Chascsa, David M.

Background: Given aspirin’s biologic plausibility for antifibrotic and antineoplastic effects, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between aspirin use and major liver-related outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis restricted exclusively to patients with biopsy- or registry-confirmed MASLD. Methods: A comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed in October 2025. Studies enrolling adults with a confirmed MASLD diagnosis were included; those with viral hepatitis or alcohol-related liver disease were excluded. Outcomes assessed included hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), fibrosis progression, cirrhosis, all-cause and liver-related mortality, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, and liver disease progression. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Results: Seven studies met the eligibility criteria, with approximately 720,000 individuals included. Pooled analysis showed that aspirin use was associated with a significantly lower HCC risk (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.43–0.81; I2 = 83%). No statistically significant association was found between aspirin use and cirrhosis incidence (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.13–2.37; I2 = 83.4%) or GI bleeding (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.74–1.66; I2 = 98.9%). Among the two studies that explored all-cause mortality, aspirin was associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.78–0.95; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Aspirin use is associated with a reduced risk of HCC and all-cause mortality in MASLD without significantly increasing GI bleeding or hemorrhagic strokes. These associations may reflect aspirin’s anti-inflammatory properties in liver disease. Further RCTs are needed to verify the causal role of aspirin in MASLD management.

ABSTRACT Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising agents for the management of advanced HCC. By reducing tumour burden, ICIs may serve as a downstaging/bridging tool to improve transplant candidacy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of patients receiving pre‐LT ICIs. Methods Multicenter, retrospective cohort study from January 2018 to December 2024, including 48 patients who received ICIs prior to LT (ICI cohort). A control cohort (non‐ICI cohort) was built (1:3) using propensity score matching including 144 patients who underwent LT for HCC without prior ICI. Results Within the ICI cohort ( N = 48) rejection occurred in 9 patients (18.8%), all biopsy‐proven, with a median onset of 31 days post‐LT (12.0–182.0). The median washout period was 60 days (13–96). Patients experiencing rejection had shorter washout periods ( p = 0.029). All rejection episodes were successfully managed; two were steroid‐resistant, one requiring re‐transplantation. There were no rejection‐related deaths. Of the 5 patients with HCC recurrence, 60% received ICI for < 90 days ( p = 0.027). Comparison between the ICI and non‐ICI cohort revealed no significant differences in rejection rates (18.8% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.916), graft failure, HCC recurrence, or overall mortality. Overall survival (OS) did not differ between ICI and non‐ICI patients ( p = 0.625) or between those with and without rejection ( p = 0.119). Rejection was not associated with increased mortality, with deaths primarily attributed to infection or HCC recurrence. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that rejection rates were similar in patients receiving ICIs pre‐LT and it can be safely managed.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer prognosis significantly, but their use has been avoided in liver transplant recipients (LTr) due to poorly characterized rejection risk. Data surrounding rejection risk are extremely suboptimal, with highly variable immunosuppression approaches and follow-up, and do not account for the learning curve in managing immunosuppression in the setting of ICI. A standardized institutional clinical practice protocol was developed in 2021 for immunosuppression management to facilitate ICI therapy with prospective close follow-up for immunosuppression levels and allograft function. Of 20 LTr, 12 (60%) were male, 18 (90%) were Caucasian, with a mean age of 54.0 (SD 11.2) years. However, 13/20 had 2 or more failed cancer therapies before ICI. Hepatocellular carcinoma ​(HCC) (N=7), lung (N=3), and melanoma (N=3) were the most frequent. Time from first ICI treatment to death was <30 days (N=5), 30–59 days (N=4), 60–89 days (N=1), and >90 days (N=6). Most deaths were cancer-related, reflecting the late stage of disease. ICI toxicity occurred in 3 LTr; pneumonitis (N=1, 5%), myocarditis (N=1, 5%), and acute cellular rejection (N=1, 5%). Four patients remain alive 178–341 days with stable allograft function and slow reduction in immunosuppression. Three out of 4 patients have a partial cancer response, and 1 with slowed progression of disease. ICI treatment in the immunosuppressed LTr is feasible with careful immunosuppression management and follow-up. Demonstrating a low rejection risk should allow for earlier utilization of these agents to improve cancer prognosis. Optimizing rejection risk with cancer response requires ongoing study.

Background/Objectives: The growing prevalence of metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)/metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is forecasted to be over 55% by 2040, representing a significant driver of cirrhosis and highlighting demand for effective therapeutic interventions. The therapeutic landscape is evolving with agents, like glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), under active investigation. A common concern across emerging therapies is potentially precipitating decompensation in patients with existing cirrhosis, necessitating careful consideration in this population. Case Presentation: A 46 y.o. female with obesity and cirrhosis from MASH and alcohol who underwent a deceased-donor liver transplant developed steatohepatitis within a year post-transplant after gaining 36 kg. Transient elastography revealed controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) 400 dB/m (S3 steatosis) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) 61.2 kPa (advanced fibrosis). Follow-up biopsy confirmed severe steatohepatitis (NAS 7/8) and advanced fibrosis (F3), attributed to metabolic dysfunction without evidence of alcohol recurrence. She decompensated with ascites and varices, leading to transplant re-enlistment at MELD-Na 29. Despite two years of intensive lifestyle modification, losing 17 kg, and recompensation, her follow-up elastography showed persistent steatosis (S3) and advanced fibrosis (F4). Subsequent allograft biopsy revealed progression to cirrhosis (F4) with ongoing steatohepatitis (NAS 3/8). Tirzepatide was initiated for the development of type 2 diabetes, attributed to steroids used for immunosuppression. After 2 years on tirzepatide, she lost 43.1 kg. Shockingly, her follow-up elastography demonstrated fibrosis regression with LSM 5.5 kPa (F1) and steatohepatitis resolution with CAP 204 dB/m (S0). Follow-up liver biopsy confirmed fibrosis regression to F2-F3 and steatohepatitis resolution (NAS 1/8). Conclusions: This case challenges the widely accepted dogma that liver MASH cirrhosis is irreversible. Using multiple liver fibrosis monitoring modalities, cirrhosis reversal was demonstrated and attributed to mechanisms of GLP-1/GIP RA therapy. This study suggests that GLP-1/GIP RA may be safe in cirrhosis and may result in fibrosis regression.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its progressive form, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), are among the most prevalent causes of chronic liver disease worldwide, closely linked to the global rise in overweight and obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Until recently, treatment options were limited to lifestyle interventions, with no approved pharmacologic therapies. Resmetirom, a liver-directed, selective thyroid hormone receptor beta (THR-β) agonist, is a promising disease-modifying agent that targets hepatic lipid metabolism, inflammation, and fibrosis. Clinical trials, including the pivotal phase 3 MAESTRO-NASH and MAESTRO-NAFLD-1 trials, have demonstrated significant improvements in liver fat reduction, lipid profiles, histological endpoints, and health-related quality of life, with a favorable safety profile. In March 2024, the FDA granted accelerated approval of resmetirom for adults with MASH and moderate-to-advanced fibrosis, marking a significant milestone in MASLD treatment. This review discusses the mechanistic rationale, preclinical data, and pivotal clinical trial outcomes supporting resmetirom’s role in MASLD/MASH management, while outlining ongoing research needs, including long-term safety, pediatric evaluation, and biomarker development for optimized patient selection.

ABSTRACTThe incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) is expected to remain significant due to rising rates of transplants performed with livers donated after circulatory death (DCD), despite the use of machine perfusion. Absent established pharmacologic interventions against this progressive etiology of allograft dysfunction and failure, we describe the use of fenofibrate—a cheap and widely‐accessible peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor agonist that downregulates bile acid production—to impede IC progression in 15 DCD liver recipients who were not responding to reactive, standard‐of‐care management. All patients were undergoing serial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopathy (ERC) to maintain biliary patency but demonstrated progressive cholestasis, with serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) rising 70.3% over the 90 days preceding fenofibrate. Cholestasis improved in all patients after fenofibrate initiation, with a 63.9% reduction in mean ALP at 90 days, maintained at 270 days (p = 0.02) and 360 days (p = 0.06). ALP improvement was associated with reduced ERC frequency during and after fenofibrate treatment, and this improvement was independent of concurrent ERC or ursodeoxycholic acid use during fenofibrate treatment. In patients who stopped treatment, ALP increased. No fenofibrate‐associated adverse events were seen. These preliminary data support the further study of agents that downregulate bile acid production as a means of impeding IC in DCD livers.

614 Background: Liver transplantation (LT) offers a 5-year survival exceeding 70% for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be used to downstage or bridge to transplantation. This study aims to evaluate the safety of ICIs prior to LT. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study, involving 9 centers, included adults who received ICIs and, subsequent LT, between 2019 and 2023. The ICI cohort was matched by age, sex, liver diseases and transplant date (1:3) with a similar cohort of HCC transplanted patients that did not receive ICIs. Results: The ICI cohort included 45 patients (Table part 1). The most common underlying liver diseases were viral. 15.5% of patients had macrovascular invasion and, 62.2% multifocal disease. The most commonly used ICI was nivolumab (75.6%), followed by atezolizumab-bevacizumab (17.8%). The median follow up was 32.5 months (17.4 - 47.6). The median ICI duration was 147 days (129.5-276.5), with a median interval of 58 days (22–193) between the last ICI dose and LT. There were 8 (17.8%) cases of graft rejection, 2 steroid-resistant leading to 1 graft failure. There were 4 (8%) HCC recurrences. During follow-up there were 6 deaths, 2 related to HCC recurrence and 4 non liver related. When compared with 135 non-ICI cohort patients, there were no differences within the groups (Table part 2). Importantly, we found no significant differences in crude rejection rates (p=0.5). Conclusions: Our study suggest that ICI treatment prior to LT is safe. ICI rejection primarily occurs in the acute post-transplant period (within 3 months), with a low risk of death due to graft failure. Further clinical trials are needed. Part 1: ICI cohort descriptive analysis. N (%); Median (IQR); Part 2: Comparison between cohorts. N (%); Mean (SD). (part 1) ICI-cohort n=45 General data Male 38 (84.4) Age 61.2 (7.6) Etiology of liver diseases Hepatitis C 17 (37.8)Hepatitis B 6 (13.3)MASLD 6 (13.3)Viral +Alcohol 5 (11.1)Alcohol 3 (6.7)Autoimmune 3 (6.7)Other 3 (6.7)Combined viral 2 (4.4) Largest tumor (mm) 39 (22) Macrovascular invasion 7 (15.5) Multifocal 28 (62.2) Locoregional therapy 36 (80.0) Number of locoregional therapies 2 (2) Immunotherapy Nivolumab 34 (75.6) Atezolizumab/bevacizumab 8 (17.8) Pembrolizumab 1 (2.2) Nivolumab+pembrolizumab 1 (2.2) PD1 inhibitor clinical trial 1 (2.2) Days of ICI treatment 147 (203) Radiological tumor response ICI No 17 (37.8) Transplant Deceased donor 43 (95.6) Washout period (days) 58 (171) Induction therapy (anti-thymoglobulin) 8 (17.8) Outcomes Rejection Biopsy proven 8 (17.8) 8 (100) Time to rejection (days) 43 (102) Graft failure Rejection 2 (4.4)1 (2.2) HCC recurrence 4 (8) Deaths 6 (13.3) Follow up Since transplant (months) 32.5 (30.2) (part 2) ICI-cohort (n=45) Non-ICI cohort (n= 135) P Post transplant rejection rate 8 (17.8) 32 (23.7) 0.53 Time to rejection (days) 180.1 (SD 218) 62.2 (SD 62.8) 0.25 Overall deaths 6 (13.3) 10 (7.4) 0.36

Background. Solid organ transplant recipients are at risk of severe coccidioidomycosis and are given prophylaxis to mitigate the risk. Patients with seropositive testing typically receive lifelong prophylaxis; currently, this prophylaxis strategy includes patients who are positive only for IgM by enzyme immunoassay (EIA-IgM-only), although this result may be falsely positive. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study at a large-volume transplant center in an endemic coccidioidomycosis region to compare outcomes of non–lung transplant recipients who were seropositive for Coccidioides but discontinued prophylaxis (case patients) to outcomes of patients who continued prophylaxis (controls). Results. No case or control patients developed active coccidioidomycosis during the follow-up period. Before transplant, 62 of 77 case patients (80.5%) had a single positive serologic test, of whom 27 of 62 were EIA-IgM-only positive (43.5%). In contrast, 57 of 77 controls (74.0%) had a single seropositive result (16/57 [28.1%] were EIA-IgM-only). The single EIA-IgM-only result was classified as falsely positive by infectious disease consultants in 20 of 43 patients (46.5%) compared with all other Coccidioides serologic results (13/111 [11.7%], P < 0.001). Lifetime antifungal prophylaxis was felt to be unnecessary for 28 of 43 patients (65.1%) who were EIA-IgM-only versus 31 of 111 patients (27.9%) with other serologic results (P < 0.001). Conclusions. For patients repeatedly positive for EIA-IgM-only and no evidence of seroconversion, compatible clinical illness, or radiographic findings, discontinuing antifungal prophylaxis may be reasonable after the first posttransplant year.