Back to Authors

Secco, Gioel Gabrio

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-7049

Mayo Clinic

Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo

Citations 2

Effect of combined renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors and diuretic treatment among patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 Infection COVID-19
Palazzuoli, Alberto , Tecson, Kristen M. , Vicenzi, Marco , D’Ascenzo, Fabrizio, Ferrari, Gaetano Maria De , Monticone, Silvia , Secco, Gioel Gabrio , Tavazzi, Guido , Forleo, Giovanni B. , Severino, Paolo , Fedele, Francesco G. , Rosa, Francesco Giuseppe De , McCullough, Peter Andrew

No container title available | April 8, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-345834/v1 Get It

Abstract Background: Antecedent use of renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi) appears crucial to prevent clinical deterioration and protect against cardiovascular and/or thrombotic complications of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), for indicated patients. Doubts have been raised about continuing treatment throughout infection, and nothing is known regarding its effect with concomitant medications. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to evaluate the differential effect of RAASi continuation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 according to diuretic use.Methods: We used the Coracle (epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and therapy in real life patients affected by Sars-Cov-2) multi-center registry, which contains data of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from 4 regions of Italy. We performed analyses on adult (50+ years) records with admission on/after February 22, 2020 with a known mortality or discharge status as of April 1, 2020. We constructed a multivariable Firth logistic regression model to complete our objective.Results: There were 286 patients in this analysis. Overall, 100 (35.0%) patients continued RAASi and 186 (65%) discontinued. There were 98 patients who were treated with a diuretic; 51 (52%) of those continued RAASi. The in-hospital mortality rates among patients treated with a diuretic and continued vs. discontinued RAASi were 7.8% vs 25.5% (p = 0.0179). There were 188 patients who were not treated with a diuretic; 49 (26.1%) of those continued RAASi. The in-hospital mortality rates among patients who were not treated with a diuretic and continued vs. discontinued RAASi were 16.3% vs 9.4% (p = 0.1827). After accounting for age, congestive heart failure, and coronary heart disease/ischemic heart disease, continuing RAASi decreased the risk of mortality by approximately 72% (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.08 – 0.94, p = 0.0391) for patients treated with diuretics, but did not alter the risk in patients who were not treated with diuretics.Conclusion: Diuretic use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who were on RAASi prior to admission was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Whether this combined therapy increases risk or is the reflection of a more severe presentation deserves further investigation. Continuing RAASi therapy in patients concomitantly treated with diuretics was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality.
Intracoronary vs intravenous bivalirudin bolus in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty
Lupi, Alessandro , Rognoni, Andrea , Cavallino, Chiara , Secco, Gioel Gabrio , Reale, Danilo, Cossa, G, Rosso, Roberta , Bongo, Angelo Sante, Cortese, Bernardo , Jaffe, Allan S. , Porto, Italo , Angiolillo, Dominick J. , Jaffe, Allan S. , Cortese, Bernardo

European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care | July 11, 2015 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 487-496

10.1177/2048872615594499 Get It