Pawlik, Timothy M

Objective: The aim of this work is to formulate recommendations based on global expert consensus to guide the surgical community on the safe resumption of surgical and endoscopic activities. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused marked disruptions in the delivery of surgical care worldwide. A thoughtful, structured approach to resuming surgical services is necessary as the impact of COVID-19 becomes better controlled. The Coronavirus Global Surgical Collaborative sought to formulate, through rigorous scientific methodology, consensus-based recommendations in collaboration with a multidisciplinary group of international experts and policymakers. Methods: Recommendations were developed following a Delphi process. Domain topics were formulated and subsequently subdivided into questions pertinent to different aspects of surgical care in the COVID-19 crisis. Forty-four experts from 15 countries across 4 continents drafted statements based on the specific questions. Anonymous Delphi voting on the statements was performed in 2 rounds, as well as in a telepresence meeting. Results: One hundred statements were formulated across 10 domains. The statements addressed terminology, impact on procedural services, patient/staff safety, managing a backlog of surgeries, methods to restart and sustain surgical services, education, and research. Eighty-three of the statements were approved during the first round of Delphi voting, and 11 during the second round. A final telepresence meeting and discussion yielded acceptance of 5 other statements. Conclusions: The Delphi process resulted in 99 recommendations. These consensus statements provide expert guidance, based on scientific methodology, for the safe resumption of surgical activities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often accompanied by weight loss. We sought to characterize factors associated with weight loss and observed nutritional interventions, as well as define the effect of weight loss on survival. Methods Consecutive subjects diagnosed with PDAC (N = 123) were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate analysis was used to compare subjects with and without substantial (>5%) weight loss. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with weight loss, and survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox survival models. Results Substantial weight loss at diagnosis was present in 71.5% of subjects and was independently associated with higher baseline body mass index, longer symptom duration, and increased tumor size. Recommendations for nutrition consultation and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy occurred in 27.6% and 36.9% of subjects, respectively. Weight loss (>5%) was not associated with worse survival on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–2.30), unless a higher threshold (>10%) was used (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–2.87). Conclusions Despite the high prevalence of weight loss at PDAC diagnosis, there are low observed rates of nutritional interventions. Weight loss based on current criteria for cancer cachexia is not associated with poor survival in PDAC.

251 Background: To assess the effect of adjuvant therapy in gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBC). Methods: Retrospective review was conducted at five institutions to identify pts who had surgery for confirmed dx of GBC from 1985-2008 (N = 189). Pts were excluded if they had chemo alone (N = 8), path other than adenoca (N= 7), carcinoma in situ (N=1), < 30 days of follow-up (N = 2), or missing data (N=14). Of the remaining 156 pts, 58 received surgery only and 98 received adj RT ± chemo. Kaplan-Meier was used for overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional hazards to compare risk factors. Results: Median age of dx was 64.4, 68.0% were female, 37.9% had ≥ stage 2b, 37.2% had + nodes, and 32.1% had + margins. Overall, 35.9% of the patients had simple cholecystectomy (SC) only and 64.1% had radical resection (ER). mOS for pts treated with surgery alone was 49.7 months (95% CI: 24.8 to Inf). On univariate analysis, + margins (HR 2.72, p<0.001) was associated with worse OS, whereas ER compared to SC improved survival in both univariate (HR 0.46, p<0.001) and multivariate (HR 0.53, p=0.033) analyses after adjusting for node/margins, T-stage, adj RT, age, gender, and institution. mOS for the entire cohort vs. adj RT (median 50.4 Gy) ± chemo was 30.7 months (95% CI: 19.2 to 46.9) vs. 26.9 months (95% CI: 15.5 to 39.1). But, compared to surgery alone, the adj group was more likely to have had node +, margin +, or T-stage 3+ (all p<0.001). The adj RT group was also less likely than surgery alone pts to have undergone ER (p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, decreased OS was also found for node + (HR 2.09, p=0.004), margin + (HR 1.84, p=0.043), and T3/T4 disease (HR 2.37, p=0.002). After adjusting for surgical extent, node, margin, T stage, age, gender, and institution, there was improved OS with adj therapy (HR: 0.43, p = 0.020). When stratified by surgical extent, the risk estimate for adj RT improved OS among those with SC (n=56; HR 0.20, p=0.135) and ER (n=100; HR 0.46, p=0.067), but was not statistically significant. Conclusions: ER was associated with improved OS, whereas node/margin+ and T-stage 3+ were associated with worse survival. In multivariate analysis, adj RT improved OS after surgery. Given the poor prognosis of GBC patients with advanced disease, consideration of adj therapy is appropriate. No significant financial relationships to disclose.