Krengli, Marco

e17019 Background: To report the role of combined chemotherapy in SGT. Methods: 251 patients with SGC treated in 2001-2011 were included in a collaborative IRB-approved retrospective RCN study. Chemotherapy is empirically administered based on extrapolation from conventional head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Ca) (SCC) and data on systemic treatment in localized SGC are lacking. Results: Median age was 60 yo with 2/5 females/males. Tumor sites were the parotid 74.9%, submandibular 16%, sublingual 2.8% or minor gland 4%. Histologic findings were adenoid cystic (ACC) 17.3%, mucoepidermoid (MEC) 19.8%, adenoCa 15.6%, salivary duct (SDC) 10.3%, acinic cell (Aci) 6.2%, ex-pleomorphic 7.8%, undifferentiated 4.9%, myoepithelial 3.3%, epithelial myoepithelial 1.6%, basal cell 1.2%, lymphoepithelial 1.2%, others 4.0%. Surgery was performed in 95.1% (complete resection 38.1%). T stages 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 17.2%, 41.2%, 18.1% and 23.5% respectively. N stages were N0 61%, N1 13%, N2 24%, N3 2%. Perineural, vascular or lymphatic emboli were present in 47%, 24%, 27% respectively. Irradiation was performed postoperatively 96% or exclusively 4% (unilateral 84%, performed w/ photons only 78%, IMRT 41%). Chemotherapy was administered in 18%, dependent on grade, N stage, and emboli (p ≤ .05). None of 17 ex-pleomorphic, 25% of undifferentiated, 36% of SDC, and 66.7% of lymphoepithelial Ca received chemotherapy (p NS). With a median follow-up of 42 months for living patients, crude local, regional, metastatic relapse rates were 112% (in field 85%), 10%, 25%, respectively. Crude death rate was 28% including 77% from SGC. 5-year survival (5y OS) was 63%. The only prognostic factor was nodal involvement (p .002). However, 5y OS differed by histology: ACC 79%, MEC 84%, Aci 67%, SCC 43%, adenoCa NOS 40%, SDC 37%. Chemotherapy did not improve survival whatever histology. Conclusions: Further prospective studies are warranted to define the role of chemotherapy by histology in the setting of localized SGT. Also molecular profile-driven systemic treatments should be investigated.

Abstract Background Paraganglioma of the head and neck (HNPGL) are rare often benign tumors. Surgery and radiation therapy (RT) are the main treatment choices. We present an analysis of outcome and toxicity after RT from 13 institutions of the Rare Cancer Network. Methods Data were collected using a questionnaire concerning patients' characteristics, treatment, and outcome. A total of 81 patients with 82 HNPGL were analyzed. Results The median follow‐up was 48 months (1‐456). Sixty‐two lesions were treated with conventional RT and 20 lesions with stereotactic RT. Local control (LC) was achieved in 69 out of 77 lesions. Late toxicity occurred in 17 patients. Patients treated with stereotactic RT experienced neither disease progression nor late toxicity. Four patients with a follow‐up longer than 20 years experienced disease progression. Conclusion RT for HNPGL offered good local control with acceptable toxicity. Stereotactic RT might offer better results. Long‐term follow‐up is required.

IntroductionAdult prostatic sarcoma (PS) is a rare disease. While surgery is considered the standard approach, the role of other therapies is not completely established. We report results of the largest multicentric contemporary cohort of PS patients.Materials and MethodsThis study included 61 adult PS patients treated in 16 American and European Institutions. Median age was 64.4 years (range: 22‐87). Curative surgery was delivered in 48 patients (prostatectomy = 26, cystoprostatectomy = 22), usually with lymphadenectomy (n = 40). Curative radiotherapy (RT) was delivered in 32 patients, as radical (n = 5), neoadjuvant (n = 10), or postoperative treatment (n = 17). Eighteen patients received chemotherapy. None of the patients received hormonal therapy.ResultsMedian follow‐up was 72 months (95%CI: 55‐not reached). Five‐year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), cancer‐specific survival, disease‐free survival, and metastases‐free rates were 47%, 53%, 56%, 35%, and 35%, respectively. Notably, curative RT (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or definitive) was associated with improved 5‐year LC (55% vs. 31%, P = 0.02) and OS (59% vs. 46%, P = 0.1). Surgically treated patients presenting with a cT3‐4 tumor (n = 31), who received RT (n = 24), had a significantly improved 5‐year LC (68% vs, 33%, P = 0.004) and OS (65% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) rates compared to patients not receiving RT. cT4 patients demonstrated a significantly lower 5‐year OS (43% vs. 61%, P = 0.006) and LC (29% vs. 69%, P < 0.001) rates. Histologic subtype was not associated with LC and OS, but patients with prostatic stromal sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or sarcomatoid carcinoma had worse 5‐year LC compared to other types (47% vs. 55%) and OS (49% vs. 58%).ConclusionAdult PS has a poor prognosis. Locally advanced tumors have poor LC and OS rates. Curative RT should be considered part of the multidisciplinary approach to PS.

The Rare Cancer Network (RCN) was formed in the early 1990's to create a global network that could pool knowledge and resources in the studies of rare malignancies whose infrequency prevented both their study with prospective clinical trials. To date, the RCN has initiated 74 studies resulting in 46 peer reviewed publications. The First International Symposium of the Rare Cancer Network took place in Nice in March of 2014. Status updates and proposals for new studies were heard for fifteen topics. Ongoing studies continue for cardiac sarcomas, thyroid cancers, glomus tumors, and adult medulloblastomas. New proposals were presented at the symposium for primary hepatic lymphoma, solitary fibrous tumors, Rosai-Dorfman disease, tumors of the ampulla of Vater, salivary gland tumors, anorectal melanoma, midline nuclear protein in testes carcinoma, pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea, osteosarcomas of the mandible, and extra-cranial hemangiopericytoma. This manuscript presents the abstracts of those proposals and updates on ongoing studies, as well a brief summary of the vision and future of the RCN.

Approximately, twenty years ago, the Rare Cancer Network (RCN) was formed in Lausanne, Switzerland, to support the study of rare malignancies. The RCN has grown over the years and now includes 130 investigators from twenty-four nations on six continents. The network held its first international symposium in Nice, France, on March 21-22, 2014. The proceedings of that meeting are presented in two companion papers. This manuscript reviews the history of the growth of the RCN and contains the abstracts of fourteen oral presentations made at the meeting of prior RCN studies. From 1993 to 2014, 74 RCN studies have been initiated, of which 54 were completed, 10 are in progress or under analysis, and 9 were stopped due to poor accrual. Forty-four peer reviewed publications have been written on behalf of the RCN.