Carr, Carrie M.

Abstract Objective To describe the technique, safety profile, and outcome of computed tomography (CT)–guided atlanto-axial lateral articulation injections performed at our institution. Methods Consecutive cases of all CT-guided atlanto-axial injections performed from January 2017 to April 2022 at our institution were searched in the electronic medical records. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, characterization of pain, potential altered anatomy, pain level before and immediately after the procedure, procedure technique, complications, and follow-up outcomes, if available. Results Forty-five injections in 40 different patients were included. The average age was 67.4 years, and 28 (70%) of the patients were female. Of the 45 injections, 43 (96%) were technically successful. The average change in pain score (0–10) from immediately before to immediately after the injection was –3.36 (SD = 2.87, range = –8 to +3). Of all injections, 14 (31%) had a postprocedural pain score of zero. In 2 cases (4%), patients reported an increase in pain score immediately after the injection. In 3 cases (7%), transient non–vertebral artery vascular uptake of contrast was documented during the procedure, which could be cleared with needle repositioning. There were no complications. Conclusion CT-guided atlanto-axial lateral articulation injection is a safe procedure with a high technical success rate. It allows for direct visualization of vital structures and provides an alternative option to the traditional fluoroscopic guidance, especially in cases of prior technically unsuccessful fluoroscopically guided injection or altered anatomy.

Background Computed tomography (CT) angiography collateral score (CTA-CS) is an important clinical outcome predictor following mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The present multireader study aimed to evaluate the performance of e-CTA software for automated assistance in CTA-CS scoring. Materials and Methods Brain CTA images of 56 patients with anterior LVO were retrospectively processed. Twelve readers of various clinical training, including junior neuroradiologists, senior neuroradiologists, and neurologists graded collateral flow using visual CTA-CS scale in two sessions separated by a washout period. Reference standard was the consensus of three expert readers. Duration of reading time, inter-rater reliability, and statistical comparison of readers’ performance metrics were analyzed between the e-CTA assisted and unassisted sessions. Results e-CTA assistance resulted in significant increase in mean accuracy (58.6% to 67.5%, p = 0.003), mean F1 score (0.574 to 0.676, p = 0.002), mean precision (58.8% to 68%, p = 0.007), and mean recall (58.7% to 69.9%, p = 0.002), especially with slight filling deficit (CTA-CS 2 and 3). Mean reading time was reduced across all readers (103.4 to 59.7 s, p = 0.001), and inter-rater agreement in CTA-CS assessment was increased (Krippendorff's alpha 0.366 to 0.676). Optimized occlusion laterality detection was also noted with mean accuracy (92.9% to 96.8%, p = 0.009). Conclusion Automated assistance for CTA-CS using e-CTA software provided helpful decision support for readers in terms of improving scoring accuracy and reading efficiency for physicians with a range of experience and training backgrounds and leading to significant improvements in inter-rater agreement.

Objectives The aim of this study is to introduce the infrapedicular approach to CT-guided spine interventions, a specialized technique that can safely expand the scope of spine lesions amenable to treatment, and to document the feasibility in a variety of procedural scenarios to the extent possible with a retrospective case series. Methods Data from 24 cases performed at a single institution over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed to assess the technical feasibility and safety profile of the technique. Results The infrapedicular approach enabled a technically satisfactory procedural result in 24 cases (mean age 63.9 years, range 35–83 years). Two peri-procedural complications occurred, including a small pneumothorax and a cerebrospinal fluid leak, both of which resolved with conservative treatment. No lasting injurious effects or additional complications were identified. The infrapedicular approach was found to be particularly useful in multiple technically challenging scenarios: it facilitates access to lesions in the inferior vertebral body, allows biopsy, cement augmentation, or ablation of high thoracic lesions difficult to treat due to limitations of steep angulation of fluoroscopy and CT scanners, and enables treatment of large lesions by using multiple overlapping probes.

Background and purpose Radiation therapy is an important component of treatment in patients with malignancies of the head, neck, and spine. However, radiation to these regions has well-known potential side effects, many of which can be encountered on imaging. In this manuscript, we review selected radiographic manifestations of therapeutic radiation to the head, neck, and spine that may be encountered in the practice of radiology. Methods We conducted an extensive literature review of known complications of radiation therapy in the head, neck, and spine. We excluded intracranial and pulmonary radiation effects from our search. We selected complications that had salient, recognizable imaging findings. We searched our imaging database for illustrative examples of these complications. Results Based on our initial literature search and imaging database review, we selected cases of radiation-induced tumors, radiation tissue necrosis (osteoradionecrosis and soft tissue necrosis), carotid stenosis and blowout secondary to radiation, enlarging thyroglossal duct cysts, radiation myelopathy, and radiation-induced vertebral compression fractures. Conclusions We describe the clinical and imaging features of selected sequelae of radiation therapy to the head, neck, and spine, with a focus on those with characteristic imaging findings that can be instrumental in helping to make the diagnosis. Knowledge of these entities and their imaging findings is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Not only do radiologists play a key role in early detection of these entities, but many of these entities can be misinterpreted if one is not familiar with them.

Standard clinical protocols require hearing protection during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patient safety. This investigation prospectively evaluated the auditory function impact of acoustic noise exposure during a 3.0T MRI in healthy adults. Twenty-nine participants with normal hearing underwent a comprehensive audiologic assessment before and immediately following a clinically indicated head MRI. Appropriate hearing protection with earplugs (and pads) was used per standard of practice. To characterize noise hazards, current sound monitoring tools were used to measure levels of pulse sequences measured. A third audiologic test was performed if a significant threshold shift (STS) was identified at the second test, within 30 days post MRI. Some sequences produced high levels (up to 114.5 dBA; 129 dB peak SPL) that required hearing protection but did not exceed 100% daily noise dose. One participant exhibited an STS in the frequency region most highly associated with noise-induced hearing loss. No participants experienced OSHA-defined STS in either ear. Overall, OAE measures did not show evidence of changes in cochlear function after MRI. In conclusion, hearing threshold shifts associated with hearing loss or OAE level shifts reflecting underlying cochlear damage were not detected in any of the 3.0T MRI study participants who used the current recommended hearing protection.

Background CT-guided biopsy is a commonly used diagnostic procedure for spinal lesions. This meta-analysis aims to investigate its diagnostic performance and complications, as well as factors influencing outcomes. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies reporting outcomes of CT-guided biopsies for spinal lesions. Diagnostic yield (ie, the rate of procedures resulting in a specific pathological diagnosis) and diagnostic accuracy (ie, the rate of procedures resulting in the correct diagnosis) were the primary outcomes of interest. Complications following biopsy procedures were also included. Results Thirty-nine studies with 3917 patients undergoing 4181 procedures were included. Diagnostic yield per procedure was 91% (95% CI 88% to 94%) among 3598 procedures. The most common reason for non-diagnostic biopsies was inadequacy of sample. No difference in diagnostic yield between different locations and between lytic, sclerotic, and mixed lesions was found. Diagnostic yield did not differ between procedures using ≤13G and ≥14G needles. Diagnostic accuracy per procedure was 86% (95% CI 82% to 89%) among 3054 procedures. Diagnostic accuracy among 2426 procedures that yielded a diagnosis was 94% (95% CI 92% to 96%). Complication rate was 1% (95% CI 0.4% to 1.9%) among 3357 procedures. Transient pain and minor hematoma were the most common complications encountered. Conclusion In our meta-analysis of 39 studies reporting diagnostic performance and complications of CT-guided biopsy, we found a diagnostic yield of 91% and diagnostic accuracy of 86% with a complication rate of 1%. Diagnostic yield did not differ between different locations, between lytic, sclerotic and mixed lesions, and between wide- and thin-bore needles.

Introduction There is increased interest in the use of artificial intelligence-based (AI) software packages in the evaluation of neuroimaging studies for acute ischemic stroke. We studied whether, compared to standard image interpretation without AI, Brainomix e-ASPECTS software improved interobserver agreement and accuracy in detecting ASPECTS regions affected in anterior circulation LVO. Methods We included 60 consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVO who had TICI 3 revascularization within 60 minutes of their baseline CT. A total of 16 readers, including senior neuroradiologists, junior neuroradiologists and vascular neurologists participated. Readers interpreted CT scans on independent workstations and assessed final ASPECTS and evaluated whether each individual ASPECTS region was affected. Two months later, readers again evaluated the CT scans, but with assistance of e-ASPECTS software. We assessed interclass correlation coefficient for total ASPECTS and interobserver agreement with Fleiss’ Kappa for each ASPECTS region with and without assistance of the e-ASPECTS. We also assessed accuracy for the readers with and without e-ASPECTS assistance. In our assessment of accuracy, ground truth was the 24 hour CT in this cohort of patients who had prompt and complete revascularization. Results Interclass correlation coefficient for total ASPECTS without e-ASPECTS assistance was 0.395, indicating fair agreement compared, to 0.574 with e-ASPECTS assistance, indicating good agreement (P < 0.01). There was significant improvement in inter-rater agreement with e-ASPECTS assistance for each individual region with the exception of M6 and caudate. The e-ASPECTS software had higher accuracy than the overall cohort of readers (with and without e-ASPECTS assistance) for every region except the caudate. Conclusions Use of Brainomix e-ASPECTS software resulted in significant improvements in inter-rater agreement and accuracy of ASPECTS score evaluation in a large group of neuroradiologists and neurologists. e-ASPECTS software was more predictive of final infarct/ASPECTS than the overall group interpreting the CT scans with and without e-ASPECTS assistance.

Purpose Understanding all factors that may impact radiation dose and procedural time is crucial to safe and efficient image-guided interventions, such as fluoroscopically guided sacroiliac (SI) joint injections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of flow pattern (intra- vs. periarticular), patient age, and body mass index (BMI) on radiation dose and fluoroscopy time. Methods A total of 134 SI joint injections were reviewed. Injectate flow pattern, age, and BMI were analyzed in respect to fluoroscopy time (minutes), radiation dose (kerma area product (KAP); µGy m 2 ), and estimated skin dose (mGy). Results BMI did not affect fluoroscopy time, but increased BMI resulted in significantly higher skin and fluoroscopy doses ( p < 0.001). There was no association between fluoroscopy time and flow pattern. Higher skin dose was associated with intraarticular flow ( p = 0.0086), and higher KAP was associated with periarticular flow ( p = 0.0128). However, the odds ratios were close to 1. There was no significant difference between fluoroscopy time or dose based on patient age. Conclusion Increased BMI had the largest impact on procedural radiation dose and skin dose. Flow pattern also showed a statistically significant association with radiation dose and skin dose, but the clinical difference was small. Proceduralists should be aware that BMI has the greatest impact on fluoroscopy dose and skin dose during SI joint injections compared to other factors.

Torus mandibularis is a benign osseous overgrowth arising from the lingual surface of the mandible. It is a common, incidental finding on imaging due to its relatively high prevalence. In the majority of cases, mandibular tori are asymptomatic. We report a novel presentation of a giant torus mandibularis causing bilateral obstruction of the submandibular ducts and consequent sialadenitis. Our patient presented with progressive pain centered in the floor of his mouth and had bilateral submandibular glandular enlargement on exam. Computed tomography showed a giant right torus mandibularis, which was causing obstruction and dilation of the bilateral submandibular ducts. Although conservative management was attempted, he ultimately underwent surgical resection of his torus with symptomatic improvement. This patient highlights a novel complication of torus mandibularis and illustrates successful treatment. Though not previously described, this complication may be underreported and should be considered in the appropriate clinical setting.