Alkhouli, Mohamad

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an approved alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. As the clinical adoption of TAVR expands, it remains important to identify predictors of mortality after TAVR. We aimed to evaluate the impact of sex differences in aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) on long-term mortality following TAVR in a large patient sample. Methods: We included consecutive patients who successfully underwent TAVR for treatment of severe native aortic valve stenosis from June 2010 to May 2021 across all US Mayo Clinic sites with follow-up through July 2021. AVCS values were obtained from preoperative computed tomography of the chest. Additional clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-proportional hazard regression models were employed to evaluate the effect of AVCS on long-term mortality. Results: A total of 2543 patients were evaluated in the final analysis. Forty-one percent were women, median age was 82 years (Q1: 76, Q3: 86), 18.4% received a permanent pacemaker following TAVR, and 88.5% received a balloon expandable valve. We demonstrate an increase in mortality risk with higher AVCS after multivariable adjustment ( P <0.001). When stratified by sex, every 500-unit increase in AVCS was associated with a 7% increase in mortality risk among women (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02–1.12]) but not in men. Conclusions: We demonstrate a notable sex difference in the association between AVCS and long-term mortality in a large TAVR patient sample. This study highlights the potential value of AVCS in preprocedural risk stratification, specifically among women undergoing TAVR. Additional studies are needed to validate this finding.

Abstract Aims There are several risk scores designed to predict mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). This study aimed to assess performance of risk scores validated for mortality prediction in patients with acute HF (AHF) and chronic HF. Methods and results MEDLINE and Scopus were searched from January 2015 to January 2021 for studies which internally or externally validated risk models for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with AHF and chronic HF. Discrimination data were analysed using C-statistics, and pooled using generic inverse-variance random-effects model. Nineteen studies (n = 494 156 patients; AHF: 24 762; chronic HF mid-term mortality: 62 000; chronic HF long-term mortality: 452 097) and 11 risk scores were included. Overall, discrimination of risk scores was good across the three subgroups: AHF mortality [C-statistic: 0.76 (0.68–0.83)], chronic HF mid-term mortality [1 year; C-statistic: 0.74 (0.68–0.79)], and chronic HF long-term mortality [≥2 years; C-statistic: 0.71 (0.69–0.73)]. MEESSI-AHF [C-statistic: 0.81 (0.80–0.83)] and MARKER-HF [C-statistic: 0.85 (0.80–0.89)] had an excellent discrimination for AHF and chronic HF mid-term mortality, respectively, whereas MECKI had good discrimination [C-statistic: 0.78 (0.73–0.83)] for chronic HF long-term mortality relative to other models. Overall, risk scores predicting short-term mortality in patients with AHF did not have evidence of poor calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow P &gt; 0.05). However, risk models predicting mid-term and long-term mortality in patients with chronic HF varied in calibration performance. Conclusions The majority of recently validated risk scores showed good discrimination for mortality in patients with HF. MEESSI-AHF demonstrated excellent discrimination in patients with AHF, and MARKER-HF and MECKI displayed an excellent discrimination in patients with chronic HF. However, modest reporting of calibration and lack of head-to-head comparisons in same populations warrant future studies.

Background: Previous percutaneous coronary intervention risk models were focused on single outcome, such as mortality or bleeding, etc, limiting their applicability. Our objective was to develop contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention risk models that not only determine in-hospital mortality but also predict postprocedure bleeding, acute kidney injury, and stroke from a common set of variables. Methods: We built risk models using logistic regression from first percutaneous coronary intervention for any indication per patient (n=19 322, 70.6% with acute coronary syndrome) using the Mayo Clinic registry from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2016. Approval for the current study was obtained from the Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board. Patients with missing outcomes (n=4183) and those under 18 (n=10) were removed resulting in a sample of 15 129. We built both models that included procedural and angiographic variables (Models A) and precatheterization model (Models B). Results: Death, bleeding, acute kidney injury, and stroke occurred in 247 (1.6%), 650 (4.3%), 1184 (7.8%), and 67 (0.4%), respectively. The C statistics from the test dataset for models A were 0.92, 0.70, 0.77, and 0.71 and for models B were 0.90, 0.67, 0.76, and 0.71 for in-hospital death, bleeding, acute kidney injury, and stroke, respectively. Bootstrap analysis indicated that the models were not overfit to the available dataset. The probabilities estimated from the models matched the observed data well, as indicated by the calibration curves. The models were robust across many subgroups, including women, elderly, acute coronary syndrome, cardiogenic shock, and diabetes. Conclusions: The new risk scoring models based on precatheterization variables and models including procedural and angiographic variables accurately predict in-hospital mortality, bleeding, acute kidney injury, and stroke. The ease of its application will provide useful prognostic and therapeutic information to both patients and physicians.

AbstractBackgroundMitral transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (MTEER) is an established therapeutic approach for mitral regurgitation (MR). Functional mitral regurgitation originating from atrial myopathy (A‐FMR) has been described.ObjectivesWe sought to assess the clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic considerations in A‐FMR patients undergoing MTEER.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2020, patients undergoing MTEER for degenerative MR (DMR), functional MR (FMR), and mixed MR were assessed. A‐FMR was defined by the presence of MR > moderate in severity; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%; and severe left atrial (LA) enlargement in the absence of LV dysfunction, leaflet pathology, or LV tethering. The diagnosis of A‐FMR (vs. ventricular‐FMR [V‐FMR]) was confirmed by three independent echocardiographers. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes as well as clinical and echocardiographic follow‐up are reported. Device success was defined as final MR grade ≤ moderate; MR reduction ≥1 grade; and final transmitral gradient <5 mmHg.Results306 patients underwent MTEER, including DMR (62%), FMR (19%), and mixed MR (19%). FMR cases included 37 (63.8%) V‐FMR and 21 (36.2%) A‐FMR. Tricuspid regurgitation (≥ moderate) was higher in A‐FMR (80.1%) compared to V‐FMR (54%) and DMR (42%). Device success did not significantly differ between A‐FMR and V‐FMR (57% vs. 73%, p = 0.34) or DMR (57% vs. 64%, p = 1.0). The A‐FMR cohort was less likely to achieve ≥3 grades of MR reduction compared to V‐FMR (19% vs. 54%, p = 0.01) and DMR (19% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.01). Patients with V‐FMR and DMR demonstrated significant reductions in mean left atrial pressure (LAP) and peak LA V‐wave, though A‐FMR did not (LAP −0.24 ± 4.9, p = 0.83; peak V‐wave −1.76 ± 9.1, p = 0.39). In follow‐up, echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were similar.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing MTEER, A‐FMR represents one‐third of FMR cases. A‐FMR demonstrates similar procedural success but blunted acute hemodynamic responses compared with DMR and V‐FMR following MTEER. Dedicated studies specifically considering A‐FMR are needed to discern the optimal therapeutic approaches.

In the evaluation of embolic strokes of undetermined source, great emphasis is often placed on cardiovascular disease, namely on atrial fibrillation. Other pathophysiologic mechanisms, however, may also be involved. Carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH)—the presence of blood components within an atheromatous plaque—has become increasingly recognized as a possible etiologic mechanism in some cryptogenic strokes. IPH is a marker of plaque instability and is associated with ipsilateral neurologic ischemic events, even in nonstenotic carotid plaques. As recognition of carotid IPH as an etiology of embolic strokes has grown, so too has the complexity with which such patients are evaluated and treated, particularly because overlaps exist in the risk factors for atrial fibrillation and IPH. In this article, we review what is currently known about carotid IPH and how this clinical entity should be approached in the context of the evaluation of embolic strokes of undetermined source.

Introduction: Unsupervised machine learning (ML) can provide insight into a dataset without significant expert time for annotation and labeling, but was never used to assess the heterogeneous MitraClip population. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that unsupervised k-means ML could identify prognostically-distinct phenogroups in MitraClip patients without a priori knowledge of the dataset. Methods: Patients who underwent MitraClip (June 2014-September 2020) at Mayo Clinic sites were identified from the Mayo institutional NCDR database for baseline and follow-up data. Variables with ≥ 50% missing data were excluded. A k-means algorithm was used for clustering analysis. Input variables were grouped according to 4 distinct k-means determined clusters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the survival of each cluster. Results: A total of 389 consecutive patients were included in the final analysis, and 95 unique variables were used. The mean age was 80.3±8.7 years; 256 (65.8%) were male. The mean STS MV Replace score was 9.1±5.7. Fifty-five (14.5%) patients died during the mean follow duration (185 days). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant survival differences among clusters (Figure 1). The cluster (cluster 2, n=120) with best survival performance (all-cause mortality 3.3%) had features of non-calcified mitral leaflets, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and less than moderate tricuspid regurgitation. Cluster 3 (n=66) had the worst survival performance (all-cause mortality 27.3%) and opposite features than cluster 2. Conclusions: Unsupervised ML can identify distinct phenotype clusters with prognostic significance in MitraClip patients. Patients with non-calcified mitral leaflets, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and less than moderate tricuspid regurgitation are intrinsically different from other MitraClip patients and should be considered the potential optimal candidates.

Background/Introduction: More than moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) at baseline is associated with worse outcome in MitraClip patients. The presence of iatrogenic ASD (iASD) may cause right-sided volume overload and lead to adverse events. However, the real effects of iASD are not well-investigated in these patients who are vulnerable to right-sided volume overload. Methods: Patients with more than moderate TR who underwent a successful MitraClip procedure in the period from June 2014 to September 2020 were identified from the Mayo institutional NCDR database. Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at about 1 year after the procedure was used to determine the presence of iASD, and speckle-tracking strain analysis was done. Patients were grouped according to the presence of iASD (iASD+ group vs. iASD- group) for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 141 consecutive patients were included for the final analysis (iASD+ group n=44 and iASD- group n=97). The mean age was 79.3 ± 8.8 years, and 72.3% were male. Follow-up echocardiography and speckle-tracking strain data did not show a significant difference in either left or right ventricular function in conventional echocardiographic parameters and strain. LA reservoir strain (13.7 ± 6.9 vs 11.5±7.5, P=0.0418) was the only parameter with significant difference among the two groups. Details are summarized in Table 1 . Conclusion: The presence of iASD can decompress the left atrium, but does not affect left or right ventricular strain function in MitraClip patients with more than moderate baseline TR.

AbstractBackgroundThough infrequent, incomplete left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may result from residual leaks. Percutaneous closure has been described though data is limited.MethodsWe compiled a registry from four centers of patients undergoing percutaneous closure of residual leaks following LAAC via surgical means or with the Watchman device. Leak severity was classified as none (no leak), mild (1–2 mm), moderate (3–4 mm), or severe (≥5 mm). Procedural and clinical success was defined as the elimination of leak or mild residual leak at the conclusion of the procedure or follow‐up, respectively.ResultsOf 72 (age 72.2 ± 9.2 years; 67% male) patients, 53 had undergone prior LAAC using the Watchman device and 19 patients surgical LAAC. Mean CHADS2‐VA2Sc score was 4.0 ± 1.8. The median leak size was 5 mm, range: 2–13). A total of 13 received Amplatzer Vascular Plug‐II, 18 received Amplatzer Duct Occluder‐II and 40 patients received coils. One underwent closure using a 21 mm‐Watchman. Procedural success was 94%. Zero surgical and nine Watchman patients (13%) had a residual leak at procedural‐end (five mild, three moderate, and one severe)—only one patient had no reduction in leak size. Overall leak size reduction was 94%. Two (3%) had intraoperative pericardial effusion. There were no device embolizations, device‐related thrombi, or procedural deaths. Clinical success was maintained at 94%. Two had cerebrovascular accidents—at 2 days (transient ischemic attack) and 10 months postprocedure. Two had major bleeding outside the 30‐day periprocedural window.ConclusionPercutaneous closure of residual leaks following left atrial appendage closure is feasible and associated with good outcomes. The procedural risk appears to be satisfactory.