Jannetto, Paul J.

Abstract Background Loperamide (Imodium®), a commonly used anti-diarrheal, is a mu opioid receptor agonist that, like all opioids, reduces gastrointestinal tract peristalsis. Loperamide is considered to have low abuse potential as it does not produce an analgesic or euphoric effect due to low bioavailability and first-pass metabolism. However, reports of individuals misusing loperamide through the use of super-therapeutic doses, alone or in combination with P-glycoprotein and/or CYP450 enzyme inhibitors, is increasing. We hypothesized that loperamide could potentially cross-react with laboratory immunoassay drug screens. Methods Drug-free urine was spiked with loperamide or its principal metabolite, N-desmethyl loperamide (dLop), and assayed on multiple fentanyl and buprenorphine assays. Fentanyl immunoassay screen-positive results at one institution were examined by high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) for the presence of loperamide and quantified by liquid chromatography– tandem MS when positive. Results Loperamide produced positive results on the Thermo DRI Fentanyl and Immunalysis Fentanyl assays at concentrations greater than 5.72 mg/L and 23.7 mg/L. dLop generated positive results for the Thermo DRI and Immunalysis fentanyl assays at concentrations exceeding 6.9 mg/L and 35.7 mg/L. dLop also produced positive buprenorphine results on the Thermo CEDIA buprenorphine assay at concentrations exceeding 12.2 mg/L. High-resolution MS analysis of 225 fentanyl immunoassay positives (Thermo DRI) yielded 5 specimens containing loperamide and/or dLop, 4 of which contained measurable quantities of fentanyl in addition to loperamide/dLop. Conclusions Laboratories using these assays should be aware of the potential for false-positive screening results due to the presence of high concentrations of loperamide and its metabolite dLop.

Rapid and accurate diagnostic testing is essential to bring the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic to an end. As the demand for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing continues to increase amid supply shortages, many laboratories have investigated the use of sources other than nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs.

OBJECTIVES: Beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit high interindividual variability in drug concentrations in patients with critical illness which led to an interest in the use of therapeutic drug monitoring to improve effectiveness and safety. To implement therapeutic drug monitoring, it is necessary to define the beta-lactam therapeutic range—in essence, what drug concentration would prompt a clinician to make dose adjustments up or down. This objective of this narrative review was to summarize evidence for the “floor” (for effectiveness) and “ceiling” (for toxicity) for the beta-lactam therapeutic range to be used with individualized therapeutic drug monitoring. DATA SOURCES: Research articles were sourced from PubMed using search term combinations of “pharmacokinetics,” “pharmacodynamics,” “toxicity,” “neurotoxicity,” “therapeutic drug monitoring,” “beta-lactam,” “cefepime,” “meropenem,” “piperacillin/tazobactam,” “ICU,” and “critical illness.” STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected if they included preclinical, translational, or clinical data on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic thresholds for effectiveness and safety for beta-lactams in critical illness. DATA SYNTHESIS: Experimental data indicate a beta-lactam concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the organism for greater than or equal to 40–60% of the dosing interval is needed, but clinical data indicate that higher concentrations may be preferrable. In the first 48 hours of critical illness, a free beta-lactam concentration at or above the susceptibility breakpoint of the most likely pathogen for 100% of the dosing interval would be reasonable (typically based on Pseudomonas aeruginosa). After 48 hours, the lowest acceptable concentration could be tailored to 1–2× the observed minimum inhibitory concentration of the organism for 100% of the dosing interval (often a more susceptible organism). Neurotoxicity is the primary dose-dependent adverse effect of beta-lactams, but the evidence remains insufficient to link a specific drug concentration to greater risk. CONCLUSIONS: As studies advance the understanding of beta-lactam exposure and response in critically ill patients, it is essential to clearly define the acceptable therapeutic range to guide regimen selection and adjustment.

Abstract Background The class of antibiotics known as β-lactams are a commonly used due to their effectiveness and safety. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed but requires an accurate assay along with well-characterized preanalytic stability, as β-lactams are known to be relatively unstable. Methods A high-throughput LC-MS/MS assay validation and stability study was performed for cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin and tazobactam in serum. Patient samples, standards, and QCs were crashed with acetonitrile containing internal standard. Following centrifugation, an aliquot of the supernatant was diluted with clinical laboratory reagent water and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Results The assay showed linearity between 0.5 and 60 µg/mL for each analyte. The intra- and interassay reproducibility at 3 different concentrations (approximately 2, 25, and 40 µg/mL) was <5% for each analyte. Accuracy studies for each analyte were compared using linear regression and demonstrated: slope = 1.0 ± 0.1; r2 ≥ 0.980; and y intercept 95% CI that included zero. Minimal ion suppression or enhancement was observed, and no significant carryover was observed up to 500 µg/mL of each analyte. Stability studies demonstrated significant loss in serum for each analyte at ambient and refrigerated temperatures (2–8 °C) and at −20 °C over days or weeks. In contrast, when stored at −80 °C, no significant loss was observed. Conclusions The LC-MS/MS assay showed acceptable performance characteristics for quantitation of β-lactams. With well-characterized stability, this assay can be used with residual specimens for pharmacokinetic modeling, which may lead to individualized dosing and improved patient care.

Background: The culmination of the widespread overprescription of opioids, a resurgence of heroin use, and increased accessibility and use of illicit synthetic opioids is commonly referred to as the opioid epidemic in North America. Methods: This article is not intended to provide a comprehensive systematic literature review, but rather summarized recent publications and online governmental reports and datasets for English-written literature primarily published between January 1, 2015 and July 1, 2020. Results: In both the United States and Canada, opioids represent one of the most widely prescribed classes of medications. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), an unprecedented increase in the use of opioid pain relievers has led to one of the worst drug overdose epidemics in US history and continues to be an ongoing major public health crisis based on recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mortality data, where almost two-thirds of all overdose deaths still involve opioids, including heroin and illicit opioids. In addition to the high mortality rates in both the United States and Canada, there has also been an increase in emergency department visits for nonmedical use of opioid pain relievers, along with additional individuals seeking treatment for opioid addiction, and a rise in neonatal abstinence syndrome. Conclusions: This article highlights the history, underlying issues, ongoing national regulatory efforts, and future strategies and therapies to help mitigate the opioid crisis in North America.

Abstract Background Arsenic is a naturally occurring element with varying species and levels of toxicity. Inorganic arsenic (e.g., arsenite (AsIII) and arsenate (AsV)) are toxic, while its metabolites (e.g., monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA)) are less toxic). Symptoms of exposure can include headaches, confusion, diarrhea, and drowsiness. As these symptoms overlap with many other conditions, arsenic exposure can often be overlooked as a cause. Arsenic toxicity may be treated with chelation and/or electrolyte replacement therapy. However, treatment is not without risks and is unnecessary for exposure to organic (nontoxic) forms of arsenic. This makes screening and differentiation of arsenic important for clinical testing. Method An IC-ICP-MS method was developed using a Dionex 5000 with ion exchange chromatography for separation and iCAP Q for detection. Nontoxic species are arsenobetaine and arsenocholine, and toxic species are AsIII, DMA, MMA, and AsV. Results Precision, linearity, and specificity studies produced acceptable results. For accuracy, proficiency testing and method comparison samples were analyzed and produced acceptable results. Carryover studies demonstrated single species carryover from the diluter at levels of 500 µg/L, which can be avoided by analysis rules in the standard operating procedure. Limit of detection studies yielded a lower limit of quantitation of 1 µg/L per species. Conclusions Here, we present a rapid and reliable method for quantifying and differentiating toxic and nontoxic forms of arsenic to allow for swift and appropriate management of patients with exposure.