Back to Authors

Neunert, Cindy E.

0000-0001-6753-6107

Mayo Clinic

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Citations 2

American Society of Hematology 2026 Guidelines for Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Initial and Second-Line Therapy in Adults with Primary ITP
Cuker, Adam, Terrell, Deirdra R. , Sowdagar, Honieh, Arnold, Donald M. , Audia, Sylvain , Bussel, James B. , González‐López, Tomás José , Masias, Camila , McCrae, Keith R. , Panch, Sandhya , Shah, Surbhi, Shy, Brenda G, Vandevelde, Jessica , Grace, Rachael F , McCrae, Keith R , Mitrovic, Mirjana , Neunert, Cindy E. , Panch, Sandhya Ramanathan , Cines, Douglas B , Vesely, Sara K , Arnold, Donald M , Terrell, Deirdra R , Cuker, Adam , González‐López, Tomás José , Grace, Rachael F. , VandeVelde, Jessica

Blood Advances | August 19, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1182/bloodadvances.2026021269 Get It

Background: Since publication of the American Society of Hematology 2019 Guidelines for Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), new clinical trials have been completed and new treatments have become available. Objective: These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are a focused update of the 2019 ASH ITP guidelines, centering on treatment of adults with primary ITP. Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel including two patient representatives that was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The University of Oklahoma supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews (up to July 19, 2025). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and identification of areas with new data or where application of new methods would be of benefit. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks and the GRADE framework for multiple comparisons, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. Results: The panel agreed on recommendations in adults with primary ITP regarding initial therapy and second-line treatment in patients who failed first-line corticosteroids. The panel also issued good practice statements on thrombopoietic agent switching and splenectomy. Conclusions: Novel recommendations of these guidelines include: (1) initial therapy with a combination of rituximab plus corticosteroids or a thrombopoietic agent plus corticosteroids rather than corticosteroids alone (conditional recommendation) and (2) a thrombopoietic agent (strong recommendation) or rituximab (conditional recommendation) for patients who failed first-line corticosteroids.
The American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guideline for immune thrombocytopenia
Lim, Wendy , Cohen, Alan R. , Solberg, Lawrence A. , Neunert, Cindy E. , Crowther, Mark Andrew

Blood | February 16, 2011 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 4190-4207

10.1182/blood-2010-08-302984 Get It

Abstract Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is commonly encountered in clinical practice. In 1996 the American Society of Hematology published a landmark guidance paper designed to assist clinicians in the management of this disorder. Since 1996 there have been numerous advances in the management of both adult and pediatric ITP. These changes mandated an update in the guidelines. This guideline uses a rigorous, evidence-based approach to the location, interpretation, and presentation of the available evidence. We have endeavored to identify, abstract, and present all available methodologically rigorous data informing the treatment of ITP. We provide evidence-based treatment recommendations using the GRADE system in those areas in which such evidence exists. We do not provide evidence in those areas in which evidence is lacking, or is of lower quality—interested readers are referred to a number of recent, consensus-based recommendations for expert opinion in these clinical areas. Our review identified the need for additional studies in many key areas of the therapy of ITP such as comparative studies of “front-line” therapy for ITP, the management of serious bleeding in patients with ITP, and studies that will provide guidance about which therapy should be used as salvage therapy for patients after failure of a first-line intervention.