McLornan, Donal P.

Abstract Introduction The 2022 WHO/ICC classifications of myeloid neoplasms (MNs) incorporated genomics into the existing clinicopathologic framework, defining new (mono)genetic entities. However, this iterative approach resulted in a mix of pathologically and genomically-defined entities, reliant on arbitrary thresholds and historically-derived boundaries between entities. We hypothesised that integrating genomics with other features, de novo from first principles, might better incorporate modern molecular knowledge to define the biological continuum, evolutionary links and overlapping features across MN. Methods The discovery cohort comprised 6484 thoroughly annotated pts. Contemporary diagnoses included 1817 AML, 1695 MDS, 737 MPN, and 1101 MDS/MPN. Non-malignant pts (AA/CHIP/CCUS/ICUS) were included to explore beyond current neoplastic boundaries. 1407 pts had ≥1 follow-up sample/s. Validation was performed in an independent international cohort (n=2012). An unsupervised random forest algorithm was used to integrate status (and VAF) for 28 mutations, karyotypes, CBC features, sex and age (total parameters 144). Features were selected for potential to be independent of BM sampling. Proximity-based multidimensional scaling/PCA were used to visualize latent structure and identify variance-driving features. Results The model projected pts onto a continuous 3-dimensional space. We first applied clustering seeking 1st-order structure, revealing 4 major clusters (C1–C4). These were further subdivided into 58 distinct subclusters (SCs) by an unsupervised iterative clustering approach. All SCs were enriched for distinctive features, with diverse associations linking genomics to clinicopathological/outcome features. Notably, contemporary diagnoses were distributed widely throughout this landscape, with 9/58 SCs containing cases spanning multiple WHO/ICC MN categories. C1 displayed the most internal heterogeneity, with admixed AML, MDS and MDS/MPN pts. It naturally subdivided down to 4th-order subclustering. Ten SCs were dominated by splicing factor mutations. For example, SF3B1MT segregated into 3 SCs, alone or with high-VAF TET2/ASXL1 or DNMT3A mutations. A separate TET2/SRSF2 SC associated with elevated monocyte%, reflecting a discrete CMML-phenotype genomic entity. NPM1MT formed a distinct SC with FLT3-ITD, distinguished further by VAFs of FLT3, TET2, and NRAS. Current genomically-defined AML subtypes separated in the 4th subclustering. C2 encompassed classical MPN driver mutations across 6 SCs, including a distinct CALRMT group and others defined by variable JAK2 VAFs, co-mutation patterns and other CBC features: eg high-VAF SF3B1MT correlated with PB blast%, and concurrent TET2MT with higher Hb/monocyte counts. C3 was characterized by TP53 alterations, with 5 SCs differing by TP53MT burden, 17p lesions, karyotypic complexity and age. Two SCs, one marked by high TP53 VAF+complex karyotype, the other by ch17 lesions, were associated with the worst OS in the whole cohort. C4 contained most known non-malignant pts, dividing into 4 SCs: 2 largely comprising CCUS and AA, while 2 reflect overlaps/convergence between AA and MDS and MPN, respectively. Repurposing single-cell pseudotime analysis suggested multiple disease origins, with various progression trajectories converging on C3. Projecting them onto the model longitudinal samples moved along these derived paths, consistent with their known progression/remission changes, validating the model's biological relevance and predictive utility. Remarkably, the 58 SCs displayed distinct risks of clonal progression and survival. To maximize potential clinical utility we created a pan-MN prognostic score integrating these features. It performed robustly (c-index 0.84), matching/exceeding existing prognostic tools and validated in an independent dataset. Conclusion Integrating clinicopathologic and genomic data we developed ab initio a continuum model of MNs that transcends historical diagnostic boundaries, captures disease evolution and stratifies clinical outcomes. It may better reflect the core biology and natural histories of specific cases, placing more rational boundaries between discrete entities. Potential advantages extend to treatment selection/trial design (in the era of molecularly-targeted therapies) and personalised prognostication throughout each disease course. Expanded validation is needed to resolve complexity in some areas (notably in C2/C4) and validate/refine this prototype framework.

Abstract “Nonclassical” myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations. Unlike classical MPNs, there is no standardized management approach for these conditions, particularly concerning the indications for and management of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. To address this gap, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee and the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) have collaborated to develop shared guidelines aimed at optimizing the selection and management of patients with these rare forms of neoplasms. A comprehensive review of the literature from the publication of the revised fourth edition of the (2016) World Health Organization classification onward was conducted. A multidisciplinary group of experts in the field convened to produce this document, which was developed through multiple rounds of draft circulation. Key recommendations include the early identification of potential transplant candidates, particularly in cases of chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL)/CEL, not otherwise specified (CEL-NOS), myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions with FGFR1, JAK2, ABL1, and FLT3 rearrangements, MDS/MPN with neutrophilia/atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, and MDS/MPN, NOS. For patients with MPN, NOS/MPN unclassifiable, standard recommendations for myelofibrosis should be applied. Similarly, in MDS/MPN with thrombocytosis, transplantation is recommended on the basis of established MDS guidelines. Given the current lack of robust evidence, this document will serve as a valuable resource to guide future research activities, providing a framework for addressing critical unanswered questions and advancing the field.

Introduction: Anemia is a cardinal feature of myelofibrosis (MF), along with splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, often used to manage anemia in patients (pts) with MF, are a negative prognostic factor for overall survival and are associated with diminished quality of life and increased healthcare-related economic burden. Momelotinib (MMB), a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable improvements in anemia, splenomegaly, and symptoms. Prespecified anemia endpoints in MMB phase 3 studies prioritized achievement of a strict transfusion independence response, defined as no transfusions for ≥12 wk immediately before the end of wk 24, with all hemoglobin levels ≥8 g/dL. Longitudinal analysis of transfusion intensity (units per 28 days) in a phase 2 trial of MMB in pts with transfusion-dependent MF demonstrated a reduction in transfusion burden in most (85%) pts (Harrison C, et al. EHA 2023). Here, we further characterize the impact of MMB and comparators on transfusion burden in pts with JAK inhibitor-naive and -experienced MF from the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1 and MOMENTUM trials. Methods: This analysis evaluated time-dependent transfusion burden in pts enrolled in the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1 (NCT01969838) and MOMENTUM (NCT04173494) trials. SIMPLIFY-1 included pts with JAK inhibitor-naive MF randomized (1:1) to receive MMB or ruxolitinib (RUX). In MOMENTUM, pts with symptomatic (Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score ≥10), anemic (hemoglobin <10 g/dL), JAK inhibitor-experienced MF were randomized (2:1) to receive MMB or danazol (DAN). All RBC units transfused were collected during the 24-wk randomized treatment period of each study and during the 84 days before receipt of randomized treatment on study for baseline assessment. Time-dependent transfusion burden was quantified by number of RBC units administered, in a tabular display of baseline- and treatment-period intensity. Pts were grouped jointly based on the baseline- and treatment-period intensity of RBC units per 28 days into ordinal bins: exactly zero units, >0 to 1 unit, >1 to 2 units, >2 to 3 units, >3 to 4 units, and >4 units. Results: In SIMPLIFY-1 (JAK inhibitor-naive pts), 150 of 213 evaluable pts (70%) in the MMB arm and 163 of 216 evaluable pts (76%) in the RUX arm required zero units of RBC transfusion per 28 days at baseline. Of pts who required zero units of transfusion at baseline, a higher proportion in the MMB arm (142 of 150 [95%]) maintained a requirement of zero RBC transfusions during randomized treatment of 24 wks vs the RUX arm (93 of 163 [57%]). Overall, the mean RBC transfusion burden per 28 days declined 0.10 units (SD, 0.701) from baseline to randomized treatment in the MMB arm and increased 0.39 units (SD, 1.016) in the RUX arm. Using ordinal bins, 87% of pts in the MMB arm maintained (144 [67.6%]) or improved (41 [19.2%]) RBC transfusion intensity during randomized treatment compared with baseline vs 54% in the RUX arm (maintained, 94 [43.5%]; improved, 23 [10.6%]) (Figure). In MOMENTUM (JAK inhibitor-experienced pts), most pts had some transfusion requirement at baseline, with 26 of 130 (20%) in the MMB arm and 11 of 65 (17%) in the DAN arm requiring zero units of RBC transfusion per 28 days. During randomized treatment, a higher proportion of pts in the MMB arm (46 of 130 [35%]) required zero units of RBC transfusion vs the DAN arm (11 of 65 [17%]), including a higher proportion of those who had zero RBC transfusion requirement at baseline who maintained zero RBC transfusion requirement during randomized treatment (MMB, 92%; DAN, 64%). The mean RBC transfusion burden per 28 days declined 0.86 units (SD, 1.748) from baseline to randomized treatment in the MMB arm and declined 0.28 units (SD, 1.584) in the DAN arm. Using ordinal bins, 85% of pts in the MMB arm maintained (25 [19.2%]) or improved (85 [65.4%]) RBC transfusion intensity compared with baseline vs 63% in the DAN arm (maintained, 7 [10.8%]; improved, 34 [52.3%]). Conclusions: These data demonstrate that MMB was associated with better maintenance of RBC transfusion intensity and zero RBC transfusion status vs RUX in pts with MF who were JAK inhibitor naive and showed greater reduction in RBC transfusion burden from baseline vs DAN in pts with MF who were JAK inhibitor experienced. Across both trials, ≥85% of pts treated with MMB maintained or improved transfusion intensity.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm that typically manifests with debilitating symptoms that progressively worsen, negatively impacting patients’ quality of life. Fatigue is a multifactorial and burdensome MF-related symptom due to its severity, persistence, and prevalence, with anemia a contributing factor and major unmet need. Clinical trials of the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib have shown consistent anemia benefits, in addition to improvements in MF-related symptoms. The phase 3 MOMENTUM trial in symptomatic and anemic patients met its primary end point, with a greater proportion having a Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Total Symptom Score (TSS) reduction ≥50% at week 24 with momelotinib versus danazol. To support the positive primary end point result, we conducted longitudinal, responder, and time-to-event analyses of patient-reported outcomes from MOMENTUM, as measured by the MFSAF, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) assessments. These analyses demonstrated rapid and durable response benefits with momelotinib, with achievement of first TSS response by day 29 and continued improvement over time. Improvements favored momelotinib versus danazol for each MFSAF individual item, and greater improvements were observed for disease- and cancer-related fatigue and physical functioning at week 24, with significant results for multiple items/domains across the 3 assessments. These findings are consistent in demonstrating that momelotinib provides substantial symptom benefit.

AbstractTo develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), we examined the data of 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in the United States (the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients who received transplantation in Europe (the European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] cohort; n = 623). Patient age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.96), and HLA-matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with an increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin levels <100 g/L at time of transplantation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2-2.19) and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.52) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points), and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61-76), 51% (95% CI, 46-56.4), and 34% (95% CI, 21-49), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; P = .0017) but not of relapse (P = .12). The derived score was predictive of OS (P < .001) and TRM (P = .002) but not of relapse (P = .17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in 2 large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF about the transplantation outcomes.

AbstractBackgroundMyelofibrosis (MF)‐associated constitutional symptoms can severely impact health‐related quality of life. Clinical trials in MF traditionally measure symptom response to treatment as a landmark endpoint of total symptom score (TSS) reduction ≥50% from baseline. However, this dichotomous assessment provides a limited view of clinically relevant symptomatic changes. Herein we evaluated longitudinal change from baseline in TSS over the continuous 24‐week period and individual symptom scores to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of symptom benefits experienced by patients with MF receiving therapy.MethodsLongitudinal symptom change was evaluated using mixed‐effect model repeated measure (MMRM) methodology with individual item‐level analyses to complement the interpretation of the landmark symptom results in the completed phase III SIMPLIFY studies of momelotinib in MF. MMRM compared mean change in TSS from baseline with Week 24 using data from all patient visits. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate item‐level odds ratios using multiple predictive imputations for missing data.ResultsMomelotinib and ruxolitinib groups reported similar overall symptom improvements, with a TSS difference of <1.5 points between groups for each post‐baseline visit in SIMPLIFY‐1. In SIMPLIFY‐2, the improvement in TSS observed in momelotinib‐treated patients was consistent with that observed in SIMPLIFY‐1, whereas progressive TSS deterioration was observed with control. Item‐level scores were heterogeneous in both studies. A similar and greater proportion of momelotinib‐treated patients were categorized as “improved” or “stable” compared with control in SIMPLIFY‐1 and SIMPLIFY‐2, respectively. Odds ratios for between‐group comparison ranged from 0.75 to 1.21 in SIMPLIFY‐1, demonstrating similarity in likelihood of symptom improvement. In SIMPLIFY‐2, the likelihood of symptom improvement in each item was higher in the momelotinib arm.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that momelotinib provides clinically relevant symptom benefits in the JAK inhibitor‐naïve and JAK inhibitor‐exposed settings.

e19040 Background: Clinical trials investigating JAK1/JAK2 inhibitors for myelofibrosis (MF) subjects have measured symptom improvement as a minimum 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at the end of a 24-week treatment period. This landmark analysis is based on post-baseline score changes from Weeks 21 (W21) to 24 and requires vastly different absolute TSS improvements for patients with very high or low baseline (BL) TSS to reach responder status. A phase 3 clinical study, SIMPLIFY-1, randomized 432 intermediate and high risk JAK inhibitor (JAKi) naive MF patients 1:1 to momelotinib (MMB) or ruxolitinib (RUX). Non-inferiority on the MPN-SAF TSS response rate endpoint at W24 was not met (MMB: 28% vs RUX: 42%); however, improvement in each of the 7 TSS items was similar for MMB vs RUX. To understand the discrepancy, we applied item analysis and mixed effect models for repeated measures (MMRM) to SIMPLIFY-1. Methods: Analyses were conducted in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in a symptomatic subset (selected as subjects with BL TSS ≥ 10). The distributions of TSS items were examined at BL and shift in scores at W24 (health state shifts) were assessed. GEE models were used to estimate item-level odds ratios using multiple predictive imputations for missing data. MMRM compared mean change in TSS from BL to W24 using data from all visits. The meaningful change threshold (MCT) was determined using Patient Global Impression of Change. Results: BL scores across items were heterogenous in the MMB and RUX groups; the proportion of subjects with no or mild symptoms (0–3 on a 0-10 point scale) ranged from 44% (tiredness) to 81% (itching). Distributions of BL scores were different across arms with 6 out of 7 items in the MMB arm reporting more severe or very severe symptoms (scores of 7-10) at BL. Despite the imbalance in BL scores, item-level health state shifts showed similar improvements for MMB and RUX. Categorical responder analysis showed no significant differences on any items. Odds ratios for each between-group comparison ranged from 0.74 to 1.20. MMRM mean TSS change at W24 was 6.35 (MMB) vs 7.87 (RUX) in the ITT and 8.80 (MMB) vs 10.46 (RUX) in the symptomatic subset. Mean TSS were near the within-subject MCT of 8 points in the ITT and exceeded the MCT in the symptomatic subset. The between-group difference was 1.52 (95% CI: (0.196, 2.847)) in the ITT and 1.67 (95% CI: -0.134, 3.468) in the symptomatic subset. Conclusions: Comparable item health state shifts at W24 and similar improvements in mean TSS as shown by MMRM, with a minimal between-group difference of 1.52 on the 70 point scale in context of an 8-point MCT suggest MMB provides clinically relevant and comparable symptom improvements to RUX; these analyses require further validation in independent data sets. Imbalance in BL symptom scores in MMB subjects may have contributed to the inability to demonstrate non-inferiority in TSS response rate at W24. Clinical trial information: NCT01969838.