Gard, Joseph J.

BackgroundEndocardial ablation of atrial ganglionated plexi (GP) has been described for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Our objective in this study was to develop percutaneous epicardial GP ablation in a canine model using novel energy sources and catheters.MethodsPhase 1: The efficacy of several modalities to ablate the GP was tested in an open chest canine model (n = 10). Phase 2: Percutaneous epicardial ablation of GP was done in six dogs using the most efficacious modality identified in phase 1 using two novel catheters.ResultsPhase 1: Direct current (DC) in varying doses (blocking [7–12 μA], electroporation [300–500 μA], ablation [3,000–7,500 μA]), radiofrequency ablation (25–50 W), ultrasound (1.5 MHz), and alcohol (2–5 mL) injection were successful at 0/8, 4/12, 5/7, 3/8, 1/5, and 5/7 GP sites. DC (500–5,000 μA) along with alcohol irrigation was tested in phase 2. Phase 2: Percutaneous epicardial ablation of the right atrium, oblique sinus, vein of Marshall, and transverse sinus GP was successful in 5/6 dogs. One dog died of ventricular fibrillation during DC ablation at 5,000 μA. Programmed stimulation induced AF in six dogs, preablation and no atrial arrhythmia in three, flutter in one, and AF in one postablation. Heart rate, blood pressure, effective atrial refractory period, and local atrial electrogram amplitude did not change significantly postablation. Microscopic examination showed elimination of GP, and minimal injury to atrial myocardium.ConclusionPercutaneous epicardial ablation of GP using DC and novel catheters is safe and feasible and may be used as an adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation in the treatment of AF in order to minimize additional atrial myocardial ablation.

IntroductionAbandoned cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads remain a contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, largely due to in vitro data showing endocardial heating secondary to the radiofrequency field. We tested the hypothesis that abandoned CIED leads do not pose an increased risk of clinical harm for patients undergoing MRI.MethodsThis single‐center retrospective study examined the outcomes of patients who had device generators removed before MRI, rendering the device leads abandoned. Information was gathered through chart review. Data collected included lead model, pacing threshold before MRI, anatomic region examined, threshold data after generator reimplantation, and clinical patient outcome.ResultsPatients (n = 19, 11 men and eight women) ranged in age from 19 to 85 at the time of MRI. There was a mean of 1.63 abandoned leads at the time of imaging; none of the leads were MRI conditional. Of the three implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads, two of three were dual coil. Most (31/35) of the scans performed were of the central nervous system, including head and spinal imaging. There were no adverse events associated with MRI in any of these patients with abandoned leads within 7 days of the scan. No lead malfunctions or clinically significant change in pacing thresholds were noted with generator reimplantation.ConclusionThe use of MRI in patients with abandoned cardiac device leads appears feasible when performed under careful monitoring, with no adverse events, although the experience is small. MRI did not affect the function of leads that were subsequently reconnected to a cardiac device.

Background— Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after electrocardioversion. OSA is highly prevalent in patients who are male, obese, and/or hypertensive, but its prevalence in patients with AF is unknown. Methods and Results— We prospectively studied consecutive patients undergoing electrocardioversion for AF (n=151) and consecutive patients without past or current AF referred to a general cardiology practice (n=312). OSA was diagnosed with the Berlin questionnaire, which is validated to identify patients with OSA. We also assessed its accuracy compared with polysomnography in a sample of the study population. Groups were compared with the 2-tailed t , Wilcoxon, and χ 2 tests. Logistic regression modeled the association of AF and OSA after adjustment for relevant covariates. Patients in each group had similar age, gender, body mass index, and rates of diabetes, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. The questionnaire performed with 0.86 sensitivity, 0.89 specificity, and 0.97 positive predictive value in our sample. The proportion of patients with OSA was significantly higher in the AF group than in the general cardiology group (49% versus 32%, P =0.0004). The adjusted odds ratio for the association between AF and OSA was 2.19 (95% CI 1.40 to 3.42, P =0.0006). Conclusions— The novel finding of this study is that a strong association exists between OSA and AF, such that OSA is strikingly more prevalent in patients with AF than in high-risk patients with multiple other cardiovascular diseases. The coinciding epidemics of obesity and AF underscore the clinical importance of these results.