Aronne, Louis J.

Abstract Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with obesity and cardiovascular risk. Results from the SURMOUNT-OSA studies demonstrated significant reduction of a number of cardiometabolic risk measures in participants with OSA and obesity following treatment with tirzepatide. Objectives: Systematically analyze all tirzepatide treatment related changes of cardiometabolic risk measures in SURMOUNT-OSA studies and investigate to what extent these changes were mediated by reductions in weight and/or OSA-related measures. Methods: The SURMOUNT-OSA master protocol comprised two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 studies. Study 1 (N=234) and 2 (N=235) included participants with moderate-to-severe OSA and obesity, who at screening reported not using, or using positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, respectively. The design and rationale of the studies have been published previously (1). The current analysis investigated the association of treatment with tirzepatide or placebo with SURMOUNT-OSA pre-specified cardiometabolic risk measures including blood pressure, and levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), HDL-C, non-HDL-C, triglycerides, fasting insulin. Further analyses included change in HOMA-IR with tirzepatide compared to placebo, and mediation analysis to determine the proportion of observed changes attributable to reductions in body weight, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden (SASHB). Results: In Study 1, participants experienced greater difference in change from baseline with tirzepatide compared to placebo in SBP (-7.9 mmHg; 95% CI -11.0 to -4.9; p<0.001), and DBP (-3.2 mmHg; 95% CI -5.4 to -1.0; p=0.005) at 48 weeks, and hsCRP (-28.9±8.2%; p=0.003), HDL-C (7.2±2.1%; p<0.001), non-HDL-C (-13.0±3.1%; p<0.001), triglycerides (-32.2±3.7%; p<0.001), fasting insulin (-41.4±5.0%; p<0.001), and HOMA-IR (-48.0±4.9%; p<0.001) at 52 weeks. In Study 2, participants experienced greater differences in change from baseline following tirzepatide compared to placebo in SBP (-4.3 mmHg; 95% CI -7.3 to -1.2; p=0.007) at 48 weeks, and hsCRP (-45.1±8.0%; p<0.001), HDL-C (10.0±2.8%; p<0.001), non-HDL-C (-14.3±2.5%; p<0.001), triglycerides (-31.5±3.7%; p<0.001), fasting insulin (-45.4±5.4%; p<0.001), and HOMA-IR (-54.8±5.0%; p<0.001) at 52 weeks. Statistically significant independent mediation effect of changes in OSA metrics was observed on hsCRP, HOMA-IR and triglycerides. In addition, the combination of changes in weight and OSA metrics, but not weight or OSA improvements alone, had a significant mediation effect on non-HDL-C. There was no significant mediation effect of weight or OSA metrics observed on DBP. Conclusions: In the SURMOUNT-OSA program trials, tirzepatide appeared to have significant cardiometabolic benefits for patients with moderate-to-severe OSA and obesity. Based on the mediation analysis, treating both sleep-disordered breathing and obesity is likely required to optimize cardiometabolic benefits for patients with OSA and obesity.

Background We conducted this study to compare the weight loss outcome of intragastric balloons (IGBs) in conjunction with pharmacotherapy vs IGB and intensive lifestyle changes alone. Methods This was a multicenter, non-randomized, retrospective study involving 4 academic hospitals. Patients underwent IGB placement with or without concomitant anti-obesity pharmacotherapy. The primary outcome was percent total weight loss (TBWL) after IGB placement at 6 and 12 months. Results This study included 102 patients, with 23 patients (mean age 46.6 years, 82.6% female) treated with IGB/pharmacotherapy and 79 patients (mean age 46.0 years, 88.6% female) treated with IGB/lifestyle modifications. Patients had a 100% follow-up rate at 6 and 12 months. At 6 months following IGB placement, both groups achieved a similar %TBWL. At 12 months, %TBWL was greater in the IGB/pharmacotherapy group (12.6% ± 1.2 vs 9.7% ± 0.7, P = .04). 65.2% of patients achieved ≥10% TBWL at 12 months in the IGB/pharmacotherapy group, compared to 38.0% in the IGB/lifestyle group ( P < .05). The proportion of patients that achieved ≥15% weight loss at 12 months was also significantly different between the IGB/pharmacotherapy and IGB/lifestyle groups (30.4% vs 20.3%, P < .05). Discussion IGB with concomitant use of pharmacotherapy did not improve weight loss while the IGB was in place compared to IGB and lifestyle changes. However, patients receiving IGB with pharmacotherapy did have greater weight loss and diminished weight regain after balloon removal compared to those receiving just IGB and lifestyle changes.