Jaiyesimi, Ishmael

e14608 Background: Beyond curative surgery, the optimal treatment for early stage pancreatic cancer is still a matter of debate. We conducted a comparative survival analysis between patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant treatment with either gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy and chemoradiation regimens. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was used to identify patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2005 who received curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy with either 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine. These groups were subdivided by treatment with radiotherapy. Patients were followed until death, study endpoint or a maximum of five years after diagnosis. Results: 359 patients received 5-fluorouracil and 346 received gemcitabine. Compared to chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil, outcomes for patients who received chemoradiation with gemcitabine did not differ. Patients who received gemcitabine without radiation had increased hazards (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.50 for high grade tumors (HGT), HR = 1.32 for low grade tumors (LGT)). However, outcomes of patients who received 5-fluorouracil without radiation varied with tumor grade. In LGT, patients had better outcomes with 5-fluorouracil when compared with chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil (HR = 0.43). In HGT, the opposite was true (HR 2.10). Conclusions: Patients with low grade resectable pancreatic cancer may have better outcomes with 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy without radiation when compared to 5-fluorouracil with radiation.

PurposeTo describe the predictive value of liver function tests (LFTs), chest x-ray, and diagnostic imaging for detecting melanoma metastasis during routine follow-up after treatment for choroidal melanoma.Materials and MethodsProspective longitudinal follow-up of patients enrolled onto two randomized trials was conducted by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) Group. Baseline and annual or semiannual systemic and laboratory evaluations were performed according to a standard protocol for 2,320 patients enrolled on the COMS.ResultsCOMS patients were screened annually for metastasis and new cancers using LFTs (alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT, or bilirubin). Elevated findings (1.5 to 2 times upper limit of normal) on LFT prompted a diagnostic or imaging test to confirm or rule out cancer recurrence. Of 714 patients with clinical reports of metastasis, 675 patients died. Of these 675 patients, all but four had either histopathologically confirmed or clinically suspected metastatic melanoma present at the time of death. Among all patients, the 5-year cumulative diagnosis rate of metastatic melanoma was 24% (95% CI, 22% to 27%). Based on all patients with reported metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value associated with at least one abnormal LFT before first diagnosis of metastasis at any site was 14.7%, 92.3%, 45.7% and 71.0%, respectively.ConclusionUse of LFTs results followed by diagnostic tests has high specificity and predictive values but low sensitivity. Better tests are needed to identify earlier metastatic disease associated with choroidal melanoma.