Salstrand, Rosalyn M.

Background. Frailty is a modifiable risk factor for morbidity and mortality among kidney transplant (KT) candidates. We previously demonstrated that an 8-wk center-based exercise intervention is associated with improved frailty parameters in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to adapt the intervention for home-based delivery and examine its feasibility, safety, and acceptability in a multicenter cohort of KT candidates. Methods. We conducted a prospective pilot study between January 2021 and November 2023 involving KT candidates from Mayo Clinic in Minnesota and Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center in Texas. Adults approved for KT who were (1) frail or prefrail by the Physical Frailty Phenotype and/or (2) had a Short Physical Performance Battery score ≤10 were enrolled. The exercise intervention consisted of an individualized exercise prescription provided by a Mayo Clinic exercise physiologist followed by 8 weekly phone calls. Feasibility was assessed via retention rates, adverse events were recorded, and acceptability was assessed via survey. Results. Baseline characteristics of the 15 enrolled participants included a median age of 64 y, 73.3% were men, and 73.3% were of White race. Sixty percent of participants completed the intervention. No unanticipated adverse events occurred. Most participants strongly agreed that the exercise intervention was beneficial to their overall health. Conclusions. This pilot study demonstrates that a home-based 8-wk exercise intervention is a promising prehabilitation strategy in KT candidates and provides important preliminary data for future larger, randomized studies.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic imposed significant constraints to delivery of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) with many programs relying on delivery of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR). We sought to compare the effects of HBCR vs conventional center-based CR (CBCR) on clinical metrics, health-related quality of life, and modifiable risk factors in CR patients. Methods: Retrospective cohort study comparing 511 HBCR patients (March 2020-April 2021; COVID-19 pandemic) and 765 age and sex matched CBCR patients (Jan 2018-Jan2020; immediately pre-pandemic) from the Mayo Clinic Health System. We assessed changes in clinical outcomes before and after CR. HBCR included 12 sessions (one in-person assessment + weekly education and exercise monitoring phone/video calls). Conventional CBCR included 36 sessions (3 sessions per week for 12 weeks). Continuous data were described as mean±SD, and comparisons of change between groups were assessed with linear regression adjusting for baseline value, in complete cases. Results: HBCR and CBCR patients were 65±14 yrs old (68% male) and 65±14 yrs old (67% male) respectively. HBCR patients demonstrated greater improvement in exercise days/week whereas CBCR patients had greater improvement in exercise min/day. HBCR patients had greater improvement in blood glucose with a trend towards greater improvement in non-HDL cholesterol. Both groups demonstrated similar improvement on nutrition, depression, health-related quality of life surveys and total, LDL and HDL cholesterol, as well as HbA1c between the groups. Conclusions: Collecting clinical metrics during the COVID-19 pandemic proved challenging due to the initial closure of out-patient services. For patients in whom data was captured, HBCR appears to be similarly effective at improving several intermediate outcomes compared to CBCR. HBCR may be an effective alternative for improving clinical outcomes in patients who are unable to participate in CBCR.