Asiedu, Gladys B.

Abstract Rural and low-socioeconomic status women face social determinants of health barriers leading to disproportionately low rates of breast cancer screening and markedly reduced participation in clinical trials. To address this gap, we developed the WeCARE (Women’s Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources, and Education) intervention using a community-engaged approach. This paper describes how Community Advisory Board feedback informed the development of Mayo Clinic Health System’s WeCARE intervention components. Their input was systematically analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) to identify determinants of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and to guide actionable refinements to intervention content and delivery.

Introduction Women residing in rural areas or belonging to lower socioeconomic status (SES) strata experience disproportionately low rates of breast cancer screening, contributing to delayed diagnoses and poorer prognoses. In addition, their participation in clinical trials remains markedly limited, reducing opportunities to access preventive and screening interventions. Promoting research preparedness among women before disease onset may empower them to make informed decisions regarding their health and willingness to participate in clinical research with fewer emotional and logistical barriers. Methods and analysis This project applies a community-based participatory research approach to develop and refine the WeCARE (Women’s Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources and Education) intervention for women aged 50–74 years who have either never undergone breast cancer screening or have not received screening in the past 5 years and who reside in rural areas or belong to low SES groups. The intervention consists of two components. Component 1 is a single-day, in-person community forum that includes (a) an educational seminar led by an oncologist to address breast cancer risk and screening guidelines, (b) survivor storytelling to enhance emotional engagement and cultural resonance and (c) facilitated navigation to breast cancer screening and future research participation. Component 2 involves structured post-forum follow-up through multiple touchpoints (phone calls and mailed boosters) to reinforce knowledge, address barriers and support screening completion and research enrolment. Quantitative data (eg, screening completion, satisfaction and follow-up engagement) will be summarised using descriptive statistics to assess feasibility and reach on 50 participants. Qualitative feedback from participants will undergo thematic analysis to identify barriers, facilitators and perceived cultural relevance. Integrated mixed-method interpretation will inform iterative refinement of the WeCARE intervention and guide design of subsequent larger trials. Ethics and dissemination Approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB #25–008934). All participants will provide informed consent. Procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity and participant safety. Data will be stored in REDCap and disseminated through publications, conferences, local town halls and community reports.

Abstract Background: Black men across the African Diaspora experience a disproportionate burden of prostate cancer (CaP). The Inclusive Cancer Care Research Equity (iCCaRE) Consortium aims to eliminate CaP burden through global scientific collaboration, innovative research, community-engaged interventions, and next-generation workforce development. The primary objective for this Consortium was to optimize CaP diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship through research, research training and education, community engagement and community outreach. The Consortium integrates digital health technologies, community navigation, precision communication and precision science. Methods: Five full projects and one pilot project were launched across partner institutions in North America and Africa. Supported by multiple cores and services, the research activities included (1) implementation of a Point of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Virtual Robot Assistant (PPCD-ViRA); (3) initiation of a cancer care at home trial; (4) migrant health studies of Caribbean and Sub-Saharan African immigrants; (5) expansion of genomic and metabolomic research; and (6) digital, psychosocial, and survivorship intervention development. Training and dissemination activities were deployed through iCCaRE TV, webinars, and community engagement programs including the Global Prostate Health Dialogue (Glo-PHD). Results: In one year, accomplishments included 45 presentations, 17 publications, 16 grant submissions, and 3 awards. The consortium delivered 408 live webinar engagements and reached more than 400 men globally through Glo-PHD. PPCD-ViRA was fully developed and prepared for clinical deployment (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mI-HS5R6sk). The African cohort expansion for genomic and metabolomic profiling was activated across several countries, with biospecimen collection underway. Media dissemination generated more than 15,000 views across platforms, including high-impact educational videos (see: www.youtube.com/@iCCaREConsortium). Training achievements included 13 early-career investigators and 7 trained prostate cancer advocates. Conclusions: In just one year, the iCCaRE Consortium Phase 2 made substantial progress toward transforming CaP equity globally. Through multidisciplinary science, digital innovation, and community partnerships, the consortium is building scalable infrastructure to address diagnosis experiences, treatment quality, and survivorship among Black men. Ongoing efforts will continue to advance precision medicine, culturally grounded interventions, and global capacity building. Citation Format: Folakemi T. Odedina, Arnold Merriweather, Roxana S. Dronca, Ernest T. Kaninjing, Solomon Rotimi, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Kimlin Ashing, Ademola A. Popoola, Gladys Asiedu, Opeyemi Bolajoko, Ewan COBRAN, Emelina Asto-Flores, Floyd Willis, Christopher Williams, Monica L. Albertie, Michelle Fudge, Oluwaseyi Toye, Collisa Mahin, Jada Melton, Inclusive Cancer Care Research Equity (iCCaRE) Consortium, Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium (CaPTC). Achieving prostate cancer equity globally: Multinational advances from the iCCaRE consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2382.

Abstract Introduction: The National Cancer Institute estimated almost 317,000 new breast cancer and over 13,000 new cervical cancer cases in 2025. While the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program has served millions of women over the past two decades, inequities in cancer screening, subsequently delayed diagnosis, and timely and appropriate treatment remain a public health challenge in the United States. Despite the substantial impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on cancer screening, few studies have accounted for SDOH at the individual level when assessing breast and cervical cancer screening adherence. The primary objective of this study is to examine whether the individual-level SDOH, measured using HOUsing-based SocioEconomic Status (HOUSES) index, is associated with breast and cervical cancer screening non-adherence (not current on respective USPSTF recommendations for age and frequency). Methods: In this retrospective study, patients were identified as those receiving primary care in the Mayo Clinic Health System and Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). The Midwest Quality Metrics panel was then used to assess patients due for screening for breast or cervical cancer in July 2023. The HOUSES, using home address and publicly available data on the residence which measures and categorizes housing status into quartiles, was obtained using the electronic health records (EHRs)-linkable patient-level information. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, controlling for Census block group-level adverse social exposome from the Area Deprivation Index, age, and comorbidities. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: For breast cancer, among 128,462 eligible patients, 20.1% (n= 25,857) were non-adherent. Compared to the highest HOUSES quartile (Q4), lower HOUSES groups showed significantly higher odds of non-adherence: Q3 OR=1.20 (95% CI=1.15, 1.25), Q2 OR=1.45; (95% CI=1.40, 1.53), and Q1 OR=1.90 (95% CI=1.81, 1.99). For cervical cancer, among 175,712 eligible patients, 29.9% (n=52,533) were non-adherent. Compared to the highest HOUSES quartile (Q4), lower HOUSES groups showed significantly higher odds of non-adherence: Q3 OR=1.07 (95% CI=1.03, 1.10), Q2 OR=1.16; (95% CI=1.12, 1.20), and Q1 OR=1.36 (95% CI=1.31, 1.41). Conclusions: A clinically meaningful association between the HOUSES index and cancer screening adherence was observed. A lower HOUSES index was associated with higher odds of non-adherence for both breast and cervical cancer screening, even after accounting for neighborhood-level risk, age, and comorbidities. Incorporating HOUSES into EHRs can be a practical “screening-for-screening” tool that enables close monitoring of higher-risk patients without additional burden of surveys. Citation Format: Eunice Y. Park, Madison Beenken, Dave Watson, Chung Il Wi, Tufia Haddad, Gladys Asiedu, Karla BALLMAN, James R. Cerhan, Carolyn Flock, Brian Lynch, Folakemi T. Odedina, Scott H. Okuno, Young J Juhn, . HOUSES as a screening tool for cancer screening: Patient-level housing-based socioeconomic status and breast and cervical cancer screening adherence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7599.

Due to systemic barriers, policymakers in the United States may be unaware of immigrants’ health-related priorities. In response, Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, a 22-year community-engaged partnership, collaborated with 14 Hispanic/Latino and Somali immigrant health promoters in fall 2023 using Photovoice to document their health-related assets and needs. After taking photos, the health promoters reflected, discussed the issues revealed in their images, and developed policy recommendations. Guided by Public Health Critical Race Praxis, we used thematic analysis to analyze health promoters’ reflections. Three themes emerged: healthy choices, inclusion of people and cultural celebrations, and access to opportunity. Health promoters want to expand healthy choices in Southeast Minnesota by growing community garden programming, protecting the environment, making healthy options accessible, and opening an affordable gym. They highlighted the importance of integrating culture and community into youth education, access to culturally appropriate foods, and the need to address Islamophobia. Health promoters wanted increased access to job opportunities, affordable housing, and health care. They saw these opportunities as vehicles for self-improvement but emphasized time management as essential in the United States. Ensuring that immigrants have a meaningful voice in shaping policies that affect health is critical. Policymakers can leverage these findings by demonstrating responsiveness to community-identified priorities and acting on health promoters’ policy recommendations. We encourage future Photovoice researchers to apply explicitly anti-racist frameworks, such as Public Health Critical Race Praxis, to document and challenge systemic oppression.

Context.— A clinic was created for patients to review their explanted organs with a pathologist. Objective.— To prospectively investigate the benefits of this type of clinic as perceived by both transplant patients and their pathologists. Design.— In this prospective study, patients participated in a videotaped viewing of heart and/or lung explants by the patient and their guest(s) and pathologist (December 2017–August 2022). Patients received a 3D-printed replica of their explant. After viewing the explanted organ, patients and their guests participated in an interview to assess their experiences. Video-reflexive ethnography was used by pathologists for data collection and practice improvement. Results.— Of 143 patients who viewed their explanted organ, 21 patients consented to having the organ-viewing session taped and to participate in a postviewing interview. The study group was comprised of 12 men; the median age was 57.5 years (range, 29–67 years). Five pathologists took part in reflexive sessions. The clinics were viewed positively by patients, providing an opportunity to better understand their disease. Pathologists had a similarly positive experience and gained important insights to patient journeys. Proposals for improvement were brought forward from both patients and pathologists. Conclusions.— Video-reflexive ethnography provided the opportunity for patients and pathologists to reflect on patient-pathology clinic appointments. This work serves as a template to build out pathology-based clinics.

Background: Underrepresented minority (URM) patients enroll in cancer clinical trials at low rates. We studied the perspectives of health care professionals to better understand the challenges and potential facilitators of recruiting URM patients into clinical trials. Methods: A purposeful sampling approach was utilized to recruit health care professionals and clinical research staff who recruited and cared for URM patients in a therapeutic cancer clinical trial at any Mayo Clinic site, from July 2018 through October 2021.Data were gathered using a semistructured qualitative interviews. Participants were interviewed about the challenges of recruiting URM patients into cancer clinical trials and possible strategies for improving URM patient enrollment. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis. Results: Of the key themes that emerged from participant interviews ( n = 28), perceived barriers to recruiting URM patients into clinical trials included lack of workforce diversity, underutilization of patient navigators, ineffective community outreach and patient recruitment, restricted access to diverse patient populations, and restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria. Other barriers reported were lack of insurance and access to care and transportation, low socioeconomic status, and mistrust of health care and research. Strategies suggested for improving the recruitment of URM patients into clinical trials included: diversifying and adding research staff, increasing and improving community outreach and advocacy, partnering with clinics closer to patients, increasing monetary and logistical support for patient participation, creating opportunities that build and enhance trust, and systematically examining and modifying clinical trial eligibility criteria. Conclusions: Our findings reveal barriers that have limited URM patient inclusion in cancer clinical trials and highlight strategies to overcoming these barriers.

Objectives Communication barriers, such as channels, comfort, and location, can negatively impact Black prostate cancer survivors’ experiences and health outcomes after treatment. Addressing these barriers promotes a survivor-centric approach that views survivors as active partners in their care. This study explored the communication preferences of Black prostate cancer survivors, focusing on preferred channels, sources, and locations for enhanced quality of life. Design Using grounded theory methodology, we conducted engaged in-depth interviews with 7 Black prostate cancer survivors, centering on their post-treatment experiences. We analyzed participant transcripts to develop codes and themes. Communication accommodation theory (CAT) was applied to examine how survivors adapt their communication styles to navigate barriers and improve their quality of life. CAT helped identify key patterns of survivors’ convergence and divergence in their communication with healthcare providers, crucial for developing survivor-centric communication strategies. Results The analysis revealed the importance of acknowledging cultural and racial perspectives in post-treatment survivorship. Themes extracted from the transcripts included communication barriers, preferences for information channels, and favored locations for sharing information. Survivors expressed a preference for a balance between face-to-face interaction and telehealth, with environments that provide safety and support playing a key role in encouraging vulnerability and open dialogue. Inclusive healthcare practices were seen as essential in empowering Black survivors to engage in meaningful communication without feeling silenced or undervalued, thus fostering a dignified quality of life. Conclusion Tailoring post-treatment communication practices to incorporate cultural sensitivity, inclusive healthcare, and safe spaces is pivotal to supporting Black survivors. These findings provide a pathway to improving survivors’ experiences and empower them to actively shape their survivorship journey. Moreover, they highlight Black men’s need for trustworthy communication with healthcare providers and peers during the post-treatment period, emphasizing the importance of direct, personalized interactions.

Abstract Background: Sub-Saharan African immigrants (SSAI) in the United States (US) constitute one of the fastest-growing segments of the immigrant population. Between 2010 and 2018, the SSAI population in the US increased by 53%, significantly outpacing the 12% growth rate for the overall foreign-born population in the US during that period. We define SSAI as the 2 million individuals living in the US originally from the region of the African continent located south of the Saharan desert. Despite their growing numbers, little is published about the extent to which SSAI adapt to health behaviors more common in the US or remain immersed in the values, beliefs, and practices reflective of their country of origin. Importantly, no study has comprehensively examined the social determinants of health factors among this population and its influence on health-seeking behaviors and decision-making regarding prostate cancer care and treatment. Aim: This study seeks to better understand the lived experiences, unmet needs and the impact of migration on the quality of life of SSAI cancer survivors in the US. Methods. We employ a qualitative approach guided by grounded theory. Selective sampling was used to identify potential participants from a database obtained via the Florida and Minesota cancer registries. We proceeded to conduct in-depth interviews with 16 cancer survivors recruited from the two caner registries. Results. We developed a conceptual framework illuminating the full range of social, behavioral, environmental, and structural factors associated with the experiences of SSAI prostate cancer survivors. From the data, the post diagnosis experiences of study participants can be categorized into three domains: 1) health behaviors; 2) treatment decision and antecedents; 3) challenges of being an immigrant. Characteristics of health behaviors include using informal care teams for social support and second opinions before treatment. Selective disclosure of diagnosis, changes to diet, exercise and searching for information about the diseases were other manifestation of behavior. While some participants made decisions about treatment soon after diagnosis, others took a more deliberative approach and relied on faith and family for social support. Some challenges in terms of being an immigrant include knowledge gaps about the US health system, lack of health insurance and transportation to hospital during treatment. Implication for public health practice. Some of the unmet needs of study participants include transportation cost to and from hospital for radiotherapy and other treatment and reducing the high out of pocket cost for co-payment and drugs. The knowledge deficit about navigating the US health system can be addressed through community-based intervention in partnerships with immigrant groups, advocacy organizations and faith-based organizations. The focus of this intervention should be to educate and empower SSAI men on how to navigate the US health system and be more assertive about their health needs and desires for treatment during doctor’s visit. Citation Format: Ernie Kaninjing, Gladys Asiedu, Kaitlin Van Voorhis, Daniel Lee, Rakinya Hinson, Mary Ellen Young. Conceptual framework on health behaviors and experiences of Sub-Saharan African immigrant prostate cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B144.

Abstract Background: Sub-Saharan African Immigrants (SSAI) represent one of the fastest-growing segments of the immigrant population in the United States (US). Between 2010 and 2018, the SSAI population in the US increased by 53%, significantly outpacing the 12% growth rate for the overall foreign-born population in the US during that time frame. Despite these growing numbers, little is published about the extent to which SSAIs adapt to health behaviors more common in the US or remain immersed in the values, beliefs and practices reflective of their country of origin. Importantly, no study has comprehensively examined the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) among this population relative to their migration experiences and their influence on health-seeking behaviors and decision-making regarding prostate cancer care and treatment options. Methods: This qualitative study employed grounded theory and the social determinants of migrant heath framework to better understand the needs of SSAI prostate cancer survivors in the United States and how to effectively support these survivors. In-depth interviews were conducted with 8 survivors who live in the states of Florida and Minnesota. Findings: Some participants reported limited access to care and financial challenges paying for drugs. In terms of coping with diagnosis and treatment, most of the participants relied on their faith, a positive outlook about survivorship and support of family members. Some participants relied on the coaching and support of a loved one who experienced prostate cancer in the past. Erectile dysfunction severely impacted the sexual life of most participants as they experienced difficulty getting an erection. Conclusion: Participants expressed the benefit of belonging to support groups with other survivors for social and emotional support. As the number of immigrants from sub-Saharan continue to rise, so too will the demand for culturally tailored care to address and reduce disparities in survivorship among this sub-population. Citation Format: Ernest Kaninjing, Gladys Asiedu, Kaitlin Van Voorhis, Mary Ellen Young, Ebenezer Erefah, Emmanuel Agboola, Folakemi Odedina, Roxana Dronca, Kimlin Ashing, Solomon Rotimi, Che Ngufor, Arnola Merriweather, John McCall, Anthony Hill. Social determinants of migrant health factors impacting prostate cancer care and survivorship among sub-Saharan African immigrant men diagnosed with prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1310.