Oyen, Lance J.

Abstract Purpose Pharmacogenomics is the study of how individual responses to medication are influenced by genetics. As medication experts, pharmacists are uniquely suited to practicing this application of precision medicine. Fundamental operational aspects of developing a pharmacy clinical pharmacogenomics practice are described, and the specific experience of a multisite health system in developing a pharmacogenomics service is discussed. Summary Considerations for the development of a clinical pharmacy–driven pharmacogenomics service include understanding testing selection, targeting the appropriate patient population, exploration of reimbursement, design of the practice, and education of the pharmacogenomics workforce. Testing can be preemptive or reactive, can occur in house or as a send-out service, and can be panel based or specific to a single gene. Pharmacogenomics is applicable to many medicine specialties, making deployment of services to strategic groups essential. Reimbursement for pharmacogenomics is variable and may pose a barrier to implementation. The demand for pharmacogenomics education for pharmacy students and as a formal postgraduate career path is growing. Pharmacogenomics service planning and implementation details for a multisite health system are described. Conclusion The practice of pharmacogenomics presents a remarkable opportunity for clinical pharmacists and health systems to improve patient care outcomes and experiences.

AbstractProfessional standards for academic health care system pharmacy departments and clinical pharmacists advocate for research and scholarly activities. Developing and sustaining a research program in a clinical pharmacy department is challenging. Over the span of a decade, a robust pharmacy research program was developed in an academic medical center not affiliated with a college of pharmacy. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a framework suitable for scaling research in pharmacy departments within an academic medical center. Objectives to accomplish the aim includes describing the structure and evolution of the clinical pharmacy department research program, listing measurable outputs and achievements of the pharmacists and the program and describing the barriers encountered and solutions that were enacted to overcome them. Elements critical to building and sustaining a research program in the pharmacy department included long‐term commitment from within the department, a departmental research infrastructure, support from institutional leadership, research funding from the institution, and a growth mindset in accordance with company initiatives to support evolving research needs. A research curriculum was developed for pharmacy residents and pharmacists, created electronic tools for research proposal scientific reviews and allocation of funds, and established departmental research career development awards that allowed for protected time to pursue research and professional development. Over the first 10 years of the program, publication rates grew more than three‐fold, faculty appointments and promotions increased approximately five‐fold, and pharmacist investigators obtained extramural federal funding. Further offsetting clinical workload relative to dedicated research time remains a challenge. The experience and success at this academic medical center suggest it is feasible to develop a robust, sustainable clinical pharmacy department research program.

Background: The safety of triple antiemetic therapy consisting of ondansetron, haloperidol, and a steroid, to surgical patients is unknown. Objective: To determine the incidence of torsade de pointes (TdP) or death following perioperative administration of triple antiemetic therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study identified 19,874 patients who received 22,202 doses of triple antiemetics during the 2.5-year time frame from March 4, 2020 to September 7, 2022 for surgical nausea prophylaxis or treatment of nausea. These patients above were cross-matched with an electrocardiogram and adverse outcome database; this identified 226 patients with documentation of a QTc > 450 ms, all ventricular tachycardias including TdP within 48 hours of receiving triple antiemetic therapy, or death within 7 days of receiving ondansetron. Results: There were 3 patients who had documented VT (n = 3), but there were no documented incidents of TdP (n = 0). There were 9 codes called on patients within 48 hours of medication administration, and none of them were due to ventricular arrythmias (n = 0). A total of 11 patients died within 7 days of triple antiemetic therapy. Ten of the 11 deaths were determined to not be from the triple antiemetic. One patient died at home within 24 hours of the procedure of an unknown cause (n = 1). Conclusions and Relevance: No episodes of TdP were identified in patients receiving triple antiemetic therapy perioperatively, though the cause of death in 1 patient could not be determined. This suggest that low-dose triple antiemetic therapy is low risk for the development of TdP.

Abstract Purpose Mayer's theory of multimedia learning proposes that personalisation and embodiment (P/E) can improve outcomes in e‐Learning. The authors hypothesised that an e‐Learning module enhanced by P/E principles would lead to higher knowledge, perceived P/E and motivation among health care professionals, compared with an unenhanced module. Methods The authors conducted a randomised trial comparing two versions of a 30‐minute multimedia e‐Learning module addressing the antibiotic management of pneumonia. The unenhanced format used slides with voiceover (human voice but no visible speaker), formal language and no specific P/E strategies. The enhanced format additionally implemented P/E strategies including conversational style, polite language, visible author, social congruence, human‐like presence and professional presence by subtly changing the script and substituting several short videos of subject matter experts. Participants included pharmacists, physicians and advanced practice providers from three academic and several community hospitals. Outcomes included knowledge, perceived P/E (assessed by the Congruence Personalisation Questionnaire, CPQ), motivation (assessed via the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey [IMMS] and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire [MSLQ]) and course satisfaction. Results There were 406 participants including 225 pharmacists, 109 physicians and 72 advanced practice providers. Post‐module knowledge was slightly higher for the enhanced versus the unenhanced format, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (adjusted mean difference, 0.04 of 10 possible, [95% CI −0.26, 0.34], p = 0.78; Cohen d 0.02). Participant perceptions of P/E (measured via CPQ) were significantly greater for the enhanced format (difference 0.46 of 5 possible [0.35, 0.56], p < 0.001; Cohen d 0.85), as were motivational features of the e‐Learning course (measured via IMMS) (difference 0.14 of 5 possible [0.02, 0.26], p = 0.02; Cohen d 0.24). Participants' overall motivational orientation (measured via MSLQ) and course satisfaction were not significantly different between the two formats ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Application of P/E principles to an e‐Learning module led to greater perceived P/E and motivational features but did not influence knowledge.

AbstractStudy ObjectiveThe primary objective of this retrospective safety study was to determine the incidence of torsades de pointes (TdP) or death following perioperative administration of low‐dose, 4 mg, ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting.Design and SettingThis is a single‐center retrospective clinical trial.PatientsThe authors identified 32,737 patients who received 37,589 doses of ondansetron during a 2‐year time frame between March 2009 and February 2011 for surgical nausea prophylaxis or treatment of nausea.Measurements and Main ResultsPatients were cross‐matched with an electrocardiogram and adverse outcome database; this identified 4759 patients with documentation of a QTc >450 milliseconds (ms), all ventricular tachycardias including TdP within 48 hours of receiving ondansetron, or death within 7 days of receiving ondansetron. No patients developed TdP or died as a direct result of ondansetron administration (n = 0; event rate = 0.0 per 10,000, 95% CI 0.0 to 1.1 per 10,000). Forty‐six of 32,737 surgical patients had documented monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 14; event rate = 4.3 per 10,000, 95% CI 2.3 to 7.2 per 10,000) or died (n = 32; event rate = 9.8 per 10,000, 95% CI 6.7 to 13.8 per 10,000) within 48 h of ondansetron administration. All monomorphic VT episodes were precipitated by existing cardiovascular disease; and 7 of 14 patients had documented monomorphic VT prior to receiving ondansetron. Of the 32 surgical patients who died, all deaths were precipitated by pre‐existing disease.ConclusionNo episodes of TdP were identified in patients receiving ondansetron perioperatively. This suggests that low‐dose ondansetron does not contribute to the development of TdP.

Abstract Background An increasing number of patients (pts) requiring anticoagulation are treated with oral factor Xa inhibitors (DOAC) as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists. Prior to the recent approval of coagulation factor Xa (recombinant), inactivated-zhzo in May 2018, four factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4PCC) have been used to reverse the effects of DOACs. We retrospectively analyzed our institutional experience with 4 PCC for reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban to determine the indications for 4PCC use and outcomes. Methods After IRB approval, pts receiving 4PCC, from Feb 2016 to January 2018 were identified from our pharmacy database and pts receiving PCC for reversal of apixiban and rivaroxaban were selected. Consenting pts medical records (MR) were reviewed for demographics and indications for DOAC and 4PCC as well as outcomes of 4PCC use. Pts were excluded if they had discontinued DOAC greater than 7 days before receiving 4PCC or if they were started on alternative forms of anticoagulation at a therapeutic dose prior to receiving PCC. Primary endpoint was clinical efficacy (clinical improvement or stability) or ability to undergo required procedure) and secondary endpoint was safety (thromboembolism and death) up to 35 days post-infusion of 4PCC. Stability for intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) was determined by clinical improvement and if head imaging performed, no change in head CT or MRI scan, whereas stability for other bleeds was determined by hemoglobin stability and opinions of providers in the MR. Primary efficacy outcome for pts undergoing surgery was based on MR comments by the performing surgeon and use of other hemostatic agents and red blood cell transfusions. Results 49 (32 male) pts, median age of 74 (31-95) years, met our study criteria and received 4PCC for reversal of apixaban (n=29) and rivaroxaban (n=20). Indications for anticoagulation were atrial fibrillation (n=35) and thrombosis (n=14). Of the 14 pts with thrombosis, 11 had deep vein thrombosis while 3 had thrombosis at other sites (arterial graft thrombus, aortic thrombus, and portal vein thrombosis). 4PCC was administered in the emergency department (n=36), intensive care unit (n=10), or the general medical wards (n=3). Indications for 4PCC included bleeding (n=40), procedure/surgery (n=6), and hemodynamic instability with clinical suspicion for bleeding (n=3). Bleeding location is reported in table 1. All procedure/surgery performed for clinical symptoms not related to hemorrhage were non-elective procedures and included exploratory laparotomy (n=4), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=1), and incision and drainage of abdominal wall abscess (n=1). Median PCC dose was 42 (10.3-63.3) IU/kg. Outcomes 32/40 (80%) pts had stability or an improvement in bleeding, while 5 pts had bleeding that did not improve. 3 pts, all with ICH, had a bleed that worsened 8 (6-8) hours after PCC but then spontaneously stabilized 24 (8-24) hours later. Of those presenting with clinical bleeding, 3 pts received FFP within 3 hours prior to treatment with 4PCC, 2 pts received FFP within 12 hours after 4PCC, and 2 pts received FFP within 3 hours before and 12 hours after 4PCC. Of 40 pts receiving PCC for bleeding, 14 also had a procedure to help achieve hemostasis (Table 2). All 6 pts were able to undergo procedure/surgery. 5/6 patients achieved adequate hemostasis. One pt had no mention of unanticipated bleeding in the MR but received 8 units of FFP intraoperatively after 4PCC. 6/49 (12%) pts had a thrombotic complication within 35 days of receiving PCC (median 4 days; (range 1-31) including arterial graft thrombus (n=1), superficial venous thrombus (n=1), bilateral soleal vein thrombosis (n=1), internal jugular vein and innominate vein thrombosis (n=1) stroke (n=1), and progression of preexisting portal vein thrombosis (n=1). All-cause mortality was 20%. 3/10 deaths were in pts who never achieved neurologic recovery after ICH and one pt had stroke-like symptoms leading to death 30 days after 4PCC (administered for ICH). Conclusion In this cohort, 80% of pts demonstrated clinical stability/improvement of hemorrhage. All pts were able to undergo surgical procedures; however 17% required additional FFP to achieve hemostasis. Thromboembolism occurred in 12% of patients. No deaths could definitely be attributed to 4PCC; however, 30% of deaths could be attributable to the underlying hemorrhagic episode. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.