Scales, Robert

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is essential to secondary cardiovascular disease prevention and management of cardiac patients. Despite its proven benefits, CR remains underutilized with enrollment and completion rates ranging from 10-30% in the US. Yet, there is a scarcity of nationally representative data among diverse populations on socioeconomic differences in barriers and beliefs of CR participation and delivery mode preferences. Hypothesis: The perceptions (barriers, beliefs), CR delivery mode preferences, and CR utilization (prior enrollment) varies by socioeconomic status (SES) among CR-eligible individuals. Methods: We conducted an anonymous national electronic survey from March 2023 to January 2024 of individuals self-reporting a prior CR-eligible diagnosis. The 22-item CR Barriers Scale assessed perceived barriers to CR enrollment and participation using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). A 13-item, validated questionnaire assessed 4 subscales pertaining to patients’ beliefs about CR, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree): perceived necessity, concerns about exercise, practical barriers and perceived suitability. CR delivery mode preferences were ascertained (eg, virtual, at-home, etc.). Mean barriers and belief scores as well as delivery mode preferences were stratified by SES. Low SES was defined as ≤ high school education, Medicaid insurance, or uninsured. High SES was defined as > high school education and non-Medicaid health insurance. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics with R software. Results: A total of 466 participants completed the survey (38.1% women, 30.6% minoritized racial/ethnic group, 29.6% low SES, 95% response rate) ( Table 1 ). The majority indicated prior enrollment in CR (81.5%) with no difference by SES. CR barrier scores did not differ significantly by SES (p=0.331) ( Table 2 ). Beliefs about CR perceived necessity and perceived suitability differed by SES (p<0.001 and p=0.025), but beliefs regarding concerns about exercise and practical barriers did not. The low SES group reported a higher preference for completely at-home CR compared to the high SES group (33.6% vs 7.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CR beliefs varied by SES while utilization did not. For CR-eligible patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, at-home CR may be a preferred alternative to center-based CR to increase CR participation and adherence.

Background Innovative restructuring of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery remains critical to reduce barriers and improve access to diverse populations. Destination Cardiac Rehab is a novel virtual world technology‐based CR program delivered through the virtual world platform, Second Life, which previously demonstrated high acceptability as an extension of traditional center‐based CR. This study aims to evaluate efficacy and adherence of the virtual world–based CR program compared with center‐based CR within a community‐informed, implementation science framework. Methods Using a noninferiority, hybrid type 1 effectiveness‐implementation, randomized controlled trial, 150 patients with an eligible cardiovascular event will be recruited from 6 geographically diverse CR centers across the United States. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either the 12‐week Destination Cardiac Rehab or the center‐based CR control groups. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite cardiovascular health score based on the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 at 3 and 6 months. Adherence outcomes include CR session attendance and participation in exercise sessions. A diverse patient/caregiver/stakeholder advisory board was assembled to guide recruitment, implementation, and dissemination plans and to contextualize study findings. The institutional review board–approved randomized controlled trial will enroll and randomize patients to the intervention (or control group) in 3 consecutive waves/year over 3 years. The results will be published at data collection and analyses completion. Conclusions The Destination Cardiac Rehab randomized controlled trial tests an innovative and potentially scalable model to enhance CR participation and advance health equity. Our findings will inform the use of effective virtual CR programs to expand equitable access to diverse patient populations. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05897710.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic imposed significant constraints to delivery of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) with many programs relying on delivery of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR). We sought to compare the effects of HBCR vs conventional center-based CR (CBCR) on clinical metrics, health-related quality of life, and modifiable risk factors in CR patients. Methods: Retrospective cohort study comparing 511 HBCR patients (March 2020-April 2021; COVID-19 pandemic) and 765 age and sex matched CBCR patients (Jan 2018-Jan2020; immediately pre-pandemic) from the Mayo Clinic Health System. We assessed changes in clinical outcomes before and after CR. HBCR included 12 sessions (one in-person assessment + weekly education and exercise monitoring phone/video calls). Conventional CBCR included 36 sessions (3 sessions per week for 12 weeks). Continuous data were described as mean±SD, and comparisons of change between groups were assessed with linear regression adjusting for baseline value, in complete cases. Results: HBCR and CBCR patients were 65±14 yrs old (68% male) and 65±14 yrs old (67% male) respectively. HBCR patients demonstrated greater improvement in exercise days/week whereas CBCR patients had greater improvement in exercise min/day. HBCR patients had greater improvement in blood glucose with a trend towards greater improvement in non-HDL cholesterol. Both groups demonstrated similar improvement on nutrition, depression, health-related quality of life surveys and total, LDL and HDL cholesterol, as well as HbA1c between the groups. Conclusions: Collecting clinical metrics during the COVID-19 pandemic proved challenging due to the initial closure of out-patient services. For patients in whom data was captured, HBCR appears to be similarly effective at improving several intermediate outcomes compared to CBCR. HBCR may be an effective alternative for improving clinical outcomes in patients who are unable to participate in CBCR.

Evidence suggests that cardiovascular (CV) fitness below the 20 th percentile for age and gender is associated with increased cardiac death and all cause mortality. This study assessed the association between CV fitness and sub-clinical atherosclerosis (SCA) in a self-selected group of participants in a cardiology-based prevention program. The study involved a single visit observation of participants. 240 apparently healthy asymptomatic adults <65 years (69% male) received a maximal graded exercise stress test and a carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) evaluation with B-mode ultrasound. CV fitness was classified based on age-gender norms (very poor=1-19 th , poor=20-39 th , fair=40-59 th , good=60-79 th , excellent/superior=80-100 th percentile). CIMT was used to define CV health based on age-gender-race norms. SCA was considered present when there was non-occlusive carotid artery plaque (>1.5mm and >50% of the surrounding intima-media) or CIMT >75 th percentile. Anyone with a prior history of clinically apparent atherosclerosis or diabetes was excluded from the study. The mean age of participants was 50 yrs (SD= 8.7). 113 participants (47%) had excellent/superior CV fitness. 41 (17%) were classified good, 36 (15%) fair, 20 (8%) poor and 30 (12%) very poor. 69 (61%) participants with excellent/superior CV fitness had advanced atherosclerosis (plaque=43%; n=49 or CIMT >75 th percentile=l7%; n=20). In the good classification there were 26 (64%) with plaque (49%; n=20) or CIMT >75 th percentile (15%; n=6). There were 23 (63%) in the fair classification with plaque (44%; n=16) or CIMT >75 th percentile (19%; n=7), 11 (55%) in the poor classification with plaque (45%; n=9) or CIMT >75 th percentile (10%; n=2) and 17 (56%) in the very poor classification with plaque (53%; n=16) or CIMT >75 th percentile (3%; n=1). 58 (24%) of the total number of participants were classified with superior CV fitness (95-100 th percentile); of which 36 (62%) had SCA (plaque=45%; n=26 or CIMT >75 th percentile=17%; n=10). In this self-selected population, CIMT testing detected evidence of SCA across all age-gender fitness classifications, which included very fit individuals. Further investigation is needed to identify other factors that may be associated with increased CV risk in apparently healthy fit asymptomatic adults.

Purpose: High-value care is becoming increasingly important as the United States shifts toward a more sustainable health care system. Lifestyle medicine (LM) may be the highest-value model of care. Surprisingly, however, it is taught in a minority of medical schools. In this article, we describe a pilot project of introducing a brief LM course taught within the Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine in Arizona. The main purpose of the course was to introduce the students to LM as a specialty practice and to provide students with foundational knowledge of the pillars of LM. Results: Students reported improved personal health habits and increased confidence in LM competencies.