White, Richard O.

Abstract Background Bedside cognitive screening tools intend to reliably and efficiently detect cognitive impairment in research, clinical, and community settings. Black American (BA) and Hispanic/Latino (H/L) adults obtain lower performance on widely used screeners, largely driven by demographics and structural and social determinants of health (SSDoH). This study characterized the performance of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance in a cohort of cognitively normal ethnoracially diverse adults while considering cohort‐specific factors that contributed to misclassification of impairment. Method Cognitively normal BA and H/L participants completed a comprehensive neurological assessment, neuropsychological testing, and MRI and amyloid‐ and tau‐PET imaging as part of a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Demographically adjusted MoCA cutoffs were applied to BA (MoCA ≤ 22) and WH/L (MoCA ≤ 24) subgroups. Hierarchical binary logistic regression assessed whether amyloid burden (Centiloid value) improved prediction of scoring below demographically adjusted MoCA cutoffs beyond demographic/SSDoH factors, including age, education, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Result Participants included 105 (47 WH/L, 58 BA/AA) cognitively normal adults (mean age = 64.71 years, SD = 8.91; 62.9% female) with average of 16.07 years of education (SD=2.35) and mild‐to‐moderate neighborhood disadvantage (mean ADI=47.60, SD=23.77). 40% of H/L participants (MoCA (≤ 24) and 17% of BA participants (MoCa ≤22) scored below demographically adjusted MoCA cut‐offs. For the H/L subgroup, the best fitting model included age, education, ADI, and amyloid burden ( R 2 = 0 .43, χ 2 = 10.98, p = 0.03). Age (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.986 – 1.487) and amyloid burden (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.67 – 1.03) approached statistical significance as individual predictors ( p = 0.06, p = 0.09). In the BA/AA subgroup, the best fitting model included age, education and ADI only ( R 2 = 0.47, χ 2 = 9.06, p = 0.02), with education approaching significance as an individual predictor (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.21 – 1.01, p = 0.05). Conclusion Sociodemographic factors continued to drive low MoCA performance in cognitively normal individuals despite applying demographically adjusted cut‐off scores by subgroup. These factors differentially impacted performance among BA/AA and WH/L participants. Careful consideration of these factors is warranted to mitigate risk of overdiagnosing impairment based on cognitive screening across clinical and research settings.

Abstract Background Disparities in structural and social determinants of health in Latino and Black communities may increase the burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Identifying dementia risk factors, which may account for up to 45% of ADRD risk, is crucial to implement effective risk‐reduction strategies. This study aimed to assess ADRD risk factors in community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black Americans by measuring the frequency of modifiable dementia risk factors through subjective and objective measures. Method Community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black adults (≥45‐years‐old) were enrolled in a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Baseline assessments conducted between Mach 2022 and November 2024 included demographics, self‐reported race/ethnicity, and history of dementia risk factors. Socioeconomic deprivation [Area Deprivation Index (ADI) State scores] and modifiable dementia risk factors were reported by participants and directly measured, including hypertension (BP >130/80 mmHg), obesity (BMI≥30), hyperlipidemia (LDL>100 mg/dL), hyperglycemia (HbA1C >5.6%), low vitamin B12 (B12<350 pg/mL), hearing loss (bedside assessment), vision loss (bedside assessment), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale ≥5). Result 105 participants (47 Latino, 55 Black), 64.7 (±8.8) years‐old, female 66 (63%), with 16 (±2.3) years of education were assessed. Black participants experienced higher socioeconomic deprivation than Latino participants (median ADI 7 vs 3; p <0.001). Dementia risk factors were common in Latino and Black participants. These included, hypertension (55.3%, 70.3%; p = 0.291), hyperlipidemia (58.7%, 55.8%; p = 0.908), obesity (29.8%, 45.5%; p = 0.263), hyperglycemia (51.1%, 49.1%; p = 0.834), low vitamin B12 (23.9%, 28.0%; p = 0.270), hearing loss (19.1%, 7.3%; p = 0.111), vision loss (85.1%, 85.2%; p = 0.771), and depression (6.4%, 5.5%; p = 0.168). Objective measures revealed a higher frequency of risk factors compared with participant‐provided history, highlighting a substantial proportion of unrecognized or inadequately treated risk factors: hypertension (62.3%, 45.1%; p = 0.067), hyperlipidemia (57.6%, 47.5%; p = 0.004), hyperglycemia (49%, 20%; p = <0.001), vitamin B12 deficiency (27.8%, 9.3%; p = 0.170), and depression (6.9%, 11.9%; p = 0.009). Conclusion Modifiable dementia risk factors were detected in most cognitively normal Latino and Black adults engaged in a longitudinal study of memory and aging. Objective measures highlighted unrecognized and undertreated risk factors. Active surveillance programs are needed to detect and treat modifiable ADRD risk factors in underrepresented populations.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruption of social networks and negatively impacted social determinants of health (SDoH, e.g., economic stability, mental health, health care access) among African Americans. The FAITH! (Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health!) Program, an academic-community partnership with African American churches, pivoted to pandemic-related impacts on health behaviors of African Americans. This exploratory, cross-sectional study examined associations between multilevel factors influencing difficulty maintaining a healthy lifestyle during the early pandemic phase, including mental/emotional health and COVID-19 hardships (e.g., job/food/housing insecurity, paying utilities). An online survey was distributed via FAITH!-affiliated churches and social media. Logistic regression (odds ratios [ORs], adjusted for age/gender) and associated 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) examined associations between difficulty maintaining a healthy lifestyle and multilevel factors. Greater than half of respondents reported difficulty maintaining a healthy lifestyle (N = 169, 54% [91/169]). Adjusted odds of having difficulty maintaining a healthy lifestyle were greater for those reporting mental/emotional health issues (high-stress OR 4.0; 95% CI [1.9,8.9], p < .001); occasional symptoms of depression (OR 3.7; 95% CI [01.9,7.7]; p < .001); anger (OR 2.5; 95% CI [1.2,5.4]; p = .044), and anxiety (OR 2.8; 95% CI [1.4,6.0]; p = .008)). COVID-19 hardships of job insecurity (OR 1.4.; 95% CI [0.7, 2,8]; p = .015), difficulty paying rent (OR 4.4; 95% CI [2.1,9.9]; p < .001) or difficulty paying for food/utilities (OR 5.4; 95% CI [2.6,11.7]; p < .001) were associated with difficulty maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Our study revealed the negative impact of mental/emotional health and COVID-19 hardships on maintaining a healthy lifestyle among African Americans. This could inform SDoH-focused lifestyle interventions during future public health crises.

AbstractBackgroundThe prevalence of dementia in populations that are underrepresented in research is projected to increase with population aging. Latino and Black individuals, the largest underrepresented populations in the US, experience a higher dementia burden than non‐Hispanic White individuals, which is not explained by ethnoracial biological factors. Disparities in structural and social determinants of health may contribute to the preponderance of medical conditions known to increase dementia risk, including potentially modifiable factors in Latino and Black communities. To assess the scope of this problem, we measured the frequency of common modifiable dementia risk factors in community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black adults.MethodCognitively normal community‐dwelling Latino and Black adults, ≥45‐years‐old, were enrolled within our longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Florida (Jacksonville, FL) and completed a baseline assessment between 3/2022 and 10/2023. Demographics, and self‐reported race/ethnicity and history of dementia risk factors were recorded. Dementia risk factors were objectively sampled through clinical interview (depression: Geriatric Depression Scale ≥5), examination (hypertension: BP >130/80 mmHg; obesity: BMI≥30), and serum analyses (hyperlipidemia: total cholesterol<200mg/dL, HDL>50mg/dL, LDL<100mg/dL, Triglycerides<150mg/dL; diabetes: HbA1C >5.6%, vitamin B12 deficiency: <350 ng/dL).Result86 participants (43 Latino, 43 Black), 65.8 (8.8) years‐old, female (62.8%), with 16 (2.4) years of education were assessed. Dementia risk factors were frequent in Latino and Black participants, including hypertension (63%, 90%; p = 0.005), hyperlipidemia (93%, 89%; p = 0.702), obesity (33%, 44%; p = 0.370), diabetes (60%, 47%; p = 0.370), vitamin B12 deficiency (21%, 21%; p = 0.989), and depression (5%, 24%; p = 0.781). These risk factors were unrecognized or suboptimally managed in a substantial proportion of Latino and Black participants: hypertension (56%, 73%; p = 0.170), hyperlipidemia (80%, 73%; p = 0.591), diabetes (57%, 47%; p = 0.502), vitamin B12 deficiency (21%, 21%; p = 0.789), and depression (5%, 3%; p>0.99).ConclusionPotentially modifiable dementia risk factors were detected in the majority of community‐dwelling Latino and Black cognitively normal older‐adults and were frequently unrecognized or suboptimally managed. Proactive screening for known dementia risk factors may provide opportunities for targeted interventions to improve brain health and decrease dementia disparities in underrepresented populations.

Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the frequency of modifiable dementia risk factors and their association with cognitive impairment and rate of decline in diverse participants engaged in studies of memory and aging. Methods Modifiable dementia risk factors and their associations with cognitive impairment and cognitive decline were determined in community‐dwelling African American (AA; n = 261) and non‐Hispanic White (nHW; n = 193) participants who completed ≥2 visits at the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer Disease Research Center in Jacksonville, Florida. Risk factors and their associations with cognitive impairment (global Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] ≥ 0.5) and rates of decline (CDR Sum of Boxes) in impaired participants were compared in AA and nHW participants, controlling for demographics, APOE ɛ4 status, and Area Deprivation Index. Results Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and diabetes were overrepresented in AA participants, but were not associated with cognitive impairment. Depression was associated with increased odds of cognitive impairment in AA (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.13–8.67) and nHW participants (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.21–6.44) but uniquely associated with faster decline in AA participants (β = 1.71, 95% CI = 0.69–2.73, p = 0.001). Fewer AA participants reported antidepressant use (9/49, 18%) than nHW counterparts (57/78, 73%, p < 0.001). Vitamin B12 deficiency was also associated with an increased rate of cognitive decline in AA participants (β = 2.65, 95% CI = 0.38–4.91, p = 0.023). Interpretation Modifiable dementia risk factors are common in AA and nHW participants, representing important risk mitigation targets. Depression was associated with dementia in AA and nHW participants, and with accelerated declines in cognitive function in AA participants. Optimizing depression screening and treatment may improve cognitive trajectories and outcomes in AA participants. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:518–529

Background: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States is high, with at least 63 million unvaccinated individuals to date. Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations experience lower COVID-19 vaccination rates despite facing a disproportionate COVID-19 burden. Objective: To assess the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among under-resourced, adult patients. Methods: Participants were patients receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in St. Paul, Minnesota. Data were collected via multiple modes over 2 phases in 2020 (self-administered electronic survey) and 2021 (study team-administered survey by telephone, self-administered written survey) to promote diversity and inclusion for study participation. The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Using logistic regression analysis, associations between vaccine acceptance and factors including risk perception, concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, social determinants of health (SDOH), co-morbidities, pandemic-induced hardships, and stress were assessed by adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: One hundred sixty-eight patients (62.5% female; mean age [SD]: 49.9 [17.4] years; 32% <$20 000 annual household income; 69% <college education) were included in the study. Sixty-one percent of the patients received or were willing to receive the vaccine. Risk perception was positively associated with vaccine acceptance (AOR: 5.3; 95% CI: 2.5, 11.5, P < .001), while concerns about the vaccine (eg, safety, side effects, rapid development of the vaccine, etc.) were negatively associated with vaccine acceptance (all P < .001). SDOH, co-morbidities, pandemic-induced hardships were not associated with vaccine acceptance. Conclusions: Our study in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population suggests that risk perception is associated with an increased likelihood of vaccine acceptance, while concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine are associated with a lower likelihood of vaccine acceptance. As these factors could impact vaccine uptake, consistent, innovative, and context-specific risk communication strategies may improve vaccine coverage in this population.

Rationale, aims, and objectives: Post-hospitalization follow-up within 30 days following discharge has been shown to positively impact time to readmission, healthcare costs, and patient self-reported adherence and satisfaction. We aimed to improve resident satisfaction with the process of establishing post-hospitalization, primary care provider (PCP) follow-up. Methods: In this quality improvement study we surveyed all internal medicine residents at our institution regarding their satisfaction with the process of establishing PCP follow-up at the time of hospital discharge. A streamlined process was developed and two subsequent interventions were enacted; a dedicated teaching session and distribution of pocket cards outlining the process. Residents were then surveyed following each intervention to assess for impact on overall satisfaction and burden of work. Results: Initially, 77.3% of residents were not satisfied with the process of establishing post-hospitalization PCP follow-up. Following the first intervention there was a trend towards increasing satisfaction rates by 16.7% (p= 0.20), and after the second intervention there was a statistically significant increase in satisfaction rates from baseline by 44% (p= 0.007). There was also a reduction in the feeling of workload burden associated with establishing PCP follow-up from 32% to 25%, and over 67% of participants either agreed or strongly agreed that the workload was not too burdensome. Conclusion: This quality improvement initiative established that resident physicians at our institution previously found the process of establishing PCP follow-up at the time of patient discharge both confusing and burdensome. Through the implementation of our interventions we were able to achieve our aims of improving resident satisfaction.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between manifestations of racism in medical school and subsequent changes in graduating medical students’ intentions to practice in underserved or minority communities, compared with their attitudes and intentions at matriculation. Method The authors used repeated-measures data from a longitudinal study of 3,756 students at 49 U.S. medical schools that were collected from 2010 to 2014. They conducted generalized linear mixed models to estimate whether manifestations of racism in school curricula/policies, school culture/climate, or student attitudes/behaviors predicted first- to fourth-year changes in students’ intentions to practice in underserved communities or primarily with minority populations. Analyses were stratified by students’ practice intentions (no/undecided/yes) at matriculation. Results Students’ more negative explicit racial attitudes were associated with decreased intention to practice with underserved or minority populations at graduation. Service learning experiences and a curriculum focused on improving minority health were associated with increased intention to practice in underserved communities. A curriculum focused on minority health/disparities, students’ perceived skill at developing relationships with minority patients, the proportion of minority students at the school, and the perception of a tense interracial environment were all associated with increased intention to care for minority patients. Conclusions This study provides evidence that racism manifested at multiple levels in medical schools was associated with graduating students’ decisions to provide care in high-need communities. Strategies to identify and eliminate structural racism and its manifestations in medical school are needed.