Regnier, Angela K.

Context.— A clinic was created for patients to review their explanted organs with a pathologist. Objective.— To prospectively investigate the benefits of this type of clinic as perceived by both transplant patients and their pathologists. Design.— In this prospective study, patients participated in a videotaped viewing of heart and/or lung explants by the patient and their guest(s) and pathologist (December 2017–August 2022). Patients received a 3D-printed replica of their explant. After viewing the explanted organ, patients and their guests participated in an interview to assess their experiences. Video-reflexive ethnography was used by pathologists for data collection and practice improvement. Results.— Of 143 patients who viewed their explanted organ, 21 patients consented to having the organ-viewing session taped and to participate in a postviewing interview. The study group was comprised of 12 men; the median age was 57.5 years (range, 29–67 years). Five pathologists took part in reflexive sessions. The clinics were viewed positively by patients, providing an opportunity to better understand their disease. Pathologists had a similarly positive experience and gained important insights to patient journeys. Proposals for improvement were brought forward from both patients and pathologists. Conclusions.— Video-reflexive ethnography provided the opportunity for patients and pathologists to reflect on patient-pathology clinic appointments. This work serves as a template to build out pathology-based clinics.

Context.— Autopsy rates have decreased dramatically despite providing important clinical information to medical practices and social benefits to decedents' families. Objective.— To assess the impact of an institutional Office of Decedent Affairs (ODA), a direct communication link between pathology and decedents' families, on hospital autopsy consent rates, autopsy-related communication, practitioner views, and next-of-kin experiences. Design.— A before and after study involving all hospital decedents whose deaths did not fall within the jurisdiction of the medical examiner's office from 2013 to 2018. A pathology-run ODA launched in May 2016 to guide next-of-kin through the hospital death process (including autopsy-related decisions) and serve as the next-of-kin's contact for any subsequent autopsy-related communication. Critical care and hematology/oncology practitioners were assessed for their autopsy-related views and decedents' next-of-kin were assessed for their autopsy-related experiences. Autopsy consent rates for non–medical examiner hospital deaths, autopsy-related communication rates, practitioner views on the role and value of autopsy, and next-of-kin autopsy experiences and decisions factors were compared prior to and after ODA launch. Results.— Autopsy consent rates significantly increased from 13.2% to 17.3% (480 of 3647 deaths versus 544 of 3148 deaths; P < .001). There were significant increases in the rate of autopsy-related discussions and bereavement counseling provided to decedents' families. Practitioner views on the positive role of autopsy for any hospital death and those with advanced stage cancer also significantly increased. Next-of-kin indicated more consistent autopsy-related discussions with the potential benefits of autopsy discussed becoming key decision factors. Conclusions.— An ODA improves hospital autopsy consent rates, autopsy-related communication, providers' autopsy-related views, and next-of-kins autopsy experiences.