Back to Authors

Kumbhari, Vivek

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-9006

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Citations 34

Endoscopic bariatric therapies for obesity: a review
Staudenmann, Dominic , Sui, Zhixian , Saxena, Payal , Kaffes, Arthur J. , Marinos, George , Kumbhari, Vivek , Aepli, Patrick, Sartoretto, Adrian , Staudenmann, Dominic A

Medical Journal of Australia | August 1, 2021 | Volume: 215 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 183-188

10.5694/mja2.51179 Get It

Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for the treatment of gastric sleeve stenosis: a feasibility and safety study
Zhang, Linda Y. , Schweitzer, Michael , Khashab, Mouen A. , Kumbhari, Vivek , Canto, Marcia Irene

Endoscopy | July 5, 2021 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 04 | Pages: 376-381

10.1055/a-1544-4923 Get It

Abstract Background Traditional endoscopic treatments have limited success in gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS). Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) could conceivably obliterate the twist/angulation that causes GSS through a tunneled stricturotomy. We report early outcomes of G-POEM for GSS treatment. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients with GSS treated with G-POEM at our center. The primary end point was clinical success, defined as symptom improvement with resumption of adequate oral intake, without requiring further intervention. Results 13 patients (mean age 43 ± 10.9 years; 12 female) underwent G-POEM for predominantly helical (11/13, 85 %) GSS. Three (23 %) had concurrent sleeve leak and 10 (77 %) had prior GSS treatment. Two intraoperative complications occurred, with no deviation to the procedure; no major complications occurred. At median follow-up of 175 (interquartile range [IQR] 119–260) days, clinical success was achieved in 10 patients (77 %). Median Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score in responders decreased from 2.06 (IQR 1.5–2.8) to 0.39 (IQR 0.2–0.5). Three patients (23 %) required surgical revision. Conclusions G-POEM was feasible and safe, and may provide an alternative option for those averse to undergoing surgical revision for treatment of GSS.
Full-thickness resection device (FTRD) for treatment of upper gastrointestinal tract lesions: the first international experience
Khashab, Mouen A., Sharaiha, Reem Z. , Hajifathalian, Kaveh , Ichkhanian, Yervant , Dawod, Qais, Schmidt, Arthur , Glaser, Nicholas, Vosoughi, Kia , Templeton, Adam W. , Samarasena, Jason , Chehade, Nabil El Hage , Lee, John G., Chang, Kenneth J. , Mizrahi, Meir, Barawi, Mohammed, Irani, Shayan , Friedland, Shai , Korc, Paul , Aadam, A. Aziz , Kowalski, Thomas E., Smallfield, George , Ginsberg, Gregory G. , Kumta, Nikhil A. , Tang, Shou-jiang, Naga, Yehia M. , Amateau, Stuart K. , Kasmin, Franklin, Goetz, Martin , Seewald, Stefan , Kumbhari, Vivek , Ngamruengphong, Saowanee , Mahdev, Srihari, Mukewar, Saurabh , Sampath, Kartik, Carr‐Locke, David L. , Khashab, Mouen A. , Meining, Alexander , Diehl, David L. , Grimm, Ian S. , James, Theodore , Al‐Haddad, Mohammad , Fukami, Norio , Lajin, Michael

Endoscopy International Open | September 22, 2020 | Volume: 08 | Issue: 10 | Pages: E1291-E1301

10.1055/a-1216-1439 Get It

Abstract Background and study aims The Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) provides a novel treatment option for lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection techniques. There are limited data on the efficacy and safety of FTRD for resection of upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) lesions. Patients and methods This was an international multicenter retrospective study, including patients who had an endoscopic resection of an upper GIT lesion using the FTRD between January 2017 and February 2019. Results Fifty-six patients from 13 centers were included. The most common lesions were mesenchymal neoplasms (n = 23, 41 %), adenomas (n = 7, 13 %), and hamartomas (n = 6, 11 %). Eighty-four percent of lesions were located in the stomach, and 14 % in the duodenum. The average size of lesions was 14 mm (range 3 to 33 mm). Deployment of the FTRD was technically successful in 93 % of patients (n = 52) leading to complete and partial resection in 43 (77 %) and 9 (16 %) patients, respectively. Overall, the FTRD led to negative histological margins (R0 resection) in 38 (68 %) of patients. A total of 12 (21 %) mild or moderate adverse events (AEs) were reported. Follow-up endoscopy was performed in 31 patients (55 %), on average 88 days after the procedure (IQR 68–138 days). Of these, 30 patients (97 %) did not have any residual or recurrent lesion on endoscopic examination and biopsy, with residual adenoma in one patient (3 %). Conclusions Our results suggest a high technical success rate and an acceptable histologically complete resection rate, with a low risk of AEs and early recurrence for FTRD resection of upper GIT lesions.
Keeping the fistula open: paradigm shift in the management of leaks after bariatric surgery?
Kumbhari, Vivek , Abu Dayyeh, Barham K, Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu

Endoscopy | August 29, 2016 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 09 | Pages: 789-791

10.1055/s-0042-113127 Get It