Gupta, Mamta

Abstract Purpose: Although the B-cell receptor (BCR) signal plays a critical role in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell survival and a target of current therapies (ibrutinib targets Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; idelalisib targets PI3Kδ), contribution of the cytokine-driven JAK2 pathway to the “CLL cell-survival signaling network” is largely undefined. Experimental Design: Patients with CLL were enrolled to investigate expression/activation of JAK2 and acylglycerol kinase (AGK), and their functional implication in primary CLL cell survival. A series of biochemical and molecular biology assays were employed to uncover the underlying mechanism. Results: We detected that compared with normal B cells, CLL cells aberrantly express constitutively active JAK2. Mechanistically, HSP90 forms a chaperoning complex with JAK2, resulting in its aberrant accumulation in CLL cells. We also discovered aberrant upregulation of a novel mitochondrial lipid kinase, AGK, which remains complexed with HSP90 in CLL cells activating JAK2. Although AGK is typically mitochondrial, we detected its nuclear localization in association with JAK2 in some CLL cells. Functionally, JAK2 phosphorylates its noncanonical substrate, histone H3(Y41), but not STAT3, activating transcription of diverse sets of genes in a patient-specific manner. Additionally, JAK2 activates the BCR signal in CLL cells via LYN/Bruton’s tyrosine kinase axis. Targeted inhibition of JAK2 as monotherapy, or in combination with the BCR inhibitors or venetoclax (a BCL2 inhibitor), induced apoptosis synergistically in CLL cells. Conclusions: These findings suggest that aberrantly expressed AGK activates JAK2, independent of cytokine, leading to activation of diverse sets of gene transcription in CLL cells. Combined targeting of JAK2 and BCR signals or BCL2 may be effective in some patients with CLL.

AbstractPeripheral T‐cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a clinically heterogeneous group that represents 10%–15% of all lymphomas. Despite improved genetic and molecular understanding, treatment outcomes for PTCL have not shown significant improvement. Although Janus kinase‐2 (JAK2) plays an important role in myeloproliferative neoplasms, the critical role of JAK isoforms in mediating prosurvival signaling in PTCL cells is not well defined. Immunohistochemical analysis of PTCL tumors (n = 96) revealed high levels of constitutively active JAK3 (pJAK3) that significantly (p < 0.04) correlated with the activation state of its canonical substrate STAT3. Furthermore, constitutive activation of JAK3 and STAT3 positively correlated, at least in part, with an oncogenic tyrosine phosphatase PTPN11. Pharmacological inhibition of JAK3 but not JAK1/JAK2 significantly (p < 0.001) decreased PTCL proliferation, survival and STAT3 activation. A sharp contrast was observed in the pJAK3 positivity between ALK+ (85.7%) versus ALK‐negative (10.0%) in human PTCL tumors and PTCL cell lines. Moreover, JAK3 and ALK reciprocally interacted in PTCL cells, forming a complex to possibly regulate STAT3 signaling. Finally, combined inhibition of JAK3 (by WHI‐P154) and ALK (by crizotinib or alectinib) significantly (p < 0.01) decreased the survival of PTCL cells as compared to either agent alone by inhibiting STAT3 downstream signaling. Collectively, our findings establish that JAK3 is a therapeutic target for a subset of PTCL, and provide rationale for the clinical evaluation of JAK3 inhibitors combined with ALK‐targeted therapy in PTCL.

Abstract Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) within the tumor microenvironment (TME) play an important role in tumor growth and progression. TAMs have been involved in producing immunosuppressive TME via various factors; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear in B-cell lymphoma, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We identified that chemokine receptor-1 (CCR1) is highly expressed on monocytes (Mo) and macrophages (MΦ), and CCR1 pharmacological inhibition or CCR1 siRNA abolished lymphoma-mediated Mo/MΦ migration in a chemotaxis assay. The deficiency of host CCR1 (CCR1 KO) was associated with decreased infiltration of peritoneal-MΦ compared with WT-CCR1. Functional studies indicated that the genetic depletion of CCR1 or treatment inhibited protumor MΦ (M2-like) phenotype by decreasing CD206 and IL-10 expression. Moreover, CCR1 depletion reprogrammed MΦ toward an MHCII+/TNFα+ immunogenic phenotype. Mechanistically, protumor MΦ driven–IL-10 provides a positive feedback loop to tumor-CCL3 by regulating the CCL3 promoter via STAT1 signaling. Therapeutic in vivo targeting of CCR1 with CCR1 antagonist BX-471 significantly reduced FC-muMCL1 mouse tumors in the syngeneic MCL model by the depletion of M2-TAMs and increased infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Our study established that CCR1 exerts a pivotal role in macrophage programming, thus shaping protumor TME and lymphoma progression. CCR1 inhibition through CCR1 antagonists may be a promising therapeutic strategy to reprogram macrophages in lymphoma-TME and achieve better clinical outcomes in patients.

Abstract Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and the treatment of these patients has improved with rituximab-based chemo-immunotherapy. However, approximately 40% of patients die of their disease and new agents with novel mechanisms of action are needed for this disease. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) has emerged as an important therapeutic target in cancer cells and rapamycin and its derivatives, which specifically inhibit mTOR, are now being actively evaluated. Recent clinical trials of mTOR inhibitors have demonstrated that a fraction of patients (35%) with relapsed DLBCL respond to single-agent temsirolimus (Smith S et al J Clin Oncol 26; May 20 Supplement abstract 8514) or everolimus (Reeder et al 2007 ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 110 (11) abstract 121) in relapsed DLBCL, however most patients are resistant to this therapy. The mechanism of this resistance remains a subject of major therapeutic significance. Herein, we report that cells from DLBCL lines (DHL-6, Ly7 and Ly3) and primary tissues from DLBCL patients (n=10) display persistent activation of the mTOR pathway as determined by phosphorylation of mTOR targets S6 ribosomal protein (S6rp) and 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1). Treatment of human DLBCL cells with various doses of rapamycin predictably demonstrated a decrease in proliferation but less than 10% reduction in overall cell survival. However, rapamycin suppressed the phosphorylation of S6rp and 4E-BP1, indicating an inhibition of raptor-mTOR (mTORC1) signaling. Paradoxically, rapamycin also concurrently increased, through a negative feedback mechanism, the phosphorylation of Akt that may contribute to drug resistance. Interestingly we found that rapamycin treatment also increased the phosphorylation of eIF4E, a survival protein downstream of mTOR, which may also be responsible for resistance of rapamycin along with Akt. To determine whether the observations found in vitro are clinically relevant, we obtained peripheral blood samples from patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with the rapamycin derivative everolimus. The levels of phosphorylated Akt and eIF4E were increased in 3 of 3 patient samples at 48 hrs and after 1 cycle compared to untreated control. Our observations therefore suggest that rapamycin derivatives potently activate Akt and eIF4E activity via activation of the mTORC2 assembly, in addition to its well-characterized ability to suppress the mTORC1 pathway. Treatment of DLBCL cells with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor LBH589 induced growth inhibition of DLBCL cells at nanomolar concentrations in a dose dependent manner in association with hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4. LBH alone was able to inhibit the phosphorylation of S6rp and 4E-BP1, while combined treatment with rapamycin inhibited the phosphorylation of S6rp and 4EBP1 to a greater extent than either agent alone. Surprisingly LBH inhibited constitutive as well as rapamycin-induced activation of Akt and eIF4E in a time and dose dependent manner. Our co-immunoprecipitation data suggest that LBH alone was able to alter the level of intact mTORC2 by reducing the amounts of rictor bound to mTOR, which is further decreased when combined with rapamycin. In support of this model, rapamycin combined with LBH exhibited enhanced synergistic inhibitory effects on survival and proliferation of DLBCL cells. The mTOR pathway is also considered to control the translation of specific mRNA species, some of which are involved in cell cycle control and angiogenesis (e.g. cyclin D1, c-Myc and HIF-1a). LBH alone down-regulated expression of c-Myc and HIF-1a, while have no effect on cyclin D1 expression. Combination of LBH with rapamycin further decreased expression of c-Myc and HIF-1a. Overall these results indicate that pharmacological inhibition of the mTOR pathway by rapamycin and LBH interferes with essential survival and proliferating pathways in DLBCL cells. We propose that the rapamycin-induced functional blockade of Akt and eIF4E is inhibited by LBH, and the combination increased the anti tumor activity of rapamycin. In summary, our data provide a mechanistic basis for enhancing mTORtargeted cancer therapy by combining an mTOR inhibitor with a HDAC inhibitor such as LBH. A phase I/II trial of this combination is planned.

Abstract MALT lymphoma is a genetically unique disorder and five mutually exclusive chromosomal translocations have been identified thus far in this disease: t(11;18), t(14;18), t(1;14), t(1;2) and t(3;14). Despite this genetic heterogeneity, all but one of the translocations affect the NF-κB signaling pathway, which is critical if not essential for antigen receptor mediated B- and T-cell activation and likely enhances MALT lymphoma growth. However, the known translocations are present in only 25% of cases suggesting that additional uncharacterized translocations exist. We used long-distance inverse polymerase chain reaction (LDI-PCR) technique to clone a novel IGH translocation partner in a 60-year-old female with a history of Sjogren’s syndrome and primary MALT lymphoma involving the parotid gland. The breakpoint on chromosome 14 occurred within the IGHSA2 switch region while the breakpoint on chromosome X fell within Xp11.4. The breakpoint on chromosome Xp11.2 fell between two genes, GPR82 and GPR34, both of which code for orphan G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The breakpoint also fell within and disrupted a larger gene called CASK (a membrane-associated guanylate kinase-MAGUK). To determine the prevalence of this translocation in MALT lymphoma we performed interphase FISH studies on 64 MALT lymphomas using a breakapart probe for GPR82. Only the index case had an abnormal split signal pattern. We next designed primers to perform real-time quantitative RT-PCR for the genes located on Xp11 and found that GPR34 RNA was highly expressed, a 49-fold increase, in the patient carrying the t(X;14)(p11.4;q32) translocation compared to a normal splenic B cell control. Expression of GPR82 and CASK RNA was similar between normal B cells and the patient carrying the t(X;14)(p11.4;q32) translocation. These data suggest that the GPR34 gene is dysregulated upon its translocation to the IGHSA2 switch region. We then measured GPR34 RNA expression in a panel of MALT lymphomas (n=12) and found that GPR34 was expressed at levels higher than that seen in normal B cells with an average increase of 11 fold, 9/11 of which had an expression lever greater than 3-fold over normal splenic B cells. In a gastric MALT lymphoma specimen arising in a 67-year-old male, we saw a 64 fold increase in GPR34 expression. Interphase FISH studies performed on this specimen showed an extra intact GPR34 signal but no translocation involving IGH or GPR34, suggesting that other mechanisms, including gene dosage effect, can upregulate GPR34. GPR34 RNA was also detected in other normal B cell populations and histologic subtypes of NHL but not to the extent seen in MALT lymphoma; values represent the expression of GPR34 normalized to β-actin and a normal B cell control (value of 1.0): t(X;14)(p11.4;q32) specimen, 49.0; MALT lymphoma, 11.0 (n=12); peripheral blood B cells, 0.48 (n=2); normal bone marrow B cells, 0.97 (n=3); follicular lymphoma, 2.47 (n=3); marginal zone B cell lymphoma, 2.47 (n=3); diffuse large cell lymphoma, 0.36, (n=3); mantle cell lymphoma, 2.67 (n=3); and multiple myeloma 0.52 (n=6). The receptor encoded by GPR34 is most similar to the PY2 receptor subfamily of GPCR and GPR34 mRNA transcripts are particularly abundant in mast cells while lower levels were detected in other immune cells including B cells. However, little is known about its natural ligand, biologic function, or the signaling cascades activated by its engagement. Because the NF-κB signaling pathway has been shown to be a common downstream target of MALT lymphoma translocations we first examined the impact of GPR34 expression on phosphorylation of Iκ-Bα. Transient expression of a YFP-GPR34 expression plasmid in HeLa cells results in increased phosphorylation of Iκ-Bα compared to the YFP control. Additionally, we observed increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in GPR34-expressing cells, however no change in phosphorylation of GSK3β was detected. In summary, these data identify a novel IGHS translocation partner in MALT lymphoma and suggest that dysregulation of GPR34 is commonly found in MALT lymphoma. Overexpression of GPR34 results in activation of the NF-κB and MAP kinase pathways and may be a novel mechanism by which MALT lymphoma occurs.

Abstract B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a serious and frequently fatal illness. Some of the genetic changes that lead to lymphoma have been discovered, but many of the other contributing mechanistic details underlying transformation events are not yet known. Members of the TNF super-family have been shown to be key mediators in the formation and regulation of both normal and malignant cell growth. APRIL (A Proliferation Inducing-ligand), a TNF family member expressed by monocytes, macrophages, and tumor cells, stimulates B-cell NHL growth and transgenic over-expression of APRIL in mice results in B cell hyperplasia and lymphoma. The ability of APRIL to bind to TNFR related receptors, BCMA (B Cell Maturation Antigen) and TACI (Transmembrane Activator and CAML Interactor), and with lower affinity to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) has complicated studies to better understand APRIL mediated signaling. It has been shown that NHL cells variably express TACI and BCMA, with TACI being most predominant, however, the specific mechanisms of how APRIL induces NHL cell growth remain to be fully defined. Therefore, we sought to specifically characterize APRIL-mediated signaling events through TACI to better understand the role of this receptor-ligand interaction in B cell NHL biology. Using a TACI-expressing NHL cell line (Karpas) we found that APRIL consistently increased NHL cell proliferation, but had very little effect on cell survival. Since the PI-3K/Akt pathway has been shown to be important in regulating cell cycle progression, we explored the possibility that APRIL-TACI interactions resulted in activation of this pathway. We found that stimulation of TACI-expressing NHL cells with APRIL results in phosphorylation of Akt but had no effect on NF-kB classical pathway activation. Because APRIL can also bind to cells via proteoglycans, we also tested the ability of APRIL to activate Akt in the presence of heparin and found that APRIL-mediated Akt phosphorylation was still detectable. These results suggest that APRIL-mediated signaling occurs independent of proteoglycan binding. In addition to activating Akt, we also found that stimulation of NHL cells with APRIL resulted in up-regulation of cyclin D1 and p21, but not c-myc and p27. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT signal transduction pathway with the pharmacological inhibitor wortmannin prevented APRIL-induced proliferation as well as up-regulation of p21 and cyclin D1 levels suggesting that PI-3K kinase is required. To further substantiate the contribution of TACI in APRIL-mediated signaling, we selectively targeted TACI expression using a siRNA approach. When TACI expression was inhibited, APRIL no longer induced NHL-B cell proliferation, Akt phosphorylation or up-regulation of p21 and cyclin D1. Taken together, these studies suggest that APRIL-TACI interactions result in activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway and up-regulation of cyclin D1 and p21, and help define the mechanism by which APRIL enhances B cell NHL growth. The inhibition of APRIL by blocking APRIL/receptor or interruption of downstream signaling may provide potential therapeutic option for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by rapid disease progression. Although the clinical outcome of MCL patients has improved in the recent years, relapses and progressive emergence of resistance to treatment are common. Therefore, alternative therapeutic strategies are in great need for the treatment of MCL patients. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), the mammalian enzymatic complex plays crucial roles in regulation of normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2), the catalytic subunit of PRC2 complex is frequently amplified or overexpressed in most solid tumor types. However, EZH2 has been reported to harbor mutations of tyrosine 641 to asparagine (Y641N) in 22% of GCB diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 7% of follicular lymphoma (FL), but not in MCL. In the current study, we sought to elucidate the role of PRC2 in MCL and its implications for epigenetic therapy. We first assessed the expression of PRC2 components EZH2, SUZ12 and EED in several MCL cell lines (Jeko, Mino, Granta, JVM2 and Z138) and normal B-cells. Western blot analysis demonstrated that SUZ12 and EED along with EZH2 are overexpressed in proliferating MCL cell lines but not in normal B-cells. Furthermore, aberrant expression of H3 trimethylation (H3K27me3), di-methylation (H3K27me2) and mono-methylation (H3K27me1) was observed in all five MCL cell lines tested as compared to normal B cells. In order to understand if MCL cells have stable and enzymatically active PRC2 methyltransferase complex, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assay using EZH2 antibody and IgG as control. Significant amount of EED and SUZ12 enrichment was observed in the EZH2 immunoprecipitates from Granta and Mino MCL cells. Collectively this data demonstrates that in the MCL cells, PRC2 complex is aberrantly active and is associated with EZH2 upregulation. To study the role of EZH2 and EED in MCL cells, we generated expression constructs of the full-length and deletion fragments EZH2-F (full length EGH2), EZH2-del (EZH2 with deletion of SET domain), EED-F (full length EED) and EED-del (EED with deletion of WD40 domain), respectively. Interestingly, overexpression of EEDWT and EZH2WT led to a significantly (p=0.05) increased cell proliferation resulted in increased H3K27 trimethylation as compared to cells transfected with empty vector. Co-transfection with EZH2-del (SET domain) with the EZH2-F attenuated EZH2-F induced H3K27me3 and cell proliferation, suggesting oncogenic role of EZH2 enzymatic activity. Interestingly, co-transfection of EED-del (deficient in WD40 domain) had no effect on EED-F induced H3K27Me3, and the proliferation was less pronounced as compared with EED-F alone. EZH2 gene inhibition with EZH2-shRNA inhibited the growth of the MCL cells. Pharmacological inhibition of global methyltransferase activity by DZNep or EZH2 specific inhibitor GSK343 greatly suppressed the H3K27me3 level with little effect on H3K27me1 in Granta cells. However, treatment with GSK343 (but not DZNep) inhibited interaction between EZH2 and EED. Furthermore, treatment with EZH2 inhibitor, GSK343, produced significant growth inhibition (more than 90%) at 20uM concentration in Mino, Granta and Z138 cells. Taken together, these results suggest wild-type EZH2 is an epigenetic target for MCL, and MCL cells are highly sensitive to the EZH2 inhibition regardless of EZH2 mutations. Our findings indicate the use of PRC2 and EZH2 epigenetic inhibitors for the treatment of MCL patients. Overall, this study implies that overexpression of wild-type EZH2 has an oncogenic role in MCL, and suggest that wild-type EZH2 may confers similar active PRC2 addiction as mutant-EZH2 does in DLBCLs, FLs and other malignancies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 960 Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive lymphoma whose survival depends on various signaling pathways one of which is Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)/Janus kinase 2 (JAK2). We have demonstrated that JAK2 is constitutively activated at the auto-phosphorylation site in many cases of DLBCL. The most common mechanism causing abnormal JAK2 activation is through dysregulated cytokine signaling. Cytokines are deregulated in several hematological malignancies and may play a role in tumor cell growth through receptor-mediated and ligand dependent activation of the JAK2 kinase. In this study we investigated the role of cytokine signaling in JAK2 activation in DLBCL and use of a novel JAK2 inhibitor (JAK2i) to inhibit IL-10 induced JAK/STAT signaling. We studied serum cytokines from 70 patients with new untreated DLBCL who participated in a clinical trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (Micallef, IN et al Blood 2011). Compared to control sera, patients with DLBCL had higher levels of several JAK2 kinase related cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, and EGF). IL-10 and IL-6 were significantly higher in DLBCL patients vs controls with p values >0.03 and >0.001, respectively. We next examined whether DLBCL cell lines produced IL-10. The phospho-JAK2 (pJAK2) positive DLBCL cell lines Ly10, DHL2 and HBL1 produced more IL-10 (40–80 pg/ml) than the pJAK2 negative cell lines Ly1, Ly19 and DHL6 (0–5 pg/ml). Analysis of the surface expression of IL-10 receptors (IL-10R) determined that most p-JAK2 positive DLBCL cells express either IL-10Ra or IL-10Rb or both. IL-10 had no effect on DLBCL cell survival in vitro; however, it did promote their proliferation. Only IL-10 (but not the other elevated cytokines) was specifically able to activate JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation in a subgroup of DLBCL cell lines. IL-10 was not able to activate JAK1, STAT1 and STAT5, which suggests a specific role of IL-10 in the JAK2 pathway. Moreover, neutralizing antibody to IL-10 inhibited IL-10-induced JAK2 and STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation. We studied the effect of SAR302503 (SAR503, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA), a selective JAK2i currently in clinical trial for myelofibrosis on constitutive JAK2 signaling in DLBCL cells. SAR503 was able to inhibit JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation in a dose and time dependent manner in a variety of DLBCL cell lines and patient samples. JAK2 inhibition with SAR2503 caused a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on survival of pJAK2 positive DLBCL cells not observed in pJAK2 negative cells. Activation of STAT3 signaling up-regulates the expression of various genes involved in cell survival and proliferation such as bcl-xl, bcl-2, mcl-1 and c-myc. We observed a dose-dependent decrease in c-myc protein and mRNA levels in Ly3 and DHL2 cells with SAR503 treatment; however, SAR503 did not effect expression of bcl2, mcl-1 and bcl-xl proteins in DLBCL cells. Interestingly, JAK2 inhibition with SAR503 inhibited the autocrine secretion of IL-10 in a dose-dependent manner. Next, we determined if higher pre-treatment serum IL-10 correlates with the overall survival of 81 DLBCL patients. IL-10 by ELISA demonstrated that IL-10 levels were high in 51% (41/81) of patients (median, 57.7pg/ml; range, 26.1–503.7), and low in 49% (40/81) (median, 15.9 pg/ml; range, 0–25.9). Using a cut-off value of 26.1pg/ml, patients with a high serum IL-10 level had a significantly worse event-free survival (p=0.01). Clinical correlation of serum IL-10 with disease parameters showed that the IL-10 level was correlated with elevated serum LDH (p= 0.0085) and IPI score (p=0.01); there was no correlation with the number of extranodal sites, age, or B symptoms. DLBCL tumors from 40 patients were classified into germinal center B-cell type (GCB) and non-GCB type using the Hans algorithm. There was a clear trend towards a higher serum IL-10 in non-GCB DLBCL patients (p <0.06). In summary, our data identifies mechanisms of JAK2 kinase activation in DLBCL and supports the hypothesis that the IL-10-JAK2-cmyc pathway is activated in patients with DLBCL. Finally our data provide a mechanistic basis of selecting and targeting DLBCL tumor cells with high IL-10 levels and/or constitutive JAK2 activity with potent and novel JAK2 inhibitors such as SAR503. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3927 Poster Board III-863 In previous studies we characterized the t(X;14)(p11.4;q32) translocation in a patient with MALT lymphoma and found that GPR34, an orphan G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), was highly expressed due to its juxtaposition to the IGHSA2 switch region. As part of a larger MALT gene expression-profiling project, we have now acquired gene expression analysis on the patient carrying the t(X;14)(p11;q32) translocation and have confirmed overexpression of GPR34. We then measured GPR34 mRNA expression in a panel of MALT lymphomas (n=17) and found that GPR34 was expressed at levels higher than that seen in normal B cells (mean, 11.3 fold; median, 5.5; range, 1.4-64 fold). When analyzed separately, 70% (12/17) had an expression level greater than 3-fold over normal B cells. Of note, in a gastric MALT lymphoma specimen, we found a 64 fold increase in GPR34 mRNA expression. FISH studies performed on this specimen showed an extra intact GPR34 signal but no translocation involving IGH or GPR34, suggesting that other mechanisms, including gene dosage effect, can upregulate GPR34. Elevated expression of GPR34 mRNA was also detected in other histologic types of NHL, but not to the extent seen in MALT lymphoma. Taken together, these data suggest that GPR34 is commonly overexpressed in MALT lymphoma and that deregulation of GPR34 expression can occur independent of a t(X;14)(p11.4;q32) translocation. The receptor encoded by GPR34 is most similar to the PY2 receptor subfamily of GPCR and GPR34 mRNA transcripts are abundant in mast cells while lower levels were detected in other immune cells including B cells. Signals from GPR34 have been briefly described and the results to date suggest that overexpression of GPR34 results in an accumulation of inositol phosphates. To further characterize the impact of GPR34 overexpression on cell signaling, HeLa cells were transduced with a retroviral expression plasmid (pBMN-GFP) that expresses GPR34 and GFP. GFP expressing cells were isolated and overexpression of GPR34 mRNA was confirmed by PCR and GPR34 protein expression was detected by flow cytometry. When normalized to the isotype control, pBMN-GPR34 cells expressed 17-fold more GPR34 on their cell surface compared to the pBMN-vector control cells. To determine which signaling pathways were affected by GPR34 overexpression, pBMN-GPR34 or pBMN-vector control cells were transfected with an AP-1, CRE, NF-κB, E2F, SRE, NFAT, or ISRE- luciferase reporter plasmid. Upon normalization with renilla, pBMN-GPR34 expressing cells had increased luciferase activity (n=3) driven by AP-1 (5.35-fold), CRE (4.7), NF-κB (2.8-fold), and E2F (2.13) when compared to pBMN-vector control cells. ISRE, NFAT, and SRE mediated luciferase expression was similar in the GPR34 and control cells. AP-1 and CRE have been implicated in a large variety of cellular processes, including transformation, and both AP-1 and CRE activity is induced upon activation of MAP kinases. To determine if MAPK activity was also upregulated in GPR34 expressing cells, we analyzed the phosphorylation status of Erk1/2 in pBMN-GPR34 cells by western blot and found that Erk1/2 was constitutively phosphorylated in GRP34 expressing cells (1.8 fold increase) compared to vector control cells. Increased phosphorylation of PKC-α/β was also detected in pBMN-GPR34 cells (3.5 fold increase compared to control cells). To determine the biologic impact of GRP34 overexpression on cell growth, the proliferation rates of pBMN-control and pBMN-GPR34 cells were compared and it was found that proliferation of GPR34 expressing cells was 2.2 times higher than that seen in control cells. Because the MAPK kinase pathway was found to be active in the pBMN-GPR34 cells, we tested the effect of the MEK inhibitor PD98059 on proliferation and saw a dose dependent decrease in proliferation of GPR34 expressing cells. These results suggest that GPR34-mediated proliferation is Erk-dependent. In summary, these data suggest that deregulation of GPR34 is commonly found in MALT lymphoma and that overexpression of GPR34 results in activation of Erk1/2, phosphorylation of PKC, and results is AP-1 and CRE mediated transcription. Additionally, our data suggest that overexpression of GPR34 results in increased cell growth that is MAPK-dependent. Taken together, this studies indicate that overexpression of a GPCR, GPR34, may be a novel mechanism by which MALT, lymphoma, and potentially other subtypes of NHL, develop. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) exists in two complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2. Most mTOR inhibitors used for hematologic diseases such as rapamycin, everolimus, and temsirolimus are considered mTORC1 inhibitors and do not target mTORC2. The central role of the mTOR kinase in controlling cell growth has sparked interest in discovering mTOR inhibitors that bind to the ATP active site and therefore target both mTORC2 and mTORC1. mTOR also regulates protein synthesis by phosphorylating the P70S6-Kinase and the eIF4E-binding-protein, 4EBP1. The effect of active site dual mTOR inhibitors on cap dependent translation has not been investigated in lymphomas. In this study we moved beyond the effect of the dual mTOR inhibitor CC214-1 (Celgene Pharmceuticals) on the mTORC2/AKT pathway to focus on its effects on cap dependent protein translation. Cap dependent translation is regulated by the translation initiation complex eIF4F (eIF4E-eIF4G-eIF4A). First, we assessed the formation of the active eIF4F (m7GTP-eIF4E-eIF4G) translation complex by a pull down assay using agarose-immobilized m7GTP cap analog to capture eIF4E and its binding partner in lymphoma cell lines (Jeko, Mino, Granta and JVM2, Ly3, Ly1, DHL6) and in primary cells (n=5). Our data demonstrate that the cap bound fraction from normal B cells contain very little eIF4G and eIF4A; however, lymphoma cells were enriched with eIF4G, eIF4E and eIF4A. Increased mRNA of eIF4E and eIF4G was observed in all lymphoma cell lines tested as compared to normal B-cells. 150 untreated diffuse large B cell lymphoma samples were stained for eIF4E by immunohistochemistry and 76% (135/150) were found eIF4E positive. Taken together, these data suggest that lymphoma cells exist in a translational activated state compared to normal B-cells. Next, we examined the effect of the dual mTOR inhibitor CC214-1 on the integrity of the eIF4F complex. In the CC214-1 treated cells the quantity of the eIF4E bound to 4EBP1 was increased whereas the amount of the eIF4E bound to eIF4G was decreased in the CC214-1 treated lymphoma cells but not in those treated with a selective mTORC1 agent (everolimus). We also found that the phosphorylation of 4EBP1 that controls protein synthesis is partially resistant to everolimus/rapamycin but fully suppressed with CC214-1. CC214-1 had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on lymphoma cell survival; however, everolimus and rapamycin were only cytostatic. Moreover, CC-214 was much more potent than rapamycin and everolimus in blocking protein translation measured by the leucine incorporation assay. To elucidate the role of the eIF4E complex in the response to CC214-1, we transiently expressed WT-eIF4E plasmid in Jeko cells and then treated with CC214-1. Ectopic expression of wt-eIF4E led to a loss in the CC-214-1 dependent decrease in the eIF4E bound eIF4G as compared with the control plasmid. Moreover, overexpression of eIF4E also protected against CC214-1-induced apoptosis. To evaluate the efficiency of cap-dependent translation in the presence of CC214-1 and rapamycin, we used the bicistronic reporter assay where translation initiation of the first cistron is dependent on the 5′ cap, whereas initiation of the second cistron depends on a viral internal ribosome entry site. Transfection of this plasmid in CC214-1 treated cells caused a significant decrease in cap-dependent, but not IRES-dependent, translation. We next looked the effect of CC214-1 on the eIF4E regulated translationally active mRNA targets. We isolated eIF4E known mRNA targets (Myc, Cylin D1, Cyclin D2 and MCL-1) by immunoprecipitation assays using eIF4E antibody (mRNA-IP). CC214-1 treated RNA-IP data showed decreased expression of Myc but not the other mRNA targets. Myc is highly expressed in the DLBCL tumors and would be a good prognostic or predictive biomarker for CC214-1 therapy. Translation deregulation is an important mechanism that causes aberrant cell growth in lymphoma cells. Currently, there is a need to identify additional agents that target this pathway. These studies provide a mechanistic basis of targeting cap dependent translation in lymphoma through next generation dual mTOR inhibitors. This study also suggests eIF4E (indicative of activated eIF4F complex) as a potential biomarker for the selection of patients for next generation mTOR inhibitors clinical trials in lymphoma patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.