Back to Authors

Pierluissi, Valeria

0009-0000-5566-8903

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in the management of post–liver transplant weight gain: A multicenter, observational study
Khan, Mohammad Qasim , Becchetti, Chiara , Jouid, M R, Mortuza, Rokhsana , Panda, Saurav, Pierluissi, Valeria , Stegagnini, M. , Bajunayd, Amani, Viganò, Raffaella, Ogunsakin, E, Elzaanoun, Reyad, Wadhwani, Arpana Kumari, Belli, Luca Saverio, Berzigotti, Annalisa, Watt, Kymberly D., Khan, Mohammad Qasim , Punchhi, Gopika , Viganò, Raffaella , Ogunsakin, Ropo Ebenezer , Elzaanoun, Reyad, Berzigotti, Annalisa , Watt, Kymberly D.

Liver Transplantation | May 28, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/lvt.0000000000000917 Get It

Post–liver transplant (LT) weight gain and metabolic dysfunction predispose to cardiovascular (CV) morbidity, allograft steatosis, and reduced long-term survival. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) promote weight loss and improve cardiometabolic health, yet evidence in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) is limited. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of GLP-1 RAs in post-LT weight management. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult LTRs treated with GLP-1 RAs across 4 international centers (January 1, 2010–June 30, 2025). Regular GLP-1 RA users were compared with matched non-users by age, sex, obesity, and diabetes status, transplant year, and center. The primary outcome was the change in body weight 1-year post-exposure. Secondary outcomes included glycemic and lipid profiles, kidney and allograft function, immunosuppression effects, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and adverse effects. Longitudinal analyses used linear mixed models with multiple imputation. Among 104 GLP-1 RA users, 68.3% initiated therapy for diabetes; subcutaneous semaglutide was most used at a median dose of 0.82±0.46 mg weekly. Treatment led to significant reductions in body weight (−3.8 kg; −3.9%, p <0.001), body mass index (BMI) (−1.6 kg/m 2 ; −5.0%, p <0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (−0.48%, p =0.002), with modest lipid improvement. Liver function tests and immunosuppression trough levels remained stable, and no treatment-limiting adverse events occurred. In matched analyses (80 GLP-1 RA users vs. 116 non-users), GLP-1 RAs facilitated greater weight loss (−3.4 kg difference, p =0.009) and HbA1c reduction (−0.43% difference in HbA1c, p =0.042) without increased risk of allograft dysfunction, T-cell–mediated rejection (TCMR), or MACE. This multicenter, international study demonstrates GLP-1 RAs are safe and moderately effective in reducing weight and improving metabolic parameters post-LT, without adverse effects on allograft function or immunosuppression, despite limitations of low dosing. Prospective, randomized trials of GLP-1 RAs in LTRs are thus warranted.
Safety of immunotherapy after liver transplantation—A multicenter study of a prospective standardized clinical practice protocol
Watt, Kymberly D. , Panda, Saurav , Pierluissi, Valeria , Abarca, Rachel, Rusch, D, Tapia, Amanda L. , Chascsa, David M. , Azhari, Hassan, Rusch, Danielle, Chascsa, David M , Panda, Saurav , Abou‐Alfa, Ghassan K.

Liver Transplantation | October 13, 2025 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 685-692

10.1097/lvt.0000000000000749 Get It

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer prognosis significantly, but their use has been avoided in liver transplant recipients (LTr) due to poorly characterized rejection risk. Data surrounding rejection risk are extremely suboptimal, with highly variable immunosuppression approaches and follow-up, and do not account for the learning curve in managing immunosuppression in the setting of ICI. A standardized institutional clinical practice protocol was developed in 2021 for immunosuppression management to facilitate ICI therapy with prospective close follow-up for immunosuppression levels and allograft function. Of 20 LTr, 12 (60%) were male, 18 (90%) were Caucasian, with a mean age of 54.0 (SD 11.2) years. However, 13/20 had 2 or more failed cancer therapies before ICI. Hepatocellular carcinoma ​(HCC) (N=7), lung (N=3), and melanoma (N=3) were the most frequent. Time from first ICI treatment to death was <30 days (N=5), 30–59 days (N=4), 60–89 days (N=1), and >90 days (N=6). Most deaths were cancer-related, reflecting the late stage of disease. ICI toxicity occurred in 3 LTr; pneumonitis (N=1, 5%), myocarditis (N=1, 5%), and acute cellular rejection (N=1, 5%). Four patients remain alive 178–341 days with stable allograft function and slow reduction in immunosuppression. Three out of 4 patients have a partial cancer response, and 1 with slowed progression of disease. ICI treatment in the immunosuppressed LTr is feasible with careful immunosuppression management and follow-up. Demonstrating a low rejection risk should allow for earlier utilization of these agents to improve cancer prognosis. Optimizing rejection risk with cancer response requires ongoing study.