Neben-Wittich, M.A.

121 Background: We evaluated the role of pre-treatment pulmonary function testing (PFT) in predicting the likelihood of cardiac and/or pulmonary toxicity for esophagus cancer patients receiving trimodality therapy. Methods: From 2007 to 2013, 64 patients with esophageal cancer received trimodality therapy at a single tertiary center with pre-treatment PFTs. The odds ratio of pre-treatment PFT as a predictor of cardiopulmonary toxicity was assess with univariate analysis (UVA). FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) and DLCO (diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide) were assessed per 0.5-unit decrease. Percent FEV1 and DLCO predicted were assessed per 10% decrease. Results: The median age was 62 years (range, 41-79) with 88% male patients. A total of 70% of patients had adenocarcinoma with 66% having stage 3 disease. Most patients were former (43%) or current smokers (32%) and 18% had COPD. One or more cardiac comorbidities were observed in 54% of patients. The median RT dose was 50 Gy and the most frequent concurrent chemotherapy was cisplatin/5FU (53%). The median pre-treatment FEV1 and DLCO was 2.8 liters (range, 1-4.9) and 22.5 mL/min/mmHg (range, 17.2-25.5), respectively. This correlated to a median percent predicted value for FEV1 and DLCO of 85% (range, 30-124%) and 81.5% (range, 49-119%), respectively. The overall rate of any cardiac and pulmonary toxicity was 35% and 50%, respectively. Percent predicted value of both FEV1 and DLCO was statistically associated with pulmonary but not cardiac toxicity (Table). Conclusions: Patients with compromised pre-treatment pulmonary function are at higher risk of developing post-treatment pulmonary toxicities. Pulmonary function testing should be routinely performed prior to initiation of trimodality therapy for patient risk stratification. [Table: see text]

711 Background: For patients with stage IVA rectal cancer with liver metastases treated with curative-intent chemotherapy and surgery, the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (RT) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pelvic RT on oncologic outcomes in this patient population. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients with stage IVA rectal adenocarcinoma with liver metastases treated with curative-intent resection of the primary tumor and all liver metastases at our institution between 1991 and 2010. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared between patients who did or did not receive pelvic RT using chi-square and unpaired ttests. Survival and recurrence estimates were calculated from date of initial diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Local recurrence (LR) was defined as recurrence in the pelvis occurring at or before distant recurrence (DR). Cox regression was used to compare rates of freedom from LR (FFLR), freedom from DR (FFDR), and overall survival (OS) between patients who did or did not receive pelvic RT. Results: The analysis included 65 patients. Median patient age at diagnosis was 59 years (range, 27-87). Tumor stage was T2 (n = 4), T3 (n = 53), or T4 (n = 8). The median number of liver metastases was 2 (range, 1-14). Surgery was low anterior resection (n = 54) or abdominoperineal resection (n = 11). All patients received perioperative fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy. Pelvic RT was administered to 35 patients (54%), either preoperatively (n = 22) or postoperatively (n = 13). Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range 25-58). Patient characteristics were similar for those who did or did not receive pelvic RT. Median follow-up was 3.7 years. The 3-year estimates of FFLR, FFDR and OS were 81% vs 58% (p =.056), 35% vs 29% (p =.75), and 66% vs 71% (p =.81) for RT vs no RT, respectively. Conclusions: In this analysis of patients with stage IVA rectal cancer with liver metastases undergoing curative intent therapy, pelvic RT (vs. no pelvic RT) was associated with a trend to lower rates of LR and similar rates of DR and OS.