Hayman, James A.

Abstract Background Professional medical societies recommend that carrier screening for 113 different genetic disorders be offered during pregnancy or preconception to all individuals, regardless of ancestry, in order to provide more equitable opportunities for patients to ascertain their reproductive risks. In our clinical laboratory experience, however, the vast majority of healthcare providers continue to order carrier screening for only cystic fibrosis (CF), which is disproportionately common in white individuals of Northern European descent. Our highest volume CF screening test is performed on >10,500 diverse patients per year and utilizes a targeted genotyping array that detects >500 variants in CFTR and >1200 variants in >150 other pertinent genes. Here we report the inequities in diagnostic yield among our first 8,000 patients for whom only limited testing was ordered and examine the barriers to widespread adoption of more inclusive carrier screening. Methods Three carrier screening options (CF, CF+spinal muscular atrophy [SMA], CF+SMA+fragile X syndrome [FXS]+hemoglobinopathies) were ordered clinically and performed on DNA extracted from 8,000 whole blood samples from unique individuals utilizing a custom SNP array (Thermo Fisher GeneTitanTM platform) designed to detect >1700 pathogenic variants in 218 different genes. Data was retrospectively reviewed to determine overall detection rates for carriers of all recommended conditions vs. only the condition(s) included in the originally ordered service. Finally, reproductive health providers at nine different ordering sites across the U.S. were interviewed regarding their current carrier screening practices. Results Patients were referred for testing by 119 different clinical facilities. 98.1% (7847/8000) had CF-only testing ordered, 1.2% (99/8000) had CF+SMA testing ordered, and 0.68% (54/8000) had testing for CF+SMA+FXS+hemoglobinopathies ordered. 7.1% (568/8000) of patients had reportable variants in CFTR. Had CF+SMA testing been ordered on all 8,000 patients, however, the diagnostic yield would have been 8.9%. Of the patients who had CF-only or CF+SMA testing ordered, 11.9% (943/7946) were found to be carriers of hemoglobinopathies. Finally, had all 8000 patients had testing for all currently recommended targets on the panel, the diagnostic yield would have increased to 55% (4396/8000). Ordering providers at 9/50 different contacted sites agreed to interview requests. 100% (9/9) of respondents indicated that their patients experience significant disparities in access to carrier screening, and that the primary cause of these inequities was insufficient insurance reimbursement. 67% (6/9) of respondents indicated that >50% of their patient population identified as non-white and would have “very strongly” benefitted from “testing for other disorders beyond CF.” Conclusions Despite clinical practice guidelines urging for more population-neutral carrier screening, major gaps exist between what is recommended versus ultimately ordered. This significantly limits the clinical utility of testing, especially in patients from underrepresented backgrounds. Improved insurance coverage for more inclusive carrier screening is needed to help reduce such disparities.

Abstract Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histology in Eastern Europe and Asia, and adenocarcinoma is most common in North America and Western Europe. Surgery is a major component of treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, and randomized trials have shown that the addition of preoperative chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy to surgery significantly improves survival. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, ramucirumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with esophageal and EGJ cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on recommendations for the management of locally advanced and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and EGJ.

It is an exciting time for big data efforts in radiation oncology. The use of big data to help aid both outcomes and decision‐making research is becoming a reality. However, there are true challenges that exist in the space of gathering and utilizing performance and outcomes data. Here, we summarize the current state of big data in radiation oncology with respect to outcomes and discuss some of the efforts and challenges in radiation oncology big data.

PurposeTo describe the predictive value of liver function tests (LFTs), chest x-ray, and diagnostic imaging for detecting melanoma metastasis during routine follow-up after treatment for choroidal melanoma.Materials and MethodsProspective longitudinal follow-up of patients enrolled onto two randomized trials was conducted by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) Group. Baseline and annual or semiannual systemic and laboratory evaluations were performed according to a standard protocol for 2,320 patients enrolled on the COMS.ResultsCOMS patients were screened annually for metastasis and new cancers using LFTs (alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT, or bilirubin). Elevated findings (1.5 to 2 times upper limit of normal) on LFT prompted a diagnostic or imaging test to confirm or rule out cancer recurrence. Of 714 patients with clinical reports of metastasis, 675 patients died. Of these 675 patients, all but four had either histopathologically confirmed or clinically suspected metastatic melanoma present at the time of death. Among all patients, the 5-year cumulative diagnosis rate of metastatic melanoma was 24% (95% CI, 22% to 27%). Based on all patients with reported metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value associated with at least one abnormal LFT before first diagnosis of metastasis at any site was 14.7%, 92.3%, 45.7% and 71.0%, respectively.ConclusionUse of LFTs results followed by diagnostic tests has high specificity and predictive values but low sensitivity. Better tests are needed to identify earlier metastatic disease associated with choroidal melanoma.