Bergeron, Caroline D.

A dementia friendly community allows people with dementia and their care partners to remain engaged in their community well into the disease. This study presents the results of primary research aimed at exploring perceptions regarding building a dementia friendly community in an African American neighborhood in northeast Florida. Twelve focus groups and five interviews were conducted with people living with dementia, informal and formal care partners, community stakeholders and neighborhood residents, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Three main themes emerged from the analyses, including (1) perceived needs, (2) facilitators and barriers to being dementia friendly, and (3) opportunities for the community to become more dementia friendly. Study findings highlight the unique needs of a single African American neighborhood and the importance of culturally tailoring the dementia friendly model to diverse communities.

AbstractBackgroundAfrican Americans are at greater risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD‐related dementia (ADRD). They are also less likely to access dementia resources or participate in dementia research. The National Alzheimer’s Project Act (NAPA) calls for special attention to dementia‐related health disparities in high risk groups. Identifying effective tools to improve rates of dementia resource utilization and research participation by African Americans is essential to achieving dementia health equity.MethodTwo neighborhoods of Jacksonville, FL, defined by zip codes, were the focus of this study. Both zip codes have a large population of African American residents per 2010 US Census, and a history of hosting outreach activities by our Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC). In one neighborhood, we modified the NAPA Dementia Friendly (DF) America toolkit to serve as a model of outreach. The second neighborhood served as a control (CON), in which we maintained our traditional outreach model of community‐based lectures. Primary outcome measures were: (1) enrollment in ADRC center‐related studies and (2) phone call volumes from individuals seeking dementia resource information. The outcomes in the DF and CON neighborhoods were compared via Fisher’s exact test to those in other zip codes in Jacksonville (OT).ResultIn the 18 months following implementation of the DF intervention, 54 African Americans enrolled in ADRC‐related research (19 DF, 3 CON, 32 OT), compared to 21 during the 18 months prior (2 DF, 0 CON, and 19 OT). The increase in DF residents enrolling in research following the intervention was statistically significant (p =0 .02) relative to OT residents. The increase observed in the CON residents was not statistically significant (p=1.0) compared to OT residents. Call volumes from African Americans increased from 13 prior to program implementation (all from OT) to 62 calls after implementation (22 DF, 1 CON, 39 OT). The increase among DF residents seeking information following the intervention was statistically significant (p =0.008) whereas the increase was not significant in the CON residents (p=0.54).ConclusionResults suggest that the NAPA DFA can be leveraged to improve dementia resource utilization and research participation among community‐dwelling African Americans.

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is prevalent in the general population, particularly among Hispanic adults. SCD increases the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. While non-pharmacologic interventions are recommended to mitigate cognitive decline and preserve daily function in SCD and MCI, such interventions are not readily available for Spanish-speaking Hispanic adults with SCD. This pilot study, preregistered at clinicialtrials.gov, aimed to develop a linguistically and culturally appropriate adaptation of an existing memory compensation intervention, the Memory Support System (MSS), from English to Spanish, and to gather data to assess its impact in this population. Twenty Spanish-speaking Hispanic adults with SCD and 16 support partners were recruited. Measures of treatment adherence, daily function, self-efficacy for memory, quality of life, mood, anxiety, and caregiver burden were assessed at baseline, treatment end, and 8-week follow-up. By treatment end, participants with SCD improved their general functional status, daily activities requiring organizational skills, and depression and anxiety symptoms. Partners reported improvement in anxiety by treatment end and in caregiver burden at follow-up. The MSS was successfully translated into Spanish and readily learned by participants with SCD and their partners. The MSS in Spanish may help with daily functioning and aspects of patient and family well-being.

AbstractBackgroundAfrican Americans are at higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD‐related dementia. They are also more likely to live in communities with fewer dementia resources. The 2011 National Alzheimer’s Project Act calls for special attention to dementia‐related health disparities in high risk groups. Ensuring access to dementia‐specific information is one tactic for addressing disparities; however, the method by which information is delivered may play a role in how effectively that information is understood and retained over time.MethodWe delivered the same dementia education presentation to two comparable, predominantly African American neighborhoods in Jacksonville, FL. In one (intervention) community, the presentation was followed by an hour‐long focus group on what makes a community “dementia friendly”, using modified materials from the Dementia Friendly America (DFA) toolbox. In the other (control) community, the presentation was followed by a social hour allowing participants to interact with presenters and ask questions informally. Our primary objective was to assess the impact of the different conditions on AD knowledge.ResultsA 7‐item scale assessing AD knowledge was administered to immediately before and after the educational presentation (pre‐test, immediate post), and again two months later (Intervention group n=40; Control n=37). Additional, one‐year follow‐up was completed on the intervention community (n=21). Groups did not differ in AD knowledge at pre‐test (M=4.5 vs. 4.2, p=NS). At immediate post‐test, both groups improved their scores, but there was again no difference between groups (M=5.8 vs. 5.4, p=NS). At two‐month post‐testing, both groups declined in their knowledge score, but the control group declined more precipitously, yielding a significant group mean difference (M= 5.4 vs. 4.7, p=0.02). At one year follow‐up, a subsample of the intervention group (n=21) was re‐examined and demonstrated no significant decline in knowledge scores as compared to 2‐month follow‐up (M=5.7 vs. 5.4, p=0.36).ConclusionResults suggest that focus group discussion following dementia education as per the DFA model may contribute to greater retention of information and exert a sustainable impact on AD knowledge over time in an African American community setting.