Stenson, Mary

AbstractPeripheral T‐cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a clinically heterogeneous group that represents 10%–15% of all lymphomas. Despite improved genetic and molecular understanding, treatment outcomes for PTCL have not shown significant improvement. Although Janus kinase‐2 (JAK2) plays an important role in myeloproliferative neoplasms, the critical role of JAK isoforms in mediating prosurvival signaling in PTCL cells is not well defined. Immunohistochemical analysis of PTCL tumors (n = 96) revealed high levels of constitutively active JAK3 (pJAK3) that significantly (p < 0.04) correlated with the activation state of its canonical substrate STAT3. Furthermore, constitutive activation of JAK3 and STAT3 positively correlated, at least in part, with an oncogenic tyrosine phosphatase PTPN11. Pharmacological inhibition of JAK3 but not JAK1/JAK2 significantly (p < 0.001) decreased PTCL proliferation, survival and STAT3 activation. A sharp contrast was observed in the pJAK3 positivity between ALK+ (85.7%) versus ALK‐negative (10.0%) in human PTCL tumors and PTCL cell lines. Moreover, JAK3 and ALK reciprocally interacted in PTCL cells, forming a complex to possibly regulate STAT3 signaling. Finally, combined inhibition of JAK3 (by WHI‐P154) and ALK (by crizotinib or alectinib) significantly (p < 0.01) decreased the survival of PTCL cells as compared to either agent alone by inhibiting STAT3 downstream signaling. Collectively, our findings establish that JAK3 is a therapeutic target for a subset of PTCL, and provide rationale for the clinical evaluation of JAK3 inhibitors combined with ALK‐targeted therapy in PTCL.

AbstractBackgroundDespite the unprecedented success of ibrutinib in lymphoma therapy, the development of ibrutinib resistance due to acquired BTK or PLCγ2 mutations has become a new clinical problem. However, not all resistance is mediated by these mutations and these mechanisms are poorly understood due to a lack of study tools that truly recapitulate this clinical scenario.MethodsWe established a novel patient‐derived ibrutinib‐resistant mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) line named MCIR1. Using immunological, molecular, and cytogenetic approaches, we comprehensively characterized MCIR1 and further demonstrated its utility in the study of resistance mechanisms and treatments to overcome this resistance.ResultsWe show that MCIR1 is a bona fide ibrutinib‐resistant MCL cell line with normal BTK‐/PLCγ2 but ibrutinib‐resistant ERK1/2 and AKT1 signaling. RNA‐Seq analysis revealed a robust non‐canonical NF‐kB signaling that drives the ibrutinib resistance. We also demonstrate the potential utility of a MCIR1‐based cell and mouse model for the discovery of new treatments to overcome BTK inhibitor resistance.ConclusionsWe have established the first patient‐derived ibrutinib‐resistant MCL cell line MCIR1 that lacks BTK or PLCγ2 mutations but exhibits a hyperactive non‐canonical NF‐kB pathway. We further demonstrate its utility in the discovery and validation of new drugs to overcome this resistance.

Chromosome region maintenance protein1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anti-cancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first in class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), has been limited by substantial adverse effects (AEs). To address this clinical problem, we focused on identifying novel strategies to boost the potency, reduce toxicity, and broaden the applicability of CRM1 inhibitors to a wider range of malignancies. We discovered that salicylates could markedly enhance the anti-tumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. KPT-330 was chosen as the prototypical CRM1 inhibitor given its current FDA approval status and characterized pharmacokinetics; and choline salicylate (CS) was chosen as the prototypical salicylate given its favorable pharmacokinetics and reduced antiplatelet, renal, neurological and gastrointestinal AEs in humans compared to other salicylates. By using cell lines belonging to different hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, we demonstrated ex vivo that the combination of KPT-330 and CS (K+CS) could induce unique and significant antitumor effect at much lower dose of KPT-330 (at 25% of the dose used in the clinic), thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical AEs (Figure 1a-d, and e-g). This significant synergetic antitumor effect observed with K+CS ex vivo was also validated in vivo by using an NSG mouse model of mantle cell lymphoma (Figure 1h). Moreover, the K+CS combination did not show this potent toxic effect on non-malignant cells in vivo and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in NSG mice. Mechanistically, protein profiling through mass spectroscopy revealed that K+CS uniquely affects the cellular pathways of DNA damage repair, DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. Studies involving immunoblotting, cell cycle analysis, immunofluorescence microscopy assessing nucleocytoplasmic molecular export and DNA damage, reporter assay to assess homologous recombination repair proficiency and immunohistochemistry showed that, compared to KPT-330 treatment alone, K+CS decreased the expression of CRM1, Rad51 and thymidylate synthase proteins in vitro and in vivo, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, and importantly a unique cell cycle arrest in S-phase, thus leading to cell apoptosis. These effects on cellular proteins and pathways were unique to K+CS treatment and were not observed with KPT-330 or CS single agent treatment. Pathway analyses through RNA sequencing also paralleled the findings of proteomic studies thus further validating the unique effect of K+CS treatment on the aforementioned cellular pathways. Importantly, K+CS treatment exerted unique and significant antitumor effect ex vivo on primary malignant cells obtained from patient's with high-risk hematologic malignancies such as double hit DLBCL, BTK and BCL2 inhibitor resistant mantle cell lymphoma, TP53 deleted/mutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and high-risk multiple myeloma thus signifying its broader applicability as a treatment option for these aggressive hematologic malignancies where there is a dire need to find new treatment strategies (Figure 1i). In summary, we describe a unique all-oral drug combination with a novel constellation of mechanisms of action on cellular pathways that are exploited by cancer cells. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple cancer types and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for therapy of blood cancers. Disclosures Witzig: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphSys: Consultancy; Immune Design: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy.

Abstract Chromosome region maintenance protein 1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anticancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first-in-class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for relapsed multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, have been limited by substantial toxicity. We discovered that salicylates markedly enhance the antitumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. Using salicylates in combination enables targeting of a range of blood cancers with a much lower dose of selinexor, thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical adverse effects. Choline salicylate (CS) with low-dose KPT-330 (K+CS) had potent, broad activity across high-risk hematological malignancies and solid-organ cancers ex vivo and in vivo. The K+CS combination was not toxic to nonmalignant cells as compared with malignant cells and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in mice. Mechanistically, compared with KPT-330 alone, K+CS suppresses the expression of CRM1, Rad51, and thymidylate synthase proteins, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, cell-cycle arrest in S-phase, and cell apoptosis. Moreover, the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors further potentiates the K+CS antitumor effect. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple types of blood cancers and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for cancer therapy in general.

Abstract Constitutive activation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling is a major driving mechanism for the proliferation and survival of various B-cell lineage non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Blocking BCR signaling using the first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib, has proved effective and is currently FDA approved for the treatment of several B-cell lymphomas. Unfortunately, significant subsets of patients possess either primary or acquired resistance to ibrutinib, often resulting in worse prognosis and poorer responses to subsequent therapies. Therefore, overcoming ibrutinib resistance is an urgent clinical need requiring new tools to both delineate the molecular mechanisms of resistance and develop viable therapeutics. To that end, we developed a mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell line, MCIR1, from a patient with clinically acquired ibrutinib resistance. MCIR1 is a bona fide MCL cell line featuring CD19+/CD5+/CD10-/CD23-/t(11;14)+/TP53+/-; and lacking the previously described mutations in BTK (C481S) and phospholipase C-gamma-2 (R665W, L845F). Importantly, MCIR1 cells possess hallmarks of ibrutinib resistance, including the insensitivity of ERK1/2 phosphorylation to ibrutinib in vitro, and the irresponsiveness of MCIR1 xenograft tumors to ibrutinib treatment in mice as compared with ibrutinib-sensitive Jeko-1 tumors. To delineate the molecular mechanism(s) of ibrutinib resistance, we identified by RNA-Seq analysis that MCIR1 cells possess robust activity of the non-canonical NFkB pathway and elevated expression of NFkB target genes, suggesting that this pathway likely drives their resistance to ibrutinib. Finally, we demonstrated the utility of MCIR1 as a tool for testing new drugs to combat ibrutinib resistance in vitro by showing its sensitivity to the anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) protein inhibitor, venetoclax. To our knowledge, MCIR1 is the first patient-derived ibrutinib-resistant cell line to be established. Hence, MCIR1 is especially useful because uniquely possesses the relevant clinical and biological features of patients with ibrutinib-resistant MCL. We propose MCIR1 as a tool to further the understanding of molecular mechanisms conferring ibrutinib resistance by providing a clinically relevant system with the capacity for molecular and genetic manipulations. Further, these features make MCIR1 an ideal model to screen drugs for combating ibrutinib resistance through both in vivo and in vitro approaches. Citation Format: Kevin E. Nowakowski, Jithma P. Abeykoon, Mary J. Stenson, Michael M. Timm, Curtis A. Hanson, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Anne J. Novak, Xiaosheng Wu, Thomas E. Witzig. MCIR1: A patient-derived ibrutinib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma line for the study of ibrutinib resistance and drug discovery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 650.

Abstract [Background]: MCL is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with a median survival of 3-4 years. New agents with mechanisms of action different than standard chemotherapy are needed to improve the outcome of MCL. Recent studies have documented single agent activity of bortezomib and rituximab in MCL. Analogs of rapamycin (temsirolimus) have also shown single agent activity in MCL (J Clin Oncol, June 27, 2005 epub). In order to provide rationale for a clinical trial combining rapamycin analogs with bortezomib or rituximab, we performed in vitro studies of the effect of combinations of these drugs on human MCL cell lines. [Methods]: Two human lymphoma cell lines - Granta 519 and M0258 - were incubated with various concentrations of rapamycin, bortezomib, and rituximab to determine the LD50 of each drug alone. For the experiments with rituximab a secondary goat anti-human (GAH) IgG Fc antibody was used to crosslink cell bound rituximab and induce cell killing. Percent viability was assessed after 48 hours using annexin/propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Tests for drug synergy used combinations of rapamycin and bortezomib and the Granta 519 cell line. Fixed ratios of the two drugs were tested and the results were evaluated for synergism (combination index &lt;1 in median effect analysis) in inducing cell death. The drug concentrations used spanned the LD50 of each drug determined from the single-agent studies. In the studies combining rituximab with bortezomib or rapamycin, a single fixed dose of rituximab and GAH Fc was tested with various concentrations of the other drugs to detect additive anti-tumor effects. Studies were performed at least in triplicate. [Results]: All three drugs exhibited single-agent activity in vitro against the two cell lines. The LD50 for rapamycin ranged from 17.5 – 25 micromolar for the Granta 519 cell line and 7.5–10 micromolar for M0258. The LD50 for bortezomib ranged from 2–5 ng/ml in both cell lines. Incubation of the cells with various concentrations of rituximab and GAH Fc had mild cytotoxic activity (reduced viability to 50–70% compared to GAH Fc control). This activity was not concentration dependent indicating saturation of CD20 by rituximab; therefore, a fixed concentration of rituximab was used for the combination experiments. When rituximab was added to bortezemib the % viability decreased by up to 37% (compared to bortezomib alone), and the bortezomib LD50 typically decreased to &lt;1–2 ng/ml (LD50 was 2–5 ng/ml with bortezomib alone). The addition of rapamycin to rituximab increased the cytotoxicity by 23% compared to either drug alone and decreased the rapamycin LD50. When rapamycin and bortezomib were combined as treatment of Granta 519 cells, rapamycin was synergistic with bortezomib with a combination index &lt;1. Sequencing the rapamycin either before or after the bortezomib treatment did not effect synergy in either direction. [Conclusion]: In vitro, rapamycin synergizes with bortezomib to enhance its cytotoxicity in MCL lines. Rituximab enhances the cytotoxicity of both of rapamycin and bortezomib. These in vitro studies provide the rationale to test combinations of these active agents in patients with MCL.

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by rapid disease progression. Although the clinical outcome of MCL patients has improved in the recent years, relapses and progressive emergence of resistance to treatment are common. Therefore, alternative therapeutic strategies are in great need for the treatment of MCL patients. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), the mammalian enzymatic complex plays crucial roles in regulation of normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2), the catalytic subunit of PRC2 complex is frequently amplified or overexpressed in most solid tumor types. However, EZH2 has been reported to harbor mutations of tyrosine 641 to asparagine (Y641N) in 22% of GCB diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 7% of follicular lymphoma (FL), but not in MCL. In the current study, we sought to elucidate the role of PRC2 in MCL and its implications for epigenetic therapy. We first assessed the expression of PRC2 components EZH2, SUZ12 and EED in several MCL cell lines (Jeko, Mino, Granta, JVM2 and Z138) and normal B-cells. Western blot analysis demonstrated that SUZ12 and EED along with EZH2 are overexpressed in proliferating MCL cell lines but not in normal B-cells. Furthermore, aberrant expression of H3 trimethylation (H3K27me3), di-methylation (H3K27me2) and mono-methylation (H3K27me1) was observed in all five MCL cell lines tested as compared to normal B cells. In order to understand if MCL cells have stable and enzymatically active PRC2 methyltransferase complex, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assay using EZH2 antibody and IgG as control. Significant amount of EED and SUZ12 enrichment was observed in the EZH2 immunoprecipitates from Granta and Mino MCL cells. Collectively this data demonstrates that in the MCL cells, PRC2 complex is aberrantly active and is associated with EZH2 upregulation. To study the role of EZH2 and EED in MCL cells, we generated expression constructs of the full-length and deletion fragments EZH2-F (full length EGH2), EZH2-del (EZH2 with deletion of SET domain), EED-F (full length EED) and EED-del (EED with deletion of WD40 domain), respectively. Interestingly, overexpression of EEDWT and EZH2WT led to a significantly (p=0.05) increased cell proliferation resulted in increased H3K27 trimethylation as compared to cells transfected with empty vector. Co-transfection with EZH2-del (SET domain) with the EZH2-F attenuated EZH2-F induced H3K27me3 and cell proliferation, suggesting oncogenic role of EZH2 enzymatic activity. Interestingly, co-transfection of EED-del (deficient in WD40 domain) had no effect on EED-F induced H3K27Me3, and the proliferation was less pronounced as compared with EED-F alone. EZH2 gene inhibition with EZH2-shRNA inhibited the growth of the MCL cells. Pharmacological inhibition of global methyltransferase activity by DZNep or EZH2 specific inhibitor GSK343 greatly suppressed the H3K27me3 level with little effect on H3K27me1 in Granta cells. However, treatment with GSK343 (but not DZNep) inhibited interaction between EZH2 and EED. Furthermore, treatment with EZH2 inhibitor, GSK343, produced significant growth inhibition (more than 90%) at 20uM concentration in Mino, Granta and Z138 cells. Taken together, these results suggest wild-type EZH2 is an epigenetic target for MCL, and MCL cells are highly sensitive to the EZH2 inhibition regardless of EZH2 mutations. Our findings indicate the use of PRC2 and EZH2 epigenetic inhibitors for the treatment of MCL patients. Overall, this study implies that overexpression of wild-type EZH2 has an oncogenic role in MCL, and suggest that wild-type EZH2 may confers similar active PRC2 addiction as mutant-EZH2 does in DLBCLs, FLs and other malignancies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 960 Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive lymphoma whose survival depends on various signaling pathways one of which is Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)/Janus kinase 2 (JAK2). We have demonstrated that JAK2 is constitutively activated at the auto-phosphorylation site in many cases of DLBCL. The most common mechanism causing abnormal JAK2 activation is through dysregulated cytokine signaling. Cytokines are deregulated in several hematological malignancies and may play a role in tumor cell growth through receptor-mediated and ligand dependent activation of the JAK2 kinase. In this study we investigated the role of cytokine signaling in JAK2 activation in DLBCL and use of a novel JAK2 inhibitor (JAK2i) to inhibit IL-10 induced JAK/STAT signaling. We studied serum cytokines from 70 patients with new untreated DLBCL who participated in a clinical trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (Micallef, IN et al Blood 2011). Compared to control sera, patients with DLBCL had higher levels of several JAK2 kinase related cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, and EGF). IL-10 and IL-6 were significantly higher in DLBCL patients vs controls with p values >0.03 and >0.001, respectively. We next examined whether DLBCL cell lines produced IL-10. The phospho-JAK2 (pJAK2) positive DLBCL cell lines Ly10, DHL2 and HBL1 produced more IL-10 (40–80 pg/ml) than the pJAK2 negative cell lines Ly1, Ly19 and DHL6 (0–5 pg/ml). Analysis of the surface expression of IL-10 receptors (IL-10R) determined that most p-JAK2 positive DLBCL cells express either IL-10Ra or IL-10Rb or both. IL-10 had no effect on DLBCL cell survival in vitro; however, it did promote their proliferation. Only IL-10 (but not the other elevated cytokines) was specifically able to activate JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation in a subgroup of DLBCL cell lines. IL-10 was not able to activate JAK1, STAT1 and STAT5, which suggests a specific role of IL-10 in the JAK2 pathway. Moreover, neutralizing antibody to IL-10 inhibited IL-10-induced JAK2 and STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation. We studied the effect of SAR302503 (SAR503, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA), a selective JAK2i currently in clinical trial for myelofibrosis on constitutive JAK2 signaling in DLBCL cells. SAR503 was able to inhibit JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation in a dose and time dependent manner in a variety of DLBCL cell lines and patient samples. JAK2 inhibition with SAR2503 caused a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on survival of pJAK2 positive DLBCL cells not observed in pJAK2 negative cells. Activation of STAT3 signaling up-regulates the expression of various genes involved in cell survival and proliferation such as bcl-xl, bcl-2, mcl-1 and c-myc. We observed a dose-dependent decrease in c-myc protein and mRNA levels in Ly3 and DHL2 cells with SAR503 treatment; however, SAR503 did not effect expression of bcl2, mcl-1 and bcl-xl proteins in DLBCL cells. Interestingly, JAK2 inhibition with SAR503 inhibited the autocrine secretion of IL-10 in a dose-dependent manner. Next, we determined if higher pre-treatment serum IL-10 correlates with the overall survival of 81 DLBCL patients. IL-10 by ELISA demonstrated that IL-10 levels were high in 51% (41/81) of patients (median, 57.7pg/ml; range, 26.1–503.7), and low in 49% (40/81) (median, 15.9 pg/ml; range, 0–25.9). Using a cut-off value of 26.1pg/ml, patients with a high serum IL-10 level had a significantly worse event-free survival (p=0.01). Clinical correlation of serum IL-10 with disease parameters showed that the IL-10 level was correlated with elevated serum LDH (p= 0.0085) and IPI score (p=0.01); there was no correlation with the number of extranodal sites, age, or B symptoms. DLBCL tumors from 40 patients were classified into germinal center B-cell type (GCB) and non-GCB type using the Hans algorithm. There was a clear trend towards a higher serum IL-10 in non-GCB DLBCL patients (p <0.06). In summary, our data identifies mechanisms of JAK2 kinase activation in DLBCL and supports the hypothesis that the IL-10-JAK2-cmyc pathway is activated in patients with DLBCL. Finally our data provide a mechanistic basis of selecting and targeting DLBCL tumor cells with high IL-10 levels and/or constitutive JAK2 activity with potent and novel JAK2 inhibitors such as SAR503. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) exists in two complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2. Most mTOR inhibitors used for hematologic diseases such as rapamycin, everolimus, and temsirolimus are considered mTORC1 inhibitors and do not target mTORC2. The central role of the mTOR kinase in controlling cell growth has sparked interest in discovering mTOR inhibitors that bind to the ATP active site and therefore target both mTORC2 and mTORC1. mTOR also regulates protein synthesis by phosphorylating the P70S6-Kinase and the eIF4E-binding-protein, 4EBP1. The effect of active site dual mTOR inhibitors on cap dependent translation has not been investigated in lymphomas. In this study we moved beyond the effect of the dual mTOR inhibitor CC214-1 (Celgene Pharmceuticals) on the mTORC2/AKT pathway to focus on its effects on cap dependent protein translation. Cap dependent translation is regulated by the translation initiation complex eIF4F (eIF4E-eIF4G-eIF4A). First, we assessed the formation of the active eIF4F (m7GTP-eIF4E-eIF4G) translation complex by a pull down assay using agarose-immobilized m7GTP cap analog to capture eIF4E and its binding partner in lymphoma cell lines (Jeko, Mino, Granta and JVM2, Ly3, Ly1, DHL6) and in primary cells (n=5). Our data demonstrate that the cap bound fraction from normal B cells contain very little eIF4G and eIF4A; however, lymphoma cells were enriched with eIF4G, eIF4E and eIF4A. Increased mRNA of eIF4E and eIF4G was observed in all lymphoma cell lines tested as compared to normal B-cells. 150 untreated diffuse large B cell lymphoma samples were stained for eIF4E by immunohistochemistry and 76% (135/150) were found eIF4E positive. Taken together, these data suggest that lymphoma cells exist in a translational activated state compared to normal B-cells. Next, we examined the effect of the dual mTOR inhibitor CC214-1 on the integrity of the eIF4F complex. In the CC214-1 treated cells the quantity of the eIF4E bound to 4EBP1 was increased whereas the amount of the eIF4E bound to eIF4G was decreased in the CC214-1 treated lymphoma cells but not in those treated with a selective mTORC1 agent (everolimus). We also found that the phosphorylation of 4EBP1 that controls protein synthesis is partially resistant to everolimus/rapamycin but fully suppressed with CC214-1. CC214-1 had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on lymphoma cell survival; however, everolimus and rapamycin were only cytostatic. Moreover, CC-214 was much more potent than rapamycin and everolimus in blocking protein translation measured by the leucine incorporation assay. To elucidate the role of the eIF4E complex in the response to CC214-1, we transiently expressed WT-eIF4E plasmid in Jeko cells and then treated with CC214-1. Ectopic expression of wt-eIF4E led to a loss in the CC-214-1 dependent decrease in the eIF4E bound eIF4G as compared with the control plasmid. Moreover, overexpression of eIF4E also protected against CC214-1-induced apoptosis. To evaluate the efficiency of cap-dependent translation in the presence of CC214-1 and rapamycin, we used the bicistronic reporter assay where translation initiation of the first cistron is dependent on the 5′ cap, whereas initiation of the second cistron depends on a viral internal ribosome entry site. Transfection of this plasmid in CC214-1 treated cells caused a significant decrease in cap-dependent, but not IRES-dependent, translation. We next looked the effect of CC214-1 on the eIF4E regulated translationally active mRNA targets. We isolated eIF4E known mRNA targets (Myc, Cylin D1, Cyclin D2 and MCL-1) by immunoprecipitation assays using eIF4E antibody (mRNA-IP). CC214-1 treated RNA-IP data showed decreased expression of Myc but not the other mRNA targets. Myc is highly expressed in the DLBCL tumors and would be a good prognostic or predictive biomarker for CC214-1 therapy. Translation deregulation is an important mechanism that causes aberrant cell growth in lymphoma cells. Currently, there is a need to identify additional agents that target this pathway. These studies provide a mechanistic basis of targeting cap dependent translation in lymphoma through next generation dual mTOR inhibitors. This study also suggests eIF4E (indicative of activated eIF4F complex) as a potential biomarker for the selection of patients for next generation mTOR inhibitors clinical trials in lymphoma patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract T cell lymphoma (TCL) is a heterogeneous group of malignant lymphomas and is subdivided in three major subgroups, (i) cutaneous (mycosis fungoides (MF), sezary syndrome (SS) and primary CTCL), (ii) nodal (peripheral T-cell lymphoma, PTCL NOS, anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), angioimmunoblastic (AITL)) (iii) and extranodal. Because of this broad morphological spectrum and immunophenotypic variation the pathogenesis of most of the TCL is poorly understood. Constitutive STAT3 signaling provides growth-promoting signals in many forms of malignancy; however in-vivo activation of phosphorylated STAT3 and its clinical correlation in subtypes of TCLs has not been extensively studied. In this study we examined constitutive STAT3 activation in various subtypes of TCL tumors and performed pre-clinical testing to determine whether STAT3 inhibitors will be effective. First, we assessed the STAT3 activation (pSTAT3Tyr705) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a tissue microarray (TMA) from 169 untreated TCL patient samples. Using a cutoff of ≥30% pSTAT3 nuclear staining, 38% (64/169) of TCL tumors were pSTAT3+. Interestingly, pSTAT3 was differentially expressed among the various TCL subgroups. 27% (16/59) PTCL NOS, 29% (11/38) AITL, 93% (14/15) ALK+ ALCL, 57% (13/28) ALK- ALCL, 50% (6/12) extranodal NK/T cell tumors and 17% (1/6) primary cutaneous showed pSTAT3 positivity. Using either a 30% or 80% cut-off, pSTAT3 positivity was associated with inferior event free survival for AITL, PTCL NOS and ALK neg ALCLs TCLs. Due to small sample size within each group statistical significance (p=0.03) was met only for ALK neg ALCL (80% cutoff). Further analysis in the human TCL cell lines and normal control T-cells also revealed differential expression of pSTATs. ALCL cell lines, Karpas 299 and SR786 were pSTAT3 positive but pSTAT5 negative. Both the CTCL (SS) cell lines HuT78 and SeAx were pSTAT3 negative, however MyLa a cell line of MF origin was strongly pSTAT3+ and pSTAT5+. The normal control CD4 T-cells was pSTAT3- and pSTAT5+. These data clearly suggest that pSTAT3 is differentially expressed among the TCL tumors and is a potential therapeutic target. Potential mechanisms for STAT3 activation could be aberrant secretion of cytokines/chemokines produced by the tumor itself or the tumor microenvironment. We compared the cytokine profile of the culture supernatant from pSTAT3 positive SUDHL1 and pSTAT3 negative HuT78 TCL cell lines using a 30-plex ELISA. The most significantly different cytokines among these 2 cell lines were interleukin -10 (IL-10) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2Ra). The SUDHL1 was found to secrete a very high level (1700 pg/ml) of IL-10, in contrast to only 167 pg/mL in the HuT78 supernatant. Moreover, SUDHL1 secretes 3.5 times more sIL-2Ra (6600 pg/ml) than the pSTAT3 negative cell line HuT78 (1800 pg/ml). In-vitro exposure to IL-10 but not sIL-2Ra was able to further upregulate pSTAT3 in SUDHL1 and Karpas 299. Overall, these data suggest that autocrine secretion of IL-10 but not sIL-2Ra is important for STAT3 activation in ALCL TCLs. Next we compared the cytokine profile of 2 pSTAT3 positive cells from different origin; SUDHL1 (ALCL) and MyLa (MF). In contrast to SUDHL1 (which produce high level of IL-10), MyLa was producing very little IL-10 (18pg/ml). The other most significantly different cytokines between these cells was RANTES with MyLa producing a very high level (28897 pg/ml) and SUDHL1 a very low level (8pg/ml). We also noticed differential level of IL-13 between these cells; MyLa producing 113pg/ml while SUDHL1 only 13 pg/ml. SAR302 (Sanofi, Cambridge, MA), a selective JAK2 inhibitor currently in clinical trial for myeloproliferative neoplasms was able to inhibit autocrine secretion of IL-10 but not sIL-2Ra in a dose-dependent manner followed by STAT3 dephosphorylation and decreased lymphoma cell survival. In summary, our data provide first evidence of in-vivo STAT3 activation in AITL, PTCL NOS, ALK negative ALCL TCLs using TMA from patient samples. Comprehensive cytokine analysis determined IL-10 as an autocrine factor driving STAT3 activation in ALCLTCLs, while RANTES and IL-13 might be important drivers for STAT3 activation in MF TCLs. Finally our data provide a mechanistic basis of selecting and targeting TCL tumor cells with high IL-10 levels and/or constitutive STAT3 activity with potent and novel JAK2 inhibitors such as SAR302 or other STAT3 inhibitors. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.