Roberts, Rosebud O.

AbstractIntroductionThe objective of our study was to investigate cross‐sectional associations of atrial fibrillation with neuroimaging measures of cerebrovascular disease and Alzheimer's disease and their interactions with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).MethodsMagnetic resonance imaging scans of individuals from a population‐based study were analyzed for infarctions, total gray matter, and hippocampal and white matter hyperintensity volumes. A subsample underwent positron emission tomography imaging.ResultsAtrial fibrillation was associated with infarctions and lower total gray matter volume. Compared with subjects with no atrial fibrillation and no infarction, the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for MCI was 2.99 (1.57–5.70; P = .001) among participants with atrial fibrillation and infarction, 0.90 (0.45–1.80; P = .77) for atrial fibrillation and no infarction, and 1.50 (0.96–2.34; P = .08) for no atrial fibrillation and any infarction.DiscussionParticipants with both atrial fibrillation and infarction are more likely to have MCI than participants with either infarction or atrial fibrillation alone.

Objectives To determine the association between multiple chronic conditions and risk of incident mild cognitive impairment ( MCI ) and dementia. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Olmsted County, Minnesota. Participants Cognitively normal individuals (N = 2,176) enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging ( MCSA ). Measurements Participants were randomly selected from the community, evaluated by a physician, and underwent neuropsychometric testing at baseline and at 15‐month intervals to assess diagnoses of MCI and dementia. Information on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes for chronic conditions in the 5 years before enrollment was electronically captured using the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records linkage system. Multimorbidity was defined as having two or more chronic conditions, and the association between multimorbidity and MCI and dementia was examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of 2,176 cognitively normal participants (mean age ± standard deviation 78.5 ± 5.2; 50.6% male), 1,884 (86.6%) had multimorbidity. The risk of MCI or dementia was higher in persons with multimorbidity (hazard ratio ( HR ) = 1.38, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 1.05–1.82) than in those with one or no chronic condition. The HR was of greater magnitude in persons with four or more conditions ( HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.21–2.13) than in those with two or three conditions ( HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.76–1.39) and for men with multimorbidity( HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.01–2.31) than for women with multimorbidity ( HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.83–1.74), compared to those with one or no chronic condition. Conclusion In older adults, having multiple chronic conditions is associated with greater risk of MCI and dementia. This is consistent with the hypothesis that multiple etiologies may contribute to MCI and late‐life dementia. Preventing chronic diseases may be beneficial in delaying or preventing MCI and dementia.

Abstract Background Objective cost estimates and source of cost differences are needed across the spectrum of cognition, including cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), newly discovered dementia, and prevalent dementia. Methods Subjects were a subset of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging stratified‐random sampling of Olmsted County, MN, residents aged 70 to 89 years. A neurologist reviewed provider‐linked medical records to identify prevalent dementia (review date = index). Remaining subjects were invited to participate in prospective clinical/neuropsychological assessments; participants were categorized as CN, MCI, or newly discovered dementia (assessment date = index). Costs for medical services/procedures 1‐year pre‐index (excluding indirect and long‐term care costs) were estimated using line‐item provider‐linked administrative data. We estimated contributions of care‐delivery site and comorbid conditions (including and excluding neuropsychiatric diagnoses) to between‐category cost differences. Results Annual mean medical costs for CN, MCI, newly discovered dementia, and prevalent dementia were $6042, $6784, $9431, $11,678, respectively. Hospital inpatient costs contributed 70% of total costs for prevalent dementia and accounted for differences between CN and both prevalent and newly discovered dementia. Ambulatory costs accounted for differences between CN and MCI. Age‐, sex‐, education‐adjusted differences reached significance for CN versus newly discovered and prevalent dementia and for MCI versus prevalent dementia. After considering all comorbid diagnoses, between‐category differences were reduced (e.g., prevalent dementia minus MCI (from $4842 to $3575); newly discovered dementia minus CN (from $3578 to $711)). Following the exclusion of neuropsychiatric diagnoses from comorbidity adjustment, between‐category differences tended to revert to greater differences. Conclusions Cost estimates did not differ significantly between CN and MCI. Substantial differences between MCI and prevalent dementia reflected high inpatient costs for dementia and appear partly related to co‐occurring mental disorders. Such comparisons can help inform models aimed at identifying where, when, and for which individuals proposed interventions might be cost‐effective.

AbstractIntroductionThe feasibility and validity of brief computerized cognitive batteries at the population‐level are unknown.MethodsNondemented participants (n = 1660, age 50–97 years) in the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging completed the computerized CogState battery and standard neuropsychological battery. The correlation between tests was examined and comparisons between CogState performance on the personal computer (PC) and iPad (n = 331), and in the clinic vs. at home (n = 194), were assessed.ResultsWe obtained valid data on greater than 97% of participants on each test. Correlations between the CogState and neuropsychological tests ranged from −0.462 to 0.531. Although absolute differences between the PC and iPad were small and participants preferred the iPad, performance on the PC was faster. Participants performed faster on Detection, One Card Learning, and One Back at home compared with the clinic.DiscussionThe computerized CogState battery, especially the iPad, was feasible, acceptable, and valid in the population.