Vesely, Sara K

Background: Since publication of the American Society of Hematology 2019 Guidelines for Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), new clinical trials have been completed and new treatments have become available. Objective: These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are a focused update of the 2019 ASH ITP guidelines, centering on treatment of adults with primary ITP. Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel including two patient representatives that was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The University of Oklahoma supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews (up to July 19, 2025). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and identification of areas with new data or where application of new methods would be of benefit. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks and the GRADE framework for multiple comparisons, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. Results: The panel agreed on recommendations in adults with primary ITP regarding initial therapy and second-line treatment in patients who failed first-line corticosteroids. The panel also issued good practice statements on thrombopoietic agent switching and splenectomy. Conclusions: Novel recommendations of these guidelines include: (1) initial therapy with a combination of rituximab plus corticosteroids or a thrombopoietic agent plus corticosteroids rather than corticosteroids alone (conditional recommendation) and (2) a thrombopoietic agent (strong recommendation) or rituximab (conditional recommendation) for patients who failed first-line corticosteroids.

Abstract We conducted this systematic review to evaluate outcomes of thrombolysis followed by anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone in pediatric patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). This systematic review addresses mortality, VTE resolution, recurrence, bleeding, and organ-specific outcomes in 5 PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) questions on thrombolysis across pulmonary embolism (PE), extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), right atrial thrombosis (RAT), cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT), and renal vein thrombosis (RVT). Meta-analysis reported risk ratios or differences (95% confidence intervals [CIs]), and absolute effects per 1000 patients. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of recommendation, assessment, Development, and Evaluation) guidelines. Thirteen nonrandomized studies were included and no randomized clinical trials addressed these questions. Thrombolysis might be associated with a higher risk of major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or unspecified bleeding with risk differences of 0.09 (95% CI, −0.06 to 0.23), 0.06 (95% CI, −0.11 to 0.22), and 0.09 (95% CI, −0.04 to 0.23), respectively. In PE with hemodynamic compromise, thrombolysis might be associated with a lower risk of mortality but conclusions on PE progression were uncertain in submassive PE. In DVT, thrombolysis may have little to no effect on mortality or thrombus resolution but might be associated with lower risk of postthrombotic syndrome. In RAT, thrombolysis might have little to no effect on thrombus resolution but a higher risk of major bleeding and mortality. For CSVT and RVT, the evidence was very limited. These findings were based on very-low-certainty evidence because of confounding and imprecision from small sample sizes. This systematic review highlights key challenges in developing recommendations for thrombolysis in children with VTE.

Abstract Purpose: Although the B-cell receptor (BCR) signal plays a critical role in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell survival and a target of current therapies (ibrutinib targets Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; idelalisib targets PI3Kδ), contribution of the cytokine-driven JAK2 pathway to the “CLL cell-survival signaling network” is largely undefined. Experimental Design: Patients with CLL were enrolled to investigate expression/activation of JAK2 and acylglycerol kinase (AGK), and their functional implication in primary CLL cell survival. A series of biochemical and molecular biology assays were employed to uncover the underlying mechanism. Results: We detected that compared with normal B cells, CLL cells aberrantly express constitutively active JAK2. Mechanistically, HSP90 forms a chaperoning complex with JAK2, resulting in its aberrant accumulation in CLL cells. We also discovered aberrant upregulation of a novel mitochondrial lipid kinase, AGK, which remains complexed with HSP90 in CLL cells activating JAK2. Although AGK is typically mitochondrial, we detected its nuclear localization in association with JAK2 in some CLL cells. Functionally, JAK2 phosphorylates its noncanonical substrate, histone H3(Y41), but not STAT3, activating transcription of diverse sets of genes in a patient-specific manner. Additionally, JAK2 activates the BCR signal in CLL cells via LYN/Bruton’s tyrosine kinase axis. Targeted inhibition of JAK2 as monotherapy, or in combination with the BCR inhibitors or venetoclax (a BCL2 inhibitor), induced apoptosis synergistically in CLL cells. Conclusions: These findings suggest that aberrantly expressed AGK activates JAK2, independent of cytokine, leading to activation of diverse sets of gene transcription in CLL cells. Combined targeting of JAK2 and BCR signals or BCL2 may be effective in some patients with CLL.