Kizilbash, Sani H.

Abstract Gliomas may leverage alternate metabolic pathways in response to metabolism-targeted therapeutic intervention, all of which remain unexplored in the live human glioma, in situ. Defining emergent mechanisms of metabolic resistance in response to therapeutic challenge can help guide rational combinatorial therapies. To date, the metabolic response of gliomas in response to therapeutic intervention has remained poorly understood due to the relative inaccessibility of the live human tumor, in situ. Microdialysis is an underutilized tool that could be leveraged to overcome this longstanding challenge. Data from our ongoing intraoperative microdialysis trial have revealed an upregulation of polyamine metabolism and a novel glioma-associated metabolite, guanidinoacetate (GAA) -- a metabolite co-produced with ornithine, which is required for polyamine synthesis. In a Phase 0 trial, we will evaluate in situ glioma responses to polyamine depletion (difluoromethylornithine, DFMO) with or without blockade of polyamine uptake (AMXT 1501) to identify candidate extracellular biomarkers of target engagement and cytotoxicity in fifteen post-operative patients who have undergone a standard-of-care planned subtotal resection for high-grade glioma. Intraoperatively, high-molecular-weight catheters will be implanted into the residual tumor and brain adjacent to the resection cavity for post-operative longitudinal monitoring of extracellular metabolites via microdialysis. Polyamines and guanidinoacetate, a candidate biomarker of glioma-upregulated polyamine synthesis, will be monitored throughout therapeutic intervention from post-operative day (POD) 1 to POD5 via longitudinal microdialysis to determine live in situ glioma pharmacodynamic responses to polyamine depletion. Catheters will be removed on post-operative day five prior to discharge. We hypothesize that GAA will reflect local tumor production of polyamine metabolism. Additionally, in situ microdialysis in Phase 0 trials will allow for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic, in addition to metabolic, monitoring, an opportunity which is rarely afforded in most clinical trials due to lack of access to the CNS.

4130 Background: KRAS is mutationally activated in over 90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Compared to pts with KRAS mutation, KRAS wild-type (wt) PDAC seem to have better response to therapy and may harbor potentially actionable molecular alterations. Here, we analyze the molecular profile and clinical outcome of a cohort of pts with KRAS wt PDAC. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on pts with PDAC who underwent CLIA-certified Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) testing at Mayo Clinic between December 1, 2018 and December 1, 2021. Pts with KRAS wt PDAC with available reports were included. Their genomic drivers, RNA expression, demographics, disease characteristics, therapies offered, and clinical outcome data were collected. The study was approved by the institutional IRB. Results: Of the 241 eligible pts, 8% (19) has KRAS wt PDAC. Among those, 2 pts had no mutation identified by the gene/molecular panel used. Of the 17 pts (89%) with identified alterations, mutations found in ³ 2 pts were TP53 (53%), CDKN2A (16%) and CDKN2B/ERBB2/PTEN/MSH3/RNF43/FBXW7/KMT2D/GNAS (11% each). Chromosomal rearrangements were identified in 5 (26%): CADPS2-BRAF, GP2-ERBB2, PTPRK-RSPO3, EML4-NTRK3 and TFG-MET. RNA expression results were available in 12 pts: common overexpression were ERBB2 (27%) and MET/NRAS/MYC/CCDN1/CCNE1/AR (18% each); and the under-expression MGMT (18%). Among the 13 pts with available MSI status via NGS, 2 (11%) were MSI-high (both had high TMB [28.4 and 23.7 m/MB]) while all others were TMB < 10 m/MB. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (68% males). 8/19 (42%) were Stage IV at diagnosis with 15/19 (79%) pts ultimately diagnosed with metastatic disease. Among metastatic pts, median lines of treatment received was 2.5 (range:0-4). 4 pts received FOLFIRINOX (FFX), 2 gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel (GP) and tumor response were comparable to previously reported results. 1 received 1st-line pembrolizumab and remained on therapy at the time of analysis. The median length of follow up from diagnosis was 29 months. A patient with TFG-MET re-arrangement previously progressed on FFX and GP was treated using a MET inhibitor, and achieved significant CA19-9 drop and pancreas tumor shrinkage at 1st restaging, with ongoing response. Conclusions: The molecular profile of KRAS wt PDAC is highly heterogeneous and difficult to generalize. Novel approaches (e.g., basket trials) are needed to develop therapy for this rare PDAC subgroup.

2058 Background: Immunotherapies targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) have failed. We hypothesize that combining therapies targeting multiple immunosuppressive pathways with cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapies will improve survival. Here, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (retifanlimab), hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), and bevacizumab, with or without an oral IDO1 inhibitor (epacadostat), in patients with rGBM in a nonrandomized, noncomparative sequential two-arm Phase II study. Methods: This is an open-label Phase II study of 2 sequential cohorts (Table). Cohort A first examines retifanlimab + bevacizumab + HFRT in patients with IDH1/2-WT rGBM. After a toxicity monitoring period, Cohort B, which adds epacadostat, starts enrolling. Key inclusion criteria includes dexamethasone ≤ 4 mg/day at registration and candidacy for reirradiation. Previous bevacizumab use for radiation necrosis is permitted. The primary endpoint is OS probability at 9 months (OS-9). Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, and toxicity. Exploratory endpoints include immunological phenotyping of blood and tissue. An increase of OS-9 from 38% (bevacizumab alone) to 60% is considered clinically relevant. Results: From 6/2020 to 12/2021, we have completed accrual for cohort A and the interim analysis results are presented here: 25 patients with rGBM enrolled, with 23 evaluable. Median age is 64.3 years (42.1-81.8), 30.4% female, 30.4% MGMT promotor methylated, median KPS 90 (range 70-100), baseline dexamethasone 0 mg (range 0-4) with 52.2% of patients on dexamethasone during the first 3 cycles, median baseline ALC 1,000 cells/µl (range 300-3,700). Patients received a median of 6 cycles to date (range 2-20). Median follow-up is 11.97 months per the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Interim analysis shows a median PFS of 9.9 months (95%CI: 5.5 to not reached (NR)) and median OS of 12.2 months (95%CI 7.3-NR). Notably, Cohort A met the primary endpoint with an OS-9 of 71.4% (95%CI: 46.7% -86.1%). No dose limiting toxicities have been yet observed. Two treatment-related grade 3 toxicities have occurred (myositis, hypertension). Cohort B enrollment is ongoing, and correlative studies pending. Conclusions: Interim analysis suggests retifanlimab combined with HFRT and bevacizumab in patients with rGBM is well-tolerated and had encouraging OS and PFS at the time of data cutoff. Cohort B, which adds epacadostat, is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03532295. [Table: see text]

2001 Background: PolyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) is an important modulator of DNA repair following temozolomide (TMZ) therapy. Pre-clinical testing demonstrated significant survival benefit for the combination of TMZ and PARP inhibitor veliparib in a subset of GBM pt-derived xenografts with MGMT promoter hypermethylation. Methods: After central pathology review and MGMT testing, patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, MGMT promoter hypermethylated GBM who had completed concurrent radiation and TMZ were randomized to adjuvant therapy with TMZ (Days 1-5 q28 days) combined with either placebo or veliparib (Days 1-7 q28 days). Veliparib/placebo+TMZ treatment was continued for up to 6 cycles. Pts accrued on the phase II and III portions of the trial were included in the primary endpoint analysis of overall survival (OS), with 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.71 using a one-sided log-rank test with type I error rate of 0.05. The planned phase III sample size was 400 pts with data maturity after 302 deaths. Results: The phase II and III portions of the trial were open to accrual from 12/15/2014 to 2/6/2017 and 11/8/2017 to 10/15/2018, respectively; 447 pts were accrued to the trial and used in this intention to treat analysis. The two treatment groups were well balanced for prognostic factors, 421 pts initiated treatment, median follow-up was 57.8 months (mos), 380 pts had disease progression and 335 pts have died. There was no difference in OS (p = 0.15; HR 0.89 (0.71-1.11), median OS 28.1 vs. 24.8 mo. for TMZ+veliparib vs. TMZ+placebo, respectively) and no difference in secondary endpoint progression free survival (PFS, p = 0.31; HR 1.05 (0.86-1.30), median 13.2 vs. 12.1 mo, respectively). There was a notable trend for extended OS with TMZ+veliparib treatment at intermediate time-points between 24 and 42 mos (3-year OS 36.6% vs. 28.9% with TMZ+placebo, p = 0.09). In an unplanned exploratory analysis, treatment with TMZ at the time of first recurrence was associated with extended post-recurrence OS (p = 0.03) for pts treated on the experimental arm; median post-recurrence OS with TMZ salvage was 17.0 mo in the TMZ+veliparib arm and 12.6 mo in the TMZ+placebo arm, as compared to 9.6 mo in either arm if TMZ salvage was not used. These data are consistent with a possible effect of veliparib limiting the emergence of TMZ resistance in a subset of GBM pts. Conclusions: Veliparib combined with adjuvant TMZ therapy was not associated with significant extension in OS or PFS in newly diagnosed, MGMT hypermethylated GBM pts. However, a subset of pts treated with TMZ+veliparib may have an extended survival following re-treatment with TMZ at first recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT02152982.

Abstract Background The management of pineal parenchymal tumors remains controversial. Methods The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for cases (age &gt;3 years) with histologically confirmed pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID, n = 90) or pineoblastoma (n = 106). Results Within the PPTID group, median age was 41 years; 49% were males. Five- and 10-year survival were 83% and 78%, respectively. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy were administered in 64% and 17% patients, respectively. The effect of radiation with or without chemotherapy (HR 1.15, P = .81, and HR 1.31, P = .72, respectively), and extent of resection (HR = 1.07, P = .93) was not significant. Within the pineoblastoma group, median age was 25 years; 51% were males. Five- and 10-year survival were 66% and 42%, respectively. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy were administered in 72% and 51%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with pineoblastoma who received both radiation and chemotherapy (n = 39) had significantly lower hazard of death (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.85, P = .02) compared to those who received radiation alone (n = 20) or no adjuvant treatment (n = 19). Finally, females in the pineoblastoma group were found to have a lower hazard of death compared to males (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.58, P = .001); this comparison trended toward statistical significance in the PPTID subgroup (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14-1.08, P = .07). Conclusions Survival rates were higher in patients with PPTID vs patients with pineoblastoma. Adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved survival in pineoblastoma and females had lower hazards of death. Further research should identify specific patient profiles and molecular subgroups more likely to benefit from multimodality therapy.

Abstract While dose escalation of radiotherapy (DERT) has failed to improve overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) for glioblastoma in previous studies, a recent phase II clinical trial utilizing 18F-DOPA-PET-directed DERT demonstrated improved PFS in MGMT-unmethylated patients and OS in MGMT-methylated patients compared to historical controls. This planned secondary analysis sought to determine 1) how 18F-DOPA-PET changes RT volumes beyond standard MRI-planning, 2) which patients benefit most and least from this protocol, 3) which are mostly likely to experience clinically significant radionecrosis after DERT, and 4) patterns of failure after DERT. For 69 evaluable patients, median MRI-defined, PET-defined, and combined low-dose gross tumor volumes (GTV51) were 54 cc (range 9-248), 23 cc (0.4-179), and 62 cc (10-260), respectively. Median MRI-defined, PET-defined, and combined high-dose GTVs (GTV76) were 32 cc (range 4-136), 6 cc (0.1-138), and 34 cc (4-162), respectively. 18F-DOPA-PET resulted in a median volumetric expansion of 13% (0-243%) and 5% (0-217%) from MRI-defined low-dose and high-dose GTV’s, respectively. Central failures ( &gt;95% of recurrence tumor volume) occurred within the 76 Gy, 60 Gy, and 51 Gy isodose lines in 32 (46%), 60 (87%), and 64 (93%) patients, respectively. Recursive partitioning analysis stratified patients by OS and PFS. Patients with 18F-DOPA-PET-defined GTV76 &gt; 7.8cc, MRI-defined GTV76 &gt; 42.7cc, and MGMT promotor-unmethylated tumors had the shortest OS, while patients with smaller PET and MRI-defined tumors had the longest OS (median 10.4 vs. 64.6 months, p&lt; 0.001). Similarly, PFS was worst in patients with 18F-DOPA-PET-defined GTV76 &gt; 2.17 cc who had biopsy only (median PFS 3.2 months, p&lt; 0.001). Patients with 18F-DOPA-PET-defined GTV51 &gt; 50 cc had the highest risk of grade 3+ radionecrosis (p&lt; 0.001). In conclusion, larger 18F-DOPA-PET and MRI-defined tumor volumes were associated with worse outcomes, and 18F-DOPA-PET-directed DERT appears to reduce risk of central recurrence in high-dose volumes.

Abstract TP53 mutations are frequent in IDH-mutant astrocytomas but unusual in oligodendroglioma and the clinical significance of TP53 mutations in oligodendroglioma are not well characterized. We reviewed genetically defined oligodendroglioma (i.e., IDH-mutant, whole-arm 1p/19q-codeleted diffuse glioma) cases that were molecularly profiled (2017-2020) at our institution and identified 7 cases with TP53 mutation (9%; n=76). Molecular testing was performed using targeted neuro-oncology NGS panel (50-gene mutation and/or 187-gene mutation/rearrangement) and OncoScan™ microarray. Four (of 7) patients were female. Median age at diagnosis was 43 years (range, 23-63). Most common presenting symptom was seizures (3 of 7). All tumors were supratentorial. Histologically, 3 tumors were WHO grade II and 4 were WHO grade III. Two (of 3) patients with a WHO grade II tumor underwent biopsy and radiotherapy at diagnosis followed by temozolomide at recurrence (progression at 67 and 157 months after diagnosis; overall survival of 124 and 201 months). Three (of 4) patients with a WHO grade III tumor were diagnosed within the last two years and are currently progression-free after standard therapy. Molecularly, in addition to TP53 mutation(s), all cases had an IDH1 and TERT promoter mutation as well as other gene mutation(s) including FUBP1 (n=5), SETD2 (n=4), PIK3R1 (n=4), PIK3CA (n=3), NF1 (n=3) and CIC (n=3). In 3 (of 7) cases, the mutational profile with high mutation count enriched for C &gt;T/G &gt;A transitions was highly suggestive of a hypermutation phenotype (2 cases were recurrent tumors treated with temozolomide; a recurrent and a treatment-naïve tumor had mismatch repair gene mutation). Five (of 7) cases, including the 3 hypermutant cases, lacked functional TP53 (1 case with 2 mutations, 2 cases with 1 mutation plus loss of other copy, 2 cases with 1 mutation plus copy neutral loss-of-heterozygosity). TP53 mutations are uncommon in oligodendroglioma and appear enriched in hypermutant tumors.

Abstract Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.