Pritchard, Kathleen I.

Abstract Learning Objectives Discuss methods for improving the efficiency of global clinical trials. Explain the need for national regulatory authorities and collaborative cancer groups to initiate efforts to quicken the activation process in their countries. Describe the activation process of phase III studies and its complex and heterogeneous regulation across different geographic and economic regions. Purpose. This study measured the time taken for setting up the different facets of Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization (ALTTO), an international phase III study being conducted in 44 participating countries. Methods. Time to regulatory authority (RA) approval, time to ethics committee/institutional review board (EC/IRB) approval, time from study approval by EC/IRB to first randomized patient, and time from first to last randomized patient were prospectively collected in the ALTTO study. Analyses were conducted by grouping countries into either geographic regions or economic classes as per the World Bank's criteria. Results. South America had a significantly longer time to RA approval (median: 236 days, range: 21–257 days) than Europe (median: 52 days, range: 0–151 days), North America (median: 26 days, range: 22–30 days), and Asia-Pacific (median: 62 days, range: 37–75 days). Upper-middle economies had longer times to RA approval (median: 123 days, range: 21–257 days) than high-income (median: 47 days, range: 0–112 days) and lower-middle income economies (median: 57 days, range: 37–62 days). No significant difference was observed for time to EC/IRB approval across the studied regions (median: 59 days, range 0–174 days). Overall, the median time from EC/IRB approval to first recruited patient was 169 days (range: 26–412 days). Conclusion. This study highlights the long time intervals required to activate a global phase III trial. Collaborative research groups, pharmaceutical industry sponsors, and regulatory authorities should analyze the current system and enter into dialogue for optimizing local policies. This would enable faster access of patients to innovative therapies and enhance the efficiency of clinical research.

Purpose In patients with hormone-dependent postmenopausal breast cancer, standard adjuvant therapy involves 5 years of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole. The steroidal inhibitor exemestane is partially non–cross-resistant with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors and is a mild androgen and could prove superior to anastrozole regarding efficacy and toxicity, specifically with less bone loss. Patients and Methods We designed an open-label, randomized, phase III trial of 5 years of exemestane versus anastrozole with a two-sided test of superiority to detect a 2.4% improvement with exemestane in 5-year event-free survival (EFS). Secondary objectives included assessment of overall survival, distant disease–free survival, incidence of contralateral new primary breast cancer, and safety. Results In the study, 7,576 women (median age, 64.1 years) were enrolled. At median follow-up of 4.1 years, 4-year EFS was 91% for exemestane and 91.2% for anastrozole (stratified hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.18; P = .85). Overall, distant disease–free survival and disease-specific survival were also similar. In all, 31.6% of patients discontinued treatment as a result of adverse effects, concomitant disease, or study refusal. Osteoporosis/osteopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, vaginal bleeding, and hypercholesterolemia were less frequent on exemestane, whereas mild liver function abnormalities and rare episodes of atrial fibrillation were less frequent on anastrozole. Vasomotor and musculoskeletal symptoms were similar between arms. Conclusion This first comparison of steroidal and nonsteroidal classes of aromatase inhibitors showed neither to be superior in terms of breast cancer outcomes as 5-year initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer by two-way test. Less toxicity on bone is compatible with one hypothesis behind MA.27 but requires confirmation. Exemestane should be considered another option as up-front adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.

Abstract Background: Based on recent breast cancer literature, we hypothesized that there could be substantive differences in apparent efficacy estimates using a log-normal (LN) survival model rather than with standard Kaplan-Meier (K-M) or Cox model methods. While both Cox and LN survival analyses offer greater specification by individual patient characteristics, the LN model may more robustly estimate survival under model misspecification. Methods: We recently pooled data for 5 NCIC CTG primary breast cancer trials: MA.5, MA.12, MA.14, MA.21, and MA.27. The total patient count for patients who received at least 1 dose of trial therapy is 11,253. Compilation included definition of STEEP endpoints (C Hudis, JCO, 2008) and standardized factor categorizations. The primary endpoint is Breast Cancer Free Interval (BCFI) defined as the time from randomization until recurrence: first local invasive or DCIS; regional, or distant; contralateral invasive or DCIS; or death from breast cancer. We found substantive evidence of non-proportionality for 7 factors compiled for the meta-analyses. In this work, we fit multivariate Cox and LN models with these 7 factors, lymph node status and pathologic T status. We then compare BCFI efficacy estimates for patient and tumour characteristics at 1-, 3-, and 5-years obtained with K-M, Cox, and LN models. Results: There was evidence that the Cox assumption of proportional hazards was violated for 7 factors: age, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, anthracycline use, chemotherapy use, race, and ECOG performance status. Differences between models were intrinsically affected by timing and extent of non-proportionality; there was no consistent pattern. In particular, investigations to date indicate efficacy estimates with absolute differences between K-M, Cox and LN estimates which varied by time of assessment: at 1-year 0.0 to 6.7%, at 3-years 0.4 to 18.6%, and at 5-years 0.2 to 17.0%. BCFI estimates with the K-M were inconsistently closer to those with the LN or Cox model: for K-M to Cox at 1-year 0.4 to 5.2%, at 3-years 0.4 to 15%, at 5-years 0.4 to 14.3%; for K-M to LN at 1-year 0.0 to 6.7%, at 3-years 0.5 to 18.6%, at 5-years 0.2 to 17.0%; for Cox to LN at 1-year 0.8 to 1.8%, at 3-years 1.9 to 6.0%, at 5-years 0.6 to 5.7%. K-M and Cox models have step-wise adjustments at events for K-M and Cox, rather than smooth modeling with the LN. Discussion: Even with reasonably large population subgroups, there were substantive differences in apparent survival (0.0 to 18.6%) between K-M, Cox and LN model types. The magnitude of differences in survival estimates was large enough to be clinically relevant and warrant further consideration as we evaluate new therapies and prognostic/predictive factors. We will be statistically investigating framework robustness under differing levels of model misspecification. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-01.

Abstract Background: The non-steroidal reversible aromatase inhibitor (AI), anastrozole (A) is approved as adjuvant monotherapy in hormone receptor (HR) positive early breast cancer (EBC). The steroidal irreversible AI exemestane (E) is approved in sequence after an initial 2-3 years of tamoxifen. MA27 tested the hypothesis that exemestane would have greater efficacy and better end-organ safety than anastrozole for several reasons: E is an irreversible and more potent AI than A; unlike A, E does not induce intra-tumoral aromatase and; through its mild androgenic activity E may exert a second anti-tumor effect and a more favorable bone and lipid metabolism profile than A. Initially the study also tested the role of a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, used in combination with an AI. However, celecoxib was discontinued early in MA27 following identification of cardiovascular toxicity with COX-2 inhibitors. Methods: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive primary breast cancer were randomized after adequate local treatment to 5 years of adjuvant A (1mg/day) or E (25mg/day) with or without celecoxib/placebo (400mg/plac twice daily for 3 years). The primary objective is the comparison of event free survival (EFS) between women treated with A or E. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS), distant recurrence (DDFS), incidence of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and safety. Quality of Life in a subset of women has been evaluated, and a very extensive tissue bank created. Stratification included: prior chemotherapy; lymph node status, celecoxib (during use), aspirin use (during randomization to celecoxib), and trastuzumab use (since November 2005). The primary endpoint (EFS) will look for an improvement from 87.5% to 89.9%; HR 0.80, 2-sided 5% level and 80% power, with 644 events required. Results: 7576 women were randomized between June 2003 and July 2008. Celecoxib/placebo, was discontinued 2 years into the trial in December 2004 after 1635 patients had received celecoxib. The number of events required for final analysis was reached April 2010. Patient characteristics were balanced for age (median 64.1yrs); race; ECOG PS; mastectomy; TNM staging and; prior adjuvant chemotherapy. EFS, OS, DDFS, and CBC as well as clinical fractures, cardiovascular events and adverse events will be presented by arm in the final analysis. Conclusions: NCIC CTG MA.27 is the first definitive EBC trial comparing a non-steroidal and steroidal AI as initial adjuvant therapy. Exemestane is not currently approved as initial adjuvant treatment and superiority or equivalence will lead to its inclusion as a first-line option for EBC in postmenopausal HR positive breast cancer. Efficacy, clinical fractures, cardiovascular events and AI related symptoms will help to define the cost-benefit ratios of these two AIs. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S1-1.

Abstract Background: The MA.17 study showed that extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole (LET) after completing 5 years of tamoxifen (TAM) markedly reduced the risk of recurrence in women with ER+ early stage breast cancer and improved overall survival in women presenting with node +ve disease. The HOXB 13:IL17BR gene expression ratio (signature) has been shown to predict outcome in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy and provides additional information beyond that from known positive (ER and PR) and negative (Her-1 and Her-2) predictors of responsiveness to tamoxifen in node-ve women. We report a case control evaluation of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI; bioTheranostics, Inc.), which combines the HOXB13 and IL17BR twogene and the molecular grade index (MGI) gene expression signatures, with respect to distinguishing which patients are at risk of late recurrences and who would respond to extended endocrine therapy with LET. The prognostic and predictive utility of quantitative immunofluorescence of ER, PR, Her-2, tumor aromatase, COX-2, GATA3 and Nat1 in the TAM-PLACEBO and the TAM-LET cohorts will also be evaluated and compared to results derived by standard immunohistochemistry. Methods: FFPE tumor blocks were collected from patients who experienced a breast cancer recurrence up to unblinding of MA.17. Controls were matched 2:1 for age, tumor size, lymph node status, and prior chemotherapy, and were all disease free for longer than cases. All cases were reviewed for standard histopathology by two independent pathologists. RNA was extracted, amplified, converted to cDNA and subjected to RT-PCR with primers and probes to HOXB13, IL17BR, BUB1A, CENPA, NEK2, RACGAP1 and RRM2. ER, PR HER1, HER2, COX2, Aromatase, GATA3 and NAT1 will be analyzed by routine IHC techniques and by immunoflourescent Automated Quantitative Analysis (AQuA). Results: 105 cases and 210 matched controls are available for evaluation. All sections are under review and tissue microarrays have been performed on all cases and controls. Detailed results on the BCI and ER, PR, Her-2 will be available at the SABCS. Discussion: MA.17 has shown that extended adjuvant endocrine therapy after tamoxifen is effective at preventing disease recurrence given for an additional 5 years. Numerous clinical trials are exploring whether extending AIs will show this benefit, and there is an increasing need to improve the therapeutic index by distinguishing those at risk from those who are not. It is also important to determine which patients will benefit from the therapy and which will recur without benefit. The latter patients could be triaged to clinical trials of novel therapies to overcome endocrine resistance. This study will help to define these issues and pave the way for more effective selection of specific patients for adjuvant endocrine strategies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-26.

Abstract Background: Analyses of adjuvant endocrine therapy suggest that the appearance of new vasomotor or joint symptoms within 3 months of initiating either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor therapy predict for lower subsequent recurrence. We hypothesized that new vasomotor or joint symptoms may predict outcomes with anastrozole or exemestane in participants in the ongoing NCIC CTG Trial MA.27. We performed a pooled analysis across treatment arms of the MA.27 trial, to examine the effects of early onset new or worsening symptoms on relapse-free survival (RFS).Methods: 7576 postmenopausal women with early breast cancer were accrued to MA.27, a randomized adjuvant trial of exemestane and anastrozole. The second interim analysis data with a 3 year median follow-up was used for this analysis. The trial's primary endpoint is event-free survival, but for this investigational analysis is RFS, which excludes non-breast cancer deaths. All 7118 participants known to be hormone receptor-positive who received trial therapy, and had no relapse in the first 3 months, were included. The association of vasomotor and joint symptoms with patient characteristics was examined with chi-square tests. Stratified log-rank and stratified univariate and multivariate Cox modeling were used to examine the association of early vasomotor and joint symptoms on disease outcomes.Results: Of 4749 women who were asymptomatic at baseline, 230 (5%) experienced vasomotor or joint symptoms at 3 months. The RFS stratified univariate Cox hazard ratio (HR) for vasomotor or joint-related symptoms was 1.184 (95% CI, 0.675-2.079). When all 7118 women were included, 361 (5%) developed new or worsening symptoms at 3 months. RFS was not statistically significant between the women with or without new symptoms (HR 1.129, 95% CI, 0.708-1.800). Higher T stage was the only factor included in the multivariate Cox RFS model that was associated with new or worsening symptoms (p<0.001).Conclusions: In contrast to prior findings, we did not observe a correlation between early emergence of symptoms and improved RFS. Longer follow-up and analysis by treatment arm and at different time points are required. Additional symptoms and time points will be added to the analysis prior to the meeting. Until further data are available, clinicians should not use treatment-emergent symptoms to counsel their patient whether to continue or change their prescribed medication. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 14.

Abstract Background: MA17 showed that adjuvant letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen markedly reduced the risk of recurrence in women with ER+ early stage breast cancer and improved overall survival in women presenting with node +ve disease. Most trials of early adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy required women to be postmenopausal at diagnosis to be eligible. We report here on a subset of women in the MA17 trial who were premenopausal at initial diagnosis and in whom subsequent menopause, prior to randomization, may have influenced their outcome on extended adjuvant letrozole.Methods: Women randomized to MA17 were divided into 2 groups: 1) pre-menopausal (< 50 years of age but underwent bilateral oophorectomy at time when tamoxifen treatment started or < 50 years of age at the start of tamoxifen treatment but became amenorrheic during adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen treatment) and 2) post-menopausal. Disease-free survival (DFS) from time of randomization for women in these two groups were summarized by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared based on log-rank test and Cox model.Results: 889 women were identified as premenopausal and 4,277 as postmenopausal. Treatment, age, race, duration of tamoxifen, prior adjuvant chemotherapy, and mastectomy were independently associated with menopausal status on multivariate analysis. The interaction between treatment and menopausal status was statistically significant for DFS (p=0.02), indicating that women diagnosed with pre-menopausal breast cancer had significantly greater benefit (Hazard ratio=0.25, 95% CI: 0.12-0.51) with letrozole treatment in terms of DFS than those with post-menopausal status (hazard ratio=0.69 with 95% CI from 0.52 to 0.91). In comparison with women treated with placebo, pre-menopausal women on letrozole had a significantly higher incidence of arthralgia (24 vs. 16%; p=0.004) but a lower incidence of vaginal bleeding (10 vs. 16%; p=0.01). Compared with placebo post-menopausal women receiving letrozole had a higher incidence of hot flashes/flashes (55 vs. 50%; p=0.001), arthralgia (25 vs. 21%; p=0.002), myalgia (15 vs. 12%; p=0.007) and alopecia (5 vs. 3%; p=0.003).Conclusions: Letrozole after tamoxifen was more effective in improving DFS in women who were premenopausal at primary diagnosis than those who were postmenopausal. Letrozole was well tolerated in premenopausal women. These data indicate that women who are premenopausal at the time of diagnosis but become postmenopausal anytime before, or during, adjuvant tamoxifen should be considered for extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 13.

Purpose Nonhormonal pharmacologic interventions are recommended for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors. Antidepressants and gabapentin have been shown to be both effective and well tolerated; however, it is not clear which is preferred. Patients and Methods This was a group-sequential, open-label, randomized, cross-over trial of 4 weeks of venlafaxine (37.5 mg daily for 7 days followed by 75 mg daily for 21 days) versus gabapentin (300 mg once per day for 3 days, then 300 mg twice per day for 3 days, then 300 mg three times per day for 22 days), with patient preference as the primary outcome. Postmenopausal women with at least 14 bothersome hot flashes per week for the prior month were eligible. A 2-week baseline period and a 2-week tapering/washout time was used before the first and second treatment periods, respectively. Diaries were used to measure hot flashes and potential toxicities throughout the study. Participants completed a preference questionnaire at the end of the study. A predefined Pocock stopping rule was applied. Patient preference and hot flash and toxicity outcomes were compared between treatments. Results Sixty-six patients were randomly assigned, 56 of whom provided a preference (eight dropped out and two had no preference); 18 (32%) preferred gabapentin and 38 (68%) preferred venlafaxine (P = .01). Both agents reduced hot flash scores to a similar extent (66% reduction). Venlafaxine was associated with increased nausea, appetite loss, constipation, and reduced negative mood changes compared with gabapentin, whereas gabapentin was associated with increased dizziness and appetite compared with venlafaxine (all P < .05). Conclusion Breast cancer survivors prefer venlafaxine over gabapentin for treating hot flashes.

Purpose We performed a case-control genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with musculoskeletal adverse events (MS-AEs) in women treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for early breast cancer. Patients and Methods A nested case-control design was used to select patients enrolled onto the MA.27 phase III trial comparing anastrozole with exemestane. Cases were matched to two controls and were defined as patients with grade 3 or 4 MS-AEs (according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0) or those who discontinued treatment for any grade of MS-AE within the first 2 years. Genotyping was performed with the Illumina Human610-Quad BeadChip. Results The GWAS included 293 cases and 585 controls. A total of 551,358 SNPs were analyzed, followed by imputation and fine mapping of a region of interest on chromosome 14. Four SNPs on chromosome 14 had the lowest P values (2.23E-06 to 6.67E-07). T-cell leukemia 1A (TCL1A) was the gene closest (926-7000 bp) to the four SNPs. Functional genomic studies revealed that one of these SNPs (rs11849538) created an estrogen response element and that TCL1A expression was estrogen dependent, was associated with the variant SNP genotypes in estradiol-treated lymphoblastoid cells transfected with estrogen receptor alpha and was directly related to interleukin 17 receptor A (IL17RA) expression. Conclusion This GWAS identified SNPs associated with MS-AEs in women treated with AIs and with a gene (TCL1A) which, in turn, was related to a cytokine (IL17). These findings provide a focus for further research to identify patients at risk for MS-AEs and to explore the mechanisms for these adverse events.

Purpose National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group trial MA.17 randomly assigned 5,187 postmenopausal, hormone-receptor–positive patients with early breast cancer who completed 5 years of tamoxifen to receive either letrozole or placebo. At 30 months median follow-up, letrozole significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) in all patients and overall survival (OS) in node-positive patients. Breast cancer incidence increases with age and more than 1,300 women age 70 years or older were enrolled onto MA.17, making it ideal to explore the benefits, toxicities, and quality of life (QOL) impact of letrozole on older women. Patients and Methods In this study, 5,169 randomly assigned patients were divided into three age groups: younger than 60 years (n = 2,152), 60 to 69 years (n = 1,694), and ≥ 70 years (n = 1,323). Log-rank test was used to compare differences in DFS, distant-disease–free survival, and OS between age and treatment groups, and Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios and associated 95% CIs. QOL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 and the Menopause-Specific Quality-of-Life questionnaire. Results At 4 years, DFS demonstrated statistically significant differences favoring letrozole only in patients age younger than 60 years (hazard ratio = 0.46; P = .0004); there was no interaction between age and treatment, indicating a similar effect of letrozole among all age groups. There was no difference in toxicity or QOL at 24 months among letrozole- and placebo-treated patients age ≥ 70 years. Conclusion Healthy patients age 70 years and older completing 5 years of tamoxifen should be considered for extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole.