Brewer, LaPrincess C.

566 Background: Video telemedicine visits (VTVs) have the potential to overcome disparities in access to cancer care for many socially, geographically, and economically disadvantaged populations. Internet connectivity, digital literacy, and socioeconomic factors are traditionally cited as influencing VTV utilization. However, digital diffusion has occurred rapidly across several sectors, including healthcare, since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and less is known about how these factors have evolved to influence VTV utilization behavior over this time. Through a qualitative approach, we aimed to: (1) explore the lived experiences of cancer patients who transitioned to VTV use as compared to those who persistently did not, and (2) identify similarities and differences between these two groups that could inform targeted interventions to support access and patient acceptance of VTVs in the setting of cancer care. Methods: During June 2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 patients (Mean age 71.3 years, range 42-88; female 50%) receiving ongoing, longitudinal cancer care at our academic medical center since July 2021 who had not used VTVs through at least October 2022. Using purposeful sampling, patients were equally divided according to VTV utilization behaviors defined as “transitioned users” (TU; i.e. those who transitioned to VTV utilization after October 2022) and “persistent non-users” (PNU). Transcripts were analyzed using a combined deductive–inductive thematic approach and categorized into themes of barriers and facilitators across three domains consistent with the COM-B model: capabilities (C), opportunities (O), and motivations (M). Results: TU patients frequently cited a reduction in travel and logistical considerations as a primary reason for uptake of VTVs. PNU patients frequently reported digital literacy barriers, particularly among older patients, as primary reasons for lack of VTV utilization. TU patients reported more experience and comfort in technical skills as compared to PNU participants. PNU patients also reported less frequent offering of VTV as an option by their care teams over time, implying they may have transitioned to VTV utilization if it had been offered with more regularity. Both study groups desired improved internet access and technical support to enhance (or, in the case of PNU patients, enable) VTV utilization. Conclusions: These findings suggest that multi-modal care delivery may best serve current patient populations, not requiring, yet offering VTV services as an adjunct to in-person care. Longer term, individual barriers to VTV use will also need to be addressed to further optimize access for patients who desire to incorporate this care modality.

The FAITH! (Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health) Cardiovascular Health and Wellness Program is more than a decade-long community-based participatory research initiative aimed at addressing cardiovascular health disparities among African-Americans in Minnesota. Founded in 2013, the program employs a culturally tailored, community-driven approach by partnering with African-American faith communities to promote cardiovascular health through education, digital health tools, and multilevel interventions targeting the social determinants of health. Grounded in community-based participatory research principles, FAITH! prioritizes equitable academic-community partnerships, co-learning, community capacity building, and shared ownership in all aspects of research and implementation. The program’s exemplary innovations include the NIH-funded FAITH! Trial, a randomized clinical trial, testing a mobile health intervention (the FAITH! App) co-created with the African-American community, and the Techquity by FAITH! study. Techquity by FAITH! evaluates the effectiveness of a culturally relevant, community-informed mHealth intervention supported by a Digital Health Advocate network to improve overall cardiovascular health and digital health literacy. During its evolution, FAITH! has addressed emergent public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, by adapting programming to provide emergency preparedness resources, health education, and vaccine outreach. Key outcomes include sustainable church-based health ministries, increased research participation, and successful translation of research into practice. The program has also contributed to research workforce development by mentoring and training diverse early-career scholars and community leaders in community-based participatory research and cardiovascular health equity research. Lessons learned highlight the transformative impact of community-based participatory research in building trust, facilitating culturally relevant dissemination, and sustaining health equity initiatives. The FAITH! model demonstrates a scalable, community-led strategy for advancing cardiovascular health in underserved populations and provides a blueprint for future initiatives aiming to reduce racial health disparities.

Background Although telehealth cardiac rehabilitation (CR) may improve access, there are concerns about its long‐term effectiveness and impact on equity as compared with in‐person CR. Our objective was to tailor a patient‐centered telehealth CR program for diverse populations. Methods CR patients and caregivers were recruited between January and September 2023 from 4 US academic medical centers. Participants engaged in human‐centered design sessions to iteratively refine a telehealth CR program. Sessions had planned topics, but there was variation across sites to account for site‐specific needs and participant feedback. Sessions were qualitatively analyzed using rapid template analysis with preselected behavioral science constructs and other emergent codes. Results The study included 21 participants (71% aged ≥60 years, 48% women, 62% non‐Hispanic White individuals; 90% CR patients, 10% CR caregivers). Participants thought that telehealth CR could be helpful for personalized support at home and convenience but recognized that technology is not always easy to use. Some expressed concerns about the safety of telehealth CR, especially at the beginning, and desired monitoring through a mobile device or video observation of exercise. Safety protocols and technology training were developed, which addressed concerns about telehealth CR. Opportunities for social support with telehealth CR were also desired. From these findings, an implementation toolkit was developed, including a graphic program description, safety plan, home exercise plan for during and after CR, and scripts for technology training and individual and group telehealth visits. Conclusions A patient‐centered telehealth CR program and implementation toolkit were systematically tailored to address the needs of diverse populations.

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive secondary cardiovascular disease program with structured lifestyle interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality. The American Heart Association cardiovascular health (CVH) framework measures health‐promoting behaviors and clinical factors, but it has not been rigorously evaluated in the CR setting. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients attending CR from January 2018 to September 2020. Patients were evaluated at baseline (pre‐CR) and completion (post‐CR) using 3 clinical factors (blood pressure, cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1c) and 4 health behaviors (smoking, body mass index, physical activity, and diet). CVH score was computed as a composite of each Life's Simple 7 component by assigning 0 points for poor, 1 point for intermediate, or 2 points for ideal (range 0–14 points). CVH scores were further categorized as poor (0–6 points), intermediate (7–8 points), and ideal (9–14 points). Missing data in the analysis were accounted for using a multiple imputation procedure. Results Patients (N=937) were aged 64.0±13.4 years old, 34% women, and attended 11±12 CR sessions. Pre‐CR, 97.2% had poor CVH scores, 2.8% had intermediate scores, and none met ideal CVH criteria. Post‐CR, there was a reduction in poor scores across all metrics except for hemoglobin A1c, which increased (40.6%–43.5%). Younger patients showed improvement in hemoglobin A1c, while older patients improved in body mass index and blood pressure. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the efficacy of CR in improving CVH but underscores the need for better blood glucose management. Tailored interventions based on age and sex may further optimize outcomes for CR participants.

BACKGROUND: Mortality due to ischemic heart disease (IHD) has declined in countries with high socioeconomic development. Whether these declines extend to other settings, and whether socioeconomic development influences IHD mortality among men and women differently, is unknown. METHODS: We obtained annual data on sex-specific IHD mortality rates for countries/territories in the GBD study (Global Burden of Disease) from 1980 to 2021. The sociodemographic index (SI), a measure of socioeconomic development, was retrieved for each country/territory. Age-adjusted IHD mortality rates were modeled as a smooth function of sex, year, and SI. RESULTS: From 1980 to 2021, IHD mortality rates did not decrease in low SI settings for men or women. In contrast, mortality rates relative to 1980 declined by >25% in average SI settings (age-adjusted mortality per 100 000, 153–107 for women and 218–161 for men) and >50% in high SI settings (age-adjusted mortality per 100 000, 162–69 for women and 258–114 for men). Comparing the 20th versus 80th percentile of SI in 2021 (corresponding to lower versus higher socioeconomic development), mortality rates were 81% higher for men and 111% higher for women living in socioeconomically deprived settings ( P for difference by sex: 0.01), although absolute differences were larger in men. The association of low SI with higher IHD mortality was especially pronounced for mortality attributable to environmental/occupational risk factors (eg, particulate matter air pollution, lead exposure, and extremes of temperature), with mortality rates being 174% higher among women and 199% higher among men. CONCLUSIONS: Across the past 4 decades, low socioeconomic development was associated with no improvement in IHD mortality rates for men or women, in contrast to the large reductions observed in settings with high socioeconomic development. In contemporary settings, socioeconomic deprivation is associated with larger relative excess mortality in women and larger absolute excess mortality in men.

Introduction: Greater religiosity, or degree of involvement in religious activities, associates with better CV health profiles. Yet, studies of the association between religiosity and incident CV events have yielded mixed results. The southeastern US is characterized by strong religious practice but has among the highest rates of incident heart failure (HF). The relationship between religiosity and incident HF is not well characterized, particularly among low-income populations. Methods: We studied 23,893 Black or White Southern Community Cohort Study participants (median age 53 years, 70% Black, 64% women, 70% annual household income <$15k) without prevalent HF or CAD at enrollment (2002-2009). Religiosity, defined by religious service attendance, was ascertained at enrollment via a single item adapted from the Duke University Religion Index. Incident HF was determined using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Research Identifiable Files (ICD-9/-10 codes 428.x or I50, I110) through December 31, 2016. We quantified the association of religious attendance with incident HF via Cox models adjusted for demographics, HF risk factors (HTN, HLD, DM, BMI, CVA), health behaviors (smoking, alcohol, physical activity, DASH diet), socioeconomic (income, education, employment, neighborhood deprivation, rurality) and psychosocial factors (marital status, social support, depressive symptoms, anti-depressant use). Results: Religious service attendance was common: >1/week (24%), 1/week (27%), <1/week (33%), and never (15%). Participants attending >1/week were more likely to be older and female, had relatively higher SES and more comorbidities, but better health behaviors and psychosocial support. HF developed in 6081 participants (25%; median 10-yr follow-up). Adjusting for demographics and HF risk factors, attendance >1/week associated with lower HF risk (HR 0.88 [0.82,0.94] and HR 0.92 [0.84,1.00] compared to <1/week or never, respectively). Attendance 1/week compared to <1/week showed similar association (HR 0.91 [0.85, 0.97]). Further adjustment for health behaviors, socioeconomic and psychosocial factors attenuated the association to non-significance. There was no interaction between religiosity and race. Conclusion: Greater frequency of religious service attendance associated with lower incident HF risk adjusting for demographics and HF risk factors; however, this association attenuated with adjustment for health behaviors, socioeconomic and psychosocial factors.

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is essential to secondary cardiovascular disease prevention and management of cardiac patients. Despite its proven benefits, CR remains underutilized with enrollment and completion rates ranging from 10-30% in the US. Yet, there is a scarcity of nationally representative data among diverse populations on socioeconomic differences in barriers and beliefs of CR participation and delivery mode preferences. Hypothesis: The perceptions (barriers, beliefs), CR delivery mode preferences, and CR utilization (prior enrollment) varies by socioeconomic status (SES) among CR-eligible individuals. Methods: We conducted an anonymous national electronic survey from March 2023 to January 2024 of individuals self-reporting a prior CR-eligible diagnosis. The 22-item CR Barriers Scale assessed perceived barriers to CR enrollment and participation using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). A 13-item, validated questionnaire assessed 4 subscales pertaining to patients’ beliefs about CR, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree): perceived necessity, concerns about exercise, practical barriers and perceived suitability. CR delivery mode preferences were ascertained (eg, virtual, at-home, etc.). Mean barriers and belief scores as well as delivery mode preferences were stratified by SES. Low SES was defined as ≤ high school education, Medicaid insurance, or uninsured. High SES was defined as > high school education and non-Medicaid health insurance. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics with R software. Results: A total of 466 participants completed the survey (38.1% women, 30.6% minoritized racial/ethnic group, 29.6% low SES, 95% response rate) ( Table 1 ). The majority indicated prior enrollment in CR (81.5%) with no difference by SES. CR barrier scores did not differ significantly by SES (p=0.331) ( Table 2 ). Beliefs about CR perceived necessity and perceived suitability differed by SES (p<0.001 and p=0.025), but beliefs regarding concerns about exercise and practical barriers did not. The low SES group reported a higher preference for completely at-home CR compared to the high SES group (33.6% vs 7.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CR beliefs varied by SES while utilization did not. For CR-eligible patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, at-home CR may be a preferred alternative to center-based CR to increase CR participation and adherence.

Methods: From a sample cohort of 274,539 consecutive adults who sought care at Mayo Clinic between 2018-2022, we ascertained demographic and clinical information, including clinically indicated TTE within 15 days and up to a year after the index clinical visit. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a tool that captures neighborhood-level disadvantages that are linked to cardiovascular morbidity and outcomes, was extracted from the Neighborhood Atlas and ranked accordingly as state percentiles stratified in quintiles, with the highest values representing “most disadvantaged” areas. We performed non-parametric multivariate regression models that adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors expressed in odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 45,823 (16.9%) subjects had a TTE performed, with a mean age of 63±16 years, 48% were women, and 86% were non-Hispanic white. According to the TTE, 4% of subjects had LVSD, while 11% had a high probability of LVSD by AI-ECG. Median state ADI was 4 IQR (2-7). In the whole cohort, subjects residing in the most disadvantaged areas were less likely to have a TTE [OR 0.94 CI (0.91- 0.97)] see Fig. 1-A ; conversely, they were more likely to have LVSD by TTE [OR 1.80 CI (1.52-2.13)] see Fig. 1-B , and higher probability of LVSD by AI-ECG [OR 1.43 CI (1.36-1.51)] when compared to those with the least disadvantage see Fig. 1-C , independent of age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors, p for trend<0.001. Conclusion: Individuals living in socially disadvantaged areas were slightly less likely to have an echocardiogram despite a significantly higher likelihood of having an LVSD (suspected by AI-ECG and confirmed by TTE), independent of cardiovascular risk factors. Highlighting an important disparity in the diagnosis of LVSD.

Background African Americans have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, leading to higher cardiovascular disease mortality than White adults. Our culturally tailored mobile health (mHealth) lifestyle intervention ( FAITH! App) has previously demonstrated efficacy in promoting ideal cardiovascular health in African Americans. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis from a cluster randomized controlled trial among African-Americans from 16 churches in Minnesota that compared the FAITH! App to a delayed intervention control group. A subgroup of participants with ≥ 1 diagnosis of overweight/obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes was examined. The primary outcome was a change in LS7 score—a measure of cardiovascular health ranging from poor to ideal (range 0–14 points)—at 6-months post-intervention. Results The analysis included 49 participants (intervention group: n = 20; mean age 58.8 years, 75% female; control group: n = 29, mean age 52.5 years, 76% female) with no significant baseline differences in cardiovascular risk factors. Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed a greater increase in LS7 score across all cardiovascular risk factors at 6-months post-intervention, with statistically significant differences among those with overweight/obesity (intervention effect 1.77, p < 0.0001) and 2+ or 3+ cardiovascular risk factors (1.00, p = 0.03; 1.09, p = 0.04). The intervention group demonstrated a higher increase in the percentage of participants with intermediate or ideal LS7 scores than the control group, although these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions Our culturally tailored mHealth lifestyle intervention was associated with significant increases in LS7 scores among African Americans with preexisting cardiovascular risk factors, suggesting its efficacy in improving cardiovascular health among this population.

Background: Delivering cardiac rehabilitation (CR) by telehealth may increase participation and promote equitable access to CR. Our objective was to tailor a patient-centered telehealth CR program to diverse populations. Methods: We recruited participants with varying CR experience (e.g. attended >1 session, did not attend CR, and caregivers) between January and September 2023 from four US academic medical centers. Participants engaged in human-centered design sessions on CR perspectives and a proposed telehealth CR program. Sessions were qualitatively analyzed using rapid template analysis with pre-selected behavioral science constructs and other emergent codes. Based on participant feedback, we iteratively revised the telehealth CR program and created an implementation toolkit. Results: Among 21 participants (76% ≥65 years, 50% female, 60% non-Hispanic White; 90% attended >1 session, 10% caregiver of a CR participant, 5% prefer not to answer), CR was overall regarded as valuable. Benefits included accountability, confidence, and feeling better. Social support was appreciated from family, friends, program co-participants, and CR staff. Participants emphasized the importance of early goal setting, accountability, and program individualization. Participants thought that using technology for telehealth CR could be helpful for accountability, facilitating relationships, and convenience. However, some participants had concerns about safety, especially at the start of their telehealth program, and desired checks such as a monitoring device or observation of exercise over video. Through human-centered design, safety protocols and technology training were developed, which participants thought addressed their concerns about participating in telehealth CR. The implementation toolkit informed by human-centered design included a participant journey, safety plan, home exercise plan for use during and after CR, and scripts for technology training and telehealth visits. Selected quotes are presented in Figure 1. Conclusions: We developed a patient-centered telehealth CR program and implementation toolkit. Future research will test the comparative effectiveness of in-person and telehealth CR on patient-centered outcomes.