Back to Authors

Kaihoi, Brian

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Abstract MP24: Socioeconomic Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Perceptions and Delivery Mode Preferences: A Nationally Representative Survey Among Diverse Cardiac Patients.
Anyetei-Anum, Grace Patrice, Averkamp, Natalie , Johnson, Matthew P. , Krogman, Ashton , Clark, Donald , Echols, Melvin , Hall, Michael E. , Hodgman, Karen, Kaihoi, Brian, Kopecky, Stephen L. , Leth, Shawn , Malik, Shaista , Scales, Robert , Shultz, Adam M. , Schulte, Phillip J. , Olson, Thomas P. , Abraham, Helayna , Marsteller, Jill , Mathews, Lena , Taylor, Bryan J. , Thomas, Randal J. , Wong, Nathan D. , Brewer, LaPrincess C.

Circulation | April 17, 2025 | Volume: 151 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.mp24 Get It

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is essential to secondary cardiovascular disease prevention and management of cardiac patients. Despite its proven benefits, CR remains underutilized with enrollment and completion rates ranging from 10-30% in the US. Yet, there is a scarcity of nationally representative data among diverse populations on socioeconomic differences in barriers and beliefs of CR participation and delivery mode preferences. Hypothesis: The perceptions (barriers, beliefs), CR delivery mode preferences, and CR utilization (prior enrollment) varies by socioeconomic status (SES) among CR-eligible individuals. Methods: We conducted an anonymous national electronic survey from March 2023 to January 2024 of individuals self-reporting a prior CR-eligible diagnosis. The 22-item CR Barriers Scale assessed perceived barriers to CR enrollment and participation using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). A 13-item, validated questionnaire assessed 4 subscales pertaining to patients’ beliefs about CR, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree): perceived necessity, concerns about exercise, practical barriers and perceived suitability. CR delivery mode preferences were ascertained (eg, virtual, at-home, etc.). Mean barriers and belief scores as well as delivery mode preferences were stratified by SES. Low SES was defined as ≤ high school education, Medicaid insurance, or uninsured. High SES was defined as > high school education and non-Medicaid health insurance. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics with R software. Results: A total of 466 participants completed the survey (38.1% women, 30.6% minoritized racial/ethnic group, 29.6% low SES, 95% response rate) ( Table 1 ). The majority indicated prior enrollment in CR (81.5%) with no difference by SES. CR barrier scores did not differ significantly by SES (p=0.331) ( Table 2 ). Beliefs about CR perceived necessity and perceived suitability differed by SES (p<0.001 and p=0.025), but beliefs regarding concerns about exercise and practical barriers did not. The low SES group reported a higher preference for completely at-home CR compared to the high SES group (33.6% vs 7.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CR beliefs varied by SES while utilization did not. For CR-eligible patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, at-home CR may be a preferred alternative to center-based CR to increase CR participation and adherence.
Efficacy and Adherence Rates of a Novel Community‐Informed Virtual World‐Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Protocol for the Destination Cardiac Rehab Randomized Controlled Trial
Brewer, LaPrincess C. , Abraham, Helayna , Clark, Donald , Echols, Melvin , Hall, Michael E. , Hodgman, Karen, Kaihoi, Brian, Kopecky, Stephen L. , Krogman, Ashton , Leth, Shawn , Malik, Shaista , Scales, Robert , Schulte, Phillip J. , Shultz, Adam M. , Wong, Nathan D. , Olson, Thomas P. , Hall, Michael , Kopecky, Stephen L , Marsteller, Jill , Mathews, Lena , Scales, Robert , Schulte, Phillip , Shultz, Adam , Thomas, Randal , Wong, Nathan , Olson, Thomas , Brewer, LaPrincess C , Taylor, Bryan J. , Thomas, Randal J.

Journal of the American Heart Association | November 28, 2023 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 23 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.123.030883 Get It

Background Innovative restructuring of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery remains critical to reduce barriers and improve access to diverse populations. Destination Cardiac Rehab is a novel virtual world technology‐based CR program delivered through the virtual world platform, Second Life, which previously demonstrated high acceptability as an extension of traditional center‐based CR. This study aims to evaluate efficacy and adherence of the virtual world–based CR program compared with center‐based CR within a community‐informed, implementation science framework. Methods Using a noninferiority, hybrid type 1 effectiveness‐implementation, randomized controlled trial, 150 patients with an eligible cardiovascular event will be recruited from 6 geographically diverse CR centers across the United States. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either the 12‐week Destination Cardiac Rehab or the center‐based CR control groups. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite cardiovascular health score based on the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 at 3 and 6 months. Adherence outcomes include CR session attendance and participation in exercise sessions. A diverse patient/caregiver/stakeholder advisory board was assembled to guide recruitment, implementation, and dissemination plans and to contextualize study findings. The institutional review board–approved randomized controlled trial will enroll and randomize patients to the intervention (or control group) in 3 consecutive waves/year over 3 years. The results will be published at data collection and analyses completion. Conclusions The Destination Cardiac Rehab randomized controlled trial tests an innovative and potentially scalable model to enhance CR participation and advance health equity. Our findings will inform the use of effective virtual CR programs to expand equitable access to diverse patient populations. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05897710.
Patient-perceived acceptability of a virtual world-based cardiac rehabilitation program
Kaihoi, Brian, Schaepe, Karen , Zarling, Kathleen K., Squires, Ray W. , Kopecky, Stephen L. , Brewer, LaPrincess C. , Zarling, Kathleen, Kopecky, Stephen, Thomas, Randal J.

DIGITAL HEALTH | April 24, 2017 | Volume: 3 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/2055207617705548 Get It

Background Despite its benefits, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation rates remain subpar. Telehealth lifestyle interventions have emerged as modalities to enhance CR accessibility. Virtual-world (VW) technology may provide a means to increase CR use. Objectives This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a VW-based CR program as an extension to medical center-based CR. Our goal is to apply the study results toward the design of a patient-centered VW platform prototype with high usability, understandability, and credibility. Methods Patients ( n = 8, 25% women) recently enrolled in outpatient CR at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota participated in a 12-week, VW health education program and provided feedback on the usability, design and satisfaction of the intervention at baseline and completion. A mixed-methods approach was used to analyze the participant perceptions of the intervention. Results Overall, there were positive participant perceptions of the VW experience. There was unanimous high satisfaction with the graphical interface appearance and ease of use. Participants placed value on the convenience, accessibility, and social connectivity of the remote program as well as the novelty of the simulation platform presentations, which aided in memorability of key concepts. Greater than 80% of participants reported that the program improved their health knowledge and helped to maintain better health habits. Conclusions Our pilot study revealed the feasibility and acceptability of an innovative VW-based CR program among cardiac patients. This novel delivery method for CR has the potential to influence healthy lifestyle change and to increase accessibility to vulnerable populations with higher cardiovascular disease burdens.