Back to Authors

Olthof, Pim

0000-0002-1691-1808

Mayo Clinic

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute

Citations 4

The E-AHPBA—ESSO—Innsbruck consensus recommendations on peri- and postoperative management following liver resection
Maier, Eva , Stättner, Stefan, Carrión-Álvarez, Lucía , Martino, Marcello Di, Primavesi, Florian, Sochorová, Dana , Laarhoven, Stijn van , Balakrishnan, Anita, Buis, Carlijn I. , Cipriani, Federica, Erdmann, Joris, Frampton, A., Fuks, David, Melloul, Emmanuel, Oberkofler, Christian E. , Petritsch, Stefan, Raab, Helmut, Rahbari, Nuh N. , Rappold, Daniela , Ruzzenente, Andrea, Schäfer, Benedikt , Serrablo, Alejandro, Soreide, Kjetil, Ernesto, Sparrelid, Starlinger, Patrick P, Tinguely, Pascale, Dasari, Bobby V M, Donadon, Matteo, Dopazo, Cristina, Gruenberger, T., Jonas, E G, Malik, Hassan, Siriwardena, Ajith K, Braunwarth, Eva , Di Martino, Marcello , Olthof, Pim , van Laarhoven, Stijn , Cipriani, Federica , Erdmann, Joris I , Lancellotti, Francesco , Oberkofler, Christian , Sallinen, Ville , Søreide, Kjetil , Starlinger, Patrick , Aldrighetti, Luca , Donadon, Matteo , Dopazo, Cristina , Gruenberger, Thomas , Viganó, Luca , Maglione, Manuel , Stättner, Stefan , Primavesi, Florian , Breitkopf, Robert , Fuks, David , Gilg, Stefan , Gulla, Aistė , Margreiter, Christian , Reiberger, Thomas , Ruzzenente, Andrea , Schaefer, Benedikt, Schnitzbauer, Andreas A. , Søreide, Kjetil , Sparrelid, Ernesto , Starlinger, Patrick , Stavrou, Gregor Alexander , Aldrighetti, Luca , Dasari, B. , Gruenberger, Thomas , Jonas, Eduard , Malik, Hassan , Siriwardena, Ajith K. , Maglione, Manuel

British Journal of Surgery | December 30, 2025 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/bjs/znaf272 Get It

Abstract Background Liver surgery carries a high risk of complications due to the complex interplay of patient-related factors, disease characteristics, and liver function. Expertise is essential for healthcare professionals managing hepatobiliary patients. This European consensus provides evidence-based guidance on selected aspects of peri- and postoperative care. Methods A modified Delphi process was used to achieve consensus, with a 70% agreement threshold. The expert panel comprised hepatobiliary surgeons, anaesthetists, hepatologists, a specialist nurse, and a physiotherapist. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Six topics were addressed: thromboprophylaxis; perioperative antibiotics; prehabilitation/nutrition/mobilization; bile leak including bilioenteric anastomosis leaks; post-hepatectomy haemorrhage; and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Evidence appraisal and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. A patient representative reviewed the guideline. Results Searching the literature yielded 204 included publications from an initial 6514. Thirty-two statements were formulated with a median evidence level of 2. Evidence strength varied by topic with noticeably lower evidence levels in complex surgery settings and less prevalent conditions. In some topics, study heterogeneity and specific inclusion criteria resulted in conditional recommendations, despite high-level evidence. Notably, the weakest evidence was found for perioperative thromboprophylaxis and PHLF management. Strong recommendations were formulated for prehabilitation, early postoperative mobilization, and avoidance of routine drain use. Several evidence gaps warranting multicentre studies were identified. Conclusion Optimizing peri- and postoperative care after liver resection remains challenging. Standardizing key practices and addressing evidence gaps through collaborative research are vital to improve outcomes.
E-AHPBA–ESSO–ESSR Innsbruck consensus guidelines for preoperative liver function assessment before hepatectomy
Primavesi, Florian , Maglione, Manuel , Cipriani, Federica , Denecke, Timm , Oberkofler, Christian E. , Dasari, B. , Heil, Jan , Sgarbură, Olivia , Søreide, Kjetil , Díaz-Nieto, Rafael, Geisel, Dominik , Henninger, Benjamin , Hessheimer, Amelia J. , Mole, Damian J. , Reiberger, Thomas , Schnitzbauer, Andreas A. , Sparrelid, Ernesto , Stockmann, Martin , Truant, Stéphanie , Aldrighetti, Luca , Braunwarth, Eva , D’Hondt, Mathieu , DeOliveira, Michelle L., Erdmann, Joris I. , Kaczirek, Klaus , Malik, Hassan , Öfner, Dietmar , Rahbari, Nuh N. , Göbel, Georg , Siriwardena, Ajith K. , Dasari, Bobby V M , Sgarbura, Olivia , Søreide, Kjetil , Lesurtel, Mickaël , Mole, Damian , Schnitzbauer, Andreas A , Aldrighetti, Luca , Erdmann, Joris I , Gruenberger, Thomas , Öfner, Dietmar , Siriwardena, Ajith K , Maier, Eva , Reiberger, Thomas , Cipriani, Federica , Oberkofler, Christian , Maglione, Manuel , Starlinger, Patrick , Fondevila, Constantino , Frampton, Adam E. , Lesurtel, Mickaël , Öllinger, Robert , Olthof, Pim , Schwarz, Christoph C. , Fuks, David , Gruenberger, Thomas , Stättner, Stefan

British Journal of Surgery | July 20, 2023 | Volume: 110 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1331-1347

10.1093/bjs/znad233 Get It

Abstract Background Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment. Methods A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. Results Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2− to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination. Conclusion These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.
Current evidence on posthepatectomy liver failure: comprehensive review
Sparrelid, Ernesto , Dasari, B. , Erdmann, Joris I. , Santol, Jonas , Gilg, Stefan , Dasari, Bobby V M , Erdmann, Joris I , Santol, Jonas , Olthof, Pim , Starlinger, Patrick

BJS Open | November 23, 2022 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/bjsopen/zrac142 Get It

AbstractIntroductionDespite important advances in many areas of hepatobiliary surgical practice during the past decades, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents an important clinical challenge for the hepatobiliary surgeon. The aim of this review is to present the current body of evidence regarding different aspects of PHLF.MethodsA literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles for each topic of PHLF covered in this review. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms on PubMed for articles on PHLF in English until May 2022.ResultsUniform reporting on PHLF is lacking due to the use of various definitions in the literature. There is no consensus on optimal preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy to avoid PHLF, although many try to estimate future liver remnant function. Once PHLF occurs, there is still no effective treatment, except liver transplantation, where the reported experience is limited.DiscussionStrict adherence to one definition is advised when reporting data on PHLF. The use of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria of PHLF is recommended. There is still no widespread established method for future liver remnant function assessment. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective way to treat severe, intractable PHLF, but for many indications, this treatment is not available in most countries.