Back to Authors

Villano, John L.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5583-0093

Mayo Clinic

University of Kentucky

Citations 4

Outcomes of Brain Metastasis from Lung Cancer
Mobley, James M., Phillips, Kerry I., Reusch, Ellen , Reddy, Niharika , Magsam, Julia, McLouth, Laurie E. , Huang, Bin , Villano, John L. , Reddy, Niharika , Magsam, Julia B , Villano, John L , Mobley, James M, Phillips, Kerry I., Chen, Quan

Cancers | January 14, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 256

10.3390/cancers17020256 Get It

Background/Objectives: Little information has been published on patients diagnosed with brain metastasis secondary to lung cancer. Correlating outcome patterns (hospice care, lost to follow-up, death before hospice care or treatment) and specific characteristics of treated and untreated patients may identify subsets of patients who may benefit from treatment. Methods: We evaluated data from the Kentucky Cancer Registry and identified 284 cases who were diagnosed with brain metastasis secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 1 August 2016, and 31 December 2019. We evaluated type and timing of treatment received, as well as focused on those patients who did not receive treatment. For those patients who did not receive treatment, various characteristics that may have impacted their decision or ability to undergo follow-up were also evaluated. This included social history, disease burden, as well as oncology treatment timelines. Lastly, due to the high smoking rate in Kentucky, we conducted an analysis of patient tobacco use. Results: Our results show that 61 cases (21.8%) never received treatment for lung cancer with brain metastasis. Further analysis of the non-treated cases demonstrated that 19 cases (31.1%) never met with an oncology team while in the hospital or after discharge; 14 of the 61 cases (23.0%) were too sick to receive treatment and died prior to having the option of treatment; and 47 of the 61 cases (77.0%) may have had the option of treatment but declined. Conclusions: Historically, patients with brain metastases have faced poor prognoses and limited treatment options. However, advancements in systemic chemoimmunotherapy and targeted therapies have introduced new treatment possibilities, offering improved symptom control and the potential for prolonged survival. This analysis is crucial for identifying potential barriers to care, optimizing resource allocation, and guiding future research.
CTNI-23. PRELIMINARY SAFETY AND PHARMACOKINETICS DATA FOR A PHASE 1B TRIAL OF TELAGLENASTAT IN COMBINATION WITH RADIATION THERAPY AND TEMOZOLOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH IDH-MUTANT GRADE 2/3 ASTROCYTOMA (NCI-10218)
Kizilbash, Sani H. , Sahebjam, Solmaz , Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Welch, Mary , Kong, Xiao–Tang , Holdhoff, Matthias , Lammers, Anita, Remick, Adam, Allred, Jacob B., McBrayer, Samuel K. , Kunos, Charles A., Adjei, Alex A. , Kizilbash, Sani H , Piccioni, David Eric , Villano, John L. , Reid, Joel M. , Port, John D. , Lanza, Ian R. , Shapiro, Geoffrey I.

Neuro-Oncology | November 14, 2022 | Volume: 24 | Issue: Supplement_7 | Pages: vii75-vii75

10.1093/neuonc/noac209.288 Get It

Abstract IDH mutant gliomas depend on glutaminase for glutamate/glutathione generation from glutamine because R-2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits branched chain amino acid transaminase mediated glutamate biosynthesis. Telaglenastat (CB-839 HCl) is a potent glutaminase-1 specific inhibitor which depletes tumor glutamate in orthotopic IDH mutant glioma PDX models and extends survival in these orthotopic models when added to radiation/temozolomide. NCI-10218 (NCT03528642) is a phase I clinical trial investigating the safety and tolerability of telaglenastat administered orally concurrently with standard doses of radiation (50.4 Gy, grade 2; 59.4 Gy, grade 3) and temozolomide (75 mg/m2 orally daily) in patients (age 16+) with previously untreated IDH mutant grade 2/3 astrocytoma. Telaglenastat dose was escalated in cohorts (400-800 mg twice daily) based on a standard 3 + 3 design to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Toxicities were graded per CTCAE v5.0. An expansion cohort additionally incorporated a seven-day run-in of telaglenastat monotherapy at RP2D prior to radiation to evaluate the pharmacodynamic impact of telaglenastat on plasma and tumor metabolites. 23 patients with IDH mutant astrocytoma (WHO grade 2, n = 5; WHO grade 3, n = 18) were accrued between December 2018 and January 2022 (Dose Escalation: 16; Dose Expansion: 7). Median age was 32 years (range 23-69 years). 61% were male and 70% were ECOG 0. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Grade 3/4 adverse events (independent of attribution) included: lymphopenia (3), neutropenia (2), leukocytosis (2), alanine transaminase elevation (2), thrombocytopenia (1), leukopenia (1), maculopapular rash (1), hyperglycemia (1), hyponatremia (1). The RP2D of concurrent telaglenastat was defined as 800 mg twice daily. Following peak absorption on Day 15 at RP2D, the mean (%CV) terminal elimination half-life in the plasma was 4.2 (53.5%) hours (range 2.1-7.1 hours). The Cmax, Tmax, oral clearance, and AUC were 1496 ng/mL, 4.0 hr, 93.6 L/hr/m2, and 7430 ng/mL*hr, respectively.
Efficacy of Treatment With Armodafinil for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Patients With High-grade Glioma
Porter, Alyx B. , Liu, Heshan , Kohli, Sadhna , Cerhan, Jane, Sloan, Jeff A. , Loprinzi, Charles L. , Kizilbash, Sani H. , Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Brown, Paul D. , Cerhan, Jane L, McMurray, Ryan P. , Kizilbash, Sani H , Le‐Rademacher, Jennifer , Villano, John L. , Mehta, Minesh P.

JAMA Oncology | December 9, 2021 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 259

10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5948 Get It

A phase III randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study of armodafinil (Nuvigil) to reduce cancer-related fatigue in patients with high-grade glioma (Alliance A221101).
Porter, Alyx B. , Liu, Heshan , Kohli, Sadhna , Cerhan, Jane H. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Loprinzi, Charles L. , Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Brown, Paul D. , McMurray, Ryan P. , Le‐Rademacher, Jennifer , Villano, John L. , Kizilbash, Sani H. , Mehta, Minesh P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 12007-12007

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.12007 Get It

12007 Background: Up to 96% of patients with high grade glioma (HGG) report moderate to severe fatigue. Armodafinil, the R-enantiomer of modafinil, is a psychostimulant with low potential for abuse that has shown potential for improving severe fatigue in HGG patients. Methods: In this phase III double blinded placebo-controlled study, adults with HGG and moderate to severe fatigue, > 4 weeks after completing radiotherapy, were randomized to receive armodafinil daily (150 mg or 250 mg) or placebo for a total of 8 weeks. The primary outcome was efficacy in treating severe fatigue. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of tolerability, neurocognitive function, and quality of life. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks. Results: A total of 328 patients were enrolled between 6/3/13-3/1/19. There were 103 (150 mg arm), 97 (250 mg arm) and 97 (placebo arm) evaluable patients with primary endpoint data available. The median age was 60 years (20-85) with a median Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) worst fatigue score of 8 (6-10). 60.3% were male, 80.5% received concomitant chemotherapy, and 39.7% were on corticosteroids. The global fatigue score at end of weeks 4 and 8 were lower than at baseline (p<0.0001) and in the 250 mg arm than placebo (p=0.0356) and was higher for corticosteroid users than non-users (p=0.0002). There was no statistically significant difference for clinically meaningful improvement in BFI usual fatigue score from baseline to end of week 8 between the three arms (p=0.9601). Patients reported an improvement in concentration at week 4 from baseline on the 150 mg arm(P=0.0311). There was no statistically significant difference on neurocognitive tests from baseline to end of week 4 (p>0.05) or week 8 (p>0.05) between arms. More patients reported insomnia on the 250 mg arm (p=0.0083). Conclusions: There is no meaningful benefit of the use of armodafinil to reduce moderate to severe fatigue in patients with HGG. In certain cases there may be benefit of armodafinil 150 mg to aid concentration without the risk of insomnia.Support: UG1CA189823;U10CA180868 (NRG). Clinical trial information: NCT01781468 .