Tavazzi, Guido

Abstract Aims Left ventricular (LV) ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) refers to the ratio of afterload (effective arterial elastance) to contractility (end-systolic elastance) as an integrated marker of cardiac performance. We sought to determine whether the echocardiographic VAC ratio, defined using the ratio of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) to stroke volume (SV), predicted mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Methods and results Mayo Clinic CICU patients from 2007 and 2018 were included. Ventricular-arterial coupling ratio was calculated as the Teichholz LVESV divided by the SV calculated from LV outflow tract Doppler. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. A total of 4685 patients were included with a median age of 69 (58, 79) years (37.2% females), with acute coronary syndrome in 54.9% and heart failure in 49.0%. A higher VAC ratio was associated with greater severity of illness, worse echocardiographic findings, and more use of critical care therapies. A total of 329 (7%) patients died during hospitalization. Patients with a higher VAC ratio had higher in-hospital mortality overall and in each admission diagnosis subgroup. After multivariable adjustment, patients with a VAC ratio >2 were at higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.28, P = 0.010). One-year mortality was higher for patients with a higher VAC ratio, especially VAC >2. Conclusion Ventricular-arterial uncoupling was associated with worse outcomes in an unselected CICU cohort. The echocardiographic VAC ratio is a simple non-invasive bedside measure that can be used for risk prediction in the CICU.

Background: Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) refers to the ratio of afterload (effective arterial elastance) to contractility (left ventricular (LV) end-systolic elastance) as an integrated marker of cardiac performance. Echocardiography might be used to evaluate VAC through a simple time-efficient bedside evaluation. Hypothesis: VAC is useful for mortality risk stratification in an unselected cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) cohort. Aims: We sought to determine whether the VAC ratio, defined using the ratio of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) to stroke volume (SV), predicted mortality in the CICU. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to the Mayo Clinic CICU between 2007 and 2018 were included. The simplified VAC ratio was calculated as the LVESV calculated from 2D measurements using the Teichholz formula divided by the SV calculated from the LV outflow tract pulsed wave Doppler measurement, with values >1 reflecting ventricular-arterial uncoupling. The main outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Results: We included 4685 patients with a median age of 69 (58-79) years; 37% were females. The median VAC ratio was 1.0 (0.7 to 1.8) and 21% of patients had a VAC ratio >2. Most clinical and echocardiographic variables differed in patients with higher VAC ratio, reflecting greater severity of illness with worse cardiac systolic and diastolic function. A total of 329 (7.0%) patients died during hospitalization. An incremental association was observed between a higher VAC and in-hospital mortality (unadjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.29, p<0.001). Patients with a VAC ratio >1 (unadjusted OR 2.85, 95% CI 2.22-3.69, p <0.001) and especially those with VAC ratio >2 (unadjusted OR 4.28, 95% CI 3.24-5.69, p<0.001) had higher in-hospital mortality overall and in each admission diagnosis subgroup of interest ( Figure ). After multivariable adjustment, patients with a VAC ratio >2 remained at higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17-2.28, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Ventricular-arterial uncoupling was associated with worse outcomes in an unselected CICU cohort. The echocardiographic VAC ratio is a simple non-invasive bedside measure that can be used for risk prediction in the CICU.

Abstract Background: Antecedent use of renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi) appears crucial to prevent clinical deterioration and protect against cardiovascular and/or thrombotic complications of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), for indicated patients. Doubts have been raised about continuing treatment throughout infection, and nothing is known regarding its effect with concomitant medications. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to evaluate the differential effect of RAASi continuation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 according to diuretic use.Methods: We used the Coracle (epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and therapy in real life patients affected by Sars-Cov-2) multi-center registry, which contains data of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from 4 regions of Italy. We performed analyses on adult (50+ years) records with admission on/after February 22, 2020 with a known mortality or discharge status as of April 1, 2020. We constructed a multivariable Firth logistic regression model to complete our objective.Results: There were 286 patients in this analysis. Overall, 100 (35.0%) patients continued RAASi and 186 (65%) discontinued. There were 98 patients who were treated with a diuretic; 51 (52%) of those continued RAASi. The in-hospital mortality rates among patients treated with a diuretic and continued vs. discontinued RAASi were 7.8% vs 25.5% (p = 0.0179). There were 188 patients who were not treated with a diuretic; 49 (26.1%) of those continued RAASi. The in-hospital mortality rates among patients who were not treated with a diuretic and continued vs. discontinued RAASi were 16.3% vs 9.4% (p = 0.1827). After accounting for age, congestive heart failure, and coronary heart disease/ischemic heart disease, continuing RAASi decreased the risk of mortality by approximately 72% (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.08 – 0.94, p = 0.0391) for patients treated with diuretics, but did not alter the risk in patients who were not treated with diuretics.Conclusion: Diuretic use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who were on RAASi prior to admission was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Whether this combined therapy increases risk or is the reflection of a more severe presentation deserves further investigation. Continuing RAASi therapy in patients concomitantly treated with diuretics was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality.