Whitaker, Thomas J.

Abstract Background Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) is essential for image‐guided particle therapy (IGPT), providing daily patient positioning, anatomical monitoring, and treatment verification. However, conventional single‐detector CBCT suffers from poor soft‐tissue contrast, long acquisition times, and motion artifacts, reducing its effectiveness for adaptive radiotherapy workflows. Addressing these challenges requires an advanced CBCT reconstruction approach capable of enhancing image quality while reducing scan time and radiation exposure. Purpose This study introduces a Dual Detector Combined Scanning (DDCS) CBCT reconstruction algorithm to overcome conventional CBCT limitations. By integrating a dual‐source, orthogonal imaging setup, DDCS significantly reduces scanning time and imaging artifacts. A modified Parker‐weighting algorithm further improves image reconstruction accuracy, ensuring high‐fidelity visualization. The goal is to enhance adaptive radiotherapy by improving real‐time patient positioning, dose verification, and motion management. Methods A dual‐detector CBCT system was designed to acquire orthogonal projections simultaneously, reducing scan time and improving data completeness. A modified Parker‐weighting algorithm corrected angular overlap distortions, ensuring better reconstruction accuracy. The system was evaluated using numerical and physical phantom studies to assess spatial resolution, contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and artifact reduction. Additionally, a dynamic phantom simulated respiratory motion, validating motion robustness for adaptive radiotherapy. Performance was compared against single‐detector CBCT, focusing on image fidelity, noise suppression, and computational efficiency. Results DDCS‐CBCT demonstrated higher CNR, reduced motion artifacts, and improved spatial resolution, leading to more accurate anatomical visualization. The system's efficiency enables faster, more reliable patient setup in IGPT while maintaining a lower imaging dose. Conclusion The proposed DDCS‐CBCT approach significantly improves imaging accuracy, reduces scan time, and enhances real‐time volumetric guidance in IGRT/IGPT. These findings support the clinical feasibility of the DDCS system and its integration into online adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare long-term patient-reported outcomes in bowel and urinary domains between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Patients with clinical T1–T2 prostate cancer receiving IMRT or IMPT at a tertiary cancer center from 2015–2018 were analyzed to determine the changes in the prospectively collected bowel function (BF), urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (UO), and urinary incontinence (UI) domains of EPIC-26. The mean changes in EPIC-26 scores were evaluated from pretreatment to 24 months post-radiotherapy for each modality. A score change >50% of the baseline standard deviation was considered a clinically meaningful change. Results: A total of 82 patients treated with IMRT (52.2%) and 56 patients treated with IMPT (53.3%) completed the questionnaire at baseline and 24 months post-RT. There were no baseline differences in domain scores between treatment modalities. At 24 months post-radiotherapy, there was a significant and clinically meaningful decline in the BF mean score in the IMRT cohort (−4.52 (range −50, 29.17), p = 0.003), whereas the decline in BF score did not reach clinical relevance or significance (−1.88 (range −37.5, 50), p = 0.046) when accounting for the Bonferroni adjustment in the IMPT cohort. A higher proportion of patients treated with IMRT had a clinically relevant reduction in BF when compared with IMPT (47.37% vs. 25.93%, p = 0.017). The mean changes in the UI and UO scores of the IMRT and IMPT cohorts were neither statically significant nor clinically relevant. Conclusions: IMPT leads to a smaller decrease in BF than IMRT at 24 months post-RT, while there was no differential effect on UO and UI.

1. Background: We sought to determine acute and subacute changes in cardiac function after proton beam (PBT) and photon beam (PhT) radiotherapy (RT) using conventional and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) in patients with malignant breast and thoracic tumors. 2. Methods: Between March 2016 and March 2017, 70 patients with breast or thoracic cancer were prospectively enrolled and underwent transthoracic echocardiography with comprehensive strain analysis at pretreatment, mid-treatment, end of treatment, and 3 months after RT. 3. Results: PBT was used to treat 44 patients; PhT 26 patients. Mean ± SD age was 55 ± 12 years; most patients (93%) were women. The median (interquartile range) of the mean heart dose was lower in the PBT than the PhT group (47 [27–79] vs. 217 [120–596] cGy, respectively; p < 0.001). Ejection fraction did not change in either group. Only the PhT group had reduced systolic tissue Doppler velocities at 3 months. 2D-STE showed changes in endocardial and epicardial longitudinal, radial, and circumferential early diastolic strain rate (SRe) in patients undergoing PhT (global longitudinal SRe, pretreatment vs. end of treatment (p = 0.04); global circumferential SRe, pretreatment vs. at 3-month follow-up (p = 0.003); global radial SRe, pretreatment vs. at 3-month follow-up (p = 0.02) for endocardial values). Epicardial strain values decreased significantly only in patients treated with PhT. Patients in the PhT group had a significant decrease in epicardial global longitudinal systolic strain rate (GLSRs) (epicardial GLSRs, at baseline vs. at end of treatment [p = 0.009]) and in GCSRe and GRSRe (epicardial GCSRe, at baseline vs. at 3-month follow-up (p = 0.02); epicardial GRSRe, at baseline vs. at 3-month follow-up (p = 0.03)) during treatment and follow-up. No changes on 2D-STE were detected in the PBT group. 4. Conclusions: Patients who underwent PhT but not PBT had reduced tissue Doppler velocities and SRe values during follow-up, suggesting early myocardial relaxation abnormalities. PBT shows promise as a cardiac-sparing RT technology.

AbstractIntroductionThis study presents a comprehensive collision avoidance framework based on three‐dimension (3D) computer‐aided design (CAD) modeling, a graphical user interface (GUI) as peripheral to the radiation treatment planning (RTP) environment, and patient‐specific plan parameters for intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT).MethodsA stand‐alone software application was developed leveraging the Varian scripting application programming interface (API) for RTP database object accessibility. The Collision Avoider software models the Hitachi ProBeat‐V half gantry design and the Kuka robotic couch with triangle mesh structures. Patient‐specific plan parameters are displayed in the collision avoidance software for potential proximity evaluation. The external surfaces of the patients and the immobilization devices are contoured based on computed tomography (CT) images. A “table junction‐to‐CT‐origin” (JCT) measurement is made for every patient at the time of CT simulation to accurately provide reference location of the patient contours to the treatment couch. Collision evaluations were performed virtually with the program during treatment planning to prevent four major types of collisional events: collisions between the gantry head and the treatment couch, gantry head and the patient's body, gantry head and the robotic arm, and collisions between the gantry head and the immobilization devices.ResultsThe Collision Avoider software was able to accurately model the proton treatment delivery system and the robotic couch position. Commonly employed clinical beam configuration and JCT values were investigated. Brain and head and neck patients require more complex gantry and patient positioning system configurations. Physical measurements were performed to validate 3D CAD model geometry. Twelve clinical proton treatment plans were used to validate the accuracy of the software. The software can predict all four types of collisional events in our clinic since its full implementation in 2020.ConclusionA highly efficient patient‐specific collision prevention program for scanning proton therapy has been successfully implemented. The graphical program has provided accurate collision detection since its inception at our institution.

Abstract Background Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a promising radiotherapeutic method by which the proton Bragg peak may be exploited to reduce the dose to non-target normal tissues, when compared with the conventional photon treatment (PhT). Purpose To evaluate the mechanical function of the left ventricle by endocardial longitudinal (GLS-basic strain), circumferential (GCS) and radial strain (GRS) and systolic (SRs) and early diastolic (SRe) strain rate following thoracic radiotherapy. Methods Between March 2016 and March 2017, 58 patients with breast or thoracic cancer scheduled to receive radiotherapy were enrolled prospectively and, underwent 2D-STE echocardiography with basic (GLS) and comprehensive (GCS, GRS,GLSRs, GCSRs, GRSRs, GLSRe, GCSRe, GRSRe parameters) analysis at pre-treatment, mid-treatment, end of treatment, 3 month and 1 year follow-up. LVEF was calculated by the biplane Simpson technique. Shapiro-Wilk's test was performed to evaluate the normal distribution of the data. Comparison between groups was performed with Student's t-test or Wilcoxon test for quantitative variables and with Chi-Square test or Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables. Tukey-Kramer method was used to compare means during follow up. A p-value &lt;0.05 was assumed as the level of statistical significance. Results Mean age was 53.3±10.9 years and 91.3% were women. PBT was used to treat 38 patients; PhT in 20. The median of the mean heart dose was lower with PBT than PhT (79±92 vs 829±1121 cGy, respectively [P&lt;.001]). No significant changes in LVEF or GLS for PBT or PhT were seen. Comprehensive strain analysis showed changes in endocardial longitudinal, radial, and circumferential early diastolic strain rate (SRe) in patients undergoing photon beam (PhT) up to one year of follow up (Table 1). No changes were detected in the PBT group. All other variables were non-significant (Not shown). Conclusion This is the first longitudinal study, with a one-year follow-up, that shows the relaxation properties of LV are compromised during PhT but not PBT. These findings should be followed in time to evaluate their influence on overall heart function. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Table 1

AbstractPurposeTo prospectively assess acute differences in patient‐reported outcomes in bowel and urinary domains between intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsBowel function (BF), urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (UO), and urinary incontinence (UI) domains of EPIC‐26 were collected in patients with T1‐T2 prostate cancer receiving IMRT or PBT at a tertiary cancer center (2015‐2018). Mean changes in domain scores were analyzed from pretreatment to the end of and 3 months post‐radiotherapy for each modality. A clinically meaningful change was defined as a score change >50% of the baseline standard deviation.ResultsA total of 157 patients receiving IMRT and 105 receiving PBT were included. There were no baseline differences in domain scores between cohorts. At the end of radiotherapy, there was significant and clinically meaningful worsening of BF and UO scores for patients receiving either modality. In the BF domain, the IMRT cohort experienced greater decrement (−13.0 vs −6.7, P < .01), and had a higher proportion of patients with clinically meaningful reduction (58.4% vs 39.5%, P = .01), compared to PBT. At 3 months post‐radiotherapy, the IMRT group had significant and clinically meaningful worsening of BF (−9.3, P < .001), whereas the change in BF score of the PBT cohort was no longer significant or clinically meaningful (−1.2, P = .25). There were no significant or clinically meaningful changes in UO or UI 3 months post‐radiotherapy.ConclusionsPBT had less acute decrement in BF than IMRT following radiotherapy. There was no difference between the two modalities in UO and UI.

305 Background: Toxicity due to radiotherapy (RT) may differ in patients (pts) with prostate cancer who receive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT). Methods: Patient-reported bowel function (BF), urinary incontinence (UI), and urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (UO) domains of the Expanded Prostate Index Composite Questionnaire (EPIC-26) were prospectively collected in pts with localized prostate cancer receiving either IMRT (n=157) or PBT (n=105) to the prostate +/- proximal seminal vesicles for clinical stage T1-T2 N0 prostate cancer at a single tertiary cancer center between 2015 and 2018. Changes in domain scores were analyzed from pretreatment to the end of RT and 3 months post-RT, assessing the acute effects of each modality. A clinically relevant change was defined as a score change that exceeded 50% of the standard deviation of a baseline value. Results: At baseline there was no difference in the scores of BF, UI, and UO domains between IMRT and PBT cohorts. At the end of RT, pts treated with either modality had a statistically significant and clinically relevant worsening of BF and UO compared to baseline. Pts treated with IMRT experienced a significantly greater decrement in BF compared to the PBT cohort (-13 vs -9, p<0.01), including significantly more IMRT pts having a clinically relevant deterioration in BF compared to PBT pts (58% vs 40%, p=0.01). Though there was a statistically significant deterioration in UI in the IMRT cohort (-4, p<0.001), this did not reach the predefined threshold for clinical relevance. Three months following RT, the IMRT group continued to have statistically significant and clinically relevant worsening of BF (-9, p<0.001), whereas the change in BF domain score of the PBT cohort was no longer statistically significant or clinically relevant compared to baseline (-1, p=0.25). There were no statistically significant or clinically relevant changes in UO or UI in either cohort at three months when compared to baseline. Conclusions: Pts who received IMRT or PBT reported unique patterns of toxicity, and pts treated with IMRT had worse decrement in BF immediately after and three months following RT, compared to those treated with PBT.

147 Background: Lymphopenia during radiation therapy (RT) has been associated with worse oncologic outcomes in a number of malignancies, including esophageal cancer (EC). No studies to date have investigated specific dosimetric parameters associated with this lymphopenia in EC. We performed an analysis of RT dose to multiple organs at risk (OARs) to investigate associations with grade 4 lymphopenia (G4L). Methods: Consecutive EC patients receiving curative intent chemoradiotherapy +/- surgery between July of 2015 and December of 2017 were included. Lymphocyte nadir was defined as the lowest lymphocyte count during RT. G4L was defined as absolute lymphocyte count <200/mm3. Dose to OARs including aorta, body, bone marrow, heart, liver, lung, and spleen were calculated. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed for each OAR at the 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 35, 40, and 50 Gy levels with volume receiving dose ‘x’(VxGy) analyzed as a continuous variable per 10% increase. Clinical tumor volume (CTV) and RT modality (photon vs. proton) as well clinical factors including sex, stage (I/II vs. III/IV), age (per 10 year increase), and BMI (per 5 unit increase) were also analyzed. Results: One hundred forty-four pts were identified for inclusion. Seventy-nine pts received photon RT and 65 proton RT. Chemotherapy was weekly carbotaxol (99%). G4L at nadir was 40% overall (56% photon, 22% proton). By organ, body V1-V30Gy (OR 1.45-8.18, p<0.01), heart V1-V30Gy (OR 1.24-1.49, p<0.01), liver V1-V35Gy (OR 1.23-2.75, p<0.01), lung V1-V30Gy (OR 1.26-5.73 p<0.01), and spleen V1-V40Gy (OR 1.26-1.49 p<0.01) were highly associated with G4L whereas dose to aorta and bone marrow were not. Advanced stage (OR, 3.92 p<0.01), photon vs. proton (OR 4.58 p<0.01), and CTV (per 100 cc’s (OR=1.21, p<0.01)) were also associated with G4L. Sex, age, and BMI were not associated with G4L. Conclusions: Low to intermediate dose volumes to OARs including body, spleen, liver, lungs, and heart were associated with G4L. These findings provide rational for the differences seen in rates of G4L for photon versus proton RT.