Back to Authors

Koh, Wui-Jin

Mayo Clinic

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Citations 2

Quality Measurement in Cancer Care: A Review and Endorsement of High-Impact Measures and Concepts
D’Amico, Thomas A., Bandini, Lindsey, Balch, Alan , Benson, Al B. , Edge, Stephen B. , Fitzgerald, Clara , Green, Robert J. , Koh, Wui-Jin, Kolodziej, Michael , Kumar, Shaji , Meropol, Neal J. , Mohler, James L. , Pfister, David G. , Walters, Ronald S., Carlson, Robert W. , Fitzgerald, C. Lyn, Green, Robert J.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 5, 2020 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 250-259

10.6004/jnccn.2020.7536 Get It

Although oncology care has evolved, outcome assessment remains a key challenge. Outcome measurement requires identification and adoption of a succinct list of metrics indicative of high-quality cancer care for use within and across healthcare systems. NCCN established an advisory committee, the NCCN Quality and Outcomes Committee, consisting of provider experts from NCCN Member Institutions and other stakeholders, including payers and patient advocacy, community oncology, and health information technology representatives, to review the existing quality landscape and identify contemporary, relevant cancer quality and outcomes measures by reevaluating validated measures for endorsement and proposing new measure concepts to fill crucial gaps. This manuscript reports on 22 measures and concepts; 15 that align with existing measures and 7 that are new.
Screening for Metastasis From Choroidal Melanoma: The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group Report 23
Diener‐West, Marie , Reynolds, Sandra M., Agugliaro, Donna J, Caldwell, Robert, Cumming, Kristi, Earle, John D., Green, Donna L., Hawkins, Barbara S., Hayman, James A. , Jaiyesimi, Ishmael , Koh, Wui-Jin, Robertson, Dennis M., Shaw, John M. , Thoma, Jonni, Kirkwood, John M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 15, 2004 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2438-2444

10.1200/jco.2004.08.194 Get It

PurposeTo describe the predictive value of liver function tests (LFTs), chest x-ray, and diagnostic imaging for detecting melanoma metastasis during routine follow-up after treatment for choroidal melanoma.Materials and MethodsProspective longitudinal follow-up of patients enrolled onto two randomized trials was conducted by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) Group. Baseline and annual or semiannual systemic and laboratory evaluations were performed according to a standard protocol for 2,320 patients enrolled on the COMS.ResultsCOMS patients were screened annually for metastasis and new cancers using LFTs (alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT, or bilirubin). Elevated findings (1.5 to 2 times upper limit of normal) on LFT prompted a diagnostic or imaging test to confirm or rule out cancer recurrence. Of 714 patients with clinical reports of metastasis, 675 patients died. Of these 675 patients, all but four had either histopathologically confirmed or clinically suspected metastatic melanoma present at the time of death. Among all patients, the 5-year cumulative diagnosis rate of metastatic melanoma was 24% (95% CI, 22% to 27%). Based on all patients with reported metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value associated with at least one abnormal LFT before first diagnosis of metastasis at any site was 14.7%, 92.3%, 45.7% and 71.0%, respectively.ConclusionUse of LFTs results followed by diagnostic tests has high specificity and predictive values but low sensitivity. Better tests are needed to identify earlier metastatic disease associated with choroidal melanoma.