Back to Authors

Swisher, Laura

Mayo Clinic

Washington University in St. Louis

Citations 2

Modeling autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease with machine learning
Luckett, Patrick H. , McCullough, Austin , Gordon, Brian A. , Strain, Jeremy F. , Flores, Shaney , Dincer, Aylin , Kuffner, Todd A. , Stern, Ari, Meeker, Karin L. , Berman, Sarah , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Fagan, Anne M. , Farlow, Martin R. , Fox, Nick C. , Xiong, Chengjie , Masters, Colin L. , Mori, Hiroshi , Noble, James M. , Salloway, Stephen , Cash, David M. , Fulham, Michael , Jack, Clifford R. , Vöglein, Jonathan , Klunk, William E. , Oh, Hwamee , Swisher, Laura, Marcus, Daniel S. , Koudelis, Deborah, Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Cash, Lisa, Hornbeck, Russ C. , Perrin, Richard J. , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C. , Bateman, Randall J. , (DIAN), for the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Wang, Qing , Cruchaga, Carlos , Jack, Clifford R , Gordon, Brian A , Bateman, Randall J , Masters, Colin L , Vöglein, Jonathan , Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C , Cash, David M , Berman, Sarah , McCarthy, John Edward , Jucker, Mathias , Schofield, Peter R. , Brickman, Adam M. , Brooks, William S. , Ghetti, Bernardino , Koeppe, Robert A. , Su, Yi , Weiner, Michael W. , Wáng, Qīng , Xiong, Chengjie , Karch, Celeste M. , McDade, Eric , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Ances, Beau M. , (DIAN), for the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Noble, James M

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 21, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1005-1016

10.1002/alz.12259 Get It

AbstractIntroductionMachine learning models were used to discover novel disease trajectories for autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.MethodsLongitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), and fluorodeoxyglucose PET were acquired in 131 mutation carriers and 74 non‐carriers from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network; the groups were matched for age, education, sex, and apolipoprotein ε4 (APOE ε4). A deep neural network was trained to predict disease progression for each modality. Relief algorithms identified the strongest predictors of mutation status.ResultsThe Relief algorithm identified the caudate, cingulate, and precuneus as the strongest predictors among all modalities. The model yielded accurate results for predicting future Pittsburgh compound B (R2 = 0.95), fluorodeoxyglucose (R2 = 0.93), and atrophy (R2 = 0.95) in mutation carriers compared to non‐carriers.DiscussionResults suggest a sigmoidal trajectory for amyloid, a biphasic response for metabolism, and a gradual decrease in volume, with disease progression primarily in subcortical, middle frontal, and posterior parietal regions.
Single-subject grey matter network trajectories over the disease course of autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease
Vermunt, Lisa , Dicks, Ellen , Wang, Guoqiao , Dincer, Aylin , Flores, Shaney , Keefe, Sarah , Berman, Sarah , Cash, David M. , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Fox, Nick C. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Hassenstab, Jason , Laske, Christoph , Xiong, Chengjie , Masters, Colin L. , Mori, Hiroshi , Morris, John C. , Noble, James M. , Perrin, Richard J. , Visser, Pieter Jelle , Bateman, Randall J. , Gordon, Brian A. , (DIAN), Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Amtashar, Fatima, Bodge, Courtney, Brandon, Susan E. , Buck, Jill , Buckles, Virginia, Chea, Sochenda, Chrem, Patricio, Chui, Helena C., Cinco, Jake, Jack, Clifford, D’Mello, Mirelle , Donahue, Tamara, Douglas, Jane, Edigo, Noelia, Erekin-Taner, Nilufer, Fagan, Anne M. , Farlow, Marty, Farrar, Angela, Feldman, Howard , Flynn, Gigi, Franklin, Erin , Gant, Cortaiga, Gardener, Samantha L. , Gray, Julia, Gurney, Jenny , Hassenstab, Jason, Hirohara, Mie, Hornbeck, Russ C. , DiBari, Siri Houeland, Ikonomović, Snežana, Jerome, Gina, Klunk, William E. , Kuder-Buletta, Elke, Marcus, Daniel S. , Mason, Neal Scott, Maue-Dreyfus, Denise, Montoya, Lucy, Nagamatsu, Akem, Neimeyer, Katie, Norton, Joanne, Raichle, Marc, Ringman, John M. , Roh, Jee Hoon , Shiroto, Tomoyo, Sigurdson, Wendy, Sparks, Paige, Swisher, Laura, Taddei, Kevin , Wang, Peter, Weiner, Mike, Wolfsberger, Mary, Xiong, Chengjie, Tijms, Betty M , Gordon, Brian A , Cruchaga, Carlos , Bateman, Randall J , Masters, Colin L , Xiong, Chengjie , Fox, Nick C , Hassenstab, Jason , Morris, John C , Roh, Jee Hoon , Cash, David M , Feldman, Howard H , Berman, Sarah , Ghetti, Bernardino , Karch, Celeste M. , McDade, Eric , Schofield, Peter R. , Xiong, Chengjie , Scheltens, Philip , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Tijms, Betty M. , (DIAN), Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Allegri, Ricardo , Brandon, Susan, Brooks, William S. , Buck, Jill, Chui, Helena C. , Fujii, Hisako , Goate, Alison , Goldman, Jill , Hassenstab, Jason, Holtzman, David M. , Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Jucker, Mathias , Kasuga, Kensaku , Kawarabayashi, Takeshi , Koeppe, Robert A. , Martins, Ralph N. , Shimada, Hiroyuki , Shoji, Mikio , Sohrabi, Hamid R. , Suzuki, Kazushi , Wang, Jen Chin C. , Xiong, Chengjie, Xu, Xiong, Noble, James M

Brain Communications | July 15, 2020 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/braincomms/fcaa102 Get It

Abstract Structural grey matter covariance networks provide an individual quantification of morphological patterns in the brain. The network integrity is disrupted in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, and network properties show associations with the level of amyloid pathology and cognitive decline. Therefore, these network properties might be disease progression markers. However, it remains unclear when and how grey matter network integrity changes with disease progression. We investigated these questions in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease mutation carriers, whose conserved age at dementia onset allows individual staging based upon their estimated years to symptom onset. From the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network observational cohort, we selected T1-weighted MRI scans from 269 mutation carriers and 170 non-carriers (mean age 38 ± 15 years, mean estimated years to symptom onset −9 ± 11), of whom 237 had longitudinal scans with a mean follow-up of 3.0 years. Single-subject grey matter networks were extracted, and we calculated for each individual the network properties which describe the network topology, including the size, clustering, path length and small worldness. We determined at which time point mutation carriers and non-carriers diverged for global and regional grey matter network metrics, both cross-sectionally and for rate of change over time. Based on cross-sectional data, the earliest difference was observed in normalized path length, which was decreased for mutation carriers in the precuneus area at 13 years and on a global level 12 years before estimated symptom onset. Based on longitudinal data, we found the earliest difference between groups on a global level 6 years before symptom onset, with a greater rate of decline of network size for mutation carriers. We further compared grey matter network small worldness with established biomarkers for Alzheimer disease (i.e. amyloid accumulation, cortical thickness, brain metabolism and cognitive function). We found that greater amyloid accumulation at baseline was associated with faster decline of small worldness over time, and decline in grey matter network measures over time was accompanied by decline in brain metabolism, cortical thinning and cognitive decline. In summary, network measures decline in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease, which is alike sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, and the properties show decline over time prior to estimated symptom onset. These data suggest that single-subject networks properties obtained from structural MRI scans form an additional non-invasive tool for understanding the substrate of cognitive decline and measuring progression from preclinical to severe clinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease.