Hinton, Alice

AbstractBackgroundObesity worsens various gastrointestinal pathologies. While bariatric surgery ameliorates obesity, it substantially modifies the gastrointestinal system depending on surgery type, with limited data on subsequent impact on obesity‐related gastrointestinal admissions.MethodsUsing the 2012–2014 Nationwide Readmission Database, we included individuals with obesity who received vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or hernia repair (HR–control surgery). Our main focus was the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for gastrointestinal inpatient admissions within 6 months following surgery compared to the 6 months preceding it, while controlling for several confounding factors. Gastrointestinal admissions were grouped into postoperative complications or obesity‐associated gastrointestinal conditions.ResultsOur cohort included 140,103 adults with RYGB, 132,253 with VSG, and 12,436 HR controls. Postoperative gastrointestinal complications were most common after RYGB, prominently obstruction (aOR = 33.17, 95%CI: 18.01, 61.10), and Clostridium difficile infection (aOR: 12.52, 95%CI: 6.22, 25.19). VSG also saw significantly increased but less frequent similar conditions. Notably, for gastrointestinal conditions associated with obesity, acute pancreatitis risk was higher post‐VSG (aOR = 6.26, 95%CI: 4.02, 9.73). Post‐RYGB patients were most likely to be admitted for cholelithiasis with cholecystitis (aOR: 4.15, 95% CI: 3.24, 5.31), followed by chronic liver disease (aOR: 3.00, 95% CI: 2.33, 3.87). The risk of noninfectious colitis admissions was threefold higher after RYGB and VSG. No gastrointestinal conditions showed an increase after HR.ConclusionDespite weight loss, bariatric surgery was associated with an increased risk of hepato‐pancreatobiliary and colitis admissions related to obesity in the first six postoperative months, with considerable variations in rates of gastrointestinal conditions by surgery type.

Drivers of the inflammatory response in acute pancreatitis remain incompletely understood. Unsaturated fatty acids, specifically palmitoleic, appear to have an association with more severe acute pancreatitis. This finding presents a new clinical understanding of fatty acid toxicity and highlights a potential future target for treatment in severe acute pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are a safe and effective treatment for obesity. However, limited knowledge exists on the underlying biological changes with IGB placement. METHODS: This single-institution study was part of an adjustable IGB randomized controlled trial. Subjects with obesity were randomized in a 2 is to 1 ratio to 32 weeks of IGB with diet/exercise counseling (n = 8) vs counseling alone (controls, n = 4). Diet/exercise counseling was continued for 24 weeks post-IGB removal to assess weight maintenance. We used mass spectrometry for nontargeted plasma lipidomics analysis and 16S rRNA sequencing to profile the fecal microbiome. RESULTS: Subjects with IGBs lost 15.5% of their body weight at 32 weeks vs 2.59% for controls ( P < 0.05). Maintenance of a 10.5% weight loss occurred post-IGB explant. IGB placement, followed by weight maintenance, led to a −378.9 μM/L reduction in serum free fatty acids compared with pre-IGB (95% confidence interval: 612.9, −145.0). This reduction was mainly in saturated, mono, and omega-6 fatty acids when compared with pre-IGB. Polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholines also increased after IGB placement (difference of 27 μM/L; 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 52.8). Compared with controls, saturated and omega-6 free fatty acids (linoleic and arachidonic acids) were reduced after IGB placement. The fecal microbiota changed post-IGB placement and weight maintenance vs pre-IGB ( P < 0.05). Further analysis showed a possible trend toward reduced Firmicutes and increased Bacteroidetes post-IGB and counseling, a change that was not conclusively different from counseling alone. DISCUSSION: IGB treatment is associated with an altered fecal microbiome profile and may have a better effect on obesity-related lipidome than counseling alone.

Abstract PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of food insecurity among patients with cancer and to validate the Hunger Vital Sign (HVS) instrument compared to the standard-of-care USDA 18-item Household Food Security Scale (HFSS). The secondary objective was to assess disparities in food access based on race, zip code and insurance status.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cancer who were hospitalized at The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSU-CCC) were identified to participate by the Department of Social Work. Each patient completed the HVS and the 18-item HFSS. The prevalence of food insecurity was estimated and 95% Wilson score confidence intervals were calculated. The agreement between the prevalence of food insecurity as measured by the two different instruments were compared through the use of McNemar’s test. Disparities in food access based on race, zip code and insurance status were further assessed with Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients participated. We found that the HVS identified food insecurity in 14.3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 9.1, 21.7) of participants, whereas the 18-item HFSS identified 8.6% (95% CI: 4.8, 15.1) of participants. However, there was no significant difference between food insecurity as measured by the HVS and the 18-item HFSS (p = 0.289). There were also no significant differences in food insecurity based on race, insurance status or geographical location of patients.CONCLUSION: The HVS is an alternative to the 18-item HFSS as a valid tool to assess food security amongst hospitalized patients with cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery (BRS) is an effective weight loss method that should, in theory, improve many gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic (GILP) diseases seen with obesity. At the same time, there is an increased morbidity related to BRS’s gastrointestinal alterations. Thus, we examined the short-term impact of BRS type on admission rates of various GILP diseases. METHODS: We queried the 2012-2014 Nationwide Readmission Database to identify obese patients who underwent vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or, as a control, hernia repair surgery (HR). Our primary aim was to compare rates of GILP diseases within 6 months post- and 6 months pre-surgery in the VSG, RYGB, and HR cohorts. In a time to event analysis we evaluated readmission rates up to 11 months post-BRS. RESULTS: We identified a total of 140,103 patients in the VSG cohort, 132,253 patients in the RYGB cohort, and 12,436 patients in the HR cohort. HR patients were slightly older with a higher percentage of Medicare insurance carriers in contrast to VSG and RYGB (Table 1). RYGB was associated with a 33-fold increased risk of intestinal obstructions compared to pre-RYGB ( P < 0.001). Other notably increased GILP diseases after RYGB from highest to lowest risk (Table 2): C. difficile infection [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 12.52, P < 0.001], GI hemorrhage (aOR: 10.95, P < 0.001), biliary disease (aOR: 4.15, P < 0.001) and functional/motility disorders (aOR: 3.57, P < 0.001). In contrast, post- versus pre-VSG patients were most frequently admitted for acute pancreatitis (aOR: 6.26, P < 0.001), followed by C. difficile infection (aOR: 4.86, P < 0.001), biliary disease (aOR: 3.14, P < 0.001), noninfectious gastroenteritis (aOR: 3.05, P < 0.001) and functional/motility disorders (aOR: 2.74, P < 0.001). No increase in admissions was observed in the control HR cohort for any of these diseases. In our time to event analysis, the probability of being admitted was most notable for intestinal obstructions within 30 days after RYGB while functional disorders predominate afterwards (Figure 1). Similarly, patients were more frequently admitted for functional disorders following VSG. CONCLUSION: The type of BRS has a differential impact on GILP admissions after surgery. There may be a limited impact of weight loss on functional disorders that seem to dominate irrespective of BRS type. This data can help better inform patients on the choice of surgery to pursue, however more data are warranted.

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic biliary intervention (BI) is often difficult to perform in patients with prior bariatric surgery (BRS). We sought to analyze outcomes of patients with prior BRS undergoing endoscopic and non-endoscopic BI. Patients and methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2007 – 2011) was reviewed to identify all adult inpatients (≥ 18 years) with a history of BRS undergoing BI. The clinical outcomes of interest were in-patient mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges. Results There were 7,343 patients with prior BRS who underwent BIs where a majority were endoscopic (4,482 vs. 2,861, P < 0.01). The mean age was 50±30.8 years and the majority were females (80.5 %). Gallstone-related disease was the most common indication for BI and managed more often with primary endoscopic management (2,146 vs. 1,132, P < 0.01). Inpatient mortality was not significantly different between patients undergoing primary endoscopic versus non-endoscopic BI (0.2 % vs. 0.7 %, P = 0.2). Patients with sepsis were significantly more likely to incur failed primary endoscopic BI (OR 2.74, 95 % CI 1.15, 6.53) and were more likely to be managed with non-endoscopic BI (OR 2.13, 95 % CI 1.3, 3.5). Primary non-endoscopic BI and failed endoscopic BI were both associated with longer LOS (by 1.77 days, P < 0.01 and by 2.17 days, P < 0.01, respectively) and higher hospitals charges (by $11,400, P < 0.01 and by $ 14,200, P < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion Primary endoscopic management may be a safe and cost-effective approach for patients with prior BRS who need BI. While primary endoscopic biliary intervention is more common, primary non-endoscopic intervention may be used more often for sepsis.

Objectives Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often accompanied by weight loss. We sought to characterize factors associated with weight loss and observed nutritional interventions, as well as define the effect of weight loss on survival. Methods Consecutive subjects diagnosed with PDAC (N = 123) were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate analysis was used to compare subjects with and without substantial (>5%) weight loss. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with weight loss, and survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox survival models. Results Substantial weight loss at diagnosis was present in 71.5% of subjects and was independently associated with higher baseline body mass index, longer symptom duration, and increased tumor size. Recommendations for nutrition consultation and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy occurred in 27.6% and 36.9% of subjects, respectively. Weight loss (>5%) was not associated with worse survival on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–2.30), unless a higher threshold (>10%) was used (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–2.87). Conclusions Despite the high prevalence of weight loss at PDAC diagnosis, there are low observed rates of nutritional interventions. Weight loss based on current criteria for cancer cachexia is not associated with poor survival in PDAC.