Maller, Jerome J.

Abstract Background Late preterm (LP) children (34 0/7 – 36 6/7 weeks of gestation) are at risk for neurocognitive challenges, yet the neuroanatomic and functional disruptions underlying these developmental differences remain poorly understood. Purpose or Hypothesis Investigate (1) regional differences in cortical surface area and thalamic nuclei volume and (2) structural variations that may explain heterogeneity in neurocognitive functioning in LP versus full term (FT) school-aged children, using two complementary approaches: a vertex-wise analysis of cortical surface area and a region-of-interest volumetric analysis of thalamic nuclei. Study Type Secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study. Population or Subjects 48 LP and 72 FT children aged 6–13 years. Field Strength/Sequence 3T; Sagittal T1-weighted MP-RAGE and axial T2-weighted 3D SPACE. Assessment FreeSurfer 7.4.1 was used to parcellate cortical regions (Destrieux atlas) and segment thalamic nuclei (25 nuclei). Neurocognitive functioning was assessed across four domains: hyperactivity/inattention (Pediatric Behavior Scale), processing speed (WISC-IV), working memory (WISC-III), and visual-spatial perception (Benton JLO). Statistical Tests Independent samples t-tests for group comparisons; vertex-wise GLMs for cortical surface analyses with false discovery rate (FDR) correction; and multiple linear regression for thalamic nuclei analyses with FDR-corrected q < 0.05. Results Vertex-wise analyses revealed regional differences in cortical surface area between LP and FT children in both hemispheres, along with associations between surface area in several cortical regions and hyperactivity/inattention, working memory, and visual-spatial perception. In contrast, using an ROI approach, thalamic nuclei volumes did not differ between groups and were not associated with any neurocognitive domains. Conclusion LP birth may be associated with subtle, region-specific bidirectional left and right hemispheric cortical surface area differences rather than widespread structural alterations in middle childhood, with regional macrostructural measures associated with individual differences in neurocognitive functioning.

Abstract Background An international Delphi panel has defined a harmonized protocol (HarP) for the manual segmentation of the hippocampus on MR. The aim of this study is to study the concurrent validity of the HarP toward local protocols, and its major sources of variance. Methods Fourteen tracers segmented 10 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cases scanned at 1.5 T and 3T following local protocols, qualified for segmentation based on the HarP through a standard web‐platform and resegmented following the HarP. The five most accurate tracers followed the HarP to segment 15 ADNI cases acquired at three time points on both 1.5 T and 3T. Results The agreement among tracers was relatively low with the local protocols (absolute left/right ICC 0.44/0.43) and much higher with the HarP (absolute left/right ICC 0.88/0.89). On the larger set of 15 cases, the HarP agreement within (left/right ICC range: 0.94/0.95 to 0.99/0.99) and among tracers (left/right ICC range: 0.89/0.90) was very high. The volume variance due to different tracers was 0.9% of the total, comparing favorably to variance due to scanner manufacturer (1.2), atrophy rates (3.5), hemispheric asymmetry (3.7), field strength (4.4), and significantly smaller than the variance due to atrophy (33.5%, P < .001), and physiological variability (49.2%, P < .001). Conclusions The HarP has high measurement stability compared with local segmentation protocols, and good reproducibility within and among human tracers. Hippocampi segmented with the HarP can be used as a reference for the qualification of human tracers and automated segmentation algorithms.

ABSTRACTBACKGROUND AND PURPOSEAn effort to define and validate a Harmonized Protocol for standard hippocampal segmentation is being carried out. We wished to estimate the effect of magnetic resonance image (MRI) spatial orientation on manual hippocampal segmentations to define optimal standard orientation of MRIs for hippocampal volumetry.METHODSThree expert tracers segmented twice the hippocampi of 10 ADNI subjects on MRI slices oriented perpendicular to the anterior‐posterior commissure (AC‐PC) line and the long hippocampal axes plane, following internationally harmonized landmarks. We computed intra and interrater reliability figures for total volumes and similarity coefficients.RESULTSTotal volume reliability was similar for both orientations. Similarity coefficients were significantly higher for the AC‐PC orientation (exact P = 0.002).DISCUSSIONThese data show that AC‐PC orientation is slightly more reliable for manual segmentations, possibly due to better visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid spaces separating hippocampal head and amygdala. A Delphi panel of experts has used these data to decide on the optimal orientation for a Harmonized Protocol for hippocampal segmentation.