, Devon, Salazar, Jennifer, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Cabrera, Yuliana, Walter, Sarah , Miller, Garrett, Coker, Godfrey, Clanton, Taylor, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Adegoke, Olusegun, Mahboubi, Payam, Moore, Shelley, Pizzola, Jeremy, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Sloan, Brittany, Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Borowski, Bret, Ward, Chad, Gunter, Jeff, Jahanshad, Neda , DeCarli, Charles, Knaack, Alexander , Chen, Stephanie Rossi, Choe, Mark, Crawford, Karen , Reiman, Eric M. , Mathis, Chet, Landau, Susan, Cairns, Nigel J., Householder, Erin, Franklin, Erin , Bernhardt, Haley, Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michael, Neu, Scott, Apostolova, Liana G. , Foroud, Tatiana M., Faber, Kelley, Wilmes, Kristi, Thal, Leon J., Lind, Betty, Crissey, Rachel, Carter, Raina, Dolen, Sara, Schneider, Lon S. , Pawluczyk, Sonia, Becerra, Mauricio, Teodoro, Liberty, Dagerman, Karen, Spann, Bryan M., Brewer, James B., Vanderswag, Helen, Ziolkowski, Jaimie, Heidebrink, Judith L. , Zbizek-Nulph, Lisa, Mason, Sara S., Albers, Colleen S., Johnson, Kris , Villaneuva-Meyer, Javier, Pavlik, Valory , Pacini, Nathaniel, Lamb, Ashley, Kass, Joseph S. , Doody, Rachelle S., Shibley, Victoria, Chowdhury, Munir , Rountree, Susan, Dang, Mimi, Mintz, Akiva , Winkfield, David, Carroll, Maria , Stobbs-Cucchi, Georgia , Oliver, Angela , Creech, Mary L., Mintun, Mark A., Schneider, Stacy, Geldmacher, David , Love, Marissa Natelson , Griffith, Randall, Clark, David, Brockington, John, Marson, Daniel , Grossman, Hillel, Goldstein, Martin , Mitsis, Effie, Samuels, Patricia, Duara, Ranjan , Greig‐Custo, Maria T., Rodriguez, Rosemarie, Albert, Marilyn, Onyike, Chiadi, Farrington, Leonie, Rudow, Scott, Brichko, Rottislav, Kielb, Stephanie , Smith, Amanda , Raj, Balebail Ashok, Fargher, Kristin, Shulman, Melanie , Faustin, Arline , Rao, Julia, Castro, Karen M. , Ulysse, Anaztasia, Chen, Shannon, Sheikh, Mohammed O., Singleton-Garvin, Jamika, Doraiswamy, P. Murali , Petrella, Jeffrey R. , James, Olga, Borges‐Neto, Salvador , Karlawish, Jason , Vaishnavi, Sanjeev , Clark, Christopher M. , Arnold, Steven E. , Smith, Charles D. , Khouli, Riham El , Raslau, Flavius D., Oakley, MaryAnn, Simpson, Donna M., Martin, Kim, Kowalski, Nancy, Keltz, Melanie, Goldstein, Bonnie S., Makino, Kelly M., Ismail, M. Saleem , Brand, Connie, Thai, Gaby , Pierce, Aimee, Witbracht, Megan , Mathews, Dana, Quiceno, Mary , Hajjar, Ihab , Cellar, Janet S., Swerdlow, Russell H. , Kremen, Sarah , Tingus, Kathleen, Lu, Po H. , Bartzokis, George, Woo, Ellen, Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Parfitt, Francine, Poki-Walker, Kim, Hake, Ann Marie , Matthews, Brandy R., Herring, Scott, Dyck, Christopher H. van , Mecca, Adam P. , Good, Susan P., MacAvoy, Martha G., Carson, Richard E. , Varma, Pradeep, Chertkow, Howard , Vaitekunis, Susan, Hosein, Chris, Mudge, Benita, Assaly, Michele, Rachinsky, Irina, Kertesz, Andrew, Drost, Dick, Rogers, John, Grant, Ian , Muse, Brittanie, Rogalskı, Emily , Robson, Jordan, Mesulam, M.‐Marsel, Kerwin, Diana , Wu, Chuang‐Kuo, Johnson, Nancy E., Lipowski, Kristine, Weıntraub, Sandra , Bonakdarpour, Borna , Hernando, Raymundo, Sarrael, Antero, Rosen, Howard J., Johnson, Kathleen, Reynolds, Brigid, Poe, Jessica, Sperling, Reisa A., Marshall, Gad A. , Yesavage, Jerome A. , Taylor, Joy L. , Chao, Steven, Coleman, Jaila, White, Jessica D. , Lane, Barton , Rosen, Allyson , Tinklenberg, Jared, Belden, Christine M. , Clark, Kelly, Zamrini, Edward , Sabbagh, Marwan, Kowall, Neil W. , Budson, Andrew E. , Ntekim, Oyonumo, Wolday, Saba, Khan, Javed , Nwulia, Evaristus , Nadarajah, Sheeba , Lerner, Alan J. , Ogrocki, Paula, Tatsuoka, Curtis , Fatica, Parianne, Olichney, John , Bates, Vernice, Capote, Horacio, Rainka, Michelle, Borrie, Michael, Lee, T‐Y, Asthana, Sanjay , Carlsson, Cynthia M., Perrin, Allison, Burke, Anna , Kataki, Maria , Hart, David , Zimmerman, Earl A. , Celmins, Dzintra, Smith, Karen Ekstam, Shim, Hyungsub , Nam, Ki Won , Schtulz, Susan K., Williamson, Jeff D. , Craft, Suzanne , Cleveland, Jo, Ott, Brian R. , Drake, Jonathan, Tremont, Geoffrey , Daiello, Lori A. , Ritter, Aaron, Bernick, Charles , Munic, Donna, O’Connell, Abigail, Mintzer, Jacobo , Wiliams, Arthur, Masdeu, Joseph C. , Shi, Jiong , Garcia, Angelica, Newhouse, Paul , Salloway, Steven, Malloy, Paul, Correia, Stephen , Kittur, Smita, Blank, Karen, Anderson, Karen, Flashman, Laura A. , Seltzer, Marc, Hynes, Mary L. , Santulli, Robert B. , Relkin, Norman , Chiang, Gloria, Lee, Athena, Lin, Michael, Ravdin, Lisa , Sood, Ajay, Blanchard, Kimberly S., Fleischman, Debra , Varon, Daniel, Greig, Maria T., Martin, Kimberly S., Reist, Christopher , Sadowsky, Carl, Villena, Teresa, Rosen, Howard, Peskind, Elaine R. , Li, Gail, Vöglein, Jonathan , Méndez, Patricio Chrem, Ikonomović, Snežana, Nadkarni, Neelesh K. , Ramírez, Laura, Leon, Yudy Milena, Ramos, Cláudia , Alzate, Diana, Baena, Ana , Londono, Natalia, Laske, Christoph , Kuder-Buletta, Elke, Gräber‐Sultan, Susanne, Preische, Oliver, Hofmann, Anna, Ishii, Kenji , Senda, Michio , Riddle, Meghan C., Menard, William, Bodge, Courtney, Surti, Mustafa, Sanchez-Gonzalez, VJ, Orozco-Barajas, Maribel, Esposito, Bianca, Fernanadez, Victoria, Jerome, Gina, Herries, Elizabeth, Seyfried, Nicholas T. , Bechara, Jacob , Chen, Allison , Hantler, Nancy, Hornbeck, Russ C. , Jarman, Steve, Keefe, Sarah , Koudelis, Deborah, Massoumzadeh, Parinaz , Nicklaus, Joyce , Pulizos, Christine, Mishall, Sheetal, Sabaredzovic, Edita, Deng, Emily , Candela, Madison, Smith, Hunter , Scott, Jalen , Gremminger, Emily, Ma, Yinjiao , Bui, Ryan , Lu, Ruijin , Daniels, Alisha , Courtney, Laura, Supnet, Charlene , Xu, Jinbin , Ringman, John M. , Barthélemy, Nicolas R. , Jack, Clifford R , Gordon, Brian A , Kantarci, Kejal , Day, Gregory S , Vöglein, Jonathan , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C , Goate, Alison M , Supnet-Bell, Charlene , Berman, Sarah , Levey, Allan I , Kremen, Sarah , Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Jucker, Mathias , Xiong, Chengjie , Karch, Celeste M. , Schofield, Peter R. , McDade, Eric , Cruchaga, Carlos , Allegri, Ricardo , Koeppe, Robert A. , Chui, Helena C. , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel , Lee, Jae‐Hong , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Swardfager, Walter , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Bateman, Randall J. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Schultz, Aaron P. , Initiative, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Jack, Clifford R., Toga, Arthur W. , Beckett, Laurel , Green, Robert C. , Saykin, Andrew J. , Morris, John C., Barnes, Lisa L. , González, Hector, Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Veitch, Dallas P. , Neuhaus, John M , Rafii, Michael S. , Donohue, Michael , Smith, Stephanie R. , Harvey, Danielle , Arani, Arvin , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Jones, David T. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Reid, Robert I. , Malone, Ian B. , Thompson, Paul M. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Nir, Talia M. , Fletcher, Evan M. , Tosun, Duygu , Yushkevich, Paul A. , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Chen, Kewei , Mathis, Chet, Nho, Kwangsik T. , Risacher, Shannon L. , Shen, Li , Nudelman, Kelly , Silbert, Lisa C. , Kaye, Jeffrey , Carter, Raina, Quinn, Joseph F. , Lord, Joanne L. , Knopman, David S. , Stern, Yaakov , Honig, Lawrence S. , Ances, Beau M. , Goldstein, Martin A., Greenberg, Jonathan, Shah, Raj C. , Lamar, Melissa , Duara, Ranjan , Sadowski, Martin , Wısnıewskı, Thomas , Wong, Terence Z. , Wolk, David A. , Jicha, Gregory A. , López, Oscar L. , Porsteinsson, Anton P. , Yanez, Beatriz, Sosa, Elizabeth M. , Kelley, Brendan , Nguyen, Trung Dung , Womack, Kyle , Lah, James J. , Burns, Jeffrey M. , Brooks, William Miles , Silverman, Daniel H.S. , Teng, Edmond , Brosch, Jared R. , Black, Sandra E. , Stefanovic, Bojana , Heyn, Chris , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Kim, Ellen , Sossi, Vesna , Feldman, Howard , Finger, Elizabeth C. , Pasternak, Stephen , Miller, Bruce L. , Perry, David C. , Turner, Raymond Scott , MCCann, Kelly, Sperling, Reisa A., Atri, Alireza , Killiany, Ronald , Stern, Robert A. , Mez, Jesse , Obisesan, Thomas O. , Maillard, Pauline , Carmichael, Owen , Bartha, Robert , Johnson, Sterling C. , Carlsson, Cynthia M. , Scharre, Douglas W. , Tarawneh, Rawan M. , Miller, Del D. , Ponto, Laura L. Boles , Koleva, Hristina , Yang, Mia , Sink, Kaycee M. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Potkin, Steven G. , Salloway, Steve , Pearlson, Godfrey D. , Sood, Ajay, Arfanakis, Konstantinos , Varón, Daniel , Martínez, Walter Fabián , Petrie, Eric C. , Noble, James M. , Surace, Ezequiel , Lopera, Francisco Javier , Aguillon, David , Londono, Natalia, Moreno, Sonia, Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Kasuga, Kensaku , Niimi, Yoshiki , Cash, David M. , Roh, Jee Hoon , Takada, Leonel Tadao , Renton, Alan , Marsh, Jacob A. , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Brooks, William S. , Chen, Charles , Flores, Shaney , McCullough, Austin , McKay, Nicole S. , Wáng, Qīng , Candela, Madison, Hobbs, Diana A. , Wang, Peter , Xu, Xiong, Li, Yan , Sosa, Ana Luisa , Smith, Jennifer A.

JAMA Neurology | October 16, 2023 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1353

10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3618 Get It

ImportanceIncreased white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume is a common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding in both autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) and late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD), but it remains unclear whether increased WMH along the AD continuum is reflective of AD-intrinsic processes or secondary to elevated systemic vascular risk factors.ObjectiveTo estimate the associations of neurodegeneration and parenchymal and vessel amyloidosis with WMH accumulation and investigate whether systemic vascular risk is associated with WMH beyond these AD-intrinsic processes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used data from 3 longitudinal cohort studies conducted in tertiary and community-based medical centers—the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN; February 2010 to March 2020), the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; July 2007 to September 2021), and the Harvard Aging Brain Study (HABS; September 2010 to December 2019).Main Outcome and MeasuresThe main outcomes were the independent associations of neurodegeneration (decreases in gray matter volume), parenchymal amyloidosis (assessed by amyloid positron emission tomography), and vessel amyloidosis (evidenced by cerebral microbleeds [CMBs]) with cross-sectional and longitudinal WMH.ResultsData from 3960 MRI sessions among 1141 participants were included: 252 pathogenic variant carriers from DIAN (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [11.2] years; 137 [54%] female), 571 older adults from ADNI (mean [SD] age, 72.8 [7.3] years; 274 [48%] female), and 318 older adults from HABS (mean [SD] age, 72.4 [7.6] years; 194 [61%] female). Longitudinal increases in WMH volume were greater in individuals with CMBs compared with those without (DIAN: t = 3.2 [P = .001]; ADNI: t = 2.7 [P = .008]), associated with longitudinal decreases in gray matter volume (DIAN: t = −3.1 [P = .002]; ADNI: t = −5.6 [P < .001]; HABS: t = −2.2 [P = .03]), greater in older individuals (DIAN: t = 6.8 [P < .001]; ADNI: t = 9.1 [P < .001]; HABS: t = 5.4 [P < .001]), and not associated with systemic vascular risk (DIAN: t = 0.7 [P = .40]; ADNI: t = 0.6 [P = .50]; HABS: t = 1.8 [P = .06]) in individuals with ADAD and LOAD after accounting for age, gray matter volume, CMB presence, and amyloid burden. In older adults without CMBs at baseline, greater WMH volume was associated with CMB development during longitudinal follow-up (Cox proportional hazards regression model hazard ratio, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.72-4.03; P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings suggest that increased WMH volume in AD is associated with neurodegeneration and parenchymal and vessel amyloidosis but not with elevated systemic vascular risk. Additionally, increased WMH volume may represent an early sign of vessel amyloidosis preceding the emergence of CMBs.
Brain network decoupling with increased serum neurofilament and reduced cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease
Wheelock, Muriah D. , Strain, Jeremy F. , Mansfield, Patricia K. , Tu, Jiaxin Cindy , Tanenbaum, Aaron , Preische, Oliver, Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Cash, David M. , Fagan, Anne M. , Fox, Nick C. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Hassenstab, Jason , Jack, Clifford R. , Xiong, Chengjie , Perrin, Richard J. , Xiong, Chengjie , Morris, John C. , Ances, Beau M. , Eggebrecht, Adam T. , Gordon, Brian A. , Network, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer, Adams, Sarah , Araki, Aki, Barthélemy, Nicolas R. , Bechara, Jacob , Berman, Sarah , Bodge, Courtney, Brandon, Susan E. , Brooks, W. K. , Brosch, Jared R. , Buck, Jill , Buckles, Virginia, Cash, Lisa, Chen, Charlie, Chrem, Patricio, Chua, Jasmin, Chui, Helena, Cruchaga, Carlos , Day, Gregory S. , Cruz, Chrismary De La, Denner, Darcy, Diffenbacher, Anna, Dincer, Aylin , Donahue, Tamara, Egido, Noelia , Esposito, Bianca, Farlow, Marty, Feldman, Becca , Fitzpatrick, Colleen , Franklin, Erin , Friedrichsen, Nelly, Gardener, Samantha L. , Goate, Alison , Goldberg, Sarah B. , Gonzalez, Alyssa, Gräber‐Sultan, Susanne, Graham, Morgan, Gray, Julia, Gremminger, Emily, Groves, Alex, Haass, Christian , Häsler, Lisa M., Hellm, Cortaiga, Herries, Elizabeth, Hoechst-Swisher, Laura, Hornbeck, Russ C. , Igor, Yakushev, Ihara, Ryoko , Ikonomović, Snežana, Ishii, Kenji , Jerome, Gina, Käser, Stephan, Keefe, Sarah , Klunk, William E. , Koudelis, Deb, Kuder-Buletta, Elke, Laske, Christoph , Martinez, Rita, Mason, Neal Scott, Mawuenyega, Kwasi G., Mejia, Arlene, Morenas‐Rodríguez, Estrella , Mori, Hiroshi , Mountz, James M. , Mummery, Cath, Nadkami, Neelesh, Nagamatsu, Akemi, Neimeyer, Katie, Norton, Joanne, Nuscher, Brigitte , Obermüller, Ulricke, Patira, Riddhi , Ping, Lingyan, Ringman, John M. , Salloway, Stephen , Senda, Michio , Seyfried, Nick , Shady, Kristine, Sigurdson, Wendy, Smith, Lori, Snitz, Beth E. , Sohrabi, Hamid R. , Stephens, Sochenda, Taddei, Kevin , Thompson, Sarah , Vöglein, Jonathan , Wang, Peter, Weamer, Elise A., Xu, Jinbin , Cruchaga, Carlos , Fagan, Anne M , Fox, Nick C , Graff-Radford, Neill R , Hassenstab, Jason , Jack, Clifford R , Karch, Celeste M , Xiong, Chengjie , McDade, Eric M , Schofield, Peter R , Xiong, Chengjie , Morris, John C , Bateman, Randall J , Jucker, Mathias , Benzinger, Tammie L S , Ances, Beau M , Eggebrecht, Adam T , Gordon, Brian A , Cruchaga, Carlos , Day, Gregory S , Vöglein, Jonathan , Cash, David M , Goate, Alison M , Berman, Sarah , Karch, Celeste M. , McDade, Eric , Schofield, Peter R. , Bateman, Randall J. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Network, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer, Allegri, Ricardo , Brandon, Susan, Brooks, William (Bill), Buck, Jill, Carter, Kathleen, Douglas, Jane, Duong, Duc M , Feldman, Becca, Fitzpatrick, Colleen, Flores, Shaney , Fujii, Hisako , Ghetti, Bernardino , Goldman, Jill , Grilo, Miguel, Hofmann, Anna, Holtzman, David M. , Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Kasuga, Kensaku , Koeppe, Robert A. , Lee, Jae‐Hong , Levey, Allan I. , Li, Yan , López, Oscar L. , Marsh, Jacob, Martins, Ralph N. , Masters, Colin L. , McCullough, Austin , Niimi, Yoshiki , Noble, James M. , O’Connor, Antoinette , Ping, Lingyan, Renton, Alan , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel , Shimada, Hiroyuki , Smith, Jennifer A. , Thompson, Sarah, Wang, Qing , Xu, Xiong

Brain | January 10, 2023 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 2928-2943

10.1093/brain/awac498 Get It

Abstract Neurofilament light chain, a putative measure of neuronal damage, is measurable in blood and CSF and is predictive of cognitive function in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. There has been limited prior work linking neurofilament light and functional connectivity, and no prior work has investigated neurofilament light associations with functional connectivity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Here, we assessed relationships between blood neurofilament light, cognition, and functional connectivity in a cross-sectional sample of 106 autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease mutation carriers and 76 non-carriers. We employed an innovative network-level enrichment analysis approach to assess connectome-wide associations with neurofilament light. Neurofilament light was positively correlated with deterioration of functional connectivity within the default mode network and negatively correlated with connectivity between default mode network and executive control networks, including the cingulo-opercular, salience, and dorsal attention networks. Further, reduced connectivity within the default mode network and between the default mode network and executive control networks was associated with reduced cognitive function. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that neurofilament levels and functional connectivity within the default mode network and between the default mode network and the dorsal attention network explained significant variance in cognitive composite scores when controlling for age, sex, and education. A mediation analysis demonstrated that functional connectivity within the default mode network and between the default mode network and dorsal attention network partially mediated the relationship between blood neurofilament light levels and cognitive function. Our novel results indicate that blood estimates of neurofilament levels correspond to direct measurements of brain dysfunction, shedding new light on the underlying biological processes of Alzheimer’s disease. Further, we demonstrate how variation within key brain systems can partially mediate the negative effects of heightened total serum neurofilament levels, suggesting potential regions for targeted interventions. Finally, our results lend further evidence that low-cost and minimally invasive blood measurements of neurofilament may be a useful marker of brain functional connectivity and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease.
Comparison of amyloid accumulation between Down syndrome and autosomal‐dominant Alzheimer disease
Boerwinkle, Anna H. , Henson, Rachel L. , Butt, Omar H. , Chen, Charles D., Fagan, Anne M. , Christian, Bradley T. , Mapstone, Mark , Price, Julie C. , Schupf, Nicole , Laymon, Charles M. , Krinsky‐McHale, Sharon J. , Lai, Florence , Rosas, H. Diana , Lott, Ira T. , Silverman, Wayne , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Chui, Helena C., Farlow, Martin R. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Mori, Hiroshi , Perrin, Richard J. , Salloway, Stephen , Xiong, Chengjie , Gordon, Brian A. , Wisch, Julie K. , Flores, Shaney , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Handen, Benjamin L. , Head, Elizabeth , Klunk, William E. , Rafii, Michael S. , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Hartley, Sigan L. , Zaman, Shahid H. , Brickman, Adam M. , Lee, Joseph H. , Allegri, Ricardo , Berman, Sarah , Chui, Helena C. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Fox, Nick C. , Goate, Alison , Day, Gregory S. , Jucker, Mathias , Lee, Jae‐Hong , Xiong, Chengjie , Martins, Ralph N. , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel , Schofield, Peter R. , Karch, Celeste M. , Hassenstab, Jason , McDade, Eric , Bateman, Randall J. , Ances, Beau M.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 20, 2022 | Volume: 18 | Issue: S6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.064684 Get It

AbstractBackgroundGiven the triplication of chromosome 21 and the location of the amyloid precursor protein gene on chromosome 21, almost all adults with Down syndrome (DS) develop Alzheimer disease (AD)‐like pathology and dementia during their lifetime. Comparing amyloid accumulation in DS to autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), another genetic form of AD, may improve our understanding of early AD pathology development.MethodWe assessed amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in 192 participants with DS and 33 sibling controls from the Alzheimer’s Biomarker Consortium‐Down Syndrome (ABC‐DS) and 265 mutation‐carriers (MC) and 169 familial controls from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) (Table 1). We calculated regional standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) using a cerebellar cortex reference region and converted global amyloid burden SUVR to centiloids. We compared amyloid PET by cognitive status and estimated‐years‐to‐symptom‐onset (EYO). EYO was calculated for DIAN participants by subtracting their age from parental age of symptom onset and for ABC‐DS participants by subtracting their age from 50.2 years, a published average age of symptom onset in a large sample of individuals with DS (Fortea et al., 2020). In a subset of participants, we assessed the relationship between amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/40.ResultThe relationship between CSF Aβ42/40 and amyloid PET was similar in DS and MC participants (Figure 1). We did not observe significant differences between MC and DS grouped by cognitive status (Figure 2). However, when assessed over EYO, global amyloid burden was significantly elevated in MC at EYO ≥ ‐23 but was not elevated in DS until EYO ≥ ‐15 (Figure 3). We observed early cortical and subcortical amyloid PET increases in both groups, but we also measured some regional differences in amyloid PET changes between MC and DS, specifically in the medial occipital region (Figure 4 and 5).ConclusionThese results demonstrate similarities in the relationship between amyloid biomarkers and the levels of amyloid accumulation in ADAD and DS. However, we also observed a 5‐10 year delay and some regional differences in amyloid accumulation in DS. This is important for future clinical trials to consider when recruiting participants and determining treatment efficacy.
Examining the effects of sex and age on tau PET binding in the absence of beta‐amyloid pathology
Dincer, Aylin , Keefe, Sarah , Hornbeck, Russ C. , Franklin, Erin , Xiong, Chengjie , Dyck, Christopher H. van , Klein, Gregory , Pariente, Jérémie , Perrin, Richard J. , Gordon, Brian A. , Flores, Shaney , McKay, Nicole S. , Hobbs, Diana A. , Wisch, Julie K. , Jack, Clifford R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , McDade, Eric , Bateman, Randall J. , Morris, John C. , Ances, Beau M. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 20, 2022 | Volume: 18 | Issue: S5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.061090 Get It

AbstractBackgroundTau PET imaging is an established tool for studying Alzheimer Disease but its sensitivity to primary age‐related tauopathy (PART) as well as sex effects in individuals without abnormal levels of amyloid are unknown.MethodsCross‐sectional data were collected from 2014 to 2019 in 144 cognitively normal younger, middle‐aged, and older adults free from amyloid pathology as quantified using PET. Regional values of tau PET binding were measured using flortaucipir. Statistical models examined the main effects of increasing age, sex, race, and sub‐threshold levels of amyloid. Secondary analyses also examined the relationship between tau PET binding and iron as measured using T2* weighted imaging and calcification as measured using CT.ResultsThere were significant positive associations between tau binding and age in 19 regions, with the largest effects seen in the inferior temporal cortex (t=4.59), caudate (t=9.58), and putamen (t=12.57). Iron as measured using T2* imaging mediated only a modest (11.9%) amount of the association between age and tau binding. Elevated tracer uptake in females was present in 23 regions in frontal, lateral parietal, and temporal regions including, most prominently the rostral middle frontal gyrus (t=7.48), superior temporal gyrus (t=5.12) and the inferior temporal gyrus (t=4.22). There were no significant effects of race or sub‐threshold levels of amyloid.ConclusionsTau PET is sensitive to primary effects of age in regions consistent with the neuropathological definition of PART although strong age effects in regions of off‐target binding were also present. There was a robust effect of sex, suggesting prior observations of elevated binding in women is not solely a potentiation of Alzheimer pathology but instead represents an ubiquitous phenomenon. Understand how both sex and age impact tracer binding is critical to understanding the utility of PET tracers as well as interpreting tracer values in the context of disease.
Comparison of amyloid accumulation between Down syndrome and autosomal‐dominant Alzheimer disease
Boerwinkle, Anna H. , Henson, Rachel L. , Butt, Omar H. , Chen, Charles D., Fagan, Anne M. , Christian, Bradley T. , Mapstone, Mark , Price, Julie C. , Schupf, Nicole , Laymon, Charles M. , Krinsky‐McHale, Sharon J. , Lai, Florence , Rosas, H. Diana , Lott, Ira T. , Silverman, Wayne , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Chui, Helena C., Farlow, Martin R. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Mori, Hiroshi , Perrin, Richard J. , Salloway, Stephen , Gordon, Brian A. , Wisch, Julie K. , Flores, Shaney , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Handen, Benjamin L. , Head, Elizabeth , Klunk, William E. , Rafii, Michael S. , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Hartley, Sigan L. , Zaman, Shahid H. , Brickman, Adam M. , Lee, Joseph H. , Allegri, Ricardo , Berman, Sarah , Chui, Helena C. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Fox, Nick C. , Goate, Alison , Day, Gregory S. , Jucker, Mathias , Lee, Jae‐Hong , Xiong, Chengjie , Martins, Ralph N. , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel , Schofield, Peter R. , Xiong, Chengjie , Karch, Celeste M. , Hassenstab, Jason , McDade, Eric , Bateman, Randall J. , Ances, Beau M.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 20, 2022 | Volume: 18 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.063959 Get It

AbstractBackgroundGiven the triplication of chromosome 21 and the location of the amyloid precursor protein gene on chromosome 21, almost all adults with Down syndrome (DS) develop Alzheimer disease (AD)‐like pathology and dementia during their lifetime. Comparing amyloid accumulation in DS to autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), another genetic form of AD, may improve our understanding of early AD pathology development.MethodWe assessed amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in 192 participants with DS and 33 sibling controls from the Alzheimer’s Biomarker Consortium‐Down Syndrome (ABC‐DS) and 265 mutation‐carriers (MC) and 169 familial controls from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) (Table 1). We calculated regional standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) using a cerebellar cortex reference region and converted global amyloid burden SUVR to centiloids. We compared amyloid PET by cognitive status and estimated‐years‐to‐symptom‐onset (EYO). EYO was calculated for DIAN participants by subtracting their age from parental age of symptom onset and for ABC‐DS participants by subtracting their age from 50.2 years, a published average age of symptom onset in a large sample of individuals with DS (Fortea et al., 2020). In a subset of participants, we assessed the relationship between amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/40.ResultThe relationship between CSF Aβ42/40 and amyloid PET was similar in DS and MC participants (Figure 1). We did not observe significant differences between MC and DS grouped by cognitive status (Figure 2). However, when assessed over EYO, global amyloid burden was significantly elevated in MC at EYO ≥ ‐23 but was not elevated in DS until EYO ≥ ‐15 (Figure 3). We observed early cortical and subcortical amyloid PET increases in both groups, but we also measured some regional differences in amyloid PET changes between MC and DS, specifically in the medial occipital region (Figure 4 and 5).ConclusionThese results demonstrate similarities in the relationship between amyloid biomarkers and the levels of amyloid accumulation in ADAD and DS. However, we also observed a 5‐10 year delay and some regional differences in amyloid accumulation in DS. This is important for future clinical trials to consider when recruiting participants and determining treatment efficacy.
Examining the effects of age and sex on tau PET binding in the absence of beta‐amyloid pathology
Gordon, Brian A. , Dincer, Aylin , Keefe, Sarah , Hobbs, Diana A. , Hornbeck, Russ C. , Franklin, Erin , Dyck, Christopher H. van , Klein, Gregory , Pariente, Jérémie , Bateman, Randall J. , Morris, John C. , Perrin, Richard J. , Gordon, Brian A , Bateman, Randall J , Morris, John C , Flores, Shaney , McKay, Nicole S. , Wisch, Julie K. , Jack, Clifford R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Xiong, Chengjie , McDade, Eric , Benzinger, Tammie L.S.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 20, 2022 | Volume: 18 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.063285 Get It

AbstractBackgroundTau PET imaging is an established tool for studying Alzheimer Disease but its sensitivity to primary age‐related tauopathy (PART) as well as sex effects in individuals without abnormal levels of amyloid are unknown.MethodsCross‐sectional data were collected from 2014 to 2019 in 144 cognitively normal younger, middle‐aged, and older adults free from amyloid pathology as quantified using PET. Regional values of tau PET binding were measured using flortaucipir. Statistical models examined the main effects of increasing age, sex, race, and subthreshold levels of amyloid. Secondary analyses also examined the relationship between tau PET binding and iron as measured using T2* weighted imaging and calcification as measured using CT.ResultsThere were significant positive associations between tau binding and age in 19 regions, with the largest effects seen in the inferior temporal cortex (t=4.59), caudate (t=9.58), and putamen (t=12.57). Iron as measured using T2* imaging mediated only a modest (11.9%) amount of the association between age and tau binding. Elevated tracer uptake in females was present in 23 regions in frontal, lateral parietal, and temporal regions including, most prominently the rostral middle frontal gyrus (t=7.48), superior temporal gyrus (t=5.12) and the inferior temporal gyrus (t=4.22). There were no significant effects of race or subthreshold levels of amyloid.ConclusionsTau PET is sensitive to primary effects of age in regions consistent with the neuropathological definition of PART although strong age effects in regions of off‐target binding were also present. There was a robust effect of sex, suggesting prior observations of elevated binding in women is not solely a potentiation of Alzheimer pathology but instead represents an ubiquitous phenomenon. Understand how both sex and age impact tracer binding is critical to understanding the utility of PET tracers as well as interpreting tracer values in the context of disease.
Amyloid‐Related Imaging Abnormalities in the DIAN‐TU‐001 Trial of Gantenerumab and Solanezumab: Lessons from a Trial in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease
Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Li, Yan , McCullough, Austin , Hofmann, Carsten, Wojtowicz, Jakub , Park, Ethan, Wang, Guoqiao , Preboske, Gregory M., Gordon, Brian A. , Chen, Charles D., Flores, Shaney , Aggarwal, Neelum T. , Berman, Sarah , Bird, Thomas D., Borowski, Bret, Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Clarnette, Roger, Fagan, Anne M. , Farlow, Martin R. , Fox, Nick C. , Gauthier, Serge , Hassenstab, Jason , Hobbs, Diana A. , Holdridge, Karen C. , Hornbeck, Russ C. , Jiménez‐Velázquez, Ivonne Z. , Klein, Gregory , Xiong, Chengjie , Mancini, Michele , McKay, Nicole S. , Mummery, Catherine J. , Ringman, John M. , Snider, B. Joy, Suzuki, Kazushi , Yaari, R. , Perrin, Richard J. , Bateman, Randall J. , Salloway, Stephen , Clifford, David B., Unit, For the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials, Wang, Qing , Gordon, Brian A , Chen, Charles D , Jucker, Mathias , Ringman, John M , Salloway, Steve , Benzinger, Tammie L S , Bateman, Randall J , Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C , Hassenstab, Jason , Berman, Sarah , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Li, Yan, Wáng, Qīng , Black, Sandra E. , Brooks, William S. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Honig, Lawrence S. , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Jack, Clifford R. , Masellis, Mario , Shimada, Hiroyuki , Wallon, David , Xiong, Chengjie , McDade, Eric , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Unit, For the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials

Annals of Neurology | September 24, 2022 | Volume: 92 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 729-744

10.1002/ana.26511 Get It

ObjectiveTo determine the characteristics of participants with amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in a trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease (DIAD).Methods142 DIAD mutation carriers received either gantenerumab SC (n = 52), solanezumab IV (n = 50), or placebo (n = 40). Participants underwent assessments with the Clinical Dementia Rating® (CDR®), neuropsychological testing, CSF biomarkers, β‐amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor ARIA. Cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses evaluated potential ARIA‐related risk factors.ResultsEleven participants developed ARIA‐E, including 3 with mild symptoms. No ARIA‐E was reported under solanezumab while gantenerumab was associated with ARIA‐E compared to placebo (odds ratio [OR] = 9.1, confidence interval [CI][1.2, 412.3]; p = 0.021). Under gantenerumab, APOE‐ɛ4 carriers were more likely to develop ARIA‐E (OR = 5.0, CI[1.0, 30.4]; p = 0.055), as were individuals with microhemorrhage at baseline (OR = 13.7, CI[1.2, 163.2]; p = 0.039). No ARIA‐E was observed at the initial 225 mg/month gantenerumab dose, and most cases were observed at doses >675 mg. At first ARIA‐E occurrence, all ARIA‐E participants were amyloid‐PET+, 60% were CDR >0, 60% were past their estimated year to symptom onset, and 60% had also incident ARIA‐H. Most ARIA‐E radiologically resolved after dose adjustment and developing ARIA‐E did not significantly increase odds of trial discontinuation. ARIA‐E was more frequently observed in the occipital lobe (90%). ARIA‐E severity was associated with age at time of ARIA‐E.InterpretationIn DIAD, solanezumab was not associated with ARIA. Gantenerumab dose over 225 mg increased ARIA‐E risk, with additional risk for individuals APOE‐ɛ4(+) or with microhemorrhage. ARIA‐E was reversible on MRI in most cases, generally asymptomatic, without additional risk for trial discontinuation. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:729–744
Association ofBDNFVal66Met With Tau Hyperphosphorylation and Cognition in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease
Barthélemy, Nicolas R. , Goate, Alison , Hassenstab, Jason , Fagan, Anne M. , Xiong, Chengjie , Cruchaga, Carlos , Farlow, Martin R. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Laske, Christoph , Masters, Colin L. , Salloway, Stephen , Morris, John C. , Bateman, Randall J. , Network, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer, Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Fitzpatrick, Colleen , Bodge, Courtney, Cruz, Chrismary De La, Mejia, Arlene, Neimeyer, Katie, Gardener, Samantha L. , Taddei, Kevin , Ping, Lingyan, Seyfried, Nick , Gräber‐Sultan, Susanne, Häsler, Lisa M., Käser, Stephan, Kuder-Buletta, Elke, Preische, Oliver, Diffenbacher, Anna, Igor, Yakushev, Levin, Johannes, Vöglein, Jonathan , Obermüller, Ulricke, Esposito, Bianca, Goate, Alison, Buck, Jill , Farlow, Marty, Chrem, Patricio, Egido, Noelia , Haass, Christian , Nuscher, Brigitte , Day, Gregory S. , Graham, Morgan, Stephens, Sochenda, Bechara, Jacob , Araki, Aki, Ishii, Kenji , Senda, Michio , Ihara, Ryoko , Nagamatsu, Akemi, Fox, Nick C. , Mummery, Cath, Goldberg, Sarah B. , Ikonomović, Snežana, Mountz, James M. , Nadkarni, Neelesh K. , Patira, Riddhi , Smith, Lori, Snitz, Beth E. , Thompson, Sarah , Weamer, Elise A., Mason, Neal Scott, Chui, Helena, Ringman, John M. , Adams, Sarah , Brandon, Susan E. , Buckles, Virginia, Cash, Lisa, Chen, Charlie, Chua, Jasmin, Cruchaga, Carlos, Denner, Darcy, Dincer, Aylin , Donahue, Tamara, Feldman, Becca , Franklin, Erin , Friedrichsen, Nelly, Gonzalez, Alyssa, Gray, Julia, Gremminger, Emily, Groves, Alex, Hassenstab, Jason, Hellm, Cortaiga, Herries, Elizabeth, Hoechst-Swisher, Laura, Hornbeck, Russ C. , Jerome, Gina, Keefe, Sarah , Koudelis, Deb, Martinez, Rita, Mawuenyega, Kwasi G., McCullough, Austin , McDade, Eric, Norton, Joanne, Perrin, Richard J. , Shady, Kristine, Sigurdson, Wendy, Xu, Jinbin , Cruchaga, Carlos , Day, Gregory S , Bateman, Randall J , Masters, Colin L , Vöglein, Jonathan , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C , Goate, Alison M , Lim, Yen Ying , Maruff, Paul , Sato, Chihiro , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Xiong, Chengjie , Schofield, Peter R. , McDade, Eric , Network, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer, Fitzpatrick, Colleen, Goldman, Jill , Noble, James M. , Martins, Ralph N. , Sohrabi, Hamid R. , Carter, Kathleen, Duong, Duc M , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Levey, Allan I. , Ping, Lingyan, Hofmann, Anna, Jucker, Mathias , Levin, Johannes, Goate, Alison, Renton, Alan , Brosch, Jared R. , Buck, Jill, Ghetti, Bernardino , Allegri, Ricardo , Morenas‐Rodríguez, Estrella , Jack, Clifford R. , Brooks, William S. , Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Kasuga, Kensaku , Fujii, Hisako , Shimada, Hiroyuki , Niimi, Yoshiki , Douglas, Jane, Grilo, Miguel, O’Connor, Antoinette , Koeppe, Robert A. , Berman, Sarah , Klunk, William E. , López, Oscar L. , Brandon, Susan, Cruchaga, Carlos, Feldman, Becca, Flores, Shaney , Gordon, Brian A. , Hassenstab, Jason, Holtzman, David M. , Karch, Celeste M. , Li, Yan , Marsh, Jacob, McDade, Eric, Smith, Jennifer A. , Wang, Peter , Wang, Qing , Xu, Xiong

JAMA Neurology | January 31, 2022 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 261

10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5181 Get It

Modeling autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease with machine learning
Luckett, Patrick H. , McCullough, Austin , Gordon, Brian A. , Strain, Jeremy F. , Flores, Shaney , Dincer, Aylin , Kuffner, Todd A. , Stern, Ari, Meeker, Karin L. , Berman, Sarah , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Fagan, Anne M. , Farlow, Martin R. , Fox, Nick C. , Xiong, Chengjie , Masters, Colin L. , Mori, Hiroshi , Noble, James M. , Salloway, Stephen , Cash, David M. , Fulham, Michael , Jack, Clifford R. , Vöglein, Jonathan , Klunk, William E. , Oh, Hwamee , Swisher, Laura, Marcus, Daniel S. , Koudelis, Deborah, Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Cash, Lisa, Hornbeck, Russ C. , Perrin, Richard J. , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C. , Bateman, Randall J. , (DIAN), for the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Wang, Qing , Cruchaga, Carlos , Jack, Clifford R , Gordon, Brian A , Bateman, Randall J , Masters, Colin L , Vöglein, Jonathan , Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C , Cash, David M , Berman, Sarah , McCarthy, John Edward , Jucker, Mathias , Schofield, Peter R. , Brickman, Adam M. , Brooks, William S. , Ghetti, Bernardino , Koeppe, Robert A. , Su, Yi , Weiner, Michael W. , Wáng, Qīng , Xiong, Chengjie , Karch, Celeste M. , McDade, Eric , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Ances, Beau M. , (DIAN), for the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Noble, James M

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 21, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1005-1016

10.1002/alz.12259 Get It

AbstractIntroductionMachine learning models were used to discover novel disease trajectories for autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.MethodsLongitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), and fluorodeoxyglucose PET were acquired in 131 mutation carriers and 74 non‐carriers from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network; the groups were matched for age, education, sex, and apolipoprotein ε4 (APOE ε4). A deep neural network was trained to predict disease progression for each modality. Relief algorithms identified the strongest predictors of mutation status.ResultsThe Relief algorithm identified the caudate, cingulate, and precuneus as the strongest predictors among all modalities. The model yielded accurate results for predicting future Pittsburgh compound B (R2 = 0.95), fluorodeoxyglucose (R2 = 0.93), and atrophy (R2 = 0.95) in mutation carriers compared to non‐carriers.DiscussionResults suggest a sigmoidal trajectory for amyloid, a biphasic response for metabolism, and a gradual decrease in volume, with disease progression primarily in subcortical, middle frontal, and posterior parietal regions.