Pritchard, Kathleen I.

502 Background: Pre-specified 5-year analyses of the phase III Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation (ALTTO) Trial defined in Amendments 11&12. Methods: From June 2007 to July 2011, 8381 patients (pts) were randomised from 946 sites in 44 countries to receive either L+T, T→L, L, or T. In 2011, due to futility the L arm was closed and is not included in this analysis. The primary end point is disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives include treatment comparisons with respect to overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), time to distant recurrence (TDR), cardiac and overall safety and tolerability. Primary analysis results of the study were published in JCO 2015 34:1034-1042. This updated analysis occurs at a 6.9 yrs median follow up (MFU). Results: All patients have reached 5-years of follow-up. 705 DFS events for L+T vs T have been observed. HR for DFS was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00; 6-yr DFS%=85% vs 82%) for L+T vs T and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.81-1.08; 6-yr DFS%=84% vs 82%) for T→L vs. T. The 6-year OS was 93%, 92%, and 91% for L+T, T→L, and T, respectively. HR for OS was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.70-1.06) for L+T vs. T and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.71-1.08) for T→L vs. T. DFS differences for L+T vs. T were slightly higher for the hormone-receptor(ER)-negative [HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-1.00; 6-yr DFS%=84% vs. 80%)] and the sequential chemotherapy [HR 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69-1.00; 6-yr DFS%=83% vs.79%)] subgroups. There were no differences in sites of first DFS events according to treatment arm for CNS, loco-regional, or distant recurrences. There were more AEs related to study treatment (L+T 93% vs T 64%). The incidence of primary cardiac end points was low: 1% for L+T, 0.5% for T→L and 0.9% for T. Conclusions: The HRs for this updated analysis are similar to those from the Primary Analysis and the event rate remains lower than anticipated (705 vs 850 planned). Cardiac toxicity remains low. This analysis suggests that HER2+/ER- tumors may have a different biology than HER2+/ER+ and may benefit more from dual HER2 blockade. Long-term follow up continues. Clinical trial information: NCT00490139.

LBA1 Background: In hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node (AN)-negative breast cancer, the 21-gene expression assay (Oncotype DX Recurrence Score [RS]) is prognostic for distant recurrence, prognostic for low recurrence with endocrine therapy alone if low (0-10), and predictive of chemotherapy benefit if high (26 or higher). We performed a prospective, randomized trial of endocrine therapy (ET) versus chemoendocrine therapy (CET) in women with a mid-range RS of 11-25. Methods: Eligibility criteria included women 18-75 years of age with HR-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node (AN)-negative breast cancer and tumors 1.1-5.0 cm in size (or 0.6-1.0 cm and int/high grade) and agreed to have chemotherapy assigned or randomized based on the RS. Women with a mid-range RS (11-25) were randomized to receive ET or CET. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), and the trial was designed to show non-inferiority for ET alone by not rejecting equality (hazard ratio [HR] margin up to 1.322 for omission of chemotherapy, 1-sided type I error rate 10%, type II error rate 5%). The target sample size was adjusted to compensate for non-adherence to randomized treatment, and the protocol-specified final analysis was triggered after 835 iDFS events. Results: Of the 10,253 eligible women enrolled between 4/7/06-10/6/10, 6711 (65.5%) had a RS of 11-25 and adequate information. There were 836 iDFS events at final analysis with a median followup of 90 months. ET was non-inferior to CET for iDFS (HR 1.08, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.94, 1.24, p=0.26) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. ET was also non-inferior for distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI; HR 1.03, p=0.80), recurrence-free interval (RFI; HR 1.12, p=0.28), and overall survival (OS; HR 0.97, p=0.80). Nine year rates were similar for iDFS (83.3% vs. 84.3%), DRFI (94.5% vs. 95.0%), RFI (92.2% vs. 92.9%), and OS (93.9% vs. 93.8%). Recurrence accounted for 338 (41.6%) the first iDFS event, of which 199 (23.8%) were distant recurrences. Treatment interaction tests were significant for age (iDFS p=0.03; RFI p= 0.02), but not menopause, tumor size, grade, or RS (continuous or RS 11-15, 16-20, 21-25). Conclusions: In women with HR-positive, HER2-negative, AN-negative breast cancer and a RS of 11-25, adjuvant ET was not inferior to CET in the ITT analysis. (Funded by NCI, BCRF, and Komen Foundation.) Clinical trial information: NCT00310180.

Abstract Background Celecoxib and low-dose aspirin might decrease risk of breast cancer recurrence. Methods In the Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.27, postmenopausal hormone receptor–positive breast cancer patients were randomly assigned (2 × 2) to adjuvant exemestane or anastrozole, and celecoxib or placebo. Low-dose aspirin of 81 mg or less was a stratification factor. Due to concerns about cardiac toxicity, celecoxib use was stopped in December 2004, while stratification by aspirin use was removed through protocol amendment. We examined the effects of celecoxib and low-dose aspirin on event-free survival (EFS), defined as time from random assignment to time of locoregional or distant disease recurrence, new primary breast cancer, or death from any cause; distant disease–free survival (DDFS); and overall survival (OS). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Random assignment to celecoxib (n = 811, 50.0%) or placebo (n = 811, 50.0%) was discontinued after 18 months (n = 1622). At a median of 4.1 years’ follow-up, among 1622 patients, 186 (11.5%) patients had an EFS event: 80 (4.9%) had distant relapse, and 125 (7.7%) died from any cause. Celecoxib did not statistically significantly impact EFS, DDFS, or OS in univariate analysis (respectively, P = .92, P = .55, and P = .56) or multivariable analysis (respectively, P = .74, P = .60, and P = .76). Low-dose aspirin use (aspirin users n = 476, 21.5%; non–aspirin users n = 1733, 78.5%) was associated in univariate analyses with worse EFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 1.96, P = 0.006) and worse OS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.35 to 2.61, P < .001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and treatment arm, aspirin use showed no statistical association with EFS (P = .08) and DDFS (P = .82), but was associated with statistically worse OS (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.49, P = .01). Conclusion Random assignment to short-term (≤18 months) celecoxib as well as use of low-dose aspirin showed no effect on DDFS and EFS in multivariable analysis. Low-dose aspirin increased “all-cause” mortality, presumably because of higher preexisting cardiovascular risks.

LBA506 Background: MA.17R is a Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) led phase III randomized controlled trial comparing letrozole to placebo after 5 years of aromatase inhibitor (AI) as adjuvant therapy for hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Quality of life (QOL) was a secondary endpoint. Methods: QOL was measured with the SF-36 (2 summary scores and 8 domains) and menopause-specific QOL (MENQOL) (4 symptom domains) at baseline and every 12 months (mo) up to 60 mo. QOL assessment was mandatory for CCTG centres but optional to centres in other groups. Mean change scores from baseline were calculated at 12 and 36 mo. Between-arm differences were assessed with the Wilcoxon test. Results: 1918 patients were randomized and 1428 patients completed the baseline QOL assessment. Compliance with QOL measures was over 85%. Baseline summary scores for SF-36 physical (PCS, 47.5 for letrozole and 47.9 for placebo) and mental (MCS, 55.5 for letrozole and 54.8 for placebo) were close to population norms (50). No differences were seen between groups in mean change scores for the SF-36 PCS and MCS and the other 8 QOL domains. Patients randomized to letrozole reported worse vasomotor symptoms (12 mo p = 0.02, 36 mo p = 0.03) and worse sexual functioning (12 mo p = 0.01, 36 mo p = 0.01). Further analyses with follow up to 60 months will be presented. Conclusions: No differences were seen in overall QOL measured by the SF 36 summary measures between letrozole and placebo groups. Differences existed for vasomotor symptoms and sexual functioning which were worse in the letrozole group and attributed to improvements in mean scores seen for women randomized to placebo. The data indicate that continuation of AI therapy after 5 years prior treatment is not associated with a deterioration of overall QOL. Treatment related vasomotor and sexual functioning alterations occur with ongoing treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT00754845.

LBA1 Background: Five years of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy either as up-front treatment or after 2-5 years of tamoxifen has become the standard of care for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer. Extending treatment with an AI to 10 years may further reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.17R) to test the efficacy of extending AI treatment for an additional five years using letrozole. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Results: A total of 1,918 women with early stage breast cancer were enrolled (median follow-up 75 months, 6.3 years). A total of 165 disease-free survival (DFS) events (67 on letrozole and 98 on placebo) occurred, of which 42 versus 53 were distant recurrences on letrozole and placebo, respectively. There were 200 deaths (100 in each treatment group). The 5 year DFS was respectively 95% for patients receiving letrozole versus 91% for those on placebo (HR 0.66; P = 0.01) from a two-sided log-rank test stratified by nodal status, prior adjuvant chemotherapy, interval between last dose of AI therapy and randomization, and duration of prior tamoxifen at randomization. The 5 year overall survival was respectively 93% for subjects on letrozole and 94% on placebo with a HR of 0.97 (P = 0.83). The annual incidence rate of contralateral breast cancer was 0.21% for subjects on letrozole versus 0.49% on placebo (P = 0.007). Conclusions: Compared to 5 years of AI treatment as initial therapy or preceded by 2-5 years of tamoxifen, extending AI treatment to 10 years significantly improves disease-free survival. Further analyses will provide a comprehensive picture of toxicities and QOL. Clinical trial information: NCT00754845.

BACKGROUNDBreast cancer patients in the MA.27 trial had similar outcomes with steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane and nonsteroidal anastrozole. AIs increase the risk of osteoporosis. This study examined the effects of self‐reported osteoporosis and osteoporosis therapy (OPT) on outcomes.METHODSThe MA.27 phase 3 adjuvant trial enrolled 7576 postmenopausal women. The primary outcome was event‐free survival (EFS), and the secondary outcome was distant disease–free survival (DDFS). Patients were permitted bisphosphonates to prevent or treat osteopenia/osteoporosis. In a multivariate, stratified Cox regression, factors were significant with a 2‐sided Wald test P value ≤ .05.RESULTSOsteoporosis was reported at the baseline by 654 of the 7576 women (8.6%) and in total by 1294 patients. Oral OPT was received at the baseline by 815 of the 7576 women (10.8%) and in total by 2711 patients (36%). With a median follow‐up of 4.1 years, 693 EFS events (9.15%) and 321 DDFS events (4.2%) occurred. Osteoporosis was not associated with EFS or DDFS. Few EFS events occurred before the initiation of OPT, with no substantive evidence of a time‐differing effect on outcomes (nonproportional hazards). OPT (yes vs no) was significantly associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR] for yes vs no, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57‐0.80; P < .001) and DDFS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44‐0.73; P <. 001). Time‐differing (time‐dependent) OPT was not (EFS; P = .45). OPT did not alter the incidence of visceral‐only metastasis (P = .31).CONCLUSIONSOral OPT, administered to postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant AI therapy, was associated with improved EFS and DDFS; the time of OPT initiation (a time‐dependent effect) did not affect the outcome. OPT did not alter the risk of visceral metastasis. Cancer 2017;123:2444–51. © 2017 American Cancer Society.