Lucas, John A.

AbstractBackgroundFor blood‐based biomarkers to fulfill their potential to revolutionize diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), additional research in diverse populations remains critical. Here, we analyzed a biracial sample to assess the profiles of blood‐based AD biomarkers and their relationships to cognition and medical comorbidities.MethodsSelf‐reported African‐American (AA; n = 267) and non‐Hispanic White (NHW; n = 268) participants evaluated through the Mayo Jacksonville Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center were matched on age, sex, and clinical diagnosis. Plasma AD biomarkers (Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, GFAP, NfL) were measured using the Quanterix SiMoA HD‐X analyzer. Cognition was assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess for differences in plasma biomarker levels by sex. Linear models tested for associations of race, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and vascular risk factors with plasma AD biomarker levels, covarying for age and sex. Additional models assessed for interactions between race and plasma biomarkers in predicting cognition, further covarying for education.ResultsThe sample included adults aged 43‐100 years, with 69% women. Education was higher in NHW participants (median 16 vs. 12 years, p<0.001). APOE (apolipoprotein E) ε4 positivity was higher in AA participants (43% vs. 34%; p = 0.04). There were no differences in plasma AD biomarker levels between AA and NHW participants. These findings were unchanged after stratifying by cognitive status (unimpaired versus impaired). Although the association between p‐tau181 and cognition appeared stronger in NHW participants while the association between Aβ42/40 and cognition appeared stronger in AA participants, these findings did not survive after excluding individuals with CKD. Women displayed higher GFAP (p = 0.002) and lower p‐tau181 (p = 0.001) levels than men. Diabetes was inversely associated with GFAP levels (p<0.001).ConclusionsIn a biracial, community‐based sample, we observed that sex differences, CKD, and vascular risk factors contributed to variation in plasma AD biomarkers, while self‐reported race did not. Our results reinforce the critical need to account for sex and systemic medical comorbidities in equitably deploying blood‐based AD biomarkers in the general population.

AbstractBackgroundGiven the overlap of symptoms between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other dementias, it is essential to develop widely accessible biomarkers that will ensure an accurate diagnosis of AD to enable its proper treatment. African Americans (AA) are twice more likely to develop AD than non‐Hispanic whites (NHW) and yet they remain underrepresented in AD research. The few studies conducted in AA suggest that there are different factors that influence AD in this population; therefore, it is possible that different biomarkers and/or therapies may be needed to effectively treat AD in AA. In this study we are testing the hypothesis that genetic variants that show association with AD‐risk in AA and with plasma levels of transcript and proteins may serve as AD biomarkers which are more accessible and less costly than cerebrospinal fluid or neuroimaging biomarkers.MethodsIn 189 AD cases and 183 cognitively unimpaired (CU) AA participants of the Florida Consortium of African American Alzheimer’s Disease Studies (FCA3DS), we performed targeted DNA sequencing of 10 AD‐associated loci. Genetic variants were tested for association with plasma transcripts and plasma total tau protein levels previously measured in this cohort using a nanoString® custom panel (Reddy J, et al. 2022) and Simoa assays (Deniz K, et al. 2021), respectively. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, the most significant expression/protein quantitative trait loci (eQTL/pQTL) were added sequentially to a base model that included only age and sex to identify eQTL/pQTL that improved the accuracy to correctly classify AD cases vs. CU.ResultsOf the 5112 variants identified in the targeted sequencing, 71 were nominally associated (p<0.05) with plasma transcript/protein levels and with AD‐risk. ROC analysis of age, sex, eQTL/pQTL in APOE, ABCA7, AKAP9, EPHA1, SORL1, and TLR4, and plasma levels of APP, ABCA7, AKAP9, CD14, CLU, and APOE‐ɛ4 dosage achieved 77.6% area under the curve (AUC) to discriminate AD vs. CU, a 19.9% improvement over a model that only included age and sex.ConclusionsPlasma transcript levels and eQTL/pQTL are promising diagnostic biomarkers for AD that may improve accessibility and reduce costs for a more accurate diagnosis of AD.

Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the frequency of modifiable dementia risk factors and their association with cognitive impairment and rate of decline in diverse participants engaged in studies of memory and aging. Methods Modifiable dementia risk factors and their associations with cognitive impairment and cognitive decline were determined in community‐dwelling African American (AA; n = 261) and non‐Hispanic White (nHW; n = 193) participants who completed ≥2 visits at the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer Disease Research Center in Jacksonville, Florida. Risk factors and their associations with cognitive impairment (global Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] ≥ 0.5) and rates of decline (CDR Sum of Boxes) in impaired participants were compared in AA and nHW participants, controlling for demographics, APOE ɛ4 status, and Area Deprivation Index. Results Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and diabetes were overrepresented in AA participants, but were not associated with cognitive impairment. Depression was associated with increased odds of cognitive impairment in AA (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.13–8.67) and nHW participants (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.21–6.44) but uniquely associated with faster decline in AA participants (β = 1.71, 95% CI = 0.69–2.73, p = 0.001). Fewer AA participants reported antidepressant use (9/49, 18%) than nHW counterparts (57/78, 73%, p < 0.001). Vitamin B12 deficiency was also associated with an increased rate of cognitive decline in AA participants (β = 2.65, 95% CI = 0.38–4.91, p = 0.023). Interpretation Modifiable dementia risk factors are common in AA and nHW participants, representing important risk mitigation targets. Depression was associated with dementia in AA and nHW participants, and with accelerated declines in cognitive function in AA participants. Optimizing depression screening and treatment may improve cognitive trajectories and outcomes in AA participants. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:518–529

Background: Dementia, vascular disease, and cancer increase with age, enabling complex comorbid interactions. Understanding vascular and cancer contributions to dementia risk and neuropathology in oldest-old may improve risk modification and outcomes. Objective: Investigate the contributions of vascular factors and cancer to dementia and neuropathology. Methods: Longitudinal clinicopathologic study of prospectively followed Mayo Clinic participants dying≥95 years-old who underwent autopsy. Participants were stratified by dementia status and compared according to demographics, vascular risk factors, cancer, and neuropathology. Results: Participants (n = 161; 83% female; 99% non-Hispanic whites)≥95 years (95–106 years-old) with/without dementia did not differ based on demographics. APOE ɛ2 frequency was higher in no dementia (20/72 [28%]) versus dementia (11/88 [12%]; p = 0.03), but APOE ɛ4 frequency did not differ. Coronary artery disease was more frequent in no dementia (31/72 [43%]) versus dementia (23/89 [26%]; p = 0.03) associated with 56% lower dementia odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44 [confidence interval (CI) = 0.19–0.98]; p = 0.04) and fewer neuritic/diffuse plaques. Diabetes had an 8-fold increase in dementia odds (OR = 8.42 [CI = 1.39–163]; p = 0.02). Diabetes associated with higher cerebrovascular disease (Dickson score; p = 0.05). Cancer associated with 63% lower dementia odds (OR = 0.37 [CI = 0.17–0.78]; p < 0.01) and lower Braak stage (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Cancer exposure in the oldest-old was associated with lower odds of dementia and tangle pathology, whereas history of coronary artery disease was associated with lower odds of dementia and amyloid-β plaque pathology. History of diabetes mellitus was associated with increased odds of dementia and cerebrovascular disease pathology. Cancer-related mechanisms and vascular risk factor reduction strategies may alter dementia risk and neuropathology in oldest-old.

AbstractBackgroundAfrican Americans are at greater risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD‐related dementia (ADRD). They are also less likely to access dementia resources or participate in dementia research. The National Alzheimer’s Project Act (NAPA) calls for special attention to dementia‐related health disparities in high risk groups. Identifying effective tools to improve rates of dementia resource utilization and research participation by African Americans is essential to achieving dementia health equity.MethodTwo neighborhoods of Jacksonville, FL, defined by zip codes, were the focus of this study. Both zip codes have a large population of African American residents per 2010 US Census, and a history of hosting outreach activities by our Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC). In one neighborhood, we modified the NAPA Dementia Friendly (DF) America toolkit to serve as a model of outreach. The second neighborhood served as a control (CON), in which we maintained our traditional outreach model of community‐based lectures. Primary outcome measures were: (1) enrollment in ADRC center‐related studies and (2) phone call volumes from individuals seeking dementia resource information. The outcomes in the DF and CON neighborhoods were compared via Fisher’s exact test to those in other zip codes in Jacksonville (OT).ResultIn the 18 months following implementation of the DF intervention, 54 African Americans enrolled in ADRC‐related research (19 DF, 3 CON, 32 OT), compared to 21 during the 18 months prior (2 DF, 0 CON, and 19 OT). The increase in DF residents enrolling in research following the intervention was statistically significant (p =0 .02) relative to OT residents. The increase observed in the CON residents was not statistically significant (p=1.0) compared to OT residents. Call volumes from African Americans increased from 13 prior to program implementation (all from OT) to 62 calls after implementation (22 DF, 1 CON, 39 OT). The increase among DF residents seeking information following the intervention was statistically significant (p =0.008) whereas the increase was not significant in the CON residents (p=0.54).ConclusionResults suggest that the NAPA DFA can be leveraged to improve dementia resource utilization and research participation among community‐dwelling African Americans.