Back to Authors

Funk, Ryan K.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in patients with stage IVA rectal adenocarcinoma.
Fossum, Croix C. , Romak, Lindsay B., Funk, Ryan K., Harmsen, William S. , Haddock, Michael G. , Neben-Wittich, M.A. , Martenson, James A., Mathis, Kellie L. , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Larson, David W. , Smoot, Rory L. , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 711-711

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.711 Get It

711 Background: For patients with stage IVA rectal cancer with liver metastases treated with curative-intent chemotherapy and surgery, the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (RT) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pelvic RT on oncologic outcomes in this patient population. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients with stage IVA rectal adenocarcinoma with liver metastases treated with curative-intent resection of the primary tumor and all liver metastases at our institution between 1991 and 2010. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared between patients who did or did not receive pelvic RT using chi-square and unpaired ttests. Survival and recurrence estimates were calculated from date of initial diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Local recurrence (LR) was defined as recurrence in the pelvis occurring at or before distant recurrence (DR). Cox regression was used to compare rates of freedom from LR (FFLR), freedom from DR (FFDR), and overall survival (OS) between patients who did or did not receive pelvic RT. Results: The analysis included 65 patients. Median patient age at diagnosis was 59 years (range, 27-87). Tumor stage was T2 (n = 4), T3 (n = 53), or T4 (n = 8). The median number of liver metastases was 2 (range, 1-14). Surgery was low anterior resection (n = 54) or abdominoperineal resection (n = 11). All patients received perioperative fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy. Pelvic RT was administered to 35 patients (54%), either preoperatively (n = 22) or postoperatively (n = 13). Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range 25-58). Patient characteristics were similar for those who did or did not receive pelvic RT. Median follow-up was 3.7 years. The 3-year estimates of FFLR, FFDR and OS were 81% vs 58% (p =.056), 35% vs 29% (p =.75), and 66% vs 71% (p =.81) for RT vs no RT, respectively. Conclusions: In this analysis of patients with stage IVA rectal cancer with liver metastases undergoing curative intent therapy, pelvic RT (vs. no pelvic RT) was associated with a trend to lower rates of LR and similar rates of DR and OS.
Risk factors for locoregional relapse after transoral robotic surgery for human papillomavirus–related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Funk, Ryan K., Moore, Eric J. , García, Joaquín J. , Harmsen, William S. , Stoddard, David G. , Vêncio, Eneida Franco , Foote, Robert L. , Price, Katharine A. , Daniel, J.

Head & Neck | December 15, 2015 | Volume: 38 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hed.24298 Get It

AbstractBackgroundFactors predicting locoregional relapse after surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were identified in the pre‐human papillomavirus (HPV) era. We examined whether traditional indications for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) still correlate with locoregional relapse in HPV‐positive patients after transoral robotic surgery (TORS).MethodsRetrospective review of oropharyngeal SCC cases identified patients with HPV‐positive tumors who did not receive adjuvant therapy after TORS despite intermediate or high‐risk features.ResultsMedian follow‐up was 26.7 months (range, 4.9–73.1 months). Five of 25 eligible patients (20%) relapsed at a median 4.8 months (range, 3.2–7.8 months). Two of 18 (11%) intermediate and 3 of 7 (43%) high‐risk patients relapsed. Kaplan–Meier 2‐year locoregional relapse‐free survival estimates for intermediate and high‐risk patients were 88% and 57% (p = .078), respectively.ConclusionTraditional indications for adjuvant RT or CRT were associated with high risk of locoregional relapse in HPV‐positive patients treated with TORS alone. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1674–E1679, 2016
The Rare Cancer Network: Ongoing Studies and Future Strategy
Özşahin, Mahmut , Mirimanoff, René-Olivier, Thariat, Juliette , Sun, Xu , Atalar, Banu , Lassen–Ramshad, Yasmin , Uğurluer, Gamze , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Houtte, Paul Van , Krengli, Marco , Zhang, Lan Jun, Funk, Ryan K., Rooney, Jessica, Miller, Robert C. , Hallemeier, Christopher, Chang, Kenneth , Funk, Ryan, Mirimanoff, R.O., Krishnan, Sunil , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Chang, Kenneth Tou En , Thariat, Juliette

Rare Tumors | November 7, 2014 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 91-94

10.4081/rt.2014.5465 Get It

The Rare Cancer Network (RCN) was formed in the early 1990's to create a global network that could pool knowledge and resources in the studies of rare malignancies whose infrequency prevented both their study with prospective clinical trials. To date, the RCN has initiated 74 studies resulting in 46 peer reviewed publications. The First International Symposium of the Rare Cancer Network took place in Nice in March of 2014. Status updates and proposals for new studies were heard for fifteen topics. Ongoing studies continue for cardiac sarcomas, thyroid cancers, glomus tumors, and adult medulloblastomas. New proposals were presented at the symposium for primary hepatic lymphoma, solitary fibrous tumors, Rosai-Dorfman disease, tumors of the ampulla of Vater, salivary gland tumors, anorectal melanoma, midline nuclear protein in testes carcinoma, pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea, osteosarcomas of the mandible, and extra-cranial hemangiopericytoma. This manuscript presents the abstracts of those proposals and updates on ongoing studies, as well a brief summary of the vision and future of the RCN.