Cabrera‐Rodriguez, Janisse N

AbstractBackgroundBlood‐based biomarkers of amyloid and neurodegeneration are increasingly used in clinical trials and entering clinical use. Differentially mapping the plasma markers to post‐mortem neuropathology in a community‐based sample is critical for interpretation.MethodWe identified 64 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) participants with antemortem plasma markers (Aβ42, Aβ40, NfL, T‐tau, Aβ42/40 ratio) measured on the Quanterix Simoa HD‐1 analyzer and with postmortem neuropathologic assessments of Alzheimer’s pathology (Braak tangle stage, Thal phase, neuritic plaque burden) and cerebrovascular pathology (Strozyk scale focused on macrovascular brain changes and Kalaria scale focused on detailed micro‐ and macro‐ vascular brain changes). Weighted linear regression models with adjustment for time between plasma markers and death were conducted with exact permutation tests to evaluate the relationships between antemortem plasma and postmortem neuropathology markers.ResultHigher plasma NfL levels and Aβ42/40 ratio were associated with both cerebrovascular neuropathologic scales (p<0.05) but were not associated with Braak neurofibrillary tangle stage, neuritic plaque score, or Thal stage (p>0.5). Plasma T‐tau was not associated with any pathological assessment. Plasma Aβ42/40 and NfL explained up to 18% of the variability in cerebrovascular neuropathologic scales.ConclusionIn this community sample of participants predominantly without dementia, plasma markers for amyloid (Aβ42/40) and neurodegeneration (NfL) were associated with cerebrovascular neuropathology at autopsy. NfL is a non‐specific marker of brain injury, therefore, its association with cerebrovascular neuropathology was in the expected direction. The association between greater cerebrovascular neuropathology and elevated Aβ42/40 requires further investigation. These findings provide evidence that cerebrovascular disease may significantly influence levels of plasma biomarkers proposed for Alzheimer’s disease. This information will be important to consider for accurate clinical interpretation of the proposed biomarkers.

AbstractBackgroundThe coarse‐grained plaque (CGP) is a divergent plaque‐type recently described in Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1. In the current study, we studied the CGPs distribution over the brain, and its association with APOE, p‐tau, and neuroinflammation.MethodThe cohort (N = 60) was selected from the Mayo Clinic brain bank in Jacksonville, USA. Brain tissue from the frontal ‐, parietal ‐, temporal cortex, and the hippocampus was immunohistochemically stained for Aβ (6F/3D), p‐tau (AT8), CD68, and GFAP. The CGP and classic cored plaque (CCP) were scored as previously described1. Total plaque burden was expressed as the sum of all cortical regions.ResultThe CGP was predominantly located in the neocortex and present in ∼60% of AD cases, who were younger at onset (p<0.05) and had a lower brain weight (p<0.05) than CGP negative cases. When stratified for APOE Ɛ4+ and Ɛ4‐, CGP burden was only in Ɛ4+ positively correlated with p‐tau, Aβ, and GFAP burden in the frontal and parietal cortex (Table 1). CGP burden was not correlated with CD68. The CCP was negatively correlated with p‐tau, and not with GFAP, Aβ or CD68 (Table 1). In APOE Ɛ4+ cases, the burden of CGPs was negatively correlated with the burden of CCPs (Fig.1).ConclusionThe neocortical CGP is correlated with increased p‐tau burden and astrogliosis in APOE Ɛ4+. The CGP is inversely correlated with the common CCP, suggesting an opposite effect of Aβ‐induced tau‐toxicity for the CGP versus the CCP. 1Boon et al., Acta Neuropathologica, 2020

Background: Dementia, vascular disease, and cancer increase with age, enabling complex comorbid interactions. Understanding vascular and cancer contributions to dementia risk and neuropathology in oldest-old may improve risk modification and outcomes. Objective: Investigate the contributions of vascular factors and cancer to dementia and neuropathology. Methods: Longitudinal clinicopathologic study of prospectively followed Mayo Clinic participants dying≥95 years-old who underwent autopsy. Participants were stratified by dementia status and compared according to demographics, vascular risk factors, cancer, and neuropathology. Results: Participants (n = 161; 83% female; 99% non-Hispanic whites)≥95 years (95–106 years-old) with/without dementia did not differ based on demographics. APOE ɛ2 frequency was higher in no dementia (20/72 [28%]) versus dementia (11/88 [12%]; p = 0.03), but APOE ɛ4 frequency did not differ. Coronary artery disease was more frequent in no dementia (31/72 [43%]) versus dementia (23/89 [26%]; p = 0.03) associated with 56% lower dementia odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44 [confidence interval (CI) = 0.19–0.98]; p = 0.04) and fewer neuritic/diffuse plaques. Diabetes had an 8-fold increase in dementia odds (OR = 8.42 [CI = 1.39–163]; p = 0.02). Diabetes associated with higher cerebrovascular disease (Dickson score; p = 0.05). Cancer associated with 63% lower dementia odds (OR = 0.37 [CI = 0.17–0.78]; p < 0.01) and lower Braak stage (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Cancer exposure in the oldest-old was associated with lower odds of dementia and tangle pathology, whereas history of coronary artery disease was associated with lower odds of dementia and amyloid-β plaque pathology. History of diabetes mellitus was associated with increased odds of dementia and cerebrovascular disease pathology. Cancer-related mechanisms and vascular risk factor reduction strategies may alter dementia risk and neuropathology in oldest-old.